Trump has now been implicated in a federal crime

[Faun]

When it’s for his campaign, of course.

Not a contribution.

LOLOLOL

Aww you poor thing. Bless your heart. You tried try so hard.

Here’s what you should do… Go get a pen, a piece of paper and a stamped envelope. Then write a letter to Michael Cohen in jail and pour your heart out to him how he was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to jail for making an excessive campaign ”contribution” for paying Stormy Daniels to keep her mouth shut.

So why aren't newspaper articles contributions?

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

 

[eagle1462010]

Not a contribution.

LOLOLOL

Aww you poor thing. Bless your heart. You tried try so hard.

Here’s what you should do… Go get a pen, a piece of paper and a stamped envelope. Then write a letter to Michael Cohen in jail and pour your heart out to him how he was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to jail for making an excessive campaign ”contribution” for paying Stormy Daniels to keep her mouth shut.

So why aren't newspaper articles contributions?

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Yeah.........Russians all over the place there..........Shall we play the anthem for the USSR.........Doesn't mean that they have him on your FEC violations........

That is open to discussion......can be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court...........might not go as well as you think......LOL

Can't be indicted anyway..........You have to do the impeachment gig in the House.........Good luck.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

Wow! That's a lot of self congratulations! How frustrating it must be for you that the facts in what the rest of the us call "reality" do not align with your fantasy.

Why don't you help him out with an FEC link of your own?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not a contribution.

LOLOLOL

Aww you poor thing. Bless your heart. You tried try so hard.

Here’s what you should do… Go get a pen, a piece of paper and a stamped envelope. Then write a letter to Michael Cohen in jail and pour your heart out to him how he was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to jail for making an excessive campaign ”contribution” for paying Stormy Daniels to keep her mouth shut.

So why aren't newspaper articles contributions?

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Can't find an FEC link to support your claim?

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOL

Aww you poor thing. Bless your heart. You tried try so hard.

Here’s what you should do… Go get a pen, a piece of paper and a stamped envelope. Then write a letter to Michael Cohen in jail and pour your heart out to him how he was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to jail for making an excessive campaign ”contribution” for paying Stormy Daniels to keep her mouth shut.

So why aren't newspaper articles contributions?

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Yeah.........Russians all over the place there..........Shall we play the anthem for the USSR.........Doesn't mean that they have him on your FEC violations........

That is open to discussion......can be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court...........might not go as well as you think......LOL

Can't be indicted anyway..........You have to do the impeachment gig in the House.........Good luck.

Sadly, you’re irredeemably retarded. I said nothing about Russia.

 

[eagle1462010]

So why aren't newspaper articles contributions?

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Yeah.........Russians all over the place there..........Shall we play the anthem for the USSR.........Doesn't mean that they have him on your FEC violations........

That is open to discussion......can be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court...........might not go as well as you think......LOL

Can't be indicted anyway..........You have to do the impeachment gig in the House.........Good luck.

Sadly, you’re irredeemably retarded. I said nothing about Russia.

That's the point...........thanks for making my point.........LOL

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOL

Aww you poor thing. Bless your heart. You tried try so hard.

Here’s what you should do… Go get a pen, a piece of paper and a stamped envelope. Then write a letter to Michael Cohen in jail and pour your heart out to him how he was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to jail for making an excessive campaign ”contribution” for paying Stormy Daniels to keep her mouth shut.

So why aren't newspaper articles contributions?

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Can't find an FEC link to support your claim?

The court has already designated it a campaign contribution. But that’s ok, Spunky. Keep fightin’ the fight.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Yeah.........Russians all over the place there..........Shall we play the anthem for the USSR.........Doesn't mean that they have him on your FEC violations........

That is open to discussion......can be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court...........might not go as well as you think......LOL

Can't be indicted anyway..........You have to do the impeachment gig in the House.........Good luck.

Sadly, you’re irredeemably retarded. I said nothing about Russia.

That's the point...........thanks for making my point.........LOL

LOL

My point was you’re irredeemably retarded. Glad we can agree on something.

 

[eagle1462010]

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Yeah.........Russians all over the place there..........Shall we play the anthem for the USSR.........Doesn't mean that they have him on your FEC violations........

That is open to discussion......can be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court...........might not go as well as you think......LOL

Can't be indicted anyway..........You have to do the impeachment gig in the House.........Good luck.

Sadly, you’re irredeemably retarded. I said nothing about Russia.

That's the point...........thanks for making my point.........LOL

LOL

My point was you’re irredeemably retarded. Glad we can agree on something.

Nah..............the 3 ring circus is retarded...........but you are one of the few who admits it really is a COUP..........it is and you know it........

But you are not your Brother's keeper............the others posting on these boards who deny it............Anyone with a lick of sense knows what this really is........

And how a PORN STAR will be the CHAMPION OF THE LEFT.............sounds like a day time cereal.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So why aren't newspaper articles contributions?

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Can't find an FEC link to support your claim?

The court has already designated it a campaign contribution. But that’s ok, Spunky. Keep fightin’ the fight.

So it should be easy for you to find it on the FEC site.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Is it your plan to appear sooo stupid, I feel pity for you? That’s already been explained to you.

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Can't find an FEC link to support your claim?

The court has already designated it a campaign contribution. But that’s ok, Spunky. Keep fightin’ the fight.

So it should be easy for you to find it on the FEC site.

LOLOL

You’re one brain-dead fuck, I’ll grant you that. Meanwhile, it’s already legally been deemed a campaign contribution.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why would I feel stupid for pointing out that none of your links show the payment is in any way a campaign contribution?

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Can't find an FEC link to support your claim?

The court has already designated it a campaign contribution. But that’s ok, Spunky. Keep fightin’ the fight.

So it should be easy for you to find it on the FEC site.

LOLOL

You’re one brain-dead fuck, I’ll grant you that. Meanwhile, it’s already legally been deemed a campaign contribution.

Making in-kind contributions to candidates - FEC.gov

Still hilarious.

 

[Marion Morrison]

And here it is Thursday..

 

[Picaro]

LOLOL

You moron. Go learn campaign finance laws.

A previous FEC chairman said it wasn't a violation, I'll take his word over yours any day.

.

LOL

What does that have to do with your ignorance over campaign finance laws? It doesn’t matter if contributions come directly from the candidate or from elseware; if it’s of value to their campaign, it has to be reported.

And it matters not whose word you take. What matters is what the FEC does and what the House does.

Actually not. Dual purpose expenses that benefit the candidate personally and has a benefit to the campaign as well, aren't campaign expenses. A campaign expense has to be solely related to the campaign and would not have been spent if not for the campaign. Are you claiming there was no dual benefit?

Seems you may not know as much as you think. Look it up.

.

I see nothing illegal about using campaign money to fight off obviously baseless opposition rubbish put out soley for political reasons, like everything the press and Democrats throws at Trump, including fake harassment lawsuits from attention whores.

What about stealing money from a charitable organization to hide affairs before an election, or using that same money to cover for lawsuits lost during that same election?

Why bring up the Clinton Foundation? Other than the fact that it's covering up and preventing prosecutions of OBama's and Hillary's criminal acts that are the reason behind your stupid fake news campaigns, I mean.

 

[keepitreal]

Cohen paid her out of campaign funds?
Link?

Too late bub. Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.

Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.

The headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.



September 2005:

Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.


2006:

Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation


February 2007:

UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.


June 2008:

Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom


2008-2010:

Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal


June 2009:

Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One


2010-2011:

Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation


June 2010:

Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.

Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.


June 29, 2010:

Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock


October 2010:

Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.


January 2013:

Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation

Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board

Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale

Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....

THEN FUCK OFF!

COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********

LOLOL

How many times has this narrative been debunked?

Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State and Bill collecting $500,000 for speech was in line with how much he was paid for other speeches, which went as high as $700,000.

LOLOL

How many times has this narrative been debunked?

Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State and Bill collecting $500,000 for speech was in line with how much he was paid for other speeches, which went as high as $700,000

Omg...really!?

Giustra, who was already a major CF donor,
and obviously had close ties to the Clinton's...
secured a major Uranium deal in Kazakhstan, for HIS company,
days after visiting the country with Bill

The next year, Guistra donates over 31 million to the CF

COME ON...

Hillary not being SoS, until 2009....
3 years after that 'donation'...means what?

What does, when the donation was made,
have to do with, when Hillary served as SoS,
based on the 'donation' given to the CF
and the circumstances preceding the 'donation'?

Based on those facts alone,
how do you not see a problem?

Based on those facts alone,
THEN factoring in what proceeded,
up until she became SoS, until she left in 2013,
how do you NOT see a problem?

looking outside the box...at the bigger picture,

Hillary had been setting the stage, with Bill's help
as early as 2005, to run for President in '08....
had it not been for Obama, she would have, hands down,
won the nomination and IMHO, won the election.

Do you NOT think, she thought,
there is no way America will elect a black man?

Her ego cost her the first time around,
and not learning from that, cost her the second time.

People wanted change...
that's why Obama won the first time

If white America was so racist,
Obama would have NEVER been elected!
Bottom line...white voters elected Obama

White voters accounted for 74% of all votes cast
Black voters accounted for 13% of all votes cast
Hispanic voters accounted for 9% of all votes cast

People wanted change even more,
that's why Trump won the election....
And, he'll win again because of all the nonsense

Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million, which is shit
McCain lost the popular vote by 10 million
So, while Trump may have lost the popular vote,
enough voters from every state are thirsty for change....
That's why the electoral decides elections

While you and your ilk are focused on shit,
the overwhelming majority of voters don't care about,
the water continues to boil rapidly, evaporating...
soon, all that will be left is a scorched pot, on a hot burner

As far as the $500,00 Bill received,
being non important in your eyes,
based on him receiving upwards of $700,00 at times....

Stop playing stupid, please...

He received that money from
a Russian government financial institution,
THAT ASSIGNED THE BUYING RATE
FOR URANIUM ONE STOCK

COME ON

If you and your ilk have such a problem with,
the personal ethics of Trump, in his private affairs,
how can you and your ilk not have a problem with,
questionable dealings, that effect our country?

Hush money to hos, from campaign funds,
when, Trump put a great deal of his own money,
into his own campaign and isn't taking a salary...
WHO FUCKING CARES!..NOT I

What about Norman Hsu?
Care to talk about him, as it relates to Hillary?

Why don't you get out of La La Land?
Pack your shit and move to Oz...
Maybe the wizard will give you a brain!

Kazakhstan is not Russia and has nothing to do with Putin or Uranium One’s deal with Rosatom; which is what you were claiming. That all happened after Giustra sold his share of Uranium One. And at the time Giustra gave the Clinton Foundation most of the money he donated, Hillary was a Senator with no influence over any deals like the Rosatom deal years later.

Again, this has been so thoroughly debunked, even by rightwing media, it’s amazing you still bring it up.

Kazakhstan is not Russia and has nothing to do with Putin or Uranium One’s deal with Rosatom; which is what you were claiming.

No, that is not what I was claiming...
That is what YOU are CLAIMING, I am claiming

Why in the world should I waste my time, responding any further
when you can't even grasp the basic gist, I twiddled down for you?

No wonder why you keep going back to...
That narrative was debunked

Nothing was debunked...it was swept under the rug
It was 'wiped clean', like, with a cloth

You're so ignorant, thinking you're so smart,
and everyone else is off in left field

Never said Kazakhstan was Russia...
But, when it comes to Kazakhstan and Russia,
maybe you ought to do your homework

That all happened after Giustra sold his share of Uranium One

Gee, how convenient, huh

Just like his oil company in Columbia

Him, Bill and Hillary having dinner together
Bill meets with Uribe, in his presidential quarters,
yous later, Hillary, then SoS meets with him,

Now, she's all for a free trade agreement with Columbia,
that she opposed when she was running in 2008

Yeah, he also lands a pipeline deal to exploratory drill
in environmentally sensitive areas along the Columbian coast

Lots of protests and complaints from,
environmental, human rights and labor groups

Money to the CF

And at the time Giustra gave the Clinton Foundation most of the money he donated, Hillary was a Senator with no influence over any deals like the Rosatom deal years later.

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES THAT MAKE!?

The money came for the help from bill
He had been in negotiations for MONTHS ALREADY
He flies there with Bill and two days later..done, come on

Oh wait, my bad....
He arrived a few days earlier then Bill,...
they just hooked up for dinner with the President
because Bill was doing business himself, unrelated of course.

You know, like on the tarmac with Lynch
just talking about the grandkids and what not...
not Hillary and any wrongdoings being investigated

The merger exceeded 3 BILLION dollars,
his stake is said to have been $45 million(yeah, right)
and he donates over $37 million to the CF

You are the weakest link....good bye

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Dayum, you’re even dumber than you seem.

4. Cohen’s Illegal Campaign Contributions

On approximately June 16, 2015, Individual-1, for whom Cohen worked at the time, began an ultimately successful campaign for President of the United States. Cohen had no formal title with the campaign, but had a campaign email address, and, at various times advised the campaign, including on matters of interest to the press. Cohen also made media appearances as a surrogate and supporter of Individual-1. During the campaign, Cohen played a central role in two similar schemes to purchase the rights to stories – each from women who claimed to have had an affair with Individual-1 – so as to suppress the stories and thereby prevent them from influencing the election. With respect to both payments, Cohen acted with the intent to influence the 2016 presidential election. Cohen coordinated his actions with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. In particular, and as Cohen himself has now admitted, with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the direction of Individual-1. As a result of Cohen's actions, neither woman spoke to the press prior to the election.

more...​

Cohen’s conviction isn’t good enough for you??

Can't find an FEC link to support your claim?

The court has already designated it a campaign contribution. But that’s ok, Spunky. Keep fightin’ the fight.

So it should be easy for you to find it on the FEC site.

LOLOL

You’re one brain-dead fuck, I’ll grant you that. Meanwhile, it’s already legally been deemed a campaign contribution.

Making in-kind contributions to candidates - FEC.gov

Still hilarious.

^^^ still going to prison for illegal campaign contributions.



.... how’s that letter of yours coming along.

 

[Faun]

Too late bub. Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.

Talk to the prosecutors. They are calling it a contribution due to the nature of the payment. IT was hidden and never reported, and Trump said he knew nothing about it, which he lied about. The prosecutors are calling it a felony.

The headline on the website Pravda
trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup,...
"Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World"

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.
The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers
and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling
much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves
not just the Russian president, but also a former American president
and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

the sale gave the Russians control of
one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset,
with implications for national security,
the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of
representatives from a number of United States government agencies.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show,
a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation
to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.
Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,
despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck
with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.
Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention
to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,
Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech
from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin
that was promoting Uranium One stock.



September 2005:

Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining financier,
wins a major uranium deal in Kazakhstan for his company, UrAsia,
days after visiting the country with former President Bill Clinton.


2006:

Mr. Giustra donates $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation


February 2007:

UrAsia merges with a South African mining company
and assumes the name Uranium One.
In the next two months, the company expands into the United States.


June 2008:

Negotations begin for an investment in Uranium One
by the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom


2008-2010:

Uranium One and former UrAsia investors
make $8.65 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Uranium One investors stand to profit on a Rosatom deal


June 2009:

Rosatom subsidiary ARMZ
takes a 17 percent ownership stake in Uranium One


2010-2011:

Investors give millions more in donations to the Clinton Foundation


June 2010:

Rosatom seeks majority ownership of Uranium One,
pending approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States, of which the State Department is a member.

Rosatom says it does not plan to increase its stake in Uranium One
or to take the company private.


June 29, 2010:

Bill Clinton is paid $500,000 for a speech in Moscow
by a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin
that assigned a buy rating to Uranium One stock


October 2010:

Rosatom’s majority ownership approved by
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.


January 2013:

Rosatom takes full control of Uranium One and takes it private

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation

Now...I didn't even mention the millions of dollars
from Russian investors and government agencies,
given to a small, off shore company,
which Podesta sat on the Executive Board

Podesta failed to disclose, not only the money but,
his involvement in this company, which had a stake in the sale

Now...unless you and your ilk
are capable of pulling your heads out of your asses
and admitting whose REALLY guilty of criminal conduct....

THEN FUCK OFF!

COLLUSION... RUSSIA... TREASON... CORRUPTED
*********CLINTONS*********

LOLOL

How many times has this narrative been debunked?

Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State and Bill collecting $500,000 for speech was in line with how much he was paid for other speeches, which went as high as $700,000.

LOLOL

How many times has this narrative been debunked?

Almost all of the donations from Giustra came before Hillary was Secretary of State and Bill collecting $500,000 for speech was in line with how much he was paid for other speeches, which went as high as $700,000

Omg...really!?

Giustra, who was already a major CF donor,
and obviously had close ties to the Clinton's...
secured a major Uranium deal in Kazakhstan, for HIS company,
days after visiting the country with Bill

The next year, Guistra donates over 31 million to the CF

COME ON...

Hillary not being SoS, until 2009....
3 years after that 'donation'...means what?

What does, when the donation was made,
have to do with, when Hillary served as SoS,
based on the 'donation' given to the CF
and the circumstances preceding the 'donation'?

Based on those facts alone,
how do you not see a problem?

Based on those facts alone,
THEN factoring in what proceeded,
up until she became SoS, until she left in 2013,
how do you NOT see a problem?

looking outside the box...at the bigger picture,

Hillary had been setting the stage, with Bill's help
as early as 2005, to run for President in '08....
had it not been for Obama, she would have, hands down,
won the nomination and IMHO, won the election.

Do you NOT think, she thought,
there is no way America will elect a black man?

Her ego cost her the first time around,
and not learning from that, cost her the second time.

People wanted change...
that's why Obama won the first time

If white America was so racist,
Obama would have NEVER been elected!
Bottom line...white voters elected Obama

White voters accounted for 74% of all votes cast
Black voters accounted for 13% of all votes cast
Hispanic voters accounted for 9% of all votes cast

People wanted change even more,
that's why Trump won the election....
And, he'll win again because of all the nonsense

Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million, which is shit
McCain lost the popular vote by 10 million
So, while Trump may have lost the popular vote,
enough voters from every state are thirsty for change....
That's why the electoral decides elections

While you and your ilk are focused on shit,
the overwhelming majority of voters don't care about,
the water continues to boil rapidly, evaporating...
soon, all that will be left is a scorched pot, on a hot burner

As far as the $500,00 Bill received,
being non important in your eyes,
based on him receiving upwards of $700,00 at times....

Stop playing stupid, please...

He received that money from
a Russian government financial institution,
THAT ASSIGNED THE BUYING RATE
FOR URANIUM ONE STOCK

COME ON

If you and your ilk have such a problem with,
the personal ethics of Trump, in his private affairs,
how can you and your ilk not have a problem with,
questionable dealings, that effect our country?

Hush money to hos, from campaign funds,
when, Trump put a great deal of his own money,
into his own campaign and isn't taking a salary...
WHO FUCKING CARES!..NOT I

What about Norman Hsu?
Care to talk about him, as it relates to Hillary?

Why don't you get out of La La Land?
Pack your shit and move to Oz...
Maybe the wizard will give you a brain!

Kazakhstan is not Russia and has nothing to do with Putin or Uranium One’s deal with Rosatom; which is what you were claiming. That all happened after Giustra sold his share of Uranium One. And at the time Giustra gave the Clinton Foundation most of the money he donated, Hillary was a Senator with no influence over any deals like the Rosatom deal years later.

Again, this has been so thoroughly debunked, even by rightwing media, it’s amazing you still bring it up.

Kazakhstan is not Russia and has nothing to do with Putin or Uranium One’s deal with Rosatom; which is what you were claiming.

No, that is not what I was claiming...
That is what YOU are CLAIMING, I am claiming

Why in the world should I waste my time, responding any further
when you can't even grasp the basic gist, I twiddled down for you?

No wonder why you keep going back to...
That narrative was debunked

Nothing was debunked...it was swept under the rug
It was 'wiped clean', like, with a cloth

You're so ignorant, thinking you're so smart,
and everyone else is off in left field

Never said Kazakhstan was Russia...
But, when it comes to Kazakhstan and Russia,
maybe you ought to do your homework

That all happened after Giustra sold his share of Uranium One

Gee, how convenient, huh

Just like his oil company in Columbia

Him, Bill and Hillary having dinner together
Bill meets with Uribe, in his presidential quarters,
yous later, Hillary, then SoS meets with him,

Now, she's all for a free trade agreement with Columbia,
that she opposed when she was running in 2008

Yeah, he also lands a pipeline deal to exploratory drill
in environmentally sensitive areas along the Columbian coast

Lots of protests and complaints from,
environmental, human rights and labor groups

Money to the CF

And at the time Giustra gave the Clinton Foundation most of the money he donated, Hillary was a Senator with no influence over any deals like the Rosatom deal years later.

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES THAT MAKE!?

The money came for the help from bill
He had been in negotiations for MONTHS ALREADY
He flies there with Bill and two days later..done, come on

Oh wait, my bad....
He arrived a few days earlier then Bill,...
they just hooked up for dinner with the President
because Bill was doing business himself, unrelated of course.

You know, like on the tarmac with Lynch
just talking about the grandkids and what not...
not Hillary and any wrongdoings being investigated

The merger exceeded 3 BILLION dollars,
his stake is said to have been $45 million(yeah, right)
and he donates over $37 million to the CF

You are the weakest link....good bye

LOLOLOL

Brain-dead con.... this has all been debunked. You should consider hopping off that turnip truck.

 

[McRocket]

At some point you fools need to read the writing on the wall. There is no crime and Trump is going to be president for a long time. You need to come to terms with this.

What a staggeringly, ignorant statement.

You are not privy to everything Trump has done. So you cannot possibly know if he has never done anything illegal or not...including things that the media does not even know about.

And you cannot read the future and you have no idea what Mueller does or does not have on Trump. So you have no factual knowledge as to what legal issues await Trump...if any.

And you should come to terms with that and stop sounding so ridiculous on this.

I have no idea what will happen to Trump.

But I am not foolish enough to run around saying I do know when I have zero, direct, personal access to Trump or Mueller's files.

 

[deanrd]

The breaking news is that Trump violated three different campaign finance laws with the assistance of Michael Cohen according to prosecutors for the southern district of New York, and Trump is being implicated as a felon. Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis

Late Friday, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a document arguing that Michael Cohen, until last year President Trump’s personal attorney, should receive a substantial prison sentence for violations of federal law to which Cohen admitted guilt in August.


Analysis | The government implicates Trump and the Trump campaign in federal campaign finance violations

You really know virtually nothing about the law. Prosecutorial abuse on the scale of these guys trying to disrupt the elected govt allows them to go after simple private citizens and ruin their lives REGARDLESS of their actual guilt.

No individual can afford going to trial with a "blank check" SPecial Counsel or the South District of NY office of Counsel. So they can LOAD UP the charges on the indictment, with any SHIT THEY DESIRE --- whether it's a solid case for that case or a whim..

And YOU as a peon citizen don't get to CHOOSE what charges are against you when you plead if you're guilty of even ONE of them. It's a package deal determined by the wolf pack holding all the cards. So no matter what you promise them in terms of making up stories that they like or spilling beans, the CHARGES THEY WANT -- will STAY on your indictment.

When you plead -- you pretty much have to accept them all. Whether they are TOTAL BULLSHIT or not..

The "campaign finance violations" that affect Trump are BULLSHIT charges. THey never would be successfully proven in lawful trial.. You cannot allow people to personally EXHORT candidates by threatening to release information in the heat of a campaign. Whether they come to you with "PROOF" that are gay, or that you have heart disease, or a "falling on your face" illness like Hillary had. That would open the door to blackmail of EVERY candidate for office and AFFECT ALL ELECTIONS.

It's a private matter that you are allowed to settle on your own terms. Besides, almost EVERY campaign commits "campaign finance violations". Go look it up moron.. Obama, the Clintons, --- all of them. And there's NEVER any actual criminal charges. It's a "process violation"...

The campaign finance charges involve federal crimes. It's that simple. More than $2700 dollars was paid to Stormy daniels. That is a crime. Not reporting it is a crime. Pleading ignorance by Trump won't work because Trump said he knew nothing of the payments to Stormy Daniels. And lastly, the payment was hidden to hide the affair to help Trump get elected. None of these charges are "bs charges". If you think they are and you are smarter than the SDNY, then why not litigate your point to them? Answer, because you have nothing to litigate.

Using a payment to a porn queen to try and take a President down is as desperate as it gets. LOL. The Demon-crats ought to be ashamed of themselves in the way they have acted over a person winning an election.

Using a fake dossier to attempt to bring obstruction charges after Trump fires Comey is as desperate as it gets. Getting a special council to investigate Trump after firing Comey shows how desperate the leftist apparatus has become.

Any means possible eh ??

Trump’s own Felonies are what’s taking him down. Not a porn queen. Besides Trump liked that porn queen. He said she reminded him of his daughter. High compliment indeed.

 

[Flopper]

With each day it just get's worse for Donald and his buddies. Russian Maria Butina has plead guilty to conspiracy against the US. Butina admitted to working with American political operatives under the direction of a former Russian Senator and deputy governor of Russia's central bank to forge bonds. She also claims to have worked with conservative leaders and 2016 U.S. presidential candidates including Donald Trump.

Trump has got to stop Mueller before it's too late. He's probably going to have an obstruction charge to deal with so he doesn't have much louse.