Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 23,367
- 8,762
- 433
The original intent there wasn't to preserve the say of smaller states, it was there to assure slave states that their political interests would be preserved. Vermont, Rhode Island, Delaware were all smaller but it was the existence of slaves that awarded you extra electoral votes.So your contention is the electoral college? Is that your beef? So you think that these giant liberal hubs like New York, LA, Austin..etc…should be able to always have their way, and smaller states are just supposed to never have a say?
You basically said nothing here. "Going away from it's acutal purpose?" You have an opinion about what that is but that's it. So does everyone else. You say it's to leave little impact on people's lives but when I challenged you on that point you ran off.That is so wrong. The cotus IS future proof, it’s just that, when we started going away from its actually purpose, and everyone started wanting something from it that it was never intended to give, that people started taking issue.