ChrisL
Diamond Member
Knock it off and just answer the question. Why those two particular lines? Are you convicting this man in the court of public opinion before he has had a trial or before you know of the evidence in total?
You got your answer. But you are not interested in the answer. Because you have an agenda that only non-whites do the wrong thing. When you are faced with an overwhelming truth that deposes your false belief, you attack the messenger. If you really had read the article and more importantly if your really understood the article, you would have known that the prince in question came under heavy criticism for his association with Epstein, a convicted child molester. The prince even had to resign from his job. That is a separate issue unto itself. The woman is not backing down. She is willing to go to the ringer. That is the gist. If there is any agenda, it is on your side; work on it.
So WHAT is the evidence?
Read the article.
It's just accusations. Where is the evidence. Please quote all the evidence submitted in your links and post them in one quote. That way, we can all look at this evidence.
Your questions indicate following:
a) You did not comprehend the article
b) You do not understand how the legal system works
Once again: it is going to the court just like the cases that involved many of the Muslim accused. I find it interesting that you were super enthusiastic about attacking the cultures of Muslim countries and did not indicate you wanted wait till the trial was over. Now, you want people to wait till the trial is over before they can post a link to objective reports from news organization like BBC. If anyone wants to see an agenda they can see very clearly who has the agenda. As far I am concerned, I have posted reports about both whites and non-whites. That clearly indicates that I do not have any agenda along the racial lines. You however are exactly opposite.
Unfortunately for you, the truth is that it is the norm in a lot of Muslim cultures. Also, I am not the one posting accusatory things. That would be you.