- Thread starter
- #41
Because they see a criminal Court judge., Don't they?Yup, links are available, but why bother. Given the current burgeoning hostility toward the Liar-in-Chief's immigration policy and the gross differences between the policy declared in the SOTU covered in the article you cited and are referencing, I have to believe that any bump the Clown may have gotten back in January has totally dissolved and eroded further support from his minority base. Why look up outdated links for current relevance as if the writers months ago were clairvoyant writing in the future tense?Links are available in the article for you to get your own answer.
And now that the fool has expressed his desire to suspend/end Due Process Constitutional protections for certain classes, as a third-world dictator would employ for "control" of his serfs, the push back will only increase from all quarters. But you go ahead and boost your Hero as you wish with non-relevant info!
I think you are confusing how CURRENT law is being enforced vs advocacy for NEW law. Also he doesn't want to deny due process to anyone, he just wants a consistent expedited procedure available for everyone, not just Mexicans and Canadians. At this point there is NOT EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.Wrong and you know that is bullshit! And that goes for the rest of your apology for the Liar-in-Chief and your blatant dodge of the facts as they exist. The "consistent expedited procedure" the Orange One Tweet'ed about and envisions is nothing but a side-step of existing due process statutory law and Constitutional guarantees. That's is exactly how autocrats operate!I think you are confusing how CURRENT law is being enforced vs advocacy for NEW law.
We deport thousands and thousands of Mexicans and they never see an immigration judge, that doesn't mean they weren't afforded due process, why should OTMs be any different?
.
No. But immigration judges handle civil and criminal proceedings related to immigration law.
.