Met Office Shoots Itself in the Foot

Discussion in 'Environment' started by IanC, Jan 17, 2013.

  1. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,779
    Thanks Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,692
    Science Gets The Stratosphere Wrong | The Resilient Earth



    and trakar still keeps telling us that only real scientists should be listened to.
     
  2. RollingThunder
    Offline

    RollingThunder Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    4,818
    Thanks Received:
    505
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +1,220
    Actually, listening to real scientists would be a lot better for you than listening to the phony science poseurs over at that fossil fuel industry sponsored denier cult propaganda outlet called "The Resilient Earth". Too bad you're too gullible and retarded to get that.
     
  3. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,779
    Thanks Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,692


    are you saying that the Met didnt screw up? that they didnt 'lose' their methodology? it doesnt matter where the information is released to the public, it is the information that is important. will any of your AGW web sites inform their readers of this? why do skeptic web sites always seem to be the first to 'find' these stories?
     
  4. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,779
    Thanks Received:
    1,122
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,692
    does anyone else see similarities between this fiasco at the Met and the scandalous screw up at CRUTemp where all the raw data was 'lost' and the IT guy painted a KeystoneKops picture of incompetence in his Harry_read_me files?
     

Share This Page