Virginia Governor Plays Race Card Again

I am. I think buildings, forts, ships, documents, houses, battlefields or anything created during the civil war should be preserved. I think monuments created decades after the war to celebrate the side that fought for slavery have no place in the public square, especially in cities like Chancellorsville which is a blue city.


So you follow the lie that the soldiers who fought for the South fought to keep their slaves? How stupid are you? There may have been a few generals, and officers who owned slaves, I would guess NONE of the enlisted, or NON coms did. There are actual rolls of the families that held slaves. MAN you liberally educated people are so damn stupid. The foot soldiers in the confederate army were fighting for their survival for their homes, their daughters and wives freedom from rape, and the other vile things the Northern soldiers did. We hear about the horrors of Andersonville, and the other camps. Southern soldiers wanted to kill every "Yankee because all of their wives had been raped their preteen daughters had been raped their homes had been burned, their crops taken and burned, their livestock butchered and killed their sons murdered, and the entire towns had been burned to the ground, many times with people in them burning too. SO WHY wouldn't they fight even if they never owned a slave. That is the legacy of Lincoln and his unconstitutional invasion into the South. That is the Real history, the Planters controlled the actions of the state houses, the northern controlled US government would not let the south count anyone other than tax paying white males as citizens because the number of actual people would have given the south complete control of the House. You don't know shit about real history. The statues are for the soldiers and the few Generals who actually were for their troops instead of for the planters Lee cared more for the common men women and children than for any of the planters and their slave holding capability. By your idea we need to take away every Englis monument in the country because this country was only a slave country for about eighty years the rest of the time the slaves were held by the Crown, And the English Crown had many times more slaves than the USA ever had. Let's make Hawaii change it's Flag after all the English were the greatest slave owners, the Crown was the largest slave owner in history. Alright then let's be fair, and equal like you liberal shit like it. No flag for Hawaii, no statues to any black activist racist who touted killing the white race. No heroes from the Indian wars, no generals who were involved in the trail of tears, the western plains wars, or the Alamo, or >>>>>>>. Either make it equal or STFU or die.
Thank you! Federal Army under Lincoln were terrorists and rapists. Marx wrote "Manifesto" in 1848. Lincoln was influenced.

There were war crimes committed on both sides.
 
The root cause is the racist attempt to remove the statue. Had that not occurred, there would have been no protest or subsequent death.
Had a neonazi coward not drove his vehicle into a crowd of people, there would have been no death.

Fuck you
. Ignore the possible beginning roots of the events problem eh ? Not very justice like wouldn't you say ?
Beginning roots? A bunch of inbred, scared white boys saw different races coming together and one of them decided to drive his car into them.
So you hate whites. No surprise, coming from a limp wristed racist such as your self absorbed self. LOL
Yeah I hate whites....because I'm white. And you're an idiot
 
Not to mention that Lincoln ONLY freed the Southern slaves because he thought they would help defeat the South - how white of him. Don't forget that Grant owned slaves even after the war.

Why the lies? All in the sake of defending the Confederacy? It's almost like you people were fans of it.

The Truth About Confederate History: Part 2

The only evidence that Union general (and later United States President) Ulysses S. Grant ever owned any slaves is a document he signed in 1859 that emancipated “my Negro man William” (i.e, William Jones), whom Grant stated in the document he had purchased from Frederick Dent (his father-in-law). Little is known about William Jones; as even Grant’s biographers note, “exactly when and how Grant acquired ownership of a slave remain something of a mystery.” There is no other evidence showing that Grant ever owned more than this one slave, much less “several.”

It is often stated that Grant’s wife, Julia Boggs Dent, “owned four slaves,” and Julia herself identified four “servants” whom she claimed “belonged” to her up until the end of 1862. However, those slaves had been purchased by Julia’s father, Frederick F. Dent, and there is no record of his ever having transferred ownership of them to Julia — without such a transfer, neither Julia nor her husband Ulysses would have had legal authority to free them.
. This is why the left is focused on white power in general today, because it see's that both sides had slaves. It is just working slowly to overthrow or render white power as impotent someday, and it starts with the history, but a cherry picked version of it.

White supremacists.are impotent.
And Lincoln and Grant were both white supremacists...

By our standards today? They all were.
So what's the excuse for tearing down Lee's monument?
 
I am. I think buildings, forts, ships, documents, houses, battlefields or anything created during the civil war should be preserved. I think monuments created decades after the war to celebrate the side that fought for slavery have no place in the public square, especially in cities like Chancellorsville which is a blue city.


So you follow the lie that the soldiers who fought for the South fought to keep their slaves? How stupid are you? There may have been a few generals, and officers who owned slaves, I would guess NONE of the enlisted, or NON coms did. There are actual rolls of the families that held slaves. MAN you liberally educated people are so damn stupid. The foot soldiers in the confederate army were fighting for their survival for their homes, their daughters and wives freedom from rape, and the other vile things the Northern soldiers did. We hear about the horrors of Andersonville, and the other camps. Southern soldiers wanted to kill every "Yankee because all of their wives had been raped their preteen daughters had been raped their homes had been burned, their crops taken and burned, their livestock butchered and killed their sons murdered, and the entire towns had been burned to the ground, many times with people in them burning too. SO WHY wouldn't they fight even if they never owned a slave. That is the legacy of Lincoln and his unconstitutional invasion into the South. That is the Real history, the Planters controlled the actions of the state houses, the northern controlled US government would not let the south count anyone other than tax paying white males as citizens because the number of actual people would have given the south complete control of the House. You don't know shit about real history. The statues are for the soldiers and the few Generals who actually were for their troops instead of for the planters Lee cared more for the common men women and children than for any of the planters and their slave holding capability. By your idea we need to take away every Englis monument in the country because this country was only a slave country for about eighty years the rest of the time the slaves were held by the Crown, And the English Crown had many times more slaves than the USA ever had. Let's make Hawaii change it's Flag after all the English were the greatest slave owners, the Crown was the largest slave owner in history. Alright then let's be fair, and equal like you liberal shit like it. No flag for Hawaii, no statues to any black activist racist who touted killing the white race. No heroes from the Indian wars, no generals who were involved in the trail of tears, the western plains wars, or the Alamo, or >>>>>>>. Either make it equal or STFU or die.
Thank you! Federal Army under Lincoln were terrorists and rapists. Marx wrote "Manifesto" in 1848. Lincoln was influenced.

There were war crimes committed on both sides.

Right. The war crimes committed by the Confederates were about 1% of what the Union committed. In fact, the entire war was just one big Union war crime.
 
Why the lies? All in the sake of defending the Confederacy? It's almost like you people were fans of it.

The Truth About Confederate History: Part 2

The only evidence that Union general (and later United States President) Ulysses S. Grant ever owned any slaves is a document he signed in 1859 that emancipated “my Negro man William” (i.e, William Jones), whom Grant stated in the document he had purchased from Frederick Dent (his father-in-law). Little is known about William Jones; as even Grant’s biographers note, “exactly when and how Grant acquired ownership of a slave remain something of a mystery.” There is no other evidence showing that Grant ever owned more than this one slave, much less “several.”

It is often stated that Grant’s wife, Julia Boggs Dent, “owned four slaves,” and Julia herself identified four “servants” whom she claimed “belonged” to her up until the end of 1862. However, those slaves had been purchased by Julia’s father, Frederick F. Dent, and there is no record of his ever having transferred ownership of them to Julia — without such a transfer, neither Julia nor her husband Ulysses would have had legal authority to free them.
. This is why the left is focused on white power in general today, because it see's that both sides had slaves. It is just working slowly to overthrow or render white power as impotent someday, and it starts with the history, but a cherry picked version of it.

White supremacists.are impotent.
And Lincoln and Grant were both white supremacists...

By our standards today? They all were.
So what's the excuse for tearing down Lee's monument?

Gosh, if you'd read the thread you'd know. But, short answer, just to piss you off.
 
I am. I think buildings, forts, ships, documents, houses, battlefields or anything created during the civil war should be preserved. I think monuments created decades after the war to celebrate the side that fought for slavery have no place in the public square, especially in cities like Chancellorsville which is a blue city.


So you follow the lie that the soldiers who fought for the South fought to keep their slaves? How stupid are you? There may have been a few generals, and officers who owned slaves, I would guess NONE of the enlisted, or NON coms did. There are actual rolls of the families that held slaves. MAN you liberally educated people are so damn stupid. The foot soldiers in the confederate army were fighting for their survival for their homes, their daughters and wives freedom from rape, and the other vile things the Northern soldiers did. We hear about the horrors of Andersonville, and the other camps. Southern soldiers wanted to kill every "Yankee because all of their wives had been raped their preteen daughters had been raped their homes had been burned, their crops taken and burned, their livestock butchered and killed their sons murdered, and the entire towns had been burned to the ground, many times with people in them burning too. SO WHY wouldn't they fight even if they never owned a slave. That is the legacy of Lincoln and his unconstitutional invasion into the South. That is the Real history, the Planters controlled the actions of the state houses, the northern controlled US government would not let the south count anyone other than tax paying white males as citizens because the number of actual people would have given the south complete control of the House. You don't know shit about real history. The statues are for the soldiers and the few Generals who actually were for their troops instead of for the planters Lee cared more for the common men women and children than for any of the planters and their slave holding capability. By your idea we need to take away every Englis monument in the country because this country was only a slave country for about eighty years the rest of the time the slaves were held by the Crown, And the English Crown had many times more slaves than the USA ever had. Let's make Hawaii change it's Flag after all the English were the greatest slave owners, the Crown was the largest slave owner in history. Alright then let's be fair, and equal like you liberal shit like it. No flag for Hawaii, no statues to any black activist racist who touted killing the white race. No heroes from the Indian wars, no generals who were involved in the trail of tears, the western plains wars, or the Alamo, or >>>>>>>. Either make it equal or STFU or die.
Thank you! Federal Army under Lincoln were terrorists and rapists. Marx wrote "Manifesto" in 1848. Lincoln was influenced.

There were war crimes committed on both sides.

Right. The war crimes committed by the Confederates were about 1% of what the Union committed. In fact, the entire war was just one big Union war crime.

So, when you guys spout off that progressives are somehow linked to civil war confederates we know it's a lie? Thank you for your honesty, even if it wasn't intentional.
 
Thank you! Federal Army under Lincoln were terrorists and rapists. Marx wrote "Manifesto" in 1848. Lincoln was influenced.

Would you have preferred the Confederacy won?
Wars have consequences, the Indian nations probably would've been better off if confederacy won.
They certainly would've been much better off as sovereign nations if Lincoln was shot much earlier…
 
. This is why the left is focused on white power in general today, because it see's that both sides had slaves. It is just working slowly to overthrow or render white power as impotent someday, and it starts with the history, but a cherry picked version of it.

White supremacists.are impotent.
And Lincoln and Grant were both white supremacists...

By our standards today? They all were.
So what's the excuse for tearing down Lee's monument?

Gosh, if you'd read the thread you'd know. But, short answer, just to piss you off.
We already knew that was the answer. So why do you think anyone should go along with your goals?
 
White supremacists.are impotent.
And Lincoln and Grant were both white supremacists...

By our standards today? They all were.
So what's the excuse for tearing down Lee's monument?

Gosh, if you'd read the thread you'd know. But, short answer, just to piss you off.
We already knew that was the answer. So why do you think anyone should go along with your goals?

We already knew you didn't bother to read through the thread?
 
VA Gov. McAuliffe to white nationalists: 'No place for you in America'
He chnag d voter registration for Democrats, now he castigates certain groups over others, when the dumb fucking PC decision to remove RobertbE. Lee statute is the Orwellian problem!

The root cause is the racist attempt to remove the statue. Had that not occurred, there would have been no protest or subsequent death. The left is to blame, complete with their use of bused in paid protestors to create violence. It backfired this time.

How is the attempt to remove the statue racist?

REL is a recognized American General that fought for the South. Had it been a Lincoln or Grant statue - would they be asking for its removal? Please, cite one case where this has occurred.

The whole remove and rename cult is racially motivated.
So you don't think that city has the right to VOTE to remove that statue from public property and put it in a museum?
. They shouldn't do it without the blessings from the voters. Include the citizens in the shaping of a society, and if not why not ? What is the fear that government has to act in an athoritarion way ?
 
VA Gov. McAuliffe to white nationalists: 'No place for you in America'
He chnag d voter registration for Democrats, now he castigates certain groups over others, when the dumb fucking PC decision to remove RobertbE. Lee statute is the Orwellian problem!

I would think that any sane person would believe there is no place for white nationalists in America. Why don't you?

Just what other freedoms are you willing to toss at the left wing alter?
If alt-right white supremists don't have the right to run people down with their car....are any of us truly free?
. What an ignorant post this was... Good grief...
 
The root cause is the racist attempt to remove the statue. Had that not occurred, there would have been no protest or subsequent death.
Had a neonazi coward not drove his vehicle into a crowd of people, there would have been no death.

Fuck you
. Ignore the possible beginning roots of the events problem eh ? Not very justice like wouldn't you say ?
Beginning roots? A bunch of inbred, scared white boys saw different races coming together and one of them decided to drive his car into them.
So you hate whites. No surprise, coming from a limp wristed racist such as your self absorbed self. LOL
Yeah I hate whites....because I'm white. And you're an idiot
. Plenty of White's hating White's. Just listen to the dumb leftist whites, otherwise like the biggest dummy of all or the biggest lying pandering idiot of them all, the one and only Hillary Clinton in which the Demon-crats loved, but most despised.
 
VA Gov. McAuliffe to white nationalists: 'No place for you in America'
He chnag d voter registration for Democrats, now he castigates certain groups over others, when the dumb fucking PC decision to remove RobertbE. Lee statute is the Orwellian problem!

The root cause is the racist attempt to remove the statue. Had that not occurred, there would have been no protest or subsequent death. The left is to blame, complete with their use of bused in paid protestors to create violence. It backfired this time.

How is the attempt to remove the statue racist?

REL is a recognized American General that fought for the South. Had it been a Lincoln or Grant statue - would they be asking for its removal? Please, cite one case where this has occurred.

The whole remove and rename cult is racially motivated.


Lincoln and Grant weren't criminals - traitors to the constitution?

There is no place in America for sedition.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
 
VA Gov. McAuliffe to white nationalists: 'No place for you in America'
He chnag d voter registration for Democrats, now he castigates certain groups over others, when the dumb fucking PC decision to remove RobertbE. Lee statute is the Orwellian problem!

The root cause is the racist attempt to remove the statue. Had that not occurred, there would have been no protest or subsequent death. The left is to blame, complete with their use of bused in paid protestors to create violence. It backfired this time.

How is the attempt to remove the statue racist?

REL is a recognized American General that fought for the South. Had it been a Lincoln or Grant statue - would they be asking for its removal? Please, cite one case where this has occurred.

The whole remove and rename cult is racially motivated.


Lincoln and Grant weren't criminals - traitors to the constitution?

There is no place in America for sedition.




Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Dumb.
 
VA Gov. McAuliffe to white nationalists: 'No place for you in America'
He chnag d voter registration for Democrats, now he castigates certain groups over others, when the dumb fucking PC decision to remove RobertbE. Lee statute is the Orwellian problem!

I would think that any sane person would believe there is no place for white nationalists in America. Why don't you?

But yet there is a place for Muslims in America? Why Muslims and not White Nationalists?
 

Forum List

Back
Top