Voters are fed up with Washington and that means DEMOCRATS

[daveman]

The RINO Republicans are the true conservatives. The far right reactionary loons, like Tea Party Samurai and Rush and Sarah and The Rabbi and etc., are not conservative Republicans. Some like The Rabbi are not Republican at all. This country won't get better until this party goes back to that of Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, and Bush the Elder. It is simply a monstrosity, a perversion, now.

So the GOP's only chance is to change party affiliation to Democrat?

Already tried that. Two Democratic Parties is what fucked up the economy so bad.

Jake Starkey is a big time Democrat liberal.

He's about as interested in the Republicans winning is as those who crossed the aisle to vote for McCain in 2000 were interested in Republicans winning.

They knew McCain would lose in the general election. It's too bad dumbass Republicans in the first three primaries in 2008 couldn't figure that out.

That's the problem with starting the primaries, in the North. It lets the damn Rinos vote first. I didn't even get a chance. By the time the primaries hit Ohio, all that was left on the ballot was McCain.

Starkey does NOT have the conservative or republican's best interests in hearts.

Oh, I know.

 

[Charles_Main]

Sorry I am as far right as most in here, But I can not agree with the title of this thread.

Yes Democrats are the ones in Power now, but I for one am fed up with all the career politicians. Party means little to me.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The RINO Republicans are the true conservatives. The far right reactionary loons, like Tea Party Samurai and Rush and Sarah and The Rabbi and etc., are not conservative Republicans. Some like The Rabbi are not Republican at all. This country won't get better until this party goes back to that of Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, and Bush the Elder. It is simply a monstrosity, a perversion, now.

So the GOP's only chance is to change party affiliation to Democrat?

Already tried that. Two Democratic Parties is what fucked up the economy so bad.

Jake Starkey is a big time Democrat liberal.

He's about as interested in the Republicans winning is as those who crossed the aisle to vote for McCain in 2000 were interested in Republicans winning.

They knew McCain would lose in the general election. It's too bad dumbass Republicans in the first three primaries in 2008 couldn't figure that out.

That's the problem with starting the primaries, in the North. It lets the damn Rinos vote first. I didn't even get a chance. By the time the primaries hit Ohio, all that was left on the ballot was McCain.

Starkey does NOT have the conservative or republican's best interests in hearts.

You are entitled to a distorted and unreal definition of the political spectrum, TPS, but are a reactionary not a conservative too. You do not believe in classical liberalism as true Republicans do. Thompson and Huckabee had no chance to win a national election. Romney did, but the southern evangelicals put him under. McCain still would have won the election if the economy had melted down six weeks later, even with Palin on the ticket.

The far right reactionaries have shot their bolt, including the Tea Party. With Paul and Angle headed for easy defeat in KY and NV, and should the TP candidate win the GOP primary in Colorado this Tuesday we will have seen the Dems hang on to two seats and pick up another one because the mainstream hates the far right non-conservatives of the GOP and beyond.

True blue lifetime Republicans, like me, simply are not going to permit your perversions to win power again in our name.

 

[teapartysamurai]

The lowest approval rating of any of the Washington players is held by the Republicans in Congress.

You ever notice when liberals say this stuff, they never back that up with any urls?

You know why? Because they know where the real low numbers are, right now, and it's with Democrats.

Why would you need a link? You didn't provide a link.

Pew Research 7/27

"Do you approve or disapprove of the job the Republican leaders in Congress are doing?"

33%

"Do you approve or disapprove of the job the Democratic leaders in Congress are doing?"

35%

Quinnipiac University Poll. July 13-19, 2010

"Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Republicans in Congress are handling their job?"

29%

"Do you approve or disapprove of the way the Democrats in Congress are handling their job?"

31%

etc., etc.

Congress

The Republicans in Congress ARE at the bottom in approval.

So STFU.

That isn't going to tell you what's happening. This is!


RealClearPolitics - Election 2010

Right now, it looks like the RNC is going to pick up six seats just in the Senate.

It looks like Democrats have the advantage in 11 states while Republicans are ahead in 23 states in the Senate.

In the House they project the GOP advantage is 6%. 149 safe for Dems, 24 likely Dems, 29 leans Dem, 32 seats are tossups, 27 leans Republican, 10 Likely Republican, 164 Safe Republican.

In Governor's races they project 8 pickups for the GOP. Projected races, 17 races go to the Dems, 32 to the GOP.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2010

Now you can spin your little poll all you want, but look at the state by state polls, AND THAT'S WHERE THE VOTING IS REALLY GOING TO HAPPEN. There is no electorial college in the way in a mid term. It's all state by state. Those state by state polls tell what's really happening. And they tell a different tale.

 

[JakeStarkey]

RealClearPolitics is not real clear in polling data. The fact is this, TP: the Dems will pick up 3 to 5 seats in the Senate (leading to an unreconciliation majority that will ram its legislation to your throat and out your ass), and the Dems will lose 8 to 12 seats in the House, leaving it with a safe majority.

The Tea Party is going to be responsible for even more liberal legislation in the coming terms. Thanks, TP.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Yeah.. Blame one party, that's gonna help us.

If they're fed up with Washington it means both. And rightfully so..

And by Conservatives you mean Palin? Ha! That's a funny joke...

Hey political genius!

Maybe you haven't been keeping up on current events, BUT ONLY ONE PARTY HAS BEEN IN CHARGE FOR THE LAST 4and 2 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How can you blame Republicans for this?

The GOP hasn't had control of the Congress since 2006, and they haven't had control of the presidency since 2008.

But it's both parties' fault?

In 2002 would the GOP had been able to get away with saying it was all the Democrats and Clinton's fault?

SORRY, NO THEY WOULDN'T HAVE.

And don't give me the liberal historical revisionistic lie that the GOP was blaming Democrats in 2002.

That's AN UTTER LIE! Bush was all about the "new tone" and "getting along with democrats." He let Ted Kennedy write the education bill for pity sake! Anyone remember that?

I sure as hell do! It frustrated the hell out of conservatives.

Now all liberals do is say the Republicans are just as much to blame for the last two years DISASTER in economic policy?

Yeah, keep trying that one libs. Sure hope makes you feel better on the first WEDNESDAY in November.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Congressional republicans are taking as much hate as congressional democrats.


There are more congressional democrats than republicans.

It will be interesting to see how it plays out. I do think you are going to see a lot fewer "Re elect Jack S Phogbound" signs than usual. And a lot more incumbents running as if they are challengers to their own seats.

A lot of marginal seats the challenger will have signs up that say "He voted for Tarp and 0bamacare. Send him home."

Look the Democrats ARE the ruling party in Washington.

The establishment is taking a hit.

Like I said, there is an alternative in the Republican party. CONSERVATIVES.

Like 1980 when the ruling class wanted Bush the elder, the voters wanted the alternative, and that was Reagan. That wasn't anti-republican. It was anti-establishment.

Same thing happening here.

But Democrats don't have an alternative. They are just different shades of extreme liberal and the voters and fed up with all of 'em.

You are kidding yourself if you believe the public is not fed up with the act of the Republicans also. The far right Conservatives are not endearing themselves with the public and the Tea Party Candidates will do worse than mainstream Republicans.

Yeah, let's run McCain again. That worked so well the last time.

 

[teapartysamurai]

RealClearPolitics is not real clear in polling data. The fact is this, TP: the Dems will pick up 3 to 5 seats in the Senate (leading to an unreconciliation majority that will ram its legislation to your throat and out your ass), and the Dems will lose 8 to 12 seats in the House, leaving it with a safe majority.

The Tea Party is going to be responsible for even more liberal legislation in the coming terms. Thanks, TP.

Put down the crack pipe and read the state by state polls.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The economic mess we are in today is the fault of the Republican Congress's policies (1994 to 2006) with Tea Party Samurai's dream boat, Bill Clinton, and then George Bush.

2006: Bush is president and easily vetoes Democratic legislation he does not like.

2008: OH, BOY, Tea Party's enemies are in office. Since Bush's last day stock market is up 60%, since today unemployment is more than a full point below Reagan's record in October 1983, and the idea of Speaker Boehner makes real Americans wet their pants in fear.

Naw, Tea Party Samurai, you little wannabee fauxconservaive. Your day is almost gone.

 

[JakeStarkey]

RealClearPolitics is not real clear in polling data. The fact is this, TP: the Dems will pick up 3 to 5 seats in the Senate (leading to an unreconciliation majority that will ram its legislation to your throat and out your ass), and the Dems will lose 8 to 12 seats in the House, leaving it with a safe majority.

The Tea Party is going to be responsible for even more liberal legislation in the coming terms. Thanks, TP.

Put down the crack pipe and read the state by state polls.

Read real polling numbers, track the donations and amounts of donations, track who is likely to vote -- honey, you, like AvorySuds, can toke all you want, but your hopes are going up in smoke.

I am going to remind you every day forever after election of your above post. I have not lost election calls in more than two decades, and I am absolutely sure about this.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Night all. Sweet dreams, Tea Party Samurai, with little fauxconservative sheep hopping the fence. Not too worry. The nightmares will begin soon.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Actually it means both republicans and democrats.

Well that's what the liberal establishment keeps telling us, but it's just cover and they know it.

The Republicans are NOT in power.

They can't stop anything Obama does. I do believe it's anti-Rino but that doesn't make it anti-Republican anymore than it did in 1980 when people were fed up with the Republican establisment and voted in Reagan.

People might remember the establishment wanted Ford (in 76) and then Bush the elder in 1980.

The voters wanted Reagan. That's anti-establishment, not anti-Republican.

There isn't a Reagan on the Democrat side. There isn't anything close.

It's anti-Democrat, because they ARE the ruling class in Washington right now, and they don't have an alternative.

I hate to quote myself, but it was the only way to post this.

This post so INFURIATED that political expert Jillian she sent me this:

Hi, you have received -364 reputation points from jillian.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
psychotic freak

Regards,
jillian

Now, OF COURSE, this is Jillian's way of saying, I'M RIGHT, and SHE KNOWS IT!

Otherwise, she would be able to refute it somehow.

But alas, I know she most likely wasn't even BORN when the 1994 election happened, let alone, when Reagan ran for office.

So, how would she know? She doesn't! So, all she can do is sputter, which is what liberals do when they KNOW they can't refute you.

They sputter, call names, but deep down, what they are saying is "HOW DARE YOU BE RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!"

It's so much fun!

 

[teapartysamurai]

The economic mess we are in today is the fault of the Republican Congress's policies (1994 to 2006) with Tea Party Samurai's dream boat, Bill Clinton, and then George Bush.

2006: Bush is president and easily vetoes Democratic legislation he does not like.

2008: OH, BOY, Tea Party's enemies are in office. Since Bush's last day stock market is up 60%, since today unemployment is more than a full point below Reagan's record in October 1983, and the idea of Speaker Boehner makes real Americans wet their pants in fear.

Naw, Tea Party Samurai, you little wannabee fauxconservaive. Your day is almost gone.

He really is living in a crack pipe dream isn't he?

Has he seen unemployment lately?

This is like Hoover telling us the Smoot/Hawley tax wasn't a failure.

 

[Natsumi]

Hi, you have received -364 reputation points from jillian.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
psychotic freak

Regards,
jillian

Now, OF COURSE, this is Jillian's way of saying, I'M RIGHT, and SHE KNOWS IT!

Wow some people just need to let it go and accept the fact of defeat and get a life!

 

[daveman]

The economic mess we are in today is the fault of the Republican Congress's policies (1994 to 2006) with Tea Party Samurai's dream boat, Bill Clinton, and then George Bush.

2006: Bush is president and easily vetoes Democratic legislation he does not like.

2008: OH, BOY, Tea Party's enemies are in office. Since Bush's last day stock market is up 60%, since today unemployment is more than a full point below Reagan's record in October 1983, and the idea of Speaker Boehner makes real Americans wet their pants in fear.

Naw, Tea Party Samurai, you little wannabee fauxconservaive. Your day is almost gone.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Hi, you have received -364 reputation points from jillian.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
psychotic freak

Regards,
jillian

Now, OF COURSE, this is Jillian's way of saying, I'M RIGHT, and SHE KNOWS IT!

Wow some people just need to let it go and accept the fact of defeat and get a life!

Nah! If Jillian didn't do this every once in a while, I wouldn't be able to post them and make fun of them. So, I hope she never accepts defeat until November 2010 and 2012.

 

[daveman]

I have not lost election calls in more than two decades, and I am absolutely sure about this.

You were calling elections in utero?

 

[teapartysamurai]

The economic mess we are in today is the fault of the Republican Congress's policies (1994 to 2006) with Tea Party Samurai's dream boat, Bill Clinton, and then George Bush.

2006: Bush is president and easily vetoes Democratic legislation he does not like.

2008: OH, BOY, Tea Party's enemies are in office. Since Bush's last day stock market is up 60%, since today unemployment is more than a full point below Reagan's record in October 1983, and the idea of Speaker Boehner makes real Americans wet their pants in fear.

Naw, Tea Party Samurai, you little wannabee fauxconservaive. Your day is almost gone.

​

​

 

[teapartysamurai]

I have not lost election calls in more than two decades, and I am absolutely sure about this.

You were calling elections in utero?

That Jake Starkey-ism definitely requires a double

 

[daveman]

I have not lost election calls in more than two decades, and I am absolutely sure about this.

You were calling elections in utero?

That Jake Starkey-ism definitely requires a double