Trump backs down

^^^^^^

So all those leftie papers were lying and creating fake news when they claimed they have it from reliable sources that there was wiretapping of the Trump organization and his campaign? You guys can't have it both ways, you know.

And "all these leftie [sic] papers" were saying O'bama did it huh?

Link(s)?
No, but they were saying that it did happen, and someone must have ordered it. So there's your evidence. Now, what did Obama know, when did he know it, and did he share this info with the Hillary campaign. Let's investigate and put whoever is responsible behind bars and throw away the key.
 
No, but they were saying that it did happen, and someone must have ordered it. So there's your evidence.

Got your evidence right here pal

C6El-7lWYAUj0Lp.jpg

170304081112-trump-accuses-obama-wiretapping-nobles-newday-00000000-large-169.jpg

WHO is named as the actor in both of those? Does it say "someone"? Does it say "Russia"?

Nnnnnnope. It says "Obama". Perhaps he means Shirley O'bama, a nurse Winfield Kansas.
Nnnnnopee. It specifies "President Obama".
Also says "Bad (or sick) guy".

How many people is the word "guy"? Just take a wild guess. Hint: your first reaction is probably the correct ONE. Nomsayin'?

Now let's zoom in on exactly where you lost the point:

goalposts.jpg


Isn't it cute though how a klown born in 1946 has no clue what McCarthyism is?
 
Speaking of McCarthyism, whether it was Obama or not, there is definite evidence that a branch of govt. wiretapped the opponent candidate in the middle of an election, and after, and leaked the info via the corrupted media, in order to damage the opponent. Which of course failed. You should be braying and hollering more about that than the Russians.
 
Speaking of McCarthyism, whether it was Obama or not, there is definite evidence that a branch of govt. wiretapped the opponent candidate in the middle of an election, and after, and leaked the info via the corrupted media, in order to damage the opponent. Which of course failed. You should be braying and hollering more about that than the Russians.

"When the goalpost move fails --- move 'em again". Yeah you go with that Sparkles. You lost.

Moreover, assuming you're referring to Comey, seems like that leak didn't "fail" at all, did it?
 
I get it. Accoprdiung to Republicans, A Presidential candidate colluding with the Russians is unworthy of investigation but OMG getting a blow job is? And OMG she used a private server OMG OMG OMG../

How the fuck you can bitch about this Russian story after your pathetic POS party spent years investigating Hillary's e-mails, Benghazi, and Bill Clinton just make me laugh my ass off that you are really that fucking stupid.
You don't get much. The Russian conspiracy has been investigated for months, where's the beef? If dems weren't so corrupt whoever did it wouldn't have had anything to release.

You don't care about national security or perjury? You have very different values than I do.
Who has been investigating? Republicans investigating Republicans. Yep, we can trust that.
 
Speaking of McCarthyism, whether it was Obama or not, there is definite evidence that a branch of govt. wiretapped the opponent candidate in the middle of an election, and after, and leaked the info via the corrupted media, in order to damage the opponent. Which of course failed. You should be braying and hollering more about that than the Russians.
No there is not. What information that Trump was wiretapped?

Leaks about Trump come from his own administration & Trump himself.
 
No they were referring to many instances of Trump campaign and his associates being wiretapped. Was there some real evidence or was it fake news?
You obviously did not read the article
Actually I did. It clearly indicates a wiretap was issued on Trump and his campaign. So there's your "evidence" that somebody was listening and reviewing Trump and / or campaign communications and transactions. Now, who issued this wiretap, and did Obama send any of this info to the Clinton campaign. Either one or both could be criminal.
Evidently you can't read. The article NEVER said whose phones were tapped.

Matthew Rosenberg @AllMattNYT


To Be Clear: The @nytimes never reported Trump campaign was wiretapped. Stories about “intercepted” comms never said whose comms intercepted

5:24 PM - 6 Mar 2017
Fake news Leftie hack NY Times will of course back track now. Why don't you ask them what they meant when they used the words "wiretap" and "intercepted communications" referring to the Trump campaign. Keep squirming.
Obviously, you just don't get it.

1) To wire tap a source to tap their phone lines. Yopu can listen to their phone conversations
2) When the Times said they had evidence from a wiretap, it just means that the person/organization that Trump or one of his minions had with this wiretapped source was noted.
3) In that care, neither Trump nor his minions were actually wiretapped but they spoke with some one that was wiretapped.

See, it is simple. So simple I thought even you could get it.

The NYT never said Trump was wiretapped. NEVER Never Never.

Then explain the FISA warrant request you lying fucking faggot.
 
:clap2:

All this criminal activity by Obama and the other agencies, and yet to see any evidence whatsoever of "collaboration" between Trump and the Russians. It's pretty pathetic, I have to tell you. Democrats using police-state tactics to go after their opponents. Disgusting.
Yet Republicans run the police state

They cover for a their dear leader while they spread lies about Obama

Obama used his intelligence agencies and resources to spy on the major parties presidential campaign, you fascist pig coup plotters along with your shadow government deep state will hang from the lightpoles for your crimes against the republic before this is over, watch your backs we're coming for you.

This is the part where you get to provide evidence of that

Otherwise you are no better than Trump (yes that is an insult)
The Obama Camp’s Disingenuous Denials on FISA Surveillance of Trump

Now go kill yourself you lying little faggot.
 
Your orange butt buddy made the claim. Why doesn't he back it up.

You really are sofa king stupid that you think people need to prove what the President of the United States says every time he talks? Here I thought that person was supposed to tell the truth & not be the ignorant lying fuck he really is.

Explain the FISA applications faggot or stfu.
FISA Applications? Lets see them.
The Obama Camp’s Disingenuous Denials on FISA Surveillance of Trump
:clap2:

All this criminal activity by Obama and the other agencies, and yet to see any evidence whatsoever of "collaboration" between Trump and the Russians. It's pretty pathetic, I have to tell you. Democrats using police-state tactics to go after their opponents. Disgusting.
I get it. Accoprdiung to Republicans, A Presidential candidate colluding with the Russians is unworthy of investigation but OMG getting a blow job is? And OMG she used a private server OMG OMG OMG../

How the fuck you can bitch about this Russian story after your pathetic POS party spent years investigating Hillary's e-mails, Benghazi, and Bill Clinton just make me laugh my ass off that you are really that fucking stupid.

Trump never colluded with the Russians and there is no evidence that he did, Clinton was investigated for obstruction and perjury during a sexual harassment lawsuit brought against him you lying little faggot.
 
Speaking of McCarthyism, whether it was Obama or not, there is definite evidence that a branch of govt. wiretapped the opponent candidate in the middle of an election, and after, and leaked the info via the corrupted media, in order to damage the opponent. Which of course failed. You should be braying and hollering more about that than the Russians.

"When the goalpost move fails --- move 'em again". Yeah you go with that Sparkles. You lost.

Moreover, assuming you're referring to Comey, seems like that leak didn't "fail" at all, did it?
Hard to understand your incoherent gibberish. You accuse of Trump making false claims of a wiretap, and as we can clearly see, there was more than sufficient evidence of a wiretap. Whether it was ordered by Obama or not, he knew about it about, provided the info to the Hillary campaign, and created the foundation for the leaks we see today. After all this is the same crooked Obama that wiretapped the German leader, and sic'd the IRS on the republicans. So it isn't a stretch that he would do the same to Trump.
 
Speaking of McCarthyism, whether it was Obama or not, there is definite evidence that a branch of govt. wiretapped the opponent candidate in the middle of an election, and after, and leaked the info via the corrupted media, in order to damage the opponent. Which of course failed. You should be braying and hollering more about that than the Russians.
No there is not. What information that Trump was wiretapped?

Leaks about Trump come from his own administration & Trump himself.
That's not what the NY Times article says. Are you having reading comprehension problems or just your average smelly leftist pothead?
 
Speaking of McCarthyism, whether it was Obama or not, there is definite evidence that a branch of govt. wiretapped the opponent candidate in the middle of an election, and after, and leaked the info via the corrupted media, in order to damage the opponent. Which of course failed. You should be braying and hollering more about that than the Russians.
No there is not. What information that Trump was wiretapped?

Leaks about Trump come from his own administration & Trump himself.
That's not what the NY Times article says. Are you having reading comprehension problems or just your average smelly leftist pothead?
For the umpteenth time. The Times articvle does NOT say Trump was wiretapped.

My God.
 
Speaking of McCarthyism, whether it was Obama or not, there is definite evidence that a branch of govt. wiretapped the opponent candidate in the middle of an election, and after, and leaked the info via the corrupted media, in order to damage the opponent. Which of course failed. You should be braying and hollering more about that than the Russians.
No there is not. What information that Trump was wiretapped?

Leaks about Trump come from his own administration & Trump himself.
That's not what the NY Times article says. Are you having reading comprehension problems or just your average smelly leftist pothead?
For the umpteenth time. The Times articvle does NOT say Trump was wiretapped.

My God.
Very first line, retard, says "wiretapped" and "intercepted communications", are you fucking blind?
 
There definitely was wiretapping, whether or not Obama knew about it and used it, is another story that will soon be determined. Don't worry, sooner or later they'll get to the bottom of all the criminal activity the Democrats engaged in.
 
There definitely was wiretapping, whether or not Obama knew about it and used it, is another story that will soon be determined. Don't worry, sooner or later they'll get to the bottom of all the criminal activity the Democrats engaged in.
Unslack your Jaw Rube
Wait What ??? I am "Shocked Shocked"
House Intelligence Chair: No Evidence Of Alleged Trump Tower Wiretap

Source: NPR

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes says he doesn't believe "there was an actual tap of Trump Tower," contrary to claims made by President Trump.

The top Democrat on the House committee, Adam Schiff, said he's seen "no evidence whatsoever" that supports Trump's claim.

Trump alleged that his predecessor, President Barack Obama, tapped his phone at Trump Tower in a pair of tweets earlier this month.

Trump has not produced any evidence to support his claim.

Read more: House Intelligence Chair: No Evidence Of Alleged Trump Tower Wiretap

House Intel Chair Devin Nunes went for the "Donald Trump uses words but they don't mean anything" :ack-1: defense on Wednesday, saying, "Are you going to take the tweets literally? And if you are, then clearly the president is wrong.":boobies:
Top Republican Goes To Insane Lengths To Try To Defend The Crazy In The Oval Office
 
Last edited:
There definitely was wiretapping, whether or not Obama knew about it and used it, is another story that will soon be determined. Don't worry, sooner or later they'll get to the bottom of all the criminal activity the Democrats engaged in.
Unslack your Jaw Rube
Wait What ??? I am "Shocked Shocked"
House Intelligence Chair: No Evidence Of Alleged Trump Tower Wiretap

Source: NPR

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes says he doesn't believe "there was an actual tap of Trump Tower," contrary to claims made by President Trump.

The top Democrat on the House committee, Adam Schiff, said he's seen "no evidence whatsoever" that supports Trump's claim.

Trump alleged that his predecessor, President Barack Obama, tapped his phone at Trump Tower in a pair of tweets earlier this month.

Trump has not produced any evidence to support his claim.

Read more: House Intelligence Chair: No Evidence Of Alleged Trump Tower Wiretap
Count your chickens when the eggs are hatched. Now go out there and burn some flags like a good Democrat. LOL
 
upload_2017-3-15_17-31-3.jpeg

In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim

re·pu·di·a·tion
rəˌpyo͞odēˈāSH(ə)n/
noun
noun: repudiation; plural noun: repudiations
  1. 1.
    rejection of a proposal or idea.
    "the repudiation of reformist policies"
  2. 2.
    denial of the truth or validity of something.
 

Forum List

Back
Top