Walmart stores stoping gun selling

[JakeStarkey]

Even the woman who introduced legislation in the Senate today said it does not take away anyone's weapons, JimBowie, it merely dries up availability.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Even the woman who introduced legislation in the Senate today said it does not take away anyone's weapons, JimBowie, it merely dries up availability.

1. They are taking semiautos from the public. The 2A defends the right of the public to buy rifles. The SCOTUS said the 2A prevents the banning of specific weapons.

2. They are using the death of these children to stir up support for banning weapons that were not used and which are used in fewer killings than baseball bats.

3. There are times when a person needs a semiauto, like protection from a rioting mob, and Feinstein is going to prevent anyone from buying those.

4. She will set up a national registry for grandfathered rifles, an historical precursor to confiscation.

5. Gun grabbers plan to get all the weapons anyway, so might as well draw the line and defend it here and insist on no weapons being banned due to looking scarey to gun grabbing pissants.

 

[JimBowie1958]

An example of what I mean when I say the gun grabbers wont have the support that they think they will:
Number Of Nation's Sheriffs Refusing To Enforce Unconstitutional Gun Laws Snowballs | CNS News

From Florida to California, a growing number of the nation's sheriffs are standing up to gun control measures proposed by both the administration and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.).

Many law enforcement officials have written letters to President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden voicing their concerns over what they believe is an effort to infringe upon the Second Amendment.

In New Mexico, 30 of the state's 33 county sheriffs have reminded state lawmakers that they are under oath to support the U.S. Constitution, and that includes the Second Amendment.

CNSNews.com previously reported that 28 of the 29 sheriff's in Utah sent a letter to President Obama stating that they will not enforce any new gun laws they believe to be unconstitutional.

Article goes on to describe more defiance in many other states. America's LEO support the US Constitutionand take their oaths seriously. It is the rare LEO in the US that is a fucking fascist.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

ANYONE REMEMBER THIS?

Wal-Mart joins Homeland Security terror fight - US news - Security | NBC News

 

[JakeStarkey]

Even the woman who introduced legislation in the Senate today said it does not take away anyone's weapons, JimBowie, it merely dries up availability.

1. They are taking semiautos from the public. The 2A defends the right of the public to buy rifles. The SCOTUS said the 2A prevents the banning of specific weapons.

2. They are using the death of these children to stir up support for banning weapons that were not used and which are used in fewer killings than baseball bats.

3. There are times when a person needs a semiauto, like protection from a rioting mob, and Feinstein is going to prevent anyone from buying those.

4. She will set up a national registry for grandfathered rifles, an historical precursor to confiscation.

5. Gun grabbers plan to get all the weapons anyway, so might as well draw the line and defend it here and insist on no weapons being banned due to looking scarey to gun grabbing pissants.

1. No one is taking anything from anybody.

2. Yes, the death of the children should be used to make sure that people are fully aware that crazy people kill people using types of weapons that maximize the violence.

3. When was the last time you were in a "rioting mob"?

4. Give us "historical precursors" that you mean. Use good solid objective examples that are easily identified, please.

5. Your subjective opinion, nothing more.

 

[Katzndogz]

80% of guns used in crimes are not bought at Wal Mart, and less than 1% comes from a gun show. Most of them come from illegal sales.

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/fuo.pdf

The entire gun control argument is based on the concept of removing the right of citizens to mount a defense to armed criminals.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Who is saying you can't have a gun?

 

[saveliberty]

Who is saying you can't have a gun?

Can't is a few steps down the road, if we continue on the present course. Right now there is a definite effort to discourage ownership. I don't own one, and will probably wait until prices come back down before I would. Guns also are a fairly decent investment. So even if I never get interested in shooting as a hobby or need one for self defense, it could be profitable.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, "can't is [not] a few steps down the road". That is mere hysteria.

 

[saveliberty]

No, "can't is [not] a few steps down the road". That is mere hysteria.

The hysteria seems to be from the gun control people blaming guns and not the mentally ill with access to weapons. Some of Obama's executive orders will address it somewhat, so that is good. Expanding gun free zones around schools is a dangerous move to me.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Armed security should be in the schools.

 

[TNHarley]

Armed security should be in the schools.

I agree. Be armed along with extensive firearm training and mental evaluations

 

[JakeStarkey]

Armed security should be in the schools.

I agree. Be armed along with extensive firearm training and mental evaluations

Police and trained security professionals, not educators.

 

[PredFan]

If my Walmart stops selling guns, I will stop purchasing anything there. I have a lot of choices.

Unfortunately, my dilemma is that I support Walmart because of their efforts against the unions. The choice is simple; 2nd Amendment trumps anti-union efforts.

I think I need to give some more money to the NRA.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Who is saying you can't have a gun?

Feinstein and other gun grabbers are saying no one will be able to buy any of 150 different weapons and that list will grow.

Let me see if I can help your discombobulation, Jake.

Suppose someone proposed a law that said blacks cant buy property, but if blacks currently have property they can keep it if they pay an additional tax and register with the government as aland owning black. Also they can buy properties in certain zoned areas, but not others.

Blacks could still buy property, but the infringement on their rights to buy property would have the whole country howling.

There is no reason to restrict the purchase of semiautomatic rifles and handguns. Its just another libtard fad-cause and it is hitting up against a rock wall that will not move.

And the consequences will be on theheads of the gun grabbing fascists who are hijacking our democractic republic.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Armed security should be in the schools.

I agree. Be armed along with extensive firearm training and mental evaluations

Police and trained security professionals, not educators.

Why not educators that volunteer, pass a vetting process, pay for the training out of their own funds and also those who might be former military?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Even the woman who introduced legislation in the Senate today said it does not take away anyone's weapons, JimBowie, it merely dries up availability.

1. They are taking semiautos from the public. The 2A defends the right of the public to buy rifles. The SCOTUS said the 2A prevents the banning of specific weapons.

2. They are using the death of these children to stir up support for banning weapons that were not used and which are used in fewer killings than baseball bats.

3. There are times when a person needs a semiauto, like protection from a rioting mob, and Feinstein is going to prevent anyone from buying those.

4. She will set up a national registry for grandfathered rifles, an historical precursor to confiscation.

5. Gun grabbers plan to get all the weapons anyway, so might as well draw the line and defend it here and insist on no weapons being banned due to looking scarey to gun grabbing pissants.

1. No one is taking anything from anybody.

Yes they are. they are taking our guns from our progeny, critical types of guns from our list of choices and they are infringing on our rights to arm ourselves.

2. Yes, the death of the children should be used to make sure that people are fully aware that crazy people kill people using types of weapons that maximize the violence.

The Sandy Hook killings were not done with an AR-15 or any other semiautomatic rifle, so your point is irrelevant.

3. When was the last time you were in a "rioting mob"?

When was the last time your house burned down? And yet you should have the right to buy fire insurance, no?

4. Give us "historical precursors" that you mean. Use good solid objective examples that are easily identified, please.

It Will Pass - Lethal Laws - Results of Gun Registration - Gun Control.

5. Your subjective opinion, nothing more.

Nope, it is simple observation of the pattern of libtard behavior. The things their ground breakers say to college students in the safety of a controled classroom are rolled into action when those students reach adulthood.

The libtards of our time over the age of 40 were indoctrinated in college to see gun rights as a function of state laws and privilege granted by the government. Hence why these bastards are trying to set up our guns for confiscation.

You have no facts, Starky, just quibbles, whines and throwing doubt on things you do not understand.

 

[jtpr312]

No, "can't is [not] a few steps down the road". That is mere hysteria.

You sound just like many German Jews did in the early 30's in Germany. Nice if you leftitsts ended up just like them for your support of America's National Socialist Demoratic Party.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, "can't is [not] a few steps down the road". That is mere hysteria.

You sound just like many German Jews did in the early 30's in Germany. Nice if you leftitsts ended up just like them for your support of America's National Socialist Demoratic Party.

No, I don't but you do sound like the Nazis of the era.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No one is taking anything from anybody. Leave your guns to your progeny. SCOTUS will uphold the bans if they are passed, which I doubt they will.

The Sandy Hook deaths were done by guns, so your point is irrelevant.

Rioting mobs and fire insurance are a derivatively false comparison.

So you have no "historical precursors" that I asked for.

Your opinion is subjective, based on your bias, nothing more

You have nothing but your nonsensical, biased hate.