WAR CRIME: U.S. Strike In Afghanistan Kills Doctors And Patients In Hospital...

[paulitician]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

The U.S. still has to be held accountable. It's an awful atrocity.

 

[paulitician]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

yeah the UN is so corrupt they wont do anything.

Have to agree. The U.S. owns the UN. They won't do anything.

 

[paulitician]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

we could land on the moon 40 years ago...don't tell me that in the 21st century the u.s. can't avoid bombing a hospital...

Its preposterous to have the expectation of a perfect record. A thousand different things could have led to that.

Doesn't make it right.

 

[Anathema]

Let me call them (and the UN) a waaahhhmbulance. There are no innocents in the wirkd. Definitely not in a war zone.

 

[paulitician]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

we could land on the moon 40 years ago...don't tell me that in the 21st century the u.s. can't avoid bombing a hospital...

Its preposterous to have the expectation of a perfect record. A thousand different things could have led to that.

Especially since we have no one there to direct any air strikes. Hell, we don't even have any allies or friends to direct any air strikes. We're blind.

Actually, the U.S. has a big presence there. It routinely conducts bombing raids.

 

[paulitician]

Let me call them (and the UN) a waaahhhmbulance. There are no innocents in the wirkd. Definitely not in a war zone.

That's illogical and immoral.

 

[the_human_being]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

we could land on the moon 40 years ago...don't tell me that in the 21st century the u.s. can't avoid bombing a hospital...

Its preposterous to have the expectation of a perfect record. A thousand different things could have led to that.

Especially since we have no one there to direct any air strikes. Hell, we don't even have any allies or friends to direct any air strikes. We're blind.

Actually, the U.S. has a big presence there. It routinely conducts bombing raids.

And actually, all parties were given the exact GPS location of the hospital. This is a major screw up.

 

[Anathema]

That's illogical and immoral.

What's illogical and immoral is expanding ammo and bodies in Afghanistan when we have enemies much closer to home in Cuba, Mexico, Canada, etc....

 

[the_human_being]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

The U.S. still has to be held accountable. It's an awful atrocity.

It's a violation of the Geneva Convention.

 

[the_human_being]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

The U.S. still has to be held accountable. It's an awful atrocity.

It'll probably cost the taxpayers a billion dollars to settle this.

 

[paulitician]

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

we could land on the moon 40 years ago...don't tell me that in the 21st century the u.s. can't avoid bombing a hospital...

Its preposterous to have the expectation of a perfect record. A thousand different things could have led to that.

Especially since we have no one there to direct any air strikes. Hell, we don't even have any allies or friends to direct any air strikes. We're blind.

Actually, the U.S. has a big presence there. It routinely conducts bombing raids.

And actually, all parties were given the exact GPS location of the hospital. This is a major screw up.

Yeah even if it was an accident, it could still be considered a War Crime.

 

[Anathema]

It's a violation of the Geneva Convention.

Which the US should not be a part of, to begin with.

 

[paulitician]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

The U.S. still has to be held accountable. It's an awful atrocity.

It'll probably cost the taxpayers a billion dollars to settle this.

Yeah, pay-offs pretty much sum up the UN at this point. It's incredibly corrupt. Everyone knows the U.S. owns it. Just about any other nation on earth, would be held accountable for such an atrocity.

 

[paulitician]

That's illogical and immoral.

What's illogical and immoral is expanding ammo and bodies in Afghanistan when we have enemies much closer to home in Cuba, Mexico, Canada, etc....

Have to agree there. We don't belong in Afghanistan.

 

[skye]

Was it one of Obama's drones the cause of this accident?

Where do they get their intelligence?

So sad.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?

This is why most people do not take you seriously

 

[Anathema]

Have to agree there. We don't belong in Afghanistan.

Exactly. We shouls have carpet nuked the country in the last quarter of 2001 and been done with it.

 

[the_human_being]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

The U.S. still has to be held accountable. It's an awful atrocity.

It'll probably cost the taxpayers a billion dollars to settle this.

Yeah, pay-offs pretty much sum up the UN at this point. It's incredibly corrupt. Everyone knows the U.S. owns it. Just about any other nation on earth, would be held accountable for such an atrocity.

I really wasn't considering paying off the UN. I was considering how much it was going to cost the taxpayers to give monetary restitution to the families of the doctors, nurses, and patients we killed.

 

[paulitician]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?

This is why most people do not take you seriously

Most other nations on earth would be held accountable for such an atrocity. Why won't the U.S. be?

 

[paulitician]

Will the UN prosecute the U.S. for War Crimes? I'm guessing not. But why not?


‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime

An air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz that killed at least 19 people is “utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, calling for a transparent investigation.

"This deeply shocking event should be promptly, thoroughly and independently investigated and the results should be made public," Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein said in a statement on Saturday.

"The seriousness of the incident is underlined by the fact that, if established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime."

He described the bombing as "utterly tragic, inexcusable, and possibly even criminal."

"International and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object of a special protection. These obligations apply no matter whose air force is involved, and irrespective of the location."...

More:
‘Inexcusable, possibly even criminal’: UN rights chief says Kunduz bombing may be war crime
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

If they intentionally targeted the hospital, sure it would be criminal, but we all know they didnt, so this thread is kind of a waste of everyones time, dont ya think?

The U.S. still has to be held accountable. It's an awful atrocity.

It'll probably cost the taxpayers a billion dollars to settle this.

Yeah, pay-offs pretty much sum up the UN at this point. It's incredibly corrupt. Everyone knows the U.S. owns it. Just about any other nation on earth, would be held accountable for such an atrocity.

I really wasn't considering paying off the UN. I was considering how much it was going to cost the taxpayers to give monetary restitution to the families of the doctors, nurses, and patients we killed.

I hear ya. But there will be no War Crimes prosecutions. The U.S. owns the UN.