- Thread starter
- #161
Good point. That is why we do not know the names of all accused. Whatever few names we know is a product of investigative journalism.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
UK politicians ran pedophile ring
- Thread starter Vikrant
- Start date
Good point. That is why we do not know the names of all accused. Whatever few names we know is a product of investigative journalism.
- Thread starter
- #162
...
...
...
BBC News - Prince Andrew sex claims emphatically denied by palace
The woman behind the allegations says she was forced to sleep with the prince when she was under age, and on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002.
...
The prince, who is fifth in line to the throne, has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein, who was sentenced to 18 months in prison for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
...
BBC News - Prince Andrew sex claims emphatically denied by palace
ChrisL
Diamond Member
...
The woman behind the allegations says she was forced to sleep with the prince when she was under age, and on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002.
...
The prince, who is fifth in line to the throne, has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein, who was sentenced to 18 months in prison for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
...
BBC News - Prince Andrew sex claims emphatically denied by palace
Nice cherry picking of quotes.
ChrisL
Diamond Member
...
The woman behind the allegations says she was forced to sleep with the prince when she was under age, and on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002.
...
The prince, who is fifth in line to the throne, has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein, who was sentenced to 18 months in prison for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
...
BBC News - Prince Andrew sex claims emphatically denied by palace
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
- Thread starter
- #165
...
The woman behind the allegations says she was forced to sleep with the prince when she was under age, and on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002.
...
The prince, who is fifth in line to the throne, has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein, who was sentenced to 18 months in prison for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
...
BBC News - Prince Andrew sex claims emphatically denied by palace
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
My agenda:
Save the space.
What you need to do to read rest of the article:
Click the hyperlink and read rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Last edited:
ChrisL
Diamond Member
...
The woman behind the allegations says she was forced to sleep with the prince when she was under age, and on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002.
...
The prince, who is fifth in line to the throne, has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein, who was sentenced to 18 months in prison for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
...
BBC News - Prince Andrew sex claims emphatically denied by palace
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
- Thread starter
- #167
...
The woman behind the allegations says she was forced to sleep with the prince when she was under age, and on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002.
...
The prince, who is fifth in line to the throne, has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein, who was sentenced to 18 months in prison for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
...
BBC News - Prince Andrew sex claims emphatically denied by palace
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
ChrisL
Diamond Member
...
The woman behind the allegations says she was forced to sleep with the prince when she was under age, and on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002.
...
The prince, who is fifth in line to the throne, has previously been criticised for his former friendship with Epstein, who was sentenced to 18 months in prison for soliciting a minor for prostitution.
...
BBC News - Prince Andrew sex claims emphatically denied by palace
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
- Thread starter
- #169
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
You got your answer. But you are not interested in the answer. Because you have an agenda that only non-whites do the wrong thing. When you are faced with an overwhelming truth that deposes your false belief, you attack the messenger. If you really had read the article and more importantly if your really understood the article, you would have known that the prince in question came under heavy criticism for his association with Epstein, a convicted child molester. The prince even had to resign from his job. That is a separate issue unto itself. The woman is not backing down. She is willing to go to the ringer. That is the gist. If there is any agenda, it is on your side; work on it.
ChrisL
Diamond Member
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
You got your answer. But you are not interested in the answer. Because you have an agenda that only non-whites do the wrong thing. When you are faced with an overwhelming truth that deposes your false belief, you attack the messenger. If you really had read the article and more importantly if your really understood the article, you would have known that the prince in question came under heavy criticism for his association with Epstein, a convicted child molester. The prince even had to resign from his job. That is a separate issue unto itself. The woman is not backing down. She is willing to go to the ringer. That is the gist. If there is any agenda, it is on your side; work on it.
I am not the one starting threads and cherry picking quotes. That would be you. I am responding to YOUR thread and YOUR quotes.
ChrisL
Diamond Member
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
You got your answer. But you are not interested in the answer. Because you have an agenda that only non-whites do the wrong thing. When you are faced with an overwhelming truth that deposes your false belief, you attack the messenger. If you really had read the article and more importantly if your really understood the article, you would have known that the prince in question came under heavy criticism for his association with Epstein, a convicted child molester. The prince even had to resign from his job. That is a separate issue unto itself. The woman is not backing down. She is willing to go to the ringer. That is the gist. If there is any agenda, it is on your side; work on it.
So WHAT is the evidence? All I see is a bunch of he said/she said. I have YET to see any evidence of any crimes yet. WHERE is the evidence?
- Thread starter
- #172
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
You got your answer. But you are not interested in the answer. Because you have an agenda that only non-whites do the wrong thing. When you are faced with an overwhelming truth that deposes your false belief, you attack the messenger. If you really had read the article and more importantly if your really understood the article, you would have known that the prince in question came under heavy criticism for his association with Epstein, a convicted child molester. The prince even had to resign from his job. That is a separate issue unto itself. The woman is not backing down. She is willing to go to the ringer. That is the gist. If there is any agenda, it is on your side; work on it.
So WHAT is the evidence?
Read the article.
ChrisL
Diamond Member
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
You got your answer. But you are not interested in the answer. Because you have an agenda that only non-whites do the wrong thing. When you are faced with an overwhelming truth that deposes your false belief, you attack the messenger. If you really had read the article and more importantly if your really understood the article, you would have known that the prince in question came under heavy criticism for his association with Epstein, a convicted child molester. The prince even had to resign from his job. That is a separate issue unto itself. The woman is not backing down. She is willing to go to the ringer. That is the gist. If there is any agenda, it is on your side; work on it.
So WHAT is the evidence?
Read the article.
It's just accusations. Where is the evidence. Please quote all the evidence submitted in your links and post them in one quote. That way, we can all look at this evidence.
ChrisL
Diamond Member
This whole thing seems a bit far fetched to be believable without any kind of corroborating evidence besides "she says/he says." I need something more.
- Thread starter
- #175
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
You got your answer. But you are not interested in the answer. Because you have an agenda that only non-whites do the wrong thing. When you are faced with an overwhelming truth that deposes your false belief, you attack the messenger. If you really had read the article and more importantly if your really understood the article, you would have known that the prince in question came under heavy criticism for his association with Epstein, a convicted child molester. The prince even had to resign from his job. That is a separate issue unto itself. The woman is not backing down. She is willing to go to the ringer. That is the gist. If there is any agenda, it is on your side; work on it.
So WHAT is the evidence?
Read the article.
It's just accusations. Where is the evidence. Please quote all the evidence submitted in your links and post them in one quote. That way, we can all look at this evidence.
Your questions indicate following:
a) You did not comprehend the article
b) You do not understand how the legal system works
Once again: it is going to the court just like the cases that involved many of the Muslim accused. I find it interesting that you were super enthusiastic about attacking the cultures of Muslim countries and did not indicate you wanted wait till the trial was over. Now, you want people to wait till the trial is over before they can post a link to objective reports from news organization like BBC. If anyone wants to see an agenda they can see very clearly who has the agenda. As far I am concerned, I have posted reports about both whites and non-whites. That clearly indicates that I do not have any agenda along the racial lines. You however are exactly opposite.
- Thread starter
- #176
This is one step in the right direction. It will protect children from becoming victims of pedophile British politicians and elites.
---
LONDON: Children from the age of 11 in Britain are to be taught about the difference between rape and consensual sex amid concerns that teenagers are coming under unprecedented pressure to have intercourse at an early age.
The classes will begin this year and will teach children how to recognise and respond to sexual pressure, coercion and manipulative techniques, including lying, 'The Sunday Times' reported.
In an article for the newspaper to mark International Women's Day, UK education secretary Nicky Morgan writes: "We have to face the fact that many pressures girls face today were unimaginable to my generation and it's our duty to ensure that our daughters leave school able to navigate the challenges and choices they'll face in adulthood."
One of the techniques that could be employed is "conscience alley", a gathering originally devised to help actors come to terms with their characters, but soon to be used in English schools to teach children about the dangers and dilemmas of consenting to sexual intercourse.
It is all part of a new government attempt to encourage discussion of difficult subjects such as rape, coercion and at what point teenagers are capable of agreeing to sex.
These so-called consent classes may be taught in English schools soon after the Easter school holidays, after concerns that teenagers are coming under unprecedented pressure to have intercourse at an early age.
Parents, teachers and government officials are also increasingly concerned about the prevalence of porn and sexting in children's lives.
UK plans rape classes for 11 year olds - The Times of India
---
LONDON: Children from the age of 11 in Britain are to be taught about the difference between rape and consensual sex amid concerns that teenagers are coming under unprecedented pressure to have intercourse at an early age.
The classes will begin this year and will teach children how to recognise and respond to sexual pressure, coercion and manipulative techniques, including lying, 'The Sunday Times' reported.
In an article for the newspaper to mark International Women's Day, UK education secretary Nicky Morgan writes: "We have to face the fact that many pressures girls face today were unimaginable to my generation and it's our duty to ensure that our daughters leave school able to navigate the challenges and choices they'll face in adulthood."
One of the techniques that could be employed is "conscience alley", a gathering originally devised to help actors come to terms with their characters, but soon to be used in English schools to teach children about the dangers and dilemmas of consenting to sexual intercourse.
It is all part of a new government attempt to encourage discussion of difficult subjects such as rape, coercion and at what point teenagers are capable of agreeing to sex.
These so-called consent classes may be taught in English schools soon after the Easter school holidays, after concerns that teenagers are coming under unprecedented pressure to have intercourse at an early age.
Parents, teachers and government officials are also increasingly concerned about the prevalence of porn and sexting in children's lives.
UK plans rape classes for 11 year olds - The Times of India
I
Indofred
Guest
including lying,
Come on - how many men can truthfully claimed they've never lied to a woman to get her into the sack?
Bloody hell, I've done it loads of times.
I've been everything from a scientist to an RAF pilot on leave, with loads of stuff in between.
The last was a total lie about my work at BAE systems, developing new radar tech for fighter aircraft.
Silly cow saw a cash machine on legs, and dropped her knickers - is that rape?
ChrisL
Diamond Member
including lying,
Come on - how many men can truthfully claimed they've never lied to a woman to get her into the sack?
Bloody hell, I've done it loads of times.
I've been everything from a scientist to an RAF pilot on leave, with loads of stuff in between.
The last was a total lie about my work at BAE systems, developing new radar tech for fighter aircraft.
Silly cow saw a cash machine on legs, and dropped her knickers - is that rape?
It is if she is incapable of consent because she's a minor.
- Moderator
- #179
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
I have to agree - at this point it's all hearsay, speculation and no evidence
I'm often skeptical of these sorts of things until statements are made under oath at least.
ChrisL
Diamond Member
Why did you choose to post those two quotes and nothing else from the link? What is your agenda?
Save the space.
Click the hyperlink and read the rest of the stuff.
You can read more about what hyperlink is here:
Hyperlink - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Yes, I read the link that you posted originally. That is why I wonder why you chose those two particular items to quote out of the entire article.
The liar's punishment is, not in the least that he (or she) is not believed, but that he (or she) cannot believe anyone else. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
I have to agree - at this point it's all hearsay, speculation and no evidence
I'm often skeptical of these sorts of things until statements are made under oath at least.
It just seems like a LOT of people are involved. I have a hard time that this could have been kept such a big secret for so long.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 18
- Views
- 151
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 115
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 320
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 264
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 62
- Views
- 446
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 338
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8069
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-