WH Speechwriter Fired For Appearing With White Supremacists

[JakeStarkey]

The point is that the black students got the assistantships because they were the best qualified. protectionist can complain all he wants about AA, but the proof is on him and he fails.

 

[OldLady]

Do people who attend black nationalist events get fired ?

out side of Ben C, does trump admin have any black people working for him????

Yes, I saw a woman on the news a night or two ago. Can't remember what she does.

did she go to any black racist meetings and speak as a guest?

I'm sure I wouldn't know, dear. Sorry I interjected there. I didn't realize.

 

[Political Junky]

Good

 

[Care4all]

Do people who attend black nationalist events get fired ?

This guy wasn't fired...

View attachment 211710

he was hired!! by both, the electoral college and the people, twice!

 

[protectionist]

The point is that the black students got the assistantships because they were the best qualified. protectionist can complain all he wants about AA, but the proof is on him and he fails.

As typical, here is a Democrat loon tune remarking with exactly the opposite of the truth. I knew most of the 8 blacks who got those assistantships. They were dum dums, who (as I already posted) were in the lowest 1/4 of the class, and who got pushed through undergraduate schools in very liberal colleges (San Jose State, City College of NY, Hunter College, UCLA), all on watered down courses.

In the case of CCNY and Hunter, they even came from high school with poor grades, on CUNY"S imbecile "Open Admissions" disastrous project.

THIS is what the proof is. Talking to liberals is like throwing water on a fire.

 

[Picaro]

Ah, so the OP is pointing out that Trump fires those with racial supremacist views, while the Democrats make them DNC Presidents. This is redundant news; we already know who the Party of violent racism and hate crimes is, the Party of Obama, Eric Holder, and the 'Reverent' Wright.

 

[protectionist]

Ah, so the OP is pointing out that Trump fires those with racial supremacist views, while the Democrats make them DNC Presidents. This is redundant news; we already know who the Party of violent racism and hate crimes is, the Party of Obama, Eric Holder, and the 'Reverent' Wright.

As well as the racist NAACP and their dirty Affirmative Action policy.

 

[Picaro]

toobfreak, the issue of danger in America is our history of white supremacy.

Peoples of color have gotten the shaft for that for centuries.

FALSE! The issue of DAMAGE in our society is BLACK supremacy embodied in Affirmative Action and Black privilege >>

Black privilege manifests itself in numerous forms:

Blacks have the right to take pride in their race. Whites don't.

Blacks can never be racist. Whites are always racist, even if they don't try to be.
Blacks get to play the race card. Whites don't.

Blacks never have to feel guilty about being black. Whites are trained to feel guilty about being white.

Blacks have the right to make blacks only organizations like the Black Student Union and the Congressional Black Caucus. Whites don't.

Blacks have the right to never take responsibility for their own actions. Anything bad which happens to a black person can be blamed on racism or white people.
Whites have to take responsibility and apologize for their actions.

Rich black people have a right to be rich. Rich white people don't.

Black people have the right to demonize white people. White people don't have the right to demonize black people.

Black people are excused when they are prejudiced against white people. White people are never excused for prejudice against black people.

Black people are a "protected class." White people are not.

Violent crimes by whites on blacks are "hate crimes." Violent crimes by blacks on whites are just "random" crimes.

Blacks have the right to affirmative action and minority set-asides. Whites have to earn their positions.

Blacks are "cool." Whites are "squares" and "rednecks."

Blacks have the right to say words like "******," which whites are never allowed to use. They have the right to incessantly repeat the word "******" in front of white people, to intimidate them and keep them in their place.

Blacks can make the most racially insensitive comments and, more often than not, no one blinks twice. They are allowed to insult others without repercussion.

Blacks can spend their rent money on designer handbags and then complain about how they don’t have the same economic opportunities as everyone else. And they get away with it.

Black men are sexual supermen. White men are sexually inadequate. Black men have huge penises. White men have small, inadequate penises.

Blacks have "civil rights". Whites don't.

Blacks are in prison because of racism. Whites are in prison because they're criminals.

Black jury members have the right to acquit criminals, if they're black.

Blacks have the right to put a halt to any policy, statement, symbol, statistic, outcome, word or expression they find offensive. Whites have no such rights.

Blacks are morally superior to whites.

"[Blacks] enjoy cultural cache around the world as victors over oppression and the hard reality of what that looks like at this point in world history. The music that they enjoy, the clothes that they wear, their very mannerisms carry a certain amount of gravitas."

Blacks can assign collective racial guilt to "you white folks." White people cannot do the reverse because that would be racist.

White people everywhere, and at all times, bear guilt for the crimes of a minority of white people in the past (e.g., slave owners, Adolf Hitler). Making blacks bear guilt, as a race, for the despicable crimes of their criminal minority is stereotyping, racist, and an insult to reason; after all, no one should ever be blamed for the acts of some unrelated person.

Blacks have "black culture." Whites are not allowed to have white culture.
African-American studies is a celebration of blackness and black culture. Whiteness studies is a demonization of white people and white culture.

White people need to undergo diversity/sensitivity training. Black people don't.
"... any generalization--favorable or unfavorable--about any minority that someone does not like is by definition "racist" and deserves to be suppressed--as long as it is said by a white person. Black diversity consultants, in contrast, can parade, without a shred of empirical evidence, the grossest racial and ethnic stereotypes with virtual impunity."

It's racist to point out racism by blacks. It's never racist to point out racism by whites.

Whites have to walk on eggshells around blacks. Blacks don't give a shit what whites think.

Blacks have the right to riot and commit violent acts in response to perceived grievances. White people have to obey the law at all times.

Blacks have the right to never be portrayed as criminals or lowlifes in films or on TV. Bad guys on the screen must always be White.

Blacks have the right to never be ridiculed, mocked, belittled or laughed at. Whites have no such right.

Black criminals have the right to have their race censored in media reports.

Facts which cause blacks embarrassment or cast them in a bad light must be suppressed. Facts which cause whites embarrassment or cast them in a bad light are reported as is.

Blacks can silence and intimidate whites by calling them racist. Whites can't silence and intimidate blacks because that would be racist.

Forcing whitey to apologize shows black power and clout. Whites can never force blacks to apologize because that would constitute a lynching.

Whites are held to a system of 'sensitivity' requirements that do not apply to blacks.

"Whites are monitored, pestered, and punished for preposterous reasons--for a look, for an innocent word, for wearing a T-shirt, for expressing a plausible argument--but blacks can say almost anything with perfect impunity."

"In discussions of race between black people and white people the conscious black person is always right; is always the ultimate authority on questions having to do with race and racism; must always be regarded as the ‘injured party,’ or the oppressed. . . . [Whites] cannot possibly be expected to be objective about questions of race."

Blacks may work for explicitly racial goals but whites may not.

Blacks are permitted to notice race. Whites are not.

"It is quite acceptable for either party to explicitly go after the black, Hispanic, or even the Jewish vote. In fact both parties gain an indispensable moral authority by doing so. But it is absolutely verboten for either party, or any white candidate, to appeal to whites as a racial identity group. Racial identity is simply forbidden to whites in America and across the entire Western world. Black children today are hammered with the idea of racial identity and pride, yet racial pride in whites constitutes a grave evil. Say 'I'm white and I'm proud' and you are a National Socialist."

A black who punches a White person is a hero standing up to oppression. A White person who punches a black is a racist.

It can be publicly admitted that blacks are superior to Whites in certain pursuits (i.e. basketball). It can never be publicly admitted that Whites are superior to blacks in other pursuits (i.e. winning Nobel prizes in science).

When blacks are overrepresented in a desirable field, it is due to their abilities.
When Whites are overrepresented in a desirable field, it is due to racism. When blacks are overrepresented in an undesirable field, it is due to racism. When Whites are overrepresented in an undesirable field, it is their own fault.

Most African countries are made up almost entirely of blacks, and have some of the world's highest birth rates. Most European countries consist of White people having to live alongside blacks and other non-whites, and have some of the world's lowest birth rates.

All 100% correct and proven.

The worst thing to happen to blacks as a demographic group is when Nixon turned AA into a quota system as a favor to the Black Caucus. This has allowed black 'leadership', corrupt to the core even in the best of times, a 'Get Out Of Jail Free' card when it came to improving education and genuine improvements in the Hoods. They no longer had the burden of actually improving anything, they and the black middle class could then just cry 'racism' whenever they failed in their administrative and teaching duties. This had wave reaches ridiculous heights long before now, with arithmetic now being declared 'racist' in schools.

Like Moynihan predicted in the late 1960s, the black middle class just likes holding the black underclass down and using them as hostages, using them to threaten Whitey with violence in order to extort bennies for themselves and line their own pockets. Crooks like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton operate on that gimmick as big time extortionists of their cronies, shaking down and extorting some of the biggest corporations on the planet..

 

[Picaro]

Ah, so the OP is pointing out that Trump fires those with racial supremacist views, while the Democrats make them DNC Presidents. This is redundant news; we already know who the Party of violent racism and hate crimes is, the Party of Obama, Eric Holder, and the 'Reverent' Wright.

As well as the racist NAACP and their dirty Affirmative Action policy.

They do not want intelligent well educated black people running around who aren't corrupt and in 'The Club'.

 

[protectionist]

They do not want intelligent well educated black people running around who aren't corrupt and in 'The Club'.

You nailed it, Picaro. I am half Hispanic (Central America - Belize), I speak Spanish fluently, and I'm proud to say that all my life, I have never once filled out an affirmative action questionnaire, even though it might have helped me to get jobs and business loans.

I think only low life losers would accept this liberal pandering, and I'm not one of them. The idea of it disgusts me.

 

[Picaro]

They do not want intelligent well educated black people running around who aren't corrupt and in 'The Club'.

You nailed it, Picaro. I am half Hispanic (Central America - Belize), I speak Spanish fluently, and I'm proud to say that all my life, I have never once filled out an affirmative action questionnaire, even though it might have helped me to get jobs and business loans.

I think only low life losers would accept this liberal pandering, and I'm not one of them. The idea of it disgusts me.

Picaro is my real name. My wife is Spanish; her family has been in Texas since the late 18th Century, pro-Chavez and GI Forum in the 1950's and 1960's. My own grandmother on my mother's side is native American, raised on a reservation in Oklahoma, walked out of it before daylight the morning she turned 16 with 40 cents in her pocket and never looked back. Married a Spanish man at 22 who was a supervisor at gas company in Texas. She has nothing positive to say about 'native American' culture at all.

None of them supported criminal illegal immigration and none of the organizations they belonged to supported it. They in fact condemned LBJ for his failure to come out against it, despite his otherwise fine record re blacks. They did not support AA as it was warped under Nixon. They do not see a need for it in the indigenous latino community at all. La Raza and the rest of the 'Aztlan' scum need to be deported ASAP; they are hard core racists into 'ethnic cleansing', no different than Nazis and are anti-American. The black 'community's' criminal leadership iss even more racist and violently anti-American, and the Democratic Party lavishly funds them all.

 

[theHawk]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

White nationalism isn’t white supremacy.

Just saying “I’m proud to be white” doesn’t make anyone a racist.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Protectionist simply can't admit the winners were better qualified than he for the assistantships.

 

[JakeStarkey]

" I am proud to be white " is not white nationalism.

 

[Correll]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

Sounds to me like he's acting like one, though. Attending their events, defending a Nazi's views as deserving "schololarly attention." If Steven Miller isn't going anywhere, you KNOW this guy must be the real deal. js

I mean, who's to say attending a white supremacist event makes you a Nazi -- have you tried the fish? I hear its fantasitic

The SPLC is not a reliable source.

What event? What "white nationalists"?

 

[Correll]

"In 2016 I attended the Mencken conference in question and delivered a stand-alone, academic talk titled 'The Intelligentsia and the Right.' I said nothing objectionable and stand by my remarks completely," Beattie said in the statement.



So, the obvious question, is what did he say in his talk.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

White nationalism isn’t white supremacy.

Just saying “I’m proud to be white” doesn’t make anyone a racist.

If being proud to be white was the extent of white nationalism, then fine...but that is not what most self declared white nationalists are about and you know it...

If as a white nationalist, you keep having to try to find ways to re-package Nazi ideology -- then you are not just proud to be white, you want a system of white supremacy to be codified by law.

 

[Correll]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

White nationalism isn’t white supremacy.

Just saying “I’m proud to be white” doesn’t make anyone a racist.

If being proud to be white was the extent of white nationalism, then fine...but that is not what most self declared white nationalists are about and you know it...

If as a white nationalist, you keep having to try to find ways to re-package Nazi ideology -- then you are not just proud to be white, you want a system of white supremacy to be codified by law.

I don't think I have ever seen anyone doing that. And I've seen a lot of people, that people like you, CLAIM are "white nationalists" or "White Supremacists" or even "nazis".

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

White nationalism isn’t white supremacy.

Just saying “I’m proud to be white” doesn’t make anyone a racist.

If being proud to be white was the extent of white nationalism, then fine...but that is not what most self declared white nationalists are about and you know it...

If as a white nationalist, you keep having to try to find ways to re-package Nazi ideology -- then you are not just proud to be white, you want a system of white supremacy to be codified by law.

I don't think I have ever seen anyone doing that. And I've seen a lot of people, that people like you, CLAIM are "white nationalists" or "White Supremacists" or even "nazis".

I understand your concerns with people being unfairly characterized as white supremacists or Nazis because they happen to be for the uplift and fair treatment of their people -- sort of like how those who argue for fair treatment of their people in the criminal justice system tends to be unfairly characterized as being against the police or against America for that matter.

So in the case of the speech writer, just because he has a strong affinity for Martin Heidegger doesn't mean he is a Nazi -- he even admits that Heidegger's Nazi ties were troubling -- but here is the thing

Lee Atwater set the playbook long ago when he said racists can no longer be overtly racist, that will hurt you -- since MLK and his Civil Rights movement defeated the age of the overt racist -- Atwater said that you have to be more covert, hidden, more coded. So just because some white nationalists don't openly say N-word this, N-word that -- doesn't mean they don't find more coded ways to push out their racist beliefs under the guise of "free exchange of ideas" or "intellectual discussions"

But when you keep continuously being at events that hosted folks like Richard Spencer, or even the person the event is named after, H.L. Menken who famously "described Jews as “plausibly…the most unpleasant race ever heard of,” and an educated black person as being a “low-caste man” who will “remain inert and inefficient until fifty generations of him have lived in civilization. And even then, the superior white race will be fifty generations ahead of him.”

Now you personally may agree with Menken, but there are others who are not so enamored with what white supremacists have to say and will speak up about it. Trump fired him, if you feel it was a mistake, take it up with Trump -- I personally feel that Trump WH can't afford many more stories like this so they acted quickly.

 

[Correll]

Trump speechwriter fired amid scrutiny of appearance with white nationalists

So this past week, the White House had to fire one of its speech writers, Darren Beattie, when the liberal media discovered he appeared at an event alongside of white supremacists. What's the big deal here? This doesn't exactly make Beattie himself a white supremacists just because he attended an event with white supremacist speakers.

Peter Brimelow, founder of the anti-immigrant website Vdare.com, is a "white nationalist" and "regularly publishes works by white supremacists, anti-Semites, and others on the radical right," claims the terrorist group SPLC. Beattie himself is not overtly racist -- the fact he wrote his doctoral thesis on Martin Heidegger, who was a member of the Nazi Party in Germany doesn't make him a Nazi sympathizer. Beattie has called Heidegger's Nazi affiliation "highly troublesome" but maintained that his work is worthy of scholarly attention.

In this case, the white house may have panicked and moved to fire Beattie, instead of standing by him and pushing back against the racist media.

White nationalism isn’t white supremacy.

Just saying “I’m proud to be white” doesn’t make anyone a racist.

If being proud to be white was the extent of white nationalism, then fine...but that is not what most self declared white nationalists are about and you know it...

If as a white nationalist, you keep having to try to find ways to re-package Nazi ideology -- then you are not just proud to be white, you want a system of white supremacy to be codified by law.

I don't think I have ever seen anyone doing that. And I've seen a lot of people, that people like you, CLAIM are "white nationalists" or "White Supremacists" or even "nazis".

I understand your concerns with people being unfairly characterized as white supremacists or Nazis because they happen to be for the uplift and fair treatment of their people -- sort of like how those who argue for fair treatment of their people in the criminal justice system tends to be unfairly characterized as being against the police or against America for that matter.

So in the case of the speech writer, just because he has a strong affinity for Martin Heidegger doesn't mean he is a Nazi -- he even admits that Heidegger's Nazi ties were troubling -- but here is the thing

Lee Atwater set the playbook long ago when he said racists can no longer be overtly racist, that will hurt you -- since MLK and his Civil Rights movement defeated the age of the overt racist -- Atwater said that you have to be more covert, hidden, more coded. So just because some white nationalists don't openly say N-word this, N-word that -- doesn't mean they don't find more coded ways to push out their racist beliefs under the guise of "free exchange of ideas" or "intellectual discussions"

But when you keep continuously being at events that hosted folks like Richard Spencer, or even the person the event is named after, H.L. Menken who famously "described Jews as “plausibly…the most unpleasant race ever heard of,” and an educated black person as being a “low-caste man” who will “remain inert and inefficient until fifty generations of him have lived in civilization. And even then, the superior white race will be fifty generations ahead of him.”

Now you personally may agree with Menken, but there are others who are not so enamored with what white supremacists have to say and will speak up about it. Trump fired him, if you feel it was a mistake, take it up with Trump -- I personally feel that Trump WH can't afford many more stories like this so they acted quickly.

Lee Atwater did not set any playbook. HIs quotes are from long afterwards, always taken out of context and do not match the historical record at all.