- Thread starter
- #41
Is there evidence that they don’t? That’s what matters. I know your article said something about environmentalists blocking deadwood clearing but without any specific details about this story, I don’t see why I would believe it.Oh god. There is so much bullshit in this article that I don’t even know where to start from. I’ll just have to make a list:What does the link say exactly? I missed it.You don’t know jack shit about the logistics of wildfires. God its bad enough you people are so willfully ignorant. Don’t pretend that you think you know something about a complex problem in state with a severe drought problem. Just because Trump decides firefighters are incompetent, it doesn’t mean you have to go full retard and assume he knows what he is talking about.
I posted a link on this thread about the problem. If you don't like that one, use "google" and find your own.
I might not know jack about wildfires. but I do know how to do research to figure out what the problem is.
Mark
Self-induced DISASTER: California fires the direct result of shortsighted environmentalist policies that prohibit forest management
1) The article makes no effort to not sound unbiased. It’s all the liberals fault and Trump was right like always. This article may as well come from Fox News. This bullshit brings me to point #2.
2) This article was written AFTER Trump criticizes the wildfire effort. We know this because it quotes one of his tweets. Please tell me you are more objective than this.
3) Not only does this article make the bullshit, baseless assertion that climate change has nothing to do with the wildfires, but we get this quote from someone in Trump’s administration. He may be the director of interior, but it’s not like that means his dumbass understands climatology. Fucking of course climate change is a huge contributor to the problem.
4) This article just pretends Cali’s unprecedented drought is not at all related to the wildfires. It’s all the liberals fault. It’s always just the fault of liberals! No more. No less.
5) The “deadwood” this article talks about it is of course entirely vague. Okay so who stopped the deadwood clearing? How much was stopped? Why are we sure the wildfire started because of it? We don’t know any of those answers because this claim came from some moron in Trump’s administration.
6) The entire summary of this article is a bullshit narrative about how the fires have started, yet you pretend regardless of why it is happening, we should cut off FEMA funding. I love how the author offers his “prayers”. That’s all he needs to say to make himself sound human. It’s not like he gives a shit if Cali gets the resources it needs to fight these fires.
If my link is wrong, you could show me where California does indeed use good forestry measures in their state.
Mark