As has been discussed on this thread several times private sales don't require any background check. You'd have figured that out if you read the link. The shooter who killed 3 and injured 4 used this loophole when he couldn't have bought from a dealer. Sounds like proof we need background checks on all gun sales. Again I win. Now please stop arguing from emotion. Calling me a liar when the article is clear about the loophole is just childish.
You must have a problem comprehending English, there is no loophole in the law. A loophole is a area of a law that is designed to prevent something that doesn't actually prevent it. An example of this is a law that is intended to make drugs illegal that specifically defines drugs by chemical composition that allows a clever person to reformulate the drug to avoid the law. Since the law was never intended to cover sales between private individuals it is only a loophole in the minds of idiots.
Wow you guys are so owned you argue the definition of loophole. That is funny.
What's funny is that you're so ignorant, they have to argue with you because you can't accept the truth. You think because some propagandist used the term incorrectly to try to have a pithy sound bite, it makes it true? THAT'S funny.