Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Christophera, Feb 24, 2010.

  1. Christophera
    Offline

    Christophera Evidence & Reason Rule

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,298
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Santa Barbara CA
    Ratings:
    +74
    A filing at a U.S. District court was completed on February 18, 2010 disclosing misprision of treason.

    Local court rules had no accommodation to present any letter to a judge. Such is specifically against the rules. U.S. code requirements did not matter. After a few trips to the court house a criminal filing was made pursuant to evidenced violations of law and actions constituting evasion or concealment of acts embodying treason. This page has links to all exhibits and photographic panels.

    Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382

    As can be seen on the below conformed face page, this made possible an "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE" relating to Title 18 authority and duty of a judge within federal criminal procedure.

    [​IMG]

    Accordingly, assertions of "steel core columns" in the core of the Twin towers is misprision of treason IF the violation of law enabling the deception by FEMA of NIST and the public is not observed AND evidence from 9-11 showing the supposed steel core columns in the core area is not provided to substantiate they existed.

    All reference to steel core columns without such respective action is misprision of treason.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2010
  2. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    :lol:

    you are a moron!!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Christophera
    Offline

    Christophera Evidence & Reason Rule

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,298
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Santa Barbara CA
    Ratings:
    +74
    You have no evidence. You appear to support treason. Cease.
     
  4. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    no evidence of what?

    you are the one claiming there was treason.

    PROVE IT!!!!:cuckoo:
     
  5. Christophera
    Offline

    Christophera Evidence & Reason Rule

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,298
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Santa Barbara CA
    Ratings:
    +74
    It's proven.

    Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382

    and thanks for the proof you are acting as a part of the treason alleged in the linked page where the District court filing is documented.
     
  6. Gamolon
    Offline

    Gamolon VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,117
    Thanks Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +356
    Watch out Fizz!!! He'll threaten you with preparing a jail cell for you also!!!!

    :lol:
     
  7. Fizz
    Offline

    Fizz BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    4,391
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +349
    having a fucking lunatic that blames the lack of a paper from 1876 as the reason he didnt pay $30,000 claim there is treason is not proof of treason.

    filing a lawsuit doesnt make it true. anyone can file a lawsuit for anything. you have already proved that.

    i can file a lawsuit and say you are flying over my house dressed in a chicken suit. it doesnt mean its actually happening.

    you remind me of this guy...
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA1hyqA6UTY]YouTube - Paranoid schizo complains to city about "rogue helicopter pilot"[/ame]
     
  8. Gamolon
    Offline

    Gamolon VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,117
    Thanks Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +356
    Does Leslie Robertson know that you have named him in legal documents in which you are accusing them of hiding information about the deaths of 3,000 people?

    I wonder....
     
  9. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,063
    It's proven?

    Where?

    When?

    You mean you think the filing of a document in Court constitutes PROOF?

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Christophera
    Offline

    Christophera Evidence & Reason Rule

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5,298
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Santa Barbara CA
    Ratings:
    +74
    It contains proof. Recognition of it is required to end treason.

    Unlikely you are interested in that because you seek to further it with your post.

    BTW, null post moron. No evidence countering what is presented as proof.

    BTW moron, did you notice the violation of law enabling the misrepresentation of the core structure?

    BTW, if you don't notice that . . . it puts you on the wrong side of the law and party to treason.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2010

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

how would you present a case to the courts showing misprision of treason