Were 4 Americans sacrificed at Benghazi so Obama could fake having defeated Al Qaeda?

Seriously, how can Hillary claim that she never told the families of the Benghazi victims that it happened because of a video? She and Obama said it enough times on camera, so why does she think she can deny it now? She and Obama repeatedly said the attacks were carried out by out of control protesters who were upset about a video. They did not state that it was a terrorist attack even though they knew it from the start.

 
Obama never intended those four Americans to be murdered. He just figured he could reduce their protection without any consequence... and that reducing their security would get him more votes by promoting the idea they didn't need security due to his masterful handling of the Middle East.

He was wrong.

And the reason he was wrong, was because he was an incompetent Commander In Chief, and surrounded himself with people who agreed with him (i.e. other incompetent military people who believed we could reason with the enemy).

But I'm open to all viewpoints. I'd like to hear Obama's and Hillary's explanation of WHY security was progressively reduced in those areas, even as attacks grew more frequent and more severe all summer and the people on the scene kept begging for MORE security, not less. Even as the administration was spending lots of money for luxurious furniture etc. in other consulates and embassies.

And they have spent several years now, avoiding that question. I'd like to know why they are doing that, too.
 
Still pushing that tired old propaganda are you? That's pretty pathetic.. Even for you..


Hillary and Obama still blaming the video as the bodies arrive from Benghazi.




Hillary again blaming a video for the attack in Benghazi.




https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=video+hillary+blaming+video+for+benghazi&fr=ymyy-t-999&fr2=p%3Amy%2Cm%3Asb

you LIE like a rug!

I just watched the ENTIRE video of Hillary speaking and NOT ONCE, NOT A PEEP, about Benghazi and blaming the video for Benghazi.

HOW do you sleep at night?
 
Still pushing that tired old propaganda are you? That's pretty pathetic.. Even for you..


Hillary and Obama still blaming the video as the bodies arrive from Benghazi.




Hillary again blaming a video for the attack in Benghazi.




https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=video+hillary+blaming+video+for+benghazi&fr=ymyy-t-999&fr2=p%3Amy%2Cm%3Asb

you LIE like a rug!

I just watched the ENTIRE video of Hillary speaking and NOT ONCE, NOT A PEEP, about Benghazi and blaming the video for Benghazi.

HOW do you sleep at night?









Watch it again and pay attention to 1:09. That's where she states the video was responsible. Care4all
 
Still pushing that tired old propaganda are you? That's pretty pathetic.. Even for you..


Hillary and Obama still blaming the video as the bodies arrive from Benghazi.




Hillary again blaming a video for the attack in Benghazi.




https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=video+hillary+blaming+video+for+benghazi&fr=ymyy-t-999&fr2=p%3Amy%2Cm%3Asb

you LIE like a rug!

I just watched the ENTIRE video of Hillary speaking and NOT ONCE, NOT A PEEP, about Benghazi and blaming the video for Benghazi.

HOW do you sleep at night?









Watch it again and pay attention to 1:09. That's where she states the video was responsible. Care4all

in the second video???
 
Still pushing that tired old propaganda are you? That's pretty pathetic.. Even for you..


Hillary and Obama still blaming the video as the bodies arrive from Benghazi.




Hillary again blaming a video for the attack in Benghazi.




https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=video+hillary+blaming+video+for+benghazi&fr=ymyy-t-999&fr2=p%3Amy%2Cm%3Asb

you LIE like a rug!

I just watched the ENTIRE video of Hillary speaking and NOT ONCE, NOT A PEEP, about Benghazi and blaming the video for Benghazi.

HOW do you sleep at night?









Watch it again and pay attention to 1:09. That's where she states the video was responsible. Care4all

in the second video???







The video in post 163
 
Still pushing that tired old propaganda are you? That's pretty pathetic.. Even for you..


Hillary and Obama still blaming the video as the bodies arrive from Benghazi.




Hillary again blaming a video for the attack in Benghazi.




https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=video+hillary+blaming+video+for+benghazi&fr=ymyy-t-999&fr2=p%3Amy%2Cm%3Asb

you LIE like a rug!

I just watched the ENTIRE video of Hillary speaking and NOT ONCE, NOT A PEEP, about Benghazi and blaming the video for Benghazi.

HOW do you sleep at night?









Watch it again and pay attention to 1:09. That's where she states the video was responsible. Care4all

in the second video???







The video in post 163

as you can see in my post in this message, there are 2 videos that Clementine posted, the second one, where he said hillary blamed benghazi on video, she DID NOT.
Hillary again blaming a video for the attack in Benghazi.


clementine has subsequently, edited his post and deleted his 2nd video of hillary where he made the claim....and I thank him for the removal...
 
Last edited:
Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

Sound that another investigation is what's lacking... I think this makes 10...

I am sorry but GOP would piss on these guys grave if they find some way Clinton or Obama was at fault... This is what is wrong with the GOP. They stopped understanding a long time ago the the public thinks they are just about pinning this on Clinton and Obama and will do everything they can to try and leverage the death of 4 people as shot against Dems...
This is more disgusting than the charges laid against Clinton and Obama...

So keep on doing it.. you are looking like first class assholes and Clinton would like the futher bump later on in the polls...
 
FACTCHECK.org has already PROVEN that the video played NO PART in the Benghazi attack. The CIA testified as such, revealing that the compound's video NEVER showed a protest. People on the ground testified there was NEVER a 'protest'. HILLARY HERSELF even testified - through her own emails - 'WE KNOW this was a terrorist attack, the video played NO PART in the attack - this was a terrorist attack'.

But you Libs keep right on repeating Hillary's lie in hopes that ONE DAY doing so might actually make it true.
More resounding silence from the Left.

No proof exists to make your conclusion correct. Thus the only conclusion to be made from your post is that you're a partisan hack too dumb to create a credible argument why HRC is not your choice for POTUS.

Since Senator/Secretary Clinton is THE MOST EXPERIENCED PERSON seeking the nomination you and other hacks must find reasons to assassinate her character, but in the process expose your own character flaws for all to see.
 
Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.
===========

Bush sacrificed 3000 American lives in 9/11 to get America to go to war.
 
Originally written May 2013

Finally, after puttering around with stories and videos and lies after the attacks, Congress is beginning to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.

What happened after the attacks, and who lied to whom and how, is less important than why security there was left to deteriorate for months, even while attacks were going on, bombs were blowing 12-foot holes in the consulate walls, and Amb. Stevens was pleading for months for more security.

That summer, Obama was crowing over "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive!". He was desperately trying to fool American voters into thinking he had defeated Al Qaeda and they were "on the run". And the increasing attacks by Al Qaeda were not fitting into the glossy image he was trying to project.

Sending MORE security into areas like Benghazi, Cairo etc. would have done even more harm to his story... so he simply didn't do it. Instead he reduced security, pulled out American agents, and in some cases substituted Libyan personnel for the American security troops. He was hoping this would look good to American voters who weren't paying much attention.

By the first week in September 2012, there were exactly three American security personnel at the consulate in Benghazi. The gate guards and patrols had been replaced by Libyans... and they were unarmed, with nothing but whistles and batons. And so, when the major attack came on Sept. 11, 2012, the people in the consulate didn't have much chance.

Basically, the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans, were sacrificed so that Obama could get more votes three weeks later in the November, 2012 election.

And that is the real scandal of Benghazi. Obama hopes fervently that people will keep complaining about Susan Rice and lies about a video afterward... because then they aren't complaining about what killed Amb. Stevens and three other Americans: Months of fatal, flagrant neglect of consulate security for the purpose of gaining votes.

------------------------------------------------------

CBS News - Breaking News, U.S., World, Business, Entertainment & Video

The Obama administration -- and the State Department in particular -- has been accused by Republican lawmakers and some former U.S. officials who worked in Libya of ignoring warning signs and even rejecting pleas for increased security around American offices in the country ahead of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, which left U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others dead.

The House Oversight Committee will begin questioning three senior State Department staff on Capitol Hill Wednesday over claims that dozens of U.S. security personnel were removed from Libya in the six months leading up to the attack, in spite of alleged requests to increase personnel levels from American officials on the ground.

According to one of the key witnesses expected to testify before the committee this week, even Ambassador Stevens himself had repeatedly requested more security personnel, but was turned down.

Lt. Col. Andy Wood, the former head of a U.S. Special Forces "Site Security Team" in Libya, has told CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson that he and many other senior staff at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, "felt we needed more, not less" security personnel in the country, but were told "to do with less.

For what reasons, I don't know."

This begins to get at the real scandal in Benghazi.
Oy. So eight investigations by Republicans into the matter is not enough? How many more do you need until you accept Obama did not lie or do anything wrong?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top