Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
. And deny the Democrats their quest for destroying the white man with the brown man ?? Now you know that that ain't gonna work with the left or for the leftist agenda. You must have fell and bumped your head. LOL.I guess your version of immigration is let anyone in here that wants to come? We don't need anymore people that can't support themselves. That's where all of this immigration shit went sideways. We don't need to let someone who's primary job qualification is pushing a fucking lawn mower. We can take a few top level scientists, engineer's or whatever we need but we don't need open borders for people that can just do menial labor. If we get back to the point we are short fucking janitors then let a few in. There's no reason for them to be the bulk of our immigrants.I want a muslim ban, and a mexican ban, a syrian ban.
We need to take about 20 years off from bringing people here. Limit the immigrants to specialized fields and only the top of their professions. No ditch diggers, no fucking drive thru operators. And nobody that get's any government funding or assistance.
I guess it's safe to say you have no clue how immigration works .
I've noticed where the disconnect is with conservatives and progressives on trumps statements about banning Muslims. The issue is the context.
Conservatives see Trumps statements on banning Muslim in the context he made them. Trump saw the immigration issue as a national security issue. We need to keep Jihadists from entering the country to protect ourselves. His first instinct was to ban Muslims to keep jihadists out and was foolish enough to say it because of his political inexperience. He was quickly told he couldn't do that and revised his position. Why?
Because his intent was never banning Muslims. His intent was national security. Banning Muslims was his mean to those ends until he realized he couldn't do that. Then he focused on more tailored approach.
Progressives on the other hand think his intention is to ban Muslims. Presumably because he is a hatefilled islamophobe who wants to oppress minorities or some nonsense like that. They are completely losing the obvious national security issue with jihadists.
To conservatives his foolish statements were a means to an end: national security. Why? Because that's the context the statements were made. To progressives his statements were the ends and he is going to implement them by any means.
But trump never cared about banning Muslims in and of itself. Here are five reasons at prove that:
1) the context he made his statements were always wit national security in mind.
2) his executive order does not attempt to ban Muslims or any other group based on religion. it does not even attempt to apply to all muslims
3) it applies to all people in the affected countries regardless to religious iviewpoints
4) removing Iraq from the list when they complied with what the administration requested shows they never cared about banning Muslims.
5) the order has always been temporary, which makes no sense if the purpose was secretly to ban Muslims.
I noticed you failed to post what he actually said .
He posted what he actually did.
How about what he actually said !
That list is a pile of bullshit . Like Iraq was suddenly fixed ! Lol. The pentagon got Trumps ear and told him to drop Iraq because it fucked upmthe war on isis .
You have never been concerned about them at all any more than I have been about Muslims in general from the ME. Why are you concerned about Muslims or Christians? Be concerned about radical jihadists and are own far right and alt right kooks, Mike.Where the hell have you ever been worried about ME Christians? You've never mentioned them until now.Yes, it was always about banning Muslims. He is not worried about ME Christians, is he?
I've noticed where the disconnect is with conservatives and progressives on trumps statements about banning Muslims. The issue is the context.
Conservatives see Trumps statements on banning Muslim in the context he made them. Trump saw the immigration issue as a national security issue. We need to keep Jihadists from entering the country to protect ourselves. His first instinct was to ban Muslims to keep jihadists out and was foolish enough to say it because of his political inexperience. He was quickly told he couldn't do that and revised his position. Why?
Because his intent was never banning Muslims. His intent was national security. Banning Muslims was his mean to those ends until he realized he couldn't do that. Then he focused on more tailored approach.
Progressives on the other hand think his intention is to ban Muslims. Presumably because he is a hatefilled islamophobe who wants to oppress minorities or some nonsense like that. They are completely losing the obvious national security issue with jihadists.
To conservatives his foolish statements were a means to an end: national security. Why? Because that's the context the statements were made. To progressives his statements were the ends and he is going to implement them by any means.
But trump never cared about banning Muslims in and of itself. Here are five reasons at prove that:
1) the context he made his statements were always wit national security in mind.
2) his executive order does not attempt to ban Muslims or any other group based on religion. it does not even attempt to apply to all muslims
3) it applies to all people in the affected countries regardless to religious iviewpoints
4) removing Iraq from the list when they complied with what the administration requested shows they never cared about banning Muslims.
5) the order has always been temporary, which makes no sense if the purpose was secretly to ban Muslims.
I noticed you failed to post what he actually said .
He posted what he actually did.
How about what he actually said !
That list is a pile of bullshit . Like Iraq was suddenly fixed ! Lol. The pentagon got Trumps ear and told him to drop Iraq because it fucked upmthe war on isis .
Stuff thats said during campaigns does not count Timmy. If it did Hillary would have been disqualified by all the crap Obama said about her in 2008. He said shes COMPLETELY out of touch with Americans and on the take.
Now suddenly in 2016, hes got good things to say about her? and he made this woman Secretary of State?
You got to be kidding me, In 2008 she was unqualified to run a hot dog stand. So here is how much, things taken out of context during presidential debates really count.
For some reason people say thing during campaigns, but it is important to look at the context. You are being fucking disingenous. You damn well know Trump is trying to protect the American people from terrorists who might come in among refugees. Yet you guys get a sad sack excuse of a Judge to obstruct an American President doing his job.
I've noticed where the disconnect is with conservatives and progressives on trumps statements about banning Muslims. The issue is the context.
Conservatives see Trumps statements on banning Muslim in the context he made them. Trump saw the immigration issue as a national security issue. We need to keep Jihadists from entering the country to protect ourselves. His first instinct was to ban Muslims to keep jihadists out and was foolish enough to say it because of his political inexperience. He was quickly told he couldn't do that and revised his position. Why?
Because his intent was never banning Muslims. His intent was national security. Banning Muslims was his mean to those ends until he realized he couldn't do that. Then he focused on more tailored approach.
Progressives on the other hand think his intention is to ban Muslims. Presumably because he is a hatefilled islamophobe who wants to oppress minorities or some nonsense like that. They are completely losing the obvious national security issue with jihadists.
To conservatives his foolish statements were a means to an end: national security. Why? Because that's the context the statements were made. To progressives his statements were the ends and he is going to implement them by any means.
But trump never cared about banning Muslims in and of itself. Here are five reasons at prove that:
1) the context he made his statements were always wit national security in mind.
2) his executive order does not attempt to ban Muslims or any other group based on religion. it does not even attempt to apply to all muslims
3) it applies to all people in the affected countries regardless to religious iviewpoints
4) removing Iraq from the list when they complied with what the administration requested shows they never cared about banning Muslims.
5) the order has always been temporary, which makes no sense if the purpose was secretly to ban Muslims.
Yes, it was always about banning Muslims. He is not worried about ME Christians, is he?
I've noticed where the disconnect is with conservatives and progressives on trumps statements about banning Muslims. The issue is the context.
Conservatives see Trumps statements on banning Muslim in the context he made them. Trump saw the immigration issue as a national security issue. We need to keep Jihadists from entering the country to protect ourselves. His first instinct was to ban Muslims to keep jihadists out and was foolish enough to say it because of his political inexperience. He was quickly told he couldn't do that and revised his position. Why?
Because his intent was never banning Muslims. His intent was national security. Banning Muslims was his mean to those ends until he realized he couldn't do that. Then he focused on more tailored approach.
Progressives on the other hand think his intention is to ban Muslims. Presumably because he is a hatefilled islamophobe who wants to oppress minorities or some nonsense like that. They are completely losing the obvious national security issue with jihadists.
To conservatives his foolish statements were a means to an end: national security. Why? Because that's the context the statements were made. To progressives his statements were the ends and he is going to implement them by any means.
But trump never cared about banning Muslims in and of itself. Here are five reasons at prove that:
1) the context he made his statements were always wit national security in mind.
2) his executive order does not attempt to ban Muslims or any other group based on religion. it does not even attempt to apply to all muslims
3) it applies to all people in the affected countries regardless to religious iviewpoints
4) removing Iraq from the list when they complied with what the administration requested shows they never cared about banning Muslims.
5) the order has always been temporary, which makes no sense if the purpose was secretly to ban Muslims.
I noticed you failed to post what he actually said .
He posted what he actually did.
How about what he actually said !
That list is a pile of bullshit . Like Iraq was suddenly fixed ! Lol. The pentagon got Trumps ear and told him to drop Iraq because it fucked upmthe war on isis .
Stuff thats said during campaigns does not count Timmy. If it did Hillary would have been disqualified by all the crap Obama said about her in 2008. He said shes COMPLETELY out of touch with Americans and on the take.
Now suddenly in 2016, hes got good things to say about her? and he made this woman Secretary of State?
You got to be kidding me, In 2008 she was unqualified to run a hot dog stand. So here is how much, things taken out of context during presidential debates really count.
For some reason people say thing during campaigns, but it is important to look at the context. You are being fucking disingenous. You damn well know Trump is trying to protect the American people from terrorists who might come in among refugees. Yet you guys get a sad sack excuse of a Judge to obstruct an American President doing his job.
It only takes one ISIS terrorist to get through as a refugee (out of the thousands being let in) to use a Mack Truck to mow down a high school band marching in a local Christmas parade.
So ISIS isn't slaughtering Christians?I've noticed where the disconnect is with conservatives and progressives on trumps statements about banning Muslims. The issue is the context.
Conservatives see Trumps statements on banning Muslim in the context he made them. Trump saw the immigration issue as a national security issue. We need to keep Jihadists from entering the country to protect ourselves. His first instinct was to ban Muslims to keep jihadists out and was foolish enough to say it because of his political inexperience. He was quickly told he couldn't do that and revised his position. Why?
Because his intent was never banning Muslims. His intent was national security. Banning Muslims was his mean to those ends until he realized he couldn't do that. Then he focused on more tailored approach.
Progressives on the other hand think his intention is to ban Muslims. Presumably because he is a hatefilled islamophobe who wants to oppress minorities or some nonsense like that. They are completely losing the obvious national security issue with jihadists.
To conservatives his foolish statements were a means to an end: national security. Why? Because that's the context the statements were made. To progressives his statements were the ends and he is going to implement them by any means.
But trump never cared about banning Muslims in and of itself. Here are five reasons at prove that:
1) the context he made his statements were always wit national security in mind.
2) his executive order does not attempt to ban Muslims or any other group based on religion. it does not even attempt to apply to all muslims
3) it applies to all people in the affected countries regardless to religious iviewpoints
4) removing Iraq from the list when they complied with what the administration requested shows they never cared about banning Muslims.
5) the order has always been temporary, which makes no sense if the purpose was secretly to ban Muslims.
You can't get around Trump's own words:
Trump:
"Donald J. Trump is calling for a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on."
Former New York mayor Rudy W. Giuliani said President Trump wanted a “Muslim ban” and requested he assemble a commission to show him “the right way to do it legally.”
In the first Muslim ban
The order also says that the administration should "prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality"
Muslims didn't fly planes into our buildings.He would be if ever a Middle East Christian shouted "Jesus is Great" before blowing himself and others up in a crowded mall, or fly planes into tall buildings.
So ISIS isn't slaughtering Christians?I've noticed where the disconnect is with conservatives and progressives on trumps statements about banning Muslims. The issue is the context.
Conservatives see Trumps statements on banning Muslim in the context he made them. Trump saw the immigration issue as a national security issue. We need to keep Jihadists from entering the country to protect ourselves. His first instinct was to ban Muslims to keep jihadists out and was foolish enough to say it because of his political inexperience. He was quickly told he couldn't do that and revised his position. Why?
Because his intent was never banning Muslims. His intent was national security. Banning Muslims was his mean to those ends until he realized he couldn't do that. Then he focused on more tailored approach.
Progressives on the other hand think his intention is to ban Muslims. Presumably because he is a hatefilled islamophobe who wants to oppress minorities or some nonsense like that. They are completely losing the obvious national security issue with jihadists.
To conservatives his foolish statements were a means to an end: national security. Why? Because that's the context the statements were made. To progressives his statements were the ends and he is going to implement them by any means.
But trump never cared about banning Muslims in and of itself. Here are five reasons at prove that:
1) the context he made his statements were always wit national security in mind.
2) his executive order does not attempt to ban Muslims or any other group based on religion. it does not even attempt to apply to all muslims
3) it applies to all people in the affected countries regardless to religious iviewpoints
4) removing Iraq from the list when they complied with what the administration requested shows they never cared about banning Muslims.
5) the order has always been temporary, which makes no sense if the purpose was secretly to ban Muslims.
You can't get around Trump's own words:
Trump:
"Donald J. Trump is calling for a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on."
Former New York mayor Rudy W. Giuliani said President Trump wanted a “Muslim ban” and requested he assemble a commission to show him “the right way to do it legally.”
In the first Muslim ban
The order also says that the administration should "prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality"
I've noticed where the disconnect is with conservatives and progressives on trumps statements about banning Muslims. The issue is the context.
Conservatives see Trumps statements on banning Muslim in the context he made them. Trump saw the immigration issue as a national security issue. We need to keep Jihadists from entering the country to protect ourselves. His first instinct was to ban Muslims to keep jihadists out and was foolish enough to say it because of his political inexperience. He was quickly told he couldn't do that and revised his position. Why?
Because his intent was never banning Muslims. His intent was national security. Banning Muslims was his mean to those ends until he realized he couldn't do that. Then he focused on more tailored approach.
Progressives on the other hand think his intention is to ban Muslims. Presumably because he is a hatefilled islamophobe who wants to oppress minorities or some nonsense like that. They are completely losing the obvious national security issue with jihadists.
To conservatives his foolish statements were a means to an end: national security. Why? Because that's the context the statements were made. To progressives his statements were the ends and he is going to implement them by any means.
But trump never cared about banning Muslims in and of itself. Here are five reasons at prove that:
1) the context he made his statements were always wit national security in mind.
2) his executive order does not attempt to ban Muslims or any other group based on religion. it does not even attempt to apply to all muslims
3) it applies to all people in the affected countries regardless to religious iviewpoints
4) removing Iraq from the list when they complied with what the administration requested shows they never cared about banning Muslims.
5) the order has always been temporary, which makes no sense if the purpose was secretly to ban Muslims.
You can't get around Trump's own words:
Trump:
"Donald J. Trump is calling for a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on."
Former New York mayor Rudy W. Giuliani said President Trump wanted a “Muslim ban” and requested he assemble a commission to show him “the right way to do it legally.”
In the first Muslim ban
The order also says that the administration should "prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality"
Christians created (and are funding) ISIS.So ISIS isn't slaughtering Christians?
Muslims didn't fly planes into our buildings.He would be if ever a Middle East Christian shouted "Jesus is Great" before blowing himself and others up in a crowded mall, or fly planes into tall buildings.
I've noticed where the disconnect is with conservatives and progressives on trumps statements about banning Muslims. The issue is the context.
Conservatives see Trumps statements on banning Muslim in the context he made them. Trump saw the immigration issue as a national security issue. We need to keep Jihadists from entering the country to protect ourselves. His first instinct was to ban Muslims to keep jihadists out and was foolish enough to say it because of his political inexperience. He was quickly told he couldn't do that and revised his position. Why?
Because his intent was never banning Muslims. His intent was national security. Banning Muslims was his mean to those ends until he realized he couldn't do that. Then he focused on more tailored approach.
Progressives on the other hand think his intention is to ban Muslims. Presumably because he is a hatefilled islamophobe who wants to oppress minorities or some nonsense like that. They are completely losing the obvious national security issue with jihadists.
To conservatives his foolish statements were a means to an end: national security. Why? Because that's the context the statements were made. To progressives his statements were the ends and he is going to implement them by any means.
But trump never cared about banning Muslims in and of itself. Here are five reasons at prove that:
1) the context he made his statements were always wit national security in mind.
2) his executive order does not attempt to ban Muslims or any other group based on religion. it does not even attempt to apply to all muslims
3) it applies to all people in the affected countries regardless to religious iviewpoints
4) removing Iraq from the list when they complied with what the administration requested shows they never cared about banning Muslims.
5) the order has always been temporary, which makes no sense if the purpose was secretly to ban Muslims.
You can't get around Trump's own words:
Trump:
"Donald J. Trump is calling for a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on."
Former New York mayor Rudy W. Giuliani said President Trump wanted a “Muslim ban” and requested he assemble a commission to show him “the right way to do it legally.”
In the first Muslim ban
The order also says that the administration should "prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality"
When he tries to pass a total ban on muslims, then let the Judge block THAT! When THAT actually happens. Meanwhile, while he's trying to pass a temporary ban, all you guys need to grow up.
Muslims didn't fly planes into our buildings.He would be if ever a Middle East Christian shouted "Jesus is Great" before blowing himself and others up in a crowded mall, or fly planes into tall buildings.
The hell they didn't. Who do you think did then?
Was it the Jews?Muslims didn't fly planes into our buildings.He would be if ever a Middle East Christian shouted "Jesus is Great" before blowing himself and others up in a crowded mall, or fly planes into tall buildings.
Muslims didn't fly planes into our buildings.He would be if ever a Middle East Christian shouted "Jesus is Great" before blowing himself and others up in a crowded mall, or fly planes into tall buildings.
The hell they didn't. Who do you think did then?
Terrorists.
No ban tonight, no ban tonight, no ban tonight...When he tries to pass a total ban on muslims, then let the Judge block THAT! When THAT actually happens. Meanwhile, while he's trying to pass a temporary ban, all you guys need to grow up.
Muslims didn't fly planes into our buildings.He would be if ever a Middle East Christian shouted "Jesus is Great" before blowing himself and others up in a crowded mall, or fly planes into tall buildings.
Radical Islamic (a subset of Muslems ) Terrorists!Muslims didn't fly planes into our buildings.He would be if ever a Middle East Christian shouted "Jesus is Great" before blowing himself and others up in a crowded mall, or fly planes into tall buildings.
The hell they didn't. Who do you think did then?
Terrorists.
