Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The pipes are imported from India and the CEO of Keystone said what? 50 permanent jobs. Real winner you got there Repubs
TransCanada CEO says 42 000 Keystone XL pipeline jobs are ongoing enduring PunditFact
Girling conceded that actual operating jobs top out at 50, but he said "that doesn’t include all of the other jobs that come with it." Referring to the same State Department report that Raddatz mentioned, Girling highlighted its finding for the project’s support of 42,000 "direct and indirect" jobs.
"For about two years," Raddatz cut in.
"No," Girling said, "the 42,000 jobs is in ongoing, enduring jobs."
Girling made it sound like the State Department’s estimate pertained to permanent -- or at least long-term -- jobs with his description of them as "ongoing, enduring."
But that is an inaccurate way to evaluate these job creation estimates.
Far Left Troll!
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
The pipes are imported from India and the CEO of Keystone said what? 50 permanent jobs. Real winner you got there Repubs
TransCanada CEO says 42 000 Keystone XL pipeline jobs are ongoing enduring PunditFact
Girling conceded that actual operating jobs top out at 50, but he said "that doesn’t include all of the other jobs that come with it." Referring to the same State Department report that Raddatz mentioned, Girling highlighted its finding for the project’s support of 42,000 "direct and indirect" jobs.
"For about two years," Raddatz cut in.
"No," Girling said, "the 42,000 jobs is in ongoing, enduring jobs."
Girling made it sound like the State Department’s estimate pertained to permanent -- or at least long-term -- jobs with his description of them as "ongoing, enduring."
But that is an inaccurate way to evaluate these job creation estimates.
Far Left Troll!
Is there something inaccurate in the post? I mean other than the Keystone guy fudging a jobs number by a factor of 1000 percent?
heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
when they're ultimately working for export to foreign countries and the inevitable tar sands spills? Yes.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
when they're ultimately working for export to foreign countries and the inevitable tar sands spills? Yes.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
when they're ultimately working for export to foreign countries and the inevitable tar sands spills? Yes.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
when they're ultimately working for export to foreign countries and the inevitable tar sands spills? Yes.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
Listen up "Dum Dum". Once that highway is built, it can be used for commerce. What a dipshit.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
How can these numbnuts laugh at "Politifact" yet believe everything "TransCanada" has to say?when they're ultimately working for export to foreign countries and the inevitable tar sands spills? Yes.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
Cripes you don't get it either!!!!!!!!!!!! Aye carumba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Keystone XL is a pipeline. A moving company if you will to move a product from point A to point B. They don't own the OIL for crying out loud.
They aren't refining the oil. They are just moving the bloody stuff to customers.
What your refineries decide to do with their finished product has nothing to do with the pipeline company.
And here's an FYI. A big FYI.
Will refined products from Keystone XL be exported?
It should be noted that Keystone XL transports crude oil, not refined products. TransCanada is an energy infrastructure company. We build energy infrastructure like pipelines, natural gas-fired power plants and wind farms.
We don’t actually extract or own a single molecule of oil or natural gas that we transport. We are contracted to build the infrastructure to safely deliver those molecules to their destination. We don’t own the oil we transport, much like a moving company doesn’t own your bed during a move.
With that being said, we can provide insight into what happens to those products when they are refined.
Crude oil is not exclusively used to produce gasoline
Crude oil is used to produce thousands of products that we use every day, not just gasoline and diesel. Crude oil feedstock is used to create the plastics that encase our cell phones and televisions, asphalt for our roads and even the latex gloves doctors use when delivering a baby.
The people suggesting that the oil Keystone XL will transport will be used to exclusively to make gasoline or diesel is simply a guess and they know that.
The United States consumes the vast majority of its refined products
The claim that “much of this oil is for export” is actually contrary to the facts, market analysis and what actual refiners and customers of Keystone XL have said.
The fact is the U.S. consumes the vast majority of all the refined products it produces. In 2012, only about 9% of U.S. refined on-road motor fuel was exported – the other 91 per cent was consumed in the United States first.
State Department’s finds Keystone XL won’t impact export trends
The State Department’s market analysis in Keystone XL’s final supplemental environmental impact statement states, “U.S. product exports are not sensitive to different scenarios of pipeline development.”
Essentially saying that exports occur (and have occurred for more than 20 years) with or without Keystone XL and the project would not impact those those trends.
What do our customers say?
Bill Day, spokesperson for oil refining company Valero, has told media that the export allegations are, “completely wrong” and that “Over the past several quarters, Valero has exported less than 10 per cent of the gasoline it makes.
The vast majority of what we make in the U.S. stays in the U.S.”
We also know that tens of thousands of jobs are tied to refining and creating the products we need and use every day. Supporting the domestic refining industry with more domestic oil at lower prices keeps the industry competitive,
Myths Facts Keystone XL Pipeline
Listen up "Dum Dum". Once that highway is built, it can be used for commerce. What a dipshit.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
The "Keystone" plan is to mine the oil in Canada, transport it through the US. Then sell it overseas. It won't lower the price of oil or gas in this country. It won't be used in this country. It will only create thousands of jobs when it leaks and it has to be cleaned up. But don't worry. Republicans will protect those foreign oil companies they same way the blocked the BP oil spill from being investigated.
The tards won and now they are cheering. They refuse to believe what they won and when the mess needs to be cleaned up, the tards with blame the Democrats. Just like they always do when they fail, which, of course, is always.
How can these numbnuts laugh at "Politifact" yet believe everything "TransCanada" has to say?when they're ultimately working for export to foreign countries and the inevitable tar sands spills? Yes.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
Cripes you don't get it either!!!!!!!!!!!! Aye carumba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Keystone XL is a pipeline. A moving company if you will to move a product from point A to point B. They don't own the OIL for crying out loud.
They aren't refining the oil. They are just moving the bloody stuff to customers.
What your refineries decide to do with their finished product has nothing to do with the pipeline company.
And here's an FYI. A big FYI.
Will refined products from Keystone XL be exported?
It should be noted that Keystone XL transports crude oil, not refined products. TransCanada is an energy infrastructure company. We build energy infrastructure like pipelines, natural gas-fired power plants and wind farms.
We don’t actually extract or own a single molecule of oil or natural gas that we transport. We are contracted to build the infrastructure to safely deliver those molecules to their destination. We don’t own the oil we transport, much like a moving company doesn’t own your bed during a move.
With that being said, we can provide insight into what happens to those products when they are refined.
Crude oil is not exclusively used to produce gasoline
Crude oil is used to produce thousands of products that we use every day, not just gasoline and diesel. Crude oil feedstock is used to create the plastics that encase our cell phones and televisions, asphalt for our roads and even the latex gloves doctors use when delivering a baby.
The people suggesting that the oil Keystone XL will transport will be used to exclusively to make gasoline or diesel is simply a guess and they know that.
The United States consumes the vast majority of its refined products
The claim that “much of this oil is for export” is actually contrary to the facts, market analysis and what actual refiners and customers of Keystone XL have said.
The fact is the U.S. consumes the vast majority of all the refined products it produces. In 2012, only about 9% of U.S. refined on-road motor fuel was exported – the other 91 per cent was consumed in the United States first.
State Department’s finds Keystone XL won’t impact export trends
The State Department’s market analysis in Keystone XL’s final supplemental environmental impact statement states, “U.S. product exports are not sensitive to different scenarios of pipeline development.”
Essentially saying that exports occur (and have occurred for more than 20 years) with or without Keystone XL and the project would not impact those those trends.
What do our customers say?
Bill Day, spokesperson for oil refining company Valero, has told media that the export allegations are, “completely wrong” and that “Over the past several quarters, Valero has exported less than 10 per cent of the gasoline it makes.
The vast majority of what we make in the U.S. stays in the U.S.”
We also know that tens of thousands of jobs are tied to refining and creating the products we need and use every day. Supporting the domestic refining industry with more domestic oil at lower prices keeps the industry competitive,
Myths Facts Keystone XL Pipeline
Listen up "Dum Dum". Once that highway is built, it can be used for commerce. What a dipshit.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
The "Keystone" plan is to mine the oil in Canada, transport it through the US. Then sell it overseas. It won't lower the price of oil or gas in this country. It won't be used in this country. It will only create thousands of jobs when it leaks and it has to be cleaned up. But don't worry. Republicans will protect those foreign oil companies they same way the blocked the BP oil spill from being investigated.
The tards won and now they are cheering. They refuse to believe what they won and when the mess needs to be cleaned up, the tards with blame the Democrats. Just like they always do when they fail, which, of course, is always.
The "Keystone" plan is to mine the oil in Canada, transport it through the US. Then sell it overseas.
Why would the Canadians pay extra to ship it further, when they can sell it to us?
Listen up "Dum Dum". Once that highway is built, it can be used for commerce. What a dipshit.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
The "Keystone" plan is to mine the oil in Canada, transport it through the US. Then sell it overseas. It won't lower the price of oil or gas in this country. It won't be used in this country. It will only create thousands of jobs when it leaks and it has to be cleaned up. But don't worry. Republicans will protect those foreign oil companies they same way the blocked the BP oil spill from being investigated.
The tards won and now they are cheering. They refuse to believe what they won and when the mess needs to be cleaned up, the tards with blame the Democrats. Just like they always do when they fail, which, of course, is always.
rdean is another left wing idiot who doesn't understand that the very nature of construction work is temporary.
And this pipeline will create thousands of jobs. Welders in Oklahoma for example have made out like bandits on that part of the pipeline. They averaged $134,000. for their "temporary construction job".
Cripes I just can't believe that liberals can be this freaking stupid!!!!!!!!!!!
Van Jones????
LOLz
Dean, you fucking dope! That's hilarious!!!
Actually that number comes from the State Department.
And this is not new information.
How can these numbnuts laugh at "Politifact" yet believe everything "TransCanada" has to say?when they're ultimately working for export to foreign countries and the inevitable tar sands spills? Yes.heres more from my politifact reference above:
Importantly, as Raddatz said, these jobs would only be supported during the construction phase, which is expected to take one to two years. After construction, the pipeline would employ about 50 people, primarily for maintenance.
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
Cripes you don't get it either!!!!!!!!!!!! Aye carumba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Keystone XL is a pipeline. A moving company if you will to move a product from point A to point B. They don't own the OIL for crying out loud.
They aren't refining the oil. They are just moving the bloody stuff to customers.
What your refineries decide to do with their finished product has nothing to do with the pipeline company.
And here's an FYI. A big FYI.
Will refined products from Keystone XL be exported?
It should be noted that Keystone XL transports crude oil, not refined products. TransCanada is an energy infrastructure company. We build energy infrastructure like pipelines, natural gas-fired power plants and wind farms.
We don’t actually extract or own a single molecule of oil or natural gas that we transport. We are contracted to build the infrastructure to safely deliver those molecules to their destination. We don’t own the oil we transport, much like a moving company doesn’t own your bed during a move.
With that being said, we can provide insight into what happens to those products when they are refined.
Crude oil is not exclusively used to produce gasoline
Crude oil is used to produce thousands of products that we use every day, not just gasoline and diesel. Crude oil feedstock is used to create the plastics that encase our cell phones and televisions, asphalt for our roads and even the latex gloves doctors use when delivering a baby.
The people suggesting that the oil Keystone XL will transport will be used to exclusively to make gasoline or diesel is simply a guess and they know that.
The United States consumes the vast majority of its refined products
The claim that “much of this oil is for export” is actually contrary to the facts, market analysis and what actual refiners and customers of Keystone XL have said.
The fact is the U.S. consumes the vast majority of all the refined products it produces. In 2012, only about 9% of U.S. refined on-road motor fuel was exported – the other 91 per cent was consumed in the United States first.
State Department’s finds Keystone XL won’t impact export trends
The State Department’s market analysis in Keystone XL’s final supplemental environmental impact statement states, “U.S. product exports are not sensitive to different scenarios of pipeline development.”
Essentially saying that exports occur (and have occurred for more than 20 years) with or without Keystone XL and the project would not impact those those trends.
What do our customers say?
Bill Day, spokesperson for oil refining company Valero, has told media that the export allegations are, “completely wrong” and that “Over the past several quarters, Valero has exported less than 10 per cent of the gasoline it makes.
The vast majority of what we make in the U.S. stays in the U.S.”
We also know that tens of thousands of jobs are tied to refining and creating the products we need and use every day. Supporting the domestic refining industry with more domestic oil at lower prices keeps the industry competitive,
Myths Facts Keystone XL Pipeline
who cares how much it pays if all the upsides are outsourced and all the downsides are internalized such as spills and pollution & the ill health effects associated w/ them?How can these numbnuts laugh at "Politifact" yet believe everything "TransCanada" has to say?when they're ultimately working for export to foreign countries and the inevitable tar sands spills? Yes.heres more from my politifact reference above:
And so fucking what? It takes hundreds of men and women to build a highway and how many permanent jobs result from the construction of that highway?
Does that negate the economic benefit to those construction workers on the highway?
Cripes you don't get it either!!!!!!!!!!!! Aye carumba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Keystone XL is a pipeline. A moving company if you will to move a product from point A to point B. They don't own the OIL for crying out loud.
They aren't refining the oil. They are just moving the bloody stuff to customers.
What your refineries decide to do with their finished product has nothing to do with the pipeline company.
And here's an FYI. A big FYI.
Will refined products from Keystone XL be exported?
It should be noted that Keystone XL transports crude oil, not refined products. TransCanada is an energy infrastructure company. We build energy infrastructure like pipelines, natural gas-fired power plants and wind farms.
We don’t actually extract or own a single molecule of oil or natural gas that we transport. We are contracted to build the infrastructure to safely deliver those molecules to their destination. We don’t own the oil we transport, much like a moving company doesn’t own your bed during a move.
With that being said, we can provide insight into what happens to those products when they are refined.
Crude oil is not exclusively used to produce gasoline
Crude oil is used to produce thousands of products that we use every day, not just gasoline and diesel. Crude oil feedstock is used to create the plastics that encase our cell phones and televisions, asphalt for our roads and even the latex gloves doctors use when delivering a baby.
The people suggesting that the oil Keystone XL will transport will be used to exclusively to make gasoline or diesel is simply a guess and they know that.
The United States consumes the vast majority of its refined products
The claim that “much of this oil is for export” is actually contrary to the facts, market analysis and what actual refiners and customers of Keystone XL have said.
The fact is the U.S. consumes the vast majority of all the refined products it produces. In 2012, only about 9% of U.S. refined on-road motor fuel was exported – the other 91 per cent was consumed in the United States first.
State Department’s finds Keystone XL won’t impact export trends
The State Department’s market analysis in Keystone XL’s final supplemental environmental impact statement states, “U.S. product exports are not sensitive to different scenarios of pipeline development.”
Essentially saying that exports occur (and have occurred for more than 20 years) with or without Keystone XL and the project would not impact those those trends.
What do our customers say?
Bill Day, spokesperson for oil refining company Valero, has told media that the export allegations are, “completely wrong” and that “Over the past several quarters, Valero has exported less than 10 per cent of the gasoline it makes.
The vast majority of what we make in the U.S. stays in the U.S.”
We also know that tens of thousands of jobs are tied to refining and creating the products we need and use every day. Supporting the domestic refining industry with more domestic oil at lower prices keeps the industry competitive,
Myths Facts Keystone XL Pipeline
You don't believe Union leaders?
"Union leaders say these projects provide jobs and stability for hundreds of people. For example, they say, their members who worked on the Gulf Coast Pipeline earned, on average, $134,000 per person.
"Which means they've got healthcare for another year, they've got a pension credit for when they retire," said Danny Hendrix, with the Local 798. "It means that those families have got healthcare, dental care--so it means a lot. It means they can make a house payment, it means they can send their kids to college."
Hendrix hopes these welders in training are next in line for similar paychecks."
Gulf Coast Pipeline Construction Creates Hundreds Of Jobs For Lo - NewsOn6.com - Tulsa OK - News Weather Video and Sports - KOTV.com
