- May 20, 2009
- 144,601
- 67,065
- 2,330
If Bobg and OR jumped on the Earth at the same time, they would move it twice as far from the Sun if they acted alone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Global warming is a hoax like global cooling was a hoax in the 70s. Like the danger from the hole in the ozone layer was a hoax. The ALAR scare was a hoax. No hoax made the billions that the biggest hoax of all generated, the Y2K hoax.
These hoaxes make money.
Activists use phonied up climate change data to pay off developing countries not to develop while the industrialized nations scurry around de-developing to bring them to the level of the 3rd world. That is, what's left after the activists deduct the handling charge for their good work.
If Bobg and OR jumped on the Earth at the same time, they would move it twice as far from the Sun if they acted alone.
If Bobg and OR jumped on the Earth at the same time, they would move it twice as far from the Sun if they acted alone.
Do you think that you will ever post anything that isn't completely moronic and pointless?....ever?....or is that a futile hope, given how utterly retarded you obviously are?
Global warming is a hoax like global cooling was a hoax in the 70s. Like the danger from the hole in the ozone layer was a hoax. The ALAR scare was a hoax. No hoax made the billions that the biggest hoax of all generated, the Y2K hoax.
These hoaxes make money.
Activists use phonied up climate change data to pay off developing countries not to develop while the industrialized nations scurry around de-developing to bring them to the level of the 3rd world. That is, what's left after the activists deduct the handling charge for their good work.
It is too bad that you are such an ignorant and confused retard. Did your parents drop you on your head a lot or is your mental retardation congenital (or both)?
As of June 10th the volume is at record low levels and the area has just want below 2007!
We will be discussing the race for the record in this thread! What's even more AMAZING is the fact that we were almost to avg this winter!
Weather patterns are everything this year like the last 4 years as that will tell where we end up! If we see a strong ridge(arctic dipole) like 2007 that lasts through the season...Well, this will easly become number one, but if we see 3-5 weeks of low pressure like 2010, 2011 in the heart of the melt season we may end up in 2 or 3rd place.
As of June 10th the volume is at record low levels and the area has just want below 2007!
We will be discussing the race for the record in this thread! What's even more AMAZING is the fact that we were almost to avg this winter!
Weather patterns are everything this year like the last 4 years as that will tell where we end up! If we see a strong ridge(arctic dipole) like 2007 that lasts through the season...Well, this will easly become number one, but if we see 3-5 weeks of low pressure like 2010, 2011 in the heart of the melt season we may end up in 2 or 3rd place.
What's really amazing is that people seem to believe that a few decades worth of data is enough to interpret the actual changes our planet goes through in the course of tens of thousands of years. Not only is it amazing, it is also quite laughable.
It was a hoax in 2008 and is a hoax today.
Not only did they have to fiddle with the data to judge the rate at which ice is melting, but they totally failed to factor in the years when ice increased.
Earth's Polar Ice Melting Less Than Thought - US News and World Report
IF the ice was really melting and melting at the rate currently postulated, the oceans would rise at the rate of 6 hundredths of an inch a year AND that supposes that there will never be a freeze again.
Every summer it gets hot and crazy people scream global warming. Just like every winter it gets cold and crazy people scream climate change.
The same people who really believed that at midnight on December 31, 1999, the world would stop and we would be immediately back into 1900. Had we had an internet back in the day, we would have been subjected to blather about how hair spray was dissolving the ozone layer. The hole was getting bigger, no it was getting smaller, oh oh, now it's bigger again. Only to have scientists come up with the clever conclusion that there is a hole in the ozone layer, it gets bigger and smaller according to some force we don't know but it's been there forever and isn't going to change no matter how much spray deodorant we don't use.
The scam of course, is global warming hysteria itself. It is a way to bilk billions of dollars out of anyone UN scientists can fool. How many billions did the UN get to help poor countries protect against Y2K? The US spent 235 billion alone.
Once global warming has been depleted of all its value, there will be a new catastrophe, equally as stupid.
As of June 10th the volume is at record low levels and the area has just want below 2007!
We will be discussing the race for the record in this thread! What's even more AMAZING is the fact that we were almost to avg this winter!
Weather patterns are everything this year like the last 4 years as that will tell where we end up! If we see a strong ridge(arctic dipole) like 2007 that lasts through the season...Well, this will easly become number one, but if we see 3-5 weeks of low pressure like 2010, 2011 in the heart of the melt season we may end up in 2 or 3rd place.
What's really amazing is that people seem to believe that a few decades worth of data is enough to interpret the actual changes our planet goes through in the course of tens of thousands of years. Not only is it amazing, it is also quite laughable.
What's amazing is that scientists believe they can control the planetary temperature the same way shamen could control rain by throwing chicken bones into a circle drawn in the dirt.
It was a hoax in 2008 and is a hoax today.
Not only did they have to fiddle with the data to judge the rate at which ice is melting, but they totally failed to factor in the years when ice increased.
Earth's Polar Ice Melting Less Than Thought - US News and World Report
IF the ice was really melting and melting at the rate currently postulated, the oceans would rise at the rate of 6 hundredths of an inch a year AND that supposes that there will never be a freeze again.
Every summer it gets hot and crazy people scream global warming. Just like every winter it gets cold and crazy people scream climate change.
The same people who really believed that at midnight on December 31, 1999, the world would stop and we would be immediately back into 1900. Had we had an internet back in the day, we would have been subjected to blather about how hair spray was dissolving the ozone layer. The hole was getting bigger, no it was getting smaller, oh oh, now it's bigger again. Only to have scientists come up with the clever conclusion that there is a hole in the ozone layer, it gets bigger and smaller according to some force we don't know but it's been there forever and isn't going to change no matter how much spray deodorant we don't use.
The scam of course, is global warming hysteria itself. It is a way to bilk billions of dollars out of anyone UN scientists can fool. How many billions did the UN get to help poor countries protect against Y2K? The US spent 235 billion alone.
Once global warming has been depleted of all its value, there will be a new catastrophe, equally as stupid.
This is how you get to global warming.
The government gives raw data to a bunch of "scientists" and says "If you find global warming we will give you billions of dollars. If you don't find global warming you will lose your job and we will make every effort to discredit you and ruin your career."
The melting sea ice means no more today than freezing sea ice meant when we had record freezes last go around. A year's worth of data or ten or twenty years worth of data is meaningless. You can't extrapolate from that what's going to happen. You have a report that says in 2012 sea ice is melting, but in 2010 it was growing!
Arctic sea ice growing - Climate scientists confused | Ecological Problems
In the last couple of years the Arctic ice was shrinking so rapidly that certain climate change scientists even made predictions how by the the year 2013 Arctic will be completely ice-free in summer months. However, the latest measured data showed that the amount of sea ice in Arctic has dramatically increased last month, reaching levels not seen at this time of year for a very long time.
In fact, since the year 2001 there hasn't been so much recorded ice at Arctic, and for the first time since 2001 Arctic ice cover is getting near to long-term average levels. This situation surprised many climate change scientists but most of them are still convinced that this is not the sign that there's no global warming but just a part of yearly variations in ice cover mainly caused by this year's unusually cold winter.
In the 1970s sea ice was growing so fast that scientists were predicting that only a narrow perimeter around the equator would be ice free by the end of the century.
Planetary changes take place over the course of millions of years, not 20 years or 50 years. The Sahara desert used to be a sea, global warming didn't dry it up into a desert. It just dried up into a desert. But it took a very, very long time to do it.
What will happen, in the future, is that sea ice will be suddenly discovered to be like the hole in the ozone layer. Sometimes it grows, sometimes it shrinks. No one knows why it just does.
If you really want something to worry about, try the caldera at Yellowstone. When it blows it will take out 2/3 of the whole country.
Like I said -- when you pick areas with "at least 15% sea ice" and declare the whole thing melted and measure the area --- it sure sounds huge don't it??
Only problem is -- 85% of the area they are measuring never had any ice..
Maybe I'd be impressed if they used "areas with at least 50% sea ice", but then there wouldn't be as much hysteria would there?
Like I said -- when you pick areas with "at least 15% sea ice" and declare the whole thing melted and measure the area --- it sure sounds huge don't it??
Only problem is -- 85% of the area they are measuring never had any ice..
Maybe I'd be impressed if they used "areas with at least 50% sea ice", but then there wouldn't be as much hysteria would there?
That's total nonsense. You quite obviously have no frigging idea what you're blabbing on about. As usual for you, fecalton.
Scientists use two terms, sea ice extent and sea ice area. Sea ice area is larger, as it is defined as the area of ocean with at least 15% sea ice. Which means that any grid square on their map that has "at least" 15% sea ice is counted as part of the sea ice area even if that grid square was 85% open water. Quite a bit of the areas that are currently open water were ice covered year round a few decades ago.
What if Rolling, BobG and OldRocks all jumped on the Earth at the same time to push it futher from the Sun....would that stop the ice from melting?