go figure? how dumb are you? in 2012 and in 2009Here you go idiot. These are all Mullers views of AGW "theory" when he was supposedly a "sceptic". As can be plainly seen...well, probably not to the brain dead such as yourself,
but to a normal person he very clearly was never a sceptic.
Enjoy the truth silly person...
Author and physicist Richard A. Muller chats with Grist about getting science back in the White Hous | Grist
Physics the Next President Needs to Know | Wired Science | Wired.com
Medieval Global Warming | MIT Technology Review
Bay Area Nobel Prize winner named US Energy Czar | abc7news.com
Global Warming Bombshell | MIT Technology Review
context. you leave out the context of his shifting belief based on evidence...unlike you
In his own words without your filter:
CALL me a converted skeptic. Three years ago I identified problems in previous climate studies that, in my mind, threw doubt on the very existence of global warming. Last year, following an intensive research effort involving a dozen scientists, I concluded that global warming was real and that the prior estimates of the rate of warming were correct. Im now going a step further: Humans are almost entirely the cause.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/opinion/the-conversion-of-a-climate-change-skeptic.html?
Bullcrap. These views are from as long ago as 2003 and they are all written in the vernacular of the AGW proponent. I see you are still not bothered by intellectual honesty.
Go figure.
The Conversion of a Climate-Change Skeptic
By RICHARD A. MULLER
Published: July 28, 2012
CALL me a converted skeptic. Three years ago I identified problems in previous climate studies that, in my mind, threw doubt on the very existence of global warming. Last year, following an intensive research effort involving a dozen scientists, I concluded that global warming was real and that the prior estimates of the rate of warming were correct. Im now going a step further: Humans are almost entirely the cause.