Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Christophera]

Chris,

Do Mr. Domel and Mr. Robertson now that your have named them in a legal document accusing them of withholding information and evidence that would lead to the arrest and conviction of people responsible for murder?

I'm sure they would be VERY interested.

Have you contacted them?

No. Your interpretation of the significance of events is erroneous as well, which is typical.

Do you know that by promoting the FEMA deception you will be held accountable for Misprision of treason?

Does Mr. Domel and Mr. Robertson know that you are accusing them of treason because they know information about the true core and won't come forward?

Do they know you have named them in a legal document?

No, and I do not have to inform them. Perhaps you should inform them.

 

[slackjawed]

If the twoofers weren't so treasonous as a group, this would be freaking hilarious.

Go back to the dayroom, lunch is over!

 

[Gamolon]

...Misprision...

Look out!!

Chris learned a new word!!!!

 

[Christophera]

If the twoofers weren't so treasonous as a group, this would be freaking hilarious.

Go back to the dayroom, lunch is over!

Get your evidence and file with a judge if that is what you believe.

Otherwise you are just furthering the concealment of treason.

 

[slackjawed]

If the twoofers weren't so treasonous as a group, this would be freaking hilarious.

Go back to the dayroom, lunch is over!

Get your evidence and file with a judge if that is what you believe.

Otherwise you are just furthering the concealment of treason.

When you win your case in court, I will.
Until then your case is just another frivolous lawsuit, tying up the courts at the expense of the taxpayer.

And you have just enough mental illness to claim others are committing treason.

Ho Hum, another day another treasonous twoofer loon.......

 

[Liability]

If the twoofers weren't so treasonous as a group, this would be freaking hilarious.

Go back to the dayroom, lunch is over!

Get your evidence and file with a judge if that is what you believe.

Otherwise you are just furthering the concealment of treason.

LOL!

You filed some odd amorphous little attempt at a court document with the Court and you think this somehow makes you proactive in your endless quest to prove a conspiracy?

Listen up. You need to learn a few things.

(A) Prosecutors do that whole "prosecuting" thang. Not individual citizens. Your filing amounts to a poorly crafted generally incoherent attempt to accuse somebody of a crime. But the thing is (one of the things, actually, is) that YOU are not a freaking public prosecutor.

You have approximately ( let me calculate this out to the tenth decimal place ) 0.0000000000 STANDING to file anything that might constitute an accusatory instrument.

(B) Your prayer for relief is gibberish. What the HELL is a Judge supposed to do with that nonsense? It would never happen, of course, but if you had managed to find the lone judicial nutbag who might be inclined to permit you to proceed in some way, you leave it impossible to say WHAT it is the judge would be "granting." [And, Judges are not genies. You can't ask them for magical favors. You have to SHOW them that they have some actual JURISIDICTIONAL grant of authority to issue an order, etc. YOU, in that hideous attempt at a "pleading(?)," failed to do any such thing.]

(c)

 

[Liability]

No. Your interpretation of the significance of events is erroneous as well, which is typical.

Do you know that by promoting the FEMA deception you will be held accountable for Misprision of treason?

Does Mr. Domel and Mr. Robertson know that you are accusing them of treason because they know information about the true core and won't come forward?

Do they know you have named them in a legal document?

No, and I do not have to inform them. Perhaps you should inform them.

LOL!

You don't have to inform them?

By your pleading (not that anybody can figure out whateverthefuckitis you "filed"), did you accuse them of crimes?

Are they parties?

Who ARE the named parties?

Should we call them "defendants?"

Did you ever hear of "Notice?"

Did you ever hear of "due process?"

Should they, whoever the "defendants" may be, not have a right to be informed of the charges against them?

Do they get "service" of "process?"

Or, since you seem to think you can somehow be a prosecutor, to get "in personam" jurisdiction over the "defendants," certainly somebody is going to have to drag them before the magistrate or judge. Who exactly is authorized, given your pleadings, to "arrest" the defendants?

Oh, and here's one you shouldn't like too much. Since it is you, and not an actual prosecutor, making these allegations, the fact that you are making them in a Court "filing" is probably not going to be adequate to insulate you from a damn fine defamation suit. Unlike a public prosecutor, you will not be the beneficiary of any immunity. And by repeating your allegations in THIS manner -- on an INTERNET message board -- you are seriously doing your damnedest to make SURE that the publication of the libel is as widely disseminated as any future plaintiff could hope for.

That's right, little ChristoFEARa, you could be on the receiving end of a good old law$uit.

Hope you didn't actually like your house.

 

[slackjawed]

Does Mr. Domel and Mr. Robertson know that you are accusing them of treason because they know information about the true core and won't come forward?

Do they know you have named them in a legal document?

No, and I do not have to inform them. Perhaps you should inform them.

LOL!

You don't have to inform them?

By your pleading (not that anybody can figure out whateverthefuckitis you "filed"), did you accuse them of crimes?

Are they parties?

Who ARE the named parties?

Should we call them "defendants?"

Did you ever hear of "Notice?"

Did you ever hear of "due process?"

Should they, whoever the "defendants" may be, not have a right to be informed of the charges against them?

Do they get "service" of "process?"

Or, since you seem to think you can somehow be a prosecutor, to get "in personam" jurisdiction over the "defendants," certainly somebody is going to have to drag them before the magistrate or judge. Who exactly is authorized, given your pleadings, to "arrest" the defendants?

Oh, and here's one you shouldn't like too much. Since it is you, and not an actual prosecutor, making these allegations, the fact that you are making them in a Court "filing" is probably not going to be adequate to insulate you from a damn fine defamation suit. Unlike a public prosecutor, you will not be the beneficiary of any immunity. And by repeating your allegations in THIS manner -- on an INTERNET message board -- you are seriously doing your damnedest to make SURE that the publication of the libel is as widely disseminated as any future plaintiff could hope for.

That's right, little ChristoFEARa, you could be on the receiving end of a good old law$uit.

Hope you didn't actually like your house.

Frivolous lawsuits like his should be criminal.
Especially ones like this one that fit Judge bean's concept of "having a fair trial and then hang him".

 

[DiveCon]

No, and I do not have to inform them. Perhaps you should inform them.

LOL!

You don't have to inform them?

By your pleading (not that anybody can figure out whateverthefuckitis you "filed"), did you accuse them of crimes?

Are they parties?

Who ARE the named parties?

Should we call them "defendants?"

Did you ever hear of "Notice?"

Did you ever hear of "due process?"

Should they, whoever the "defendants" may be, not have a right to be informed of the charges against them?

Do they get "service" of "process?"

Or, since you seem to think you can somehow be a prosecutor, to get "in personam" jurisdiction over the "defendants," certainly somebody is going to have to drag them before the magistrate or judge. Who exactly is authorized, given your pleadings, to "arrest" the defendants?

Oh, and here's one you shouldn't like too much. Since it is you, and not an actual prosecutor, making these allegations, the fact that you are making them in a Court "filing" is probably not going to be adequate to insulate you from a damn fine defamation suit. Unlike a public prosecutor, you will not be the beneficiary of any immunity. And by repeating your allegations in THIS manner -- on an INTERNET message board -- you are seriously doing your damnedest to make SURE that the publication of the libel is as widely disseminated as any future plaintiff could hope for.

That's right, little ChristoFEARa, you could be on the receiving end of a good old law$uit.

Hope you didn't actually like your house.

Frivolous lawsuits like his should be criminal.
Especially ones like this one that fit Judge bean's concept of "having a fair trial and then hang him".

i hope Cali has those laws and that loser pays

 

[slackjawed]

LOL!

You don't have to inform them?

By your pleading (not that anybody can figure out whateverthefuckitis you "filed"), did you accuse them of crimes?

Are they parties?

Who ARE the named parties?

Should we call them "defendants?"

Did you ever hear of "Notice?"

Did you ever hear of "due process?"

Should they, whoever the "defendants" may be, not have a right to be informed of the charges against them?

Do they get "service" of "process?"

Or, since you seem to think you can somehow be a prosecutor, to get "in personam" jurisdiction over the "defendants," certainly somebody is going to have to drag them before the magistrate or judge. Who exactly is authorized, given your pleadings, to "arrest" the defendants?

Oh, and here's one you shouldn't like too much. Since it is you, and not an actual prosecutor, making these allegations, the fact that you are making them in a Court "filing" is probably not going to be adequate to insulate you from a damn fine defamation suit. Unlike a public prosecutor, you will not be the beneficiary of any immunity. And by repeating your allegations in THIS manner -- on an INTERNET message board -- you are seriously doing your damnedest to make SURE that the publication of the libel is as widely disseminated as any future plaintiff could hope for.

That's right, little ChristoFEARa, you could be on the receiving end of a good old law$uit.

Hope you didn't actually like your house.

Frivolous lawsuits like his should be criminal.
Especially ones like this one that fit Judge bean's concept of "having a fair trial and then hang him".

i hope Cali has those laws and that loser pays

Cali has those laws, but usually doesn't enforce them against the criminally insane........he's safe.

 

[DiveCon]

Frivolous lawsuits like his should be criminal.
Especially ones like this one that fit Judge bean's concept of "having a fair trial and then hang him".

i hope Cali has those laws and that loser pays

Cali has those laws, but usually doesn't enforce them against the criminally insane........he's safe.

gotta love his take though
the only way he can lose is if all the judges are treasonous

 

[slackjawed]

i hope Cali has those laws and that loser pays

Cali has those laws, but usually doesn't enforce them against the criminally insane........he's safe.

gotta love his take though
the only way he can lose is if all the judges are treasonous

yup, but then it is California, and they do have judges that are nutjobs like him. Yet his case is filed against new york, and Cali ain't going to go against NY.

 

[Christophera]

Cali has those laws, but usually doesn't enforce them against the criminally insane........he's safe.

gotta love his take though
the only way he can lose is if all the judges are treasonous

yup, but then it is California, and they do have judges that are nutjobs like him. Yet his case is filed against new york, and Cali ain't going to go against NY.

You might want to save your message. At your indictment for treason it could be misinterpreted to show you are so confused you did not know it is filed in a federal court

In fact, all the agents pretending to be morons and so confused might make the same plea. Glad to see you are getting legal counsel so soon and sticking together.

 

[slackjawed]

gotta love his take though
the only way he can lose is if all the judges are treasonous

yup, but then it is California, and they do have judges that are nutjobs like him. Yet his case is filed against new york, and Cali ain't going to go against NY.

You might want to save your message. At your indictment for treason it could be misinterpreted to show you are so confused you did not know it is filed in a federal court

In fact, all the agents pretending to be morons and so confused might make the same plea. Glad to see you are getting legal counsel so soon and sticking together.

 

[Fizz]

gotta love his take though
the only way he can lose is if all the judges are treasonous

yup, but then it is California, and they do have judges that are nutjobs like him. Yet his case is filed against new york, and Cali ain't going to go against NY.

You might want to save your message. At your indictment for treason it could be misinterpreted to show you are so confused you did not know it is filed in a federal court

In fact, all the agents pretending to be morons and so confused might make the same plea. Glad to see you are getting legal counsel so soon and sticking together.

would you like my real name? you can include it on your lawsuit as a super secret government agent if you like. i would find it somewhat amusing to watch you get thrown in jail for contempt when you freak out on the judge when your case is thrown out.

its too bad that you dont have anything of value for Robertson to take away from you in a lawsuit. i guess thats one of the benefits of of being a lowlife criminal that refuses to work and refuses to pay child support and leeches off your sister. you cant even afford your own apartment, right? arent you still living in that boarding house?

 

[DiveCon]

yup, but then it is California, and they do have judges that are nutjobs like him. Yet his case is filed against new york, and Cali ain't going to go against NY.

You might want to save your message. At your indictment for treason it could be misinterpreted to show you are so confused you did not know it is filed in a federal court

In fact, all the agents pretending to be morons and so confused might make the same plea. Glad to see you are getting legal counsel so soon and sticking together.

would you like my real name? you can include it on your lawsuit as a super secret government agent if you like. i would find it somewhat amusing to watch you get thrown in jail for contempt when you freak out on the judge when your case is thrown out.

its too bad that you dont have anything of value for Robertson to take away from you in a lawsuit. i guess thats one of the benefits of of being a lowlife criminal that refuses to work and refuses to pay child support and leeches off your sister. you cant even afford your own apartment, right? arent you still living in that boarding house?

MAN< i hope they have court TV there that day
LOL

 

[Christophera]

The altered scans of absolete plans show actions designed to mislead and conceal the act of treason obstructing justice and due process investigation/analysis for "cause of death" empowering the continued deception and uses of American power un constitutionally taken. Unlawful and malicious in everyway towards freedom and the Constitution.

The role of the altered scans is to support FEMA in their misinformation to NIST, enabled by guilini's acts.

 

[slackjawed]

i expect to see this on the news the day it comes to court.

i can see the headlines now:

Disgruntled Truther Shot in Courtroom having temper tantrum, bailif awarded community service medal!

 

[DiveCon]

The altered scans of absolete plans show actions designed to mislead and conceal the act of treason obstructing justice and due process investigation/analysis for "cause of death" empowering the continued deception and uses of American power un constitutionally taken. Unlawful and malicious in everyway towards freedom and the Constitution.



The role of the altered scans is to support FEMA in their misinformation to NIST, enabled by guilini's acts.

does that lady know you are forging her signature and posting it on the internet?

 

[Christophera]

The altered scans of absolete plans show actions designed to mislead and conceal the act of treason obstructing justice and due process investigation/analysis for "cause of death" empowering the continued deception and uses of American power un constitutionally taken. Unlawful and malicious in everyway towards freedom and the Constitution.



The role of the altered scans is to support FEMA in their misinformation to NIST, enabled by guilini's acts.

does that lady know you are forging her signature and posting it on the internet?

You misrepresent agent. The entire thing is here.

Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382