Trump posts 2018 signed letter from Stormy Daniels that destroys the Democrats’ hush money witch hunt

[j-mac]

I have no idea.

oh, but you’re sure he’s guilty of a crime right?

• How many corporate executives in New York were running a Presidential Campaigns?

Not a crime.

• How many of that group boinked a porn star while their wife was at home having just given birth to his son?

Not a crime.

• Then how many of that group had a fixer lawyer break the law to pay the porn star not to revive previously published media stories (6 year old?) about the boinking?

Are NDAs illegal?

• Then how many of that group had their lawyer commit criminal campaign finance law violation and went to prison?

That would be Federal if true, and the FEC said no violation. And you can’t point to 1 candidate who broke campaign finance law who wound up in prison…

• Then how many of that group committed felony business record falsification to hide and aid in the crime that the fixer lawyer engaged in?

Not a states issue, and the feds looked at it and declined to prosecute. Hence, no crime.

By the time you start at the top bullet and keep narrowing it down to the last bullet, I'd say it's either (a) a unique situation for the relevant events, or (b) not many.

WW

How about not one.

 

[j-mac]

Using campaign funds?

FEC looked at it, and declined to prosecute.

 

[j-mac]

Conservative

That’s right…registered.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That’s right…registered.

You can stand in a barn and call yourself a tractor....it does not make you tractor.

 

[rightwinger]

So, what was the crime he was “covering up”?

Ask Melania

 

[WorldWatcher]

oh, but you’re sure he’s guilty of a crime right?

You didn't ask me if I thought he was guilty, you asked how many corporate executives in the State of New York have gotten anything more than a fine.

Which isn't the correct question. The correct question is "How many corporate executives in the State of New York paid for an NDA regarding an affair right before election and added someone committing campaign finance crimes and then attempted to hide it by felonious falsification of business records?"

See simple falsification of business records is a misdemeanor, however falsification of business records to either commit (say tax fraud) or hide/aid someone else in a crime is a felony.

Not a crime.

Never said it was. It sets the context.

Not a crime.

Actually what Cohen did was a crime as he violated campaign finance laws in the process. Not the NDA itself, but his paying for the NDA out of his own pocket to hide the transaction for FPOTUS#45's campaign.

Are NDAs illegal?

No, criminal violation of campaign finance laws is.

Thats the halarious part. If FPOTUS#45 had done things the right way, there would be no crime(s) and he wouldn't currently be in legal jeporady. As someone one said about Nixon (or maybe Capone), it's not the crime that gets you it's the cover up. So instead of doing it the illegal way...

• FPOTUS#45 has an NDA negotiated with Stormy,
• FPOTUS#45's lawyer writes up the contract,
• FPOTUS#45 provides a certified check to cover the amount from personal funds,
• FPOTUS#45 then reports the contribution to the campaign for logging in the campaign financials as this action was to hide the information from the public and support the campaign. (And don't give me BS about "protecting" Melania, the story had already gone public years before. This was a rehash of previous reports.)

The funny part is the public would never have known about the NDA prior to the election. The events were so close to the election that the next campaign financials wouldn't be required until after the election.

That would be Federal if true, and the FEC said no violation.

The FEC never ruled on it and said "No Violation". Go back and research it. The FEC investigators recommended "Yes Investigate" and the GOP members prevented an investigation. They (the GOP members) wouldn't allow an investigation and a vote on the merits.

And you can’t point to 1 candidate who broke campaign finance law who wound up in prison…

FPOTUS#45 isn't being charged with violation of campaign finance laws.

He's being charges with felonious falsification of New York State criminal code pertaining to business laws. At a minimum the DA will attempt to show that FPOTUS#45 attempted to hide Cohen's activities through the falsification of business records. He may (I don't know, we'll have to see

Not a states issue,

Falsification of New York State business records is - ya - a states issue.

and the feds looked at it and declined to prosecute. Hence, no crime.

By the feds if you mean the FEC, this is false, the FEC investigators recommended a formal investigation, the GOP prevented the investigation and so there was no decision to prosecute or not since the didn't investigate.

But regardless, FPOUTS#45 isn't charged with campaign finance crime.

How about not one.

I agree, probably not one New York Corporate executive who also happens to be a candidate for federal office just days before the election, who had boinked a porn start, paid a fixer to commit campaign finance violations, the paid the fixer in illegally for "attorney services" which are a tax deductible business expense while "hush money to a porn star" aren't, then committed felonious falsification of business records to hide/aid in the fixers crimes.

I wouldn't say "not one" but l will agree it's pretty rare.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

FEC looked at it, and declined to prosecute.

https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7313/7313_28.pdf

No, they didn't the FEC blocked it's investigators from further investigating despite that being the recommendations from the FEC's Office of General Counsel.

WW

 

[Dragonlady]

Because it's inflammatory language that implies something illegal, and, in over 3,000 charges filed by the DOJ not a single person has been charges with insurrection.

Yes they have. Stewart Rhodes, among others, has been convicted of seditious conspiracy.

Jury Convicts Four Leaders of the Proud Boys of Seditious Conspiracy Related to U.S. Capitol Breach

A jury in the District of Columbia today returned guilty verdicts on multiple felonies against five members of the Proud Boys, finding four of the defendants guilty of seditious conspiracy for their actions before and during the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

www.justice.gov

Is there anything else you need a correction on????

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

This case is over. She signed the letter stating she never had an affair with Trump. Here it is below.

Eek! too funny It's old news! You people didn't even know this?


A 2018 letter by adult film star Stormy Daniels denying sexual relations with former U.S. President Donald J. Trump is circulating online by users who believe it to be new in March 2023.

It is old news from early 2018 before I came forward. I think it's HYSTERICAL that tiny is trying to spin this as some kind of new information. There's a clip of this from the @jimmykimmel show& I discuss it in my book "Full Disclosure”.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N3621O6/

 

[j-mac]

Ask Melania

So none, got it.

 

[Faun]

So, what was the crime he was “covering up”?

Cohen's illegal payment to Stormy Daniels.

 

[Faun]

That’s right…registered.

Where do conservatives register?

 

[Faun]

You didn't ask me if I thought he was guilty, you asked how many corporate executives in the State of New York have gotten anything more than a fine.

Which isn't the correct question. The correct question is "How many corporate executives in the State of New York paid for an NDA regarding an affair right before election and added someone committing campaign finance crimes and then attempted to hide it by felonious falsification of business records?"

See simple falsification of business records is a misdemeanor, however falsification of business records to either commit (say tax fraud) or hide/aid someone else in a crime is a felony.



Never said it was. It sets the context.



Actually what Cohen did was a crime as he violated campaign finance laws in the process. Not the NDA itself, but his paying for the NDA out of his own pocket to hide the transaction for FPOTUS#45's campaign.



No, criminal violation of campaign finance laws is.

Thats the halarious part. If FPOTUS#45 had done things the right way, there would be no crime(s) and he wouldn't currently be in legal jeporady. As someone one said about Nixon (or maybe Capone), it's not the crime that gets you it's the cover up. So instead of doing it the illegal way...

• FPOTUS#45 has an NDA negotiated with Stormy,
• FPOTUS#45's lawyer writes up the contract,
• FPOTUS#45 provides a certified check to cover the amount from personal funds,
• FPOTUS#45 then reports the contribution to the campaign for logging in the campaign financials as this action was to hide the information from the public and support the campaign. (And don't give me BS about "protecting" Melania, the story had already gone public years before. This was a rehash of previous reports.)

The funny part is the public would never have known about the NDA prior to the election. The events were so close to the election that the next campaign financials wouldn't be required until after the election.



The FEC never ruled on it and said "No Violation". Go back and research it. The FEC investigators recommended "Yes Investigate" and the GOP members prevented an investigation. They (the GOP members) wouldn't allow an investigation and a vote on the merits.



FPOTUS#45 isn't being charged with violation of campaign finance laws.

He's being charges with felonious falsification of New York State criminal code pertaining to business laws. At a minimum the DA will attempt to show that FPOTUS#45 attempted to hide Cohen's activities through the falsification of business records. He may (I don't know, we'll have to see



Falsification of New York State business records is - ya - a states issue.



By the feds if you mean the FEC, this is false, the FEC investigators recommended a formal investigation, the GOP prevented the investigation and so there was no decision to prosecute or not since the didn't investigate.

But regardless, FPOUTS#45 isn't charged with campaign finance crime.



I agree, probably not one New York Corporate executive who also happens to be a candidate for federal office just days before the election, who had boinked a porn start, paid a fixer to commit campaign finance violations, the paid the fixer in illegally for "attorney services" which are a tax deductible business expense while "hush money to a porn star" aren't, then committed felonious falsification of business records to hide/aid in the fixers crimes.

I wouldn't say "not one" but l will agree it's pretty rare.

WW

And don't give me BS about "protecting" Melania, the story had already gone public years before. This was a rehash of previous reports.

And don't forget... Trump tried to stall the payment to her until after the election so then he wouldn't have to pay her at all. Then he wouldn't care if she went public with her story. Proves it was all about the election and not at all about protecting Melanie.

 

[Mashmont]

I have no idea.

• How many corporate executives in New York were running a Presidential Campaigns?
• How many of that group boinked a porn star while their wife was at home having just given birth to his son?
• Then how many of that group had a fixer lawyer break the law to pay the porn star not to revive previously published media stories (6 year old?) about the boinking?
• Then how many of that group had their lawyer commit criminal campaign finance law violation and went to prison?
• Then how many of that group committed felony business record falsification to hide and aid in the crime that the fixer lawyer engaged in?

By the time you start at the top bullet and keep narrowing it down to the last bullet, I'd say it's either (a) a unique situation for the relevant events, or (b) not many.

WW

Must we always bring up Bill Clinton?

 

[j-mac]

Cohen's illegal payment to Stormy Daniels

That’s Cohen’s problem…

 

[j-mac]

Where do conservatives register?

You can register as that in my state

 

[Care4all]

The behind-the-scenes buzz is that the slimebag Cohen was working him.

 

[j-mac]

County of Greenville, SC

www.greenvillecounty.org

 

[Care4all]

That’s Cohen’s problem…

And what about Trump's illegal reimbursement to Cohen for the hush money payment through the Trump org as a new audio system expense write off?

 

[Oddball]

Cohen is a well known slimebag....Your tribe absolutely hated him before he flipped for you.

I wouldn't put human sacrifice past that subhuman scum at this point.