Trump impeachment defense team will include Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz

Tramp thought he was disgusting, must be the money is good, after all he did impeach Clinton for cheating on his wife.
Actually lying under oath, but don't let the facts get in the way. You never do.

Lying under oath about having an affair. Don't let the facts get in your way. LOL.

Is tramp going under oath, or giving a sample of his blood??? Or anything, they didn't ok any witnesses and documents. And the witnesses , if they are allowed, will exert EP.
It's still a felony you ignorant slut.

He should of refused to go under oath, like tramp did and will do. Barr is protecting him. As long as tramp has his job, barr has his.

He wouldn't have went under oath, but like always, the Democrat always feels they are the smartest one in the room. Bill thought he was way too smart to be outdone by some 20 something kid. Little did he know or suspect. Otherwise, he would't have testified under oath.

You must mean the old hag Tripp.
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?
Actually Dershowitz got Epstein off with a slap on the wrist. Since Trump. Epstein and Dershowitz all ran in the same circle, Dershowitz being retained by Trump was inevitable.
 
Except. . . Guarding the country against corruption is hardly tantamount to Murder.

But if it wasn't for that big huge fucking difference. . . .
Trump is corruption. He ain’t guarding us from himself.

Link?

Proof?

He was forcing Ukraine to help his election by investigating his opponent. That’s corrupt.

Ironically, Biden was the one fighting corruption.

Logic is not your strongest suit, is it.

Here's a fucking clue for you.

Trump was already elected when the calls were made. Check the fucking dates. Trump invited to new Ukrane prez to TRUMP'S inauguration.

How the fuck could Trump abuse the power of his Presidency if he wasn't already president? Dumbazz?
What the hell are you talking about? No one can possibly be this poorly informed.

Derp on my part.

I own it.

Not poorly informed. But I did pull up a few sites that made me draw some wrong conclusions on the timeline.

Multitasking at work is not a good thing and it showed.

My argument is still the same, regardless.

Trump (or any other president) is within their rights to try to root out corruption and to use our foreign aid as leverage in that effort. Even if it involves a suspicion about a political rival.

Too bad Trump couldn't trust the FBI too look into someone other than himself.
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?
He is like the lawyer that arranges bail for rapists and chomos.

Would that be like Hillary bragging about getting a child rapist off, then laughing about it?
Describing the events almost a decade after they had occurred, Clinton’s struck a casual and complacent attitude toward her client and the trial for rape of a minor. “I had him take a polygraph, which he passed – which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” she added with a laugh. Clinton can also be heard laughing at several points when discussing the crime lab’s accidental destruction of DNA evidence that tied Taylor to the crime.

Guy Benson - Unearthed Audio: Hillary Discusses Defending Child Rapist

Q: Did Hillary Clinton volunteer in 1975 to defend a rapist, who was found not guilty, and laugh about it in an interview in 1980?

A: Clinton defended an accused rapist, but she did not volunteer. He pleaded guilty to a lesser offense. She laughed when recalling unusual aspects of the case.
Clinton's 1975 Rape Case
 
Trump is corruption. He ain’t guarding us from himself.

Link?

Proof?

He was forcing Ukraine to help his election by investigating his opponent. That’s corrupt.

Ironically, Biden was the one fighting corruption.

Logic is not your strongest suit, is it.

Here's a fucking clue for you.

Trump was already elected when the calls were made. Check the fucking dates. Trump invited to new Ukrane prez to TRUMP'S inauguration.

How the fuck could Trump abuse the power of his Presidency if he wasn't already president? Dumbazz?
What the hell are you talking about? No one can possibly be this poorly informed.

Derp on my part.

I own it.

Not poorly informed. But I did pull up a few sites that made me draw some wrong conclusions on the timeline.

Multitasking at work is not a good thing and it showed.

My argument is still the same, regardless.

Trump (or any other president) is within their rights to try to root out corruption and to use our foreign aid as leverage in that effort. Even if it involves a suspicion about a political rival.

Too bad Trump couldn't trust the FBI too look into someone other than himself.

Not according to the Impound Control Act, and he was not ruling out corruption, he was introducing it in the new Potus.
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?

Trump is innocent because he committed no crime, and the Articles don't even charge him with a crime.
Article-2 is dead because the USSC said that Trump does have the right to due process, and that it's NOT "Obstruction of the House" which isn't even a thing.
Article-1 is dead because hearsay evidence is not allowed in the Senate.

"If the crime doesn't fit you must acquit."
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?
Actually Dershowitz got Epstein off with a slap on the wrist. Since Trump. Epstein and Dershowitz all ran in the same circle, Dershowitz being retained by Trump was inevitable.
Isn't Dershowitz being investigated for screwing little girls, he got on loan from Epstein?
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?
Actually Dershowitz got Epstein off with a slap on the wrist. Since Trump. Epstein and Dershowitz all ran in the same circle, Dershowitz being retained by Trump was inevitable.
Are you suggesting Blackmail?
No I am suggesting two birds of a feather.
That is what I was (somewhat) suggesting. Cool.
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?
Actually Dershowitz got Epstein off with a slap on the wrist. Since Trump. Epstein and Dershowitz all ran in the same circle, Dershowitz being retained by Trump was inevitable.
Isn't Dershowitz being investigated for screwing little girls, he got on loan from Epstein?
I think so. Just like Trump being sued for raping a 13 year old.
 
He was forcing Ukraine to help his election by investigating his opponent. That’s corrupt.

Ironically, Biden was the one fighting corruption.

By directly threatening to hold tax dollars unless someone got fired.
He bragged about it, himself!
Yeah. The guy that he got fired was corrupt. You want our tax dollars funding that corruption?

Biden committed Bribery; a REAL impeachable crime, cooter.

Bribery? If putting contingencies on receiving US aid is bribery, then every administration has committed bribery.

I could give you some money, but before I do, you need to fire an individual by tomorrow.

This is what you erroneously call a contingency.

You're low IQ.
I hope you don't vote!

Wh
Trump is corruption. He ain’t guarding us from himself.

Link?

Proof?

He was forcing Ukraine to help his election by investigating his opponent. That’s corrupt.

Ironically, Biden was the one fighting corruption.

Logic is not your strongest suit, is it.

Here's a fucking clue for you.

Trump was already elected when the calls were made. Check the fucking dates. Trump invited to new Ukrane prez to TRUMP'S inauguration.

How the fuck could Trump abuse the power of his Presidency if he wasn't already president? Dumbazz?
What the hell are you talking about? No one can possibly be this poorly informed.

Derp on my part.

I own it.

Not poorly informed. But I did pull up a few sites that made me draw some wrong conclusions on the timeline.

Multitasking at work is not a good thing and it showed.

My argument is still the same, regardless.

Trump (or any other president) is within their rights to try to root out corruption and to use our foreign aid as leverage in that effort. Even if it involves a suspicion about a political rival.

Too bad Trump couldn't trust the FBI too look into someone other than himself.

Does Biden have the same right to root out corruption? That’s what he was doing by trying to get the corrupt prosecutor fired.
 
Trump will become the OJ of presidents. Acquitted but not innocent.

And Obama was guilty, but never charged.
Did someone say Former President Obama?
images
Yea, he holds his cock instead of pledging !!! Surrender Monkey to the end!

anthem.jpg
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?


A jury of his peers voted unanimously that Mr. Simpson was as Innocent as a Newborn Babe.

If you'll remember the key was the glove which did not fit, so they must, and did, acquit.
Yea......Trumps “peers” in the Senate will do the same
 
He is an unemployed buffoon.
Who me? Prove it.
What is your speciality in terms of medicine? You don’t know. You lied.

Colorectal surgery. That’s how I know how to handle a big angry asshole like yourself.
Then you don’t make $500k assman. Unless you run your own clinic.

Ha! CRS is well paid, for sure. But that was just a joke. I don’t know how those guys do it every day.
You’re a joke
 
Which has nothing to do with his duties as president.

Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury

Honesty under oath is not a duty?

Bye, bud.

I'm tired of your deflections

A Trumpster talking about honesty!


:laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
You’re such an immature twit.

bad day little man?
You’re a pussy
Awwwwww :itsok:
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?
He is like the lawyer that arranges bail for rapists and chomos.

Would that be like Hillary bragging about getting a child rapist off, then laughing about it?
Describing the events almost a decade after they had occurred, Clinton’s struck a casual and complacent attitude toward her client and the trial for rape of a minor. “I had him take a polygraph, which he passed – which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” she added with a laugh. Clinton can also be heard laughing at several points when discussing the crime lab’s accidental destruction of DNA evidence that tied Taylor to the crime.

Guy Benson - Unearthed Audio: Hillary Discusses Defending Child Rapist

Q: Did Hillary Clinton volunteer in 1975 to defend a rapist, who was found not guilty, and laugh about it in an interview in 1980?

A: Clinton defended an accused rapist, but she did not volunteer. He pleaded guilty to a lesser offense. She laughed when recalling unusual aspects of the case.
Clinton's 1975 Rape Case
I provided a link to the audio of her laughing about getting a child rapist off.

You brought spin by the lefty factcheck site.

You lose, again.
 
Who me? Prove it.
What is your speciality in terms of medicine? You don’t know. You lied.

Colorectal surgery. That’s how I know how to handle a big angry asshole like yourself.
Then you don’t make $500k assman. Unless you run your own clinic.

Ha! CRS is well paid, for sure. But that was just a joke. I don’t know how those guys do it every day.
You’re a joke

You’re not funny.
 
So Dershowitz will be convincing us that Trump is innocent the same way he convinced us that OJ was innocent?
Actually Dershowitz got Epstein off with a slap on the wrist. Since Trump. Epstein and Dershowitz all ran in the same circle, Dershowitz being retained by Trump was inevitable.
Isn't Dershowitz being investigated for screwing little girls, he got on loan from Epstein?
I think so. Just like Trump being sued for raping a 13 year old.
Had not heard about possibly raping a 13 year old. Heard rumor about Russian chicks peeing on his chest, and of course we are all familiar with some of the really good looking bimbos he cheated on his current wife with. Don't like him, but doubt he raped any 13 year old kid. Bet there is good money in suing his ass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top