Trump has lowest pres-elect popularity in many decades

[easyt65]

I believe Trump will actually try to detroy ISIS, not arm, train, and protect them like Hillary and Barry did.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

The polls still have Hillary winning...

The polls were right. She won the popular vote.

Thanks to Putin

I remember the RWnuts around here gleeful that the Russian hacking was hurting Clinton. You people were CERTAIN it was hurting Clinton.

How soon you forget.

What you mean by "YOU PEOPLE"

A week or two ago the Republicans in Congress tried to pull off an ethics rules revision,

and a flood of public opinion knocked them back on their heels and they abandoned it.

That is the sort thing this weak president and out of touch Congress are going to be up against from now on.

I think you may once again be polling your chickens before they are hatched...are you sure they've abandoned it?...not saying they haven't, but even a weak president on their side is better for them than a strong one on the other side.

 

[owebo]

LOL there it comes out again. The 'birtherism' of 2016.

'Spawn' of Hillary's 2008 Birtherism (proven)

Hillary had nothing to do with birtherism. No one has ever produced one quote of Hillary Clinton claiming Obama wasn't born in the US.

Hillary invented it.....

 

[NYcarbineer]

The polls still have Hillary winning...

The polls were right. She won the popular vote.

How's that working out, snowflake?

They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.

No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.

NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.

It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.

Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.

It failed - Hillary lost.

The numbers they got were right.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

 

[easyt65]

Hillary had nothing to do with birtherism.

You LIE, snowflake. It has been oroven her campaign spread it around in 2008 as Barry came out of nowhere to kick her ass.

As Barry said in 2008:
"Hillary Clinton will DO and SAY anything to win."

 

[NYcarbineer]

I believe Trump will actually try to detroy ISIS, not arm, train, and protect them like Hillary and Barry did.

Who told you to say that?

lol

 

[easyt65]

The polls still have Hillary winning...

The polls were right. She won the popular vote.

How's that working out, snowflake?

They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.

No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.

NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.

It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.

Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.

It failed - Hillary lost.

The numbers they got were right.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Hillary had nothing to do with birtherism.

You LIE, snowflake. It has been oroven her campaign spread it around in 2008 as Barry came out of nowhere to kick her ass.

As Barry said in 2008:
"Hillary Clinton will DO and SAY anything to win."

All Mostly False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

All False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

All Pants on Fire! statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

 

[NYcarbineer]

The polls were right. She won the popular vote.

How's that working out, snowflake?

They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.

No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.

NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.

It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.

Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.

It failed - Hillary lost.

The numbers they got were right.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.

The articles were wrong. I'm right. Look at the polls in that link and tell me how wrong those polls were.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

People generally don't trust or like him, as well, considering his on-stage performance the last two years, they should not: except in one area.

But all of that may not matter if he does come through, according to analysis, on jobs. I would also add in fighting ISIS as well.

If he gets a Single Payer system through, all the better. It won't matter if he deports or does not deport 11 million people, or if he builds or does not build a wall.

If he can get the lower working classes on the job again with good paying wages, his popularity will improve . . . dramatically.

If he fails on jobs and ISIS, his chance for a second term would seemingly dramatically decrease.

Trump to take office with dismal ratings -- except on jobs
Donald Trump's transition has hurt his popularity, not helped
Trump Transition Winning No Popularity Points

Did you know that Trumps Popularity is 25 points higher than the liberal news orgs? That it is much higher than Congress? Why is it that the lickspittle, lapdog, liberal media, didn't learn after the last election, not to give FALSE information about the polls?

Poll - Hillary Clinton up 12% over Trump in 2016 election. Yeah, it is hard for REAL, intelligent people to believe the polls. Only the dumbass, retarded, Liberals believe what the left wants you to believe. You just have to laugh at the stupidity of the left.

Presidential poll: Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump by 12 - CNNPolitics.com

(CNN)Hillary Clinton has a 12-point lead over Donald Trump and has reached 50% support nationally among likely voters, a new ABC News tracking poll shows.

 

[owebo]

Hillary had nothing to do with birtherism.

You LIE, snowflake. It has been oroven her campaign spread it around in 2008 as Barry came out of nowhere to kick her ass.

As Barry said in 2008:
"Hillary Clinton will DO and SAY anything to win."

All Mostly False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

All False statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

All Pants on Fire! statements involving Donald Trump | PolitiFact

 

[NYcarbineer]

The polls were right. She won the popular vote.

How's that working out, snowflake?

They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.

No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.

NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.

It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.

Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.

It failed - Hillary lost.

The numbers they got were right.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.

You mean like this article?
2016 Presidential Polls: Trump Vs. Clinton Polls Were Right — Polling More Accurate Than 2012 Election

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The polls still have Hillary winning...

The polls were right. She won the popular vote.

Thanks to Putin

I remember the RWnuts around here gleeful that the Russian hacking was hurting Clinton. You people were CERTAIN it was hurting Clinton.

How soon you forget.

Seth Rich gave Assange the emails, John Podesta fell for a phishing scam, Hillary used her own personal, unsecured server, there are no Russians anywhere

 

[easyt65]

How's that working out, snowflake?

They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.

No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.

NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.

It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.

Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.

It failed - Hillary lost.

The numbers they got were right.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.

The articles were wrong. I'm right. Look at the polls in that link and tell me how wrong those polls were.

2 days, snowflake.

 

[owebo]

How's that working out, snowflake?

They predicted an Electoral College landslide - they were wrong - you lose.

No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.

NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.

It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.

Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.

It failed - Hillary lost.

The numbers they got were right.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.

The articles were wrong. I'm right. Look at the polls in that link and tell me how wrong those polls were.

You mean all the polls showing Hillary winning?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well, at least we're compiling a good long list of RW'ers who declare the polls to be fake,

just in case Trump happens to get some good polls in the future.

 

[NYcarbineer]

No they didn't. Pollsters don't poll electors. They poll people. They poll the popular vote. The national polls got the popular vote almost exactly right.

NO shit, genius. They over-sampled democrats to get their numbers.

It's an old political trick before the election meant to discourage opposition voters to the point they believe it is pointless to go vote, believing there is no way their candidate can win.

Like rigging their Primary and feeding debate questions in advance to Hillary, this was a dirty attempt to steal the election.

It failed - Hillary lost.

The numbers they got were right.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

No, snowflake. After the loss articles and articles were written about the polls being SO wrong. Poor snowflake.

The articles were wrong. I'm right. Look at the polls in that link and tell me how wrong those polls were.

You mean all the polls showing Hillary winning?

Those polls only show who would win the popular vote, and they were right on.

 

[easyt65]

Hang your hat on that, snowflake.

 

[easyt65]

Those polls only show who would win the popular vote, and they were right on.

How's that 'popular vote win' working out, snowflake?

How are those recounts coming?

Flip any Electoral College voters lately?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's CNN and ABC WAPO polls....who gives a shit? The same polls assured us Clinton was comfortably ahead and would cruise to a win.

Now, who won?

 

[easyt65]

1,000 political seats / positions lost under Barry...Hillary being the biggest.



(Damn, the Russians have really been busy.)