Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's because republicans appoint judges based on ideology instead of legal competence. Remember those judges Trump nominated, especially the one who failed questioning from Senator John Kennedy (R), about such simple things as federal evidence motions.
I think we would be better off with judges who weren't lawyers.
And Doctors who never went to medical school.
And scientists who never took mathematics.
What a stupid comment.
A statist fool would naturally think so.
Yes. Only a "statist fool" would think that Judges should, you know, know what the law is.
We need judges who base their opinions on their "common sense" and emotion, right?
Yes. Only a "statist fool" would think that Judges should, you know, know what the law is.
We need judges who base their opinions on their "common sense" and emotion, right?
I guess you're not familiar with the 9th Circus.....
That's because republicans appoint judges based on ideology instead of legal competence. Remember those judges Trump nominated, especially the one who failed questioning from Senator John Kennedy (R), about such simple things as federal evidence motions.
I think we would be better off with judges who weren't lawyers.
And Doctors who never went to medical school.
And scientists who never took mathematics.
What a stupid comment.
A statist fool would naturally think so.
Yes. Only a "statist fool" would think that Judges should, you know, know what the law is.
We need judges who base their opinions on their "common sense" and emotion, right?
Like the judge who used Trumps campaign rhetoric to halt trumps ban on people from worn torn countries? He didn't use the law he ruled on his feelings
Or the judge who just halted trumps recindince of the dreamers based on trumps tweets?
I think it's pretty safe to say that I know more about the 9th Circuit than you do.
And Airline "drivers" who aren't trained pilots. Brilliant!Its my opinion that many Judges are political operatives these days Crixxus .
That's because republicans appoint judges based on ideology instead of legal competence. Remember those judges Trump nominated, especially the one who failed questioning from Senator John Kennedy (R), about such simple things as federal evidence motions.
I think we would be better off with judges who weren't lawyers.
Despite Exposés and Embarrassments, Hundreds of Judges Preside in New York Without Law Degrees — ProPublica
How about the 6th Circuit? How come Righties never talk about that one? It's been overturned a lot more than the 9th.
Yes. Only a "statist fool" would think that Judges should, you know, know what the law is.
We need judges who base their opinions on their "common sense" and emotion, right?
I guess you're not familiar with the 9th Circus.....
I think we would be better off with judges who weren't lawyers.
And Doctors who never went to medical school.
And scientists who never took mathematics.
What a stupid comment.
A statist fool would naturally think so.
Yes. Only a "statist fool" would think that Judges should, you know, know what the law is.
We need judges who base their opinions on their "common sense" and emotion, right?
Like the judge who used Trumps campaign rhetoric to halt trumps ban on people from worn torn countries? He didn't use the law he ruled on his feelings
Or the judge who just halted trumps recindince of the dreamers based on trumps tweets?
You don't think that the President's own words, typed into his phone with his own stubby little fingers, is an accurate representation of the President's thought process and intention?
You don't think that the President's own words, typed into his phone with his own stubby little fingers, is an accurate representation of the President's thought process and intention?
And Airline "drivers" who aren't trained pilots. Brilliant!Its my opinion that many Judges are political operatives these days Crixxus .
That's because republicans appoint judges based on ideology instead of legal competence. Remember those judges Trump nominated, especially the one who failed questioning from Senator John Kennedy (R), about such simple things as federal evidence motions.
I think we would be better off with judges who weren't lawyers.
Despite Exposés and Embarrassments, Hundreds of Judges Preside in New York Without Law Degrees — ProPublica
Thank you for so clearly articulating why electing judges is a bad idea.
And Doctors who never went to medical school.
And scientists who never took mathematics.
What a stupid comment.
A statist fool would naturally think so.
Yes. Only a "statist fool" would think that Judges should, you know, know what the law is.
We need judges who base their opinions on their "common sense" and emotion, right?
Like the judge who used Trumps campaign rhetoric to halt trumps ban on people from worn torn countries? He didn't use the law he ruled on his feelings
Or the judge who just halted trumps recindince of the dreamers based on trumps tweets?
You don't think that the President's own words, typed into his phone with his own stubby little fingers, is an accurate representation of the President's thought process and intention?
It's not based on the law or precedence now is ir? The first one was based on campaign rehetoric.
And Airline "drivers" who aren't trained pilots. Brilliant!That's because republicans appoint judges based on ideology instead of legal competence. Remember those judges Trump nominated, especially the one who failed questioning from Senator John Kennedy (R), about such simple things as federal evidence motions.
I think we would be better off with judges who weren't lawyers.
Despite Exposés and Embarrassments, Hundreds of Judges Preside in New York Without Law Degrees — ProPublica
Thank you for so clearly articulating why electing judges is a bad idea.
Then why do liberals do it, then cry about it?
How about the 6th Circuit? How come Righties never talk about that one? It's been overturned a lot more than the 9th.
That's your excuse, is it?How about the 6th Circuit? How come Righties never talk about that one? It's been overturned a lot more than the 9th.
Because the records you speak of are only recent...and based on a stint where the SCOTUS was terribly Left leaning.
Let's see what happens with Trumps picks on board
That's your excuse, is it?
How about the 6th Circuit? How come Righties never talk about that one? It's been overturned a lot more than the 9th.
Because the records you speak of are only recent...and based on a stint where the SCOTUS was terribly Left leaning.
Let's see what happens with Trumps picks on board
.
.
.
Knocking down Lefties arguments with half my brain tied behind my back.
yes they are jackasses.....seems like only if you beat the crap out of them they will learn
You're really so deluded as to believe that the SCOTUS has been "terribly left-leaning" at any point in recent history?
Spoken like a true trumpanzee....living your violence vicariously thru the internet.yes they are jackasses.....seems like only if you beat the crap out of them they will learn
"Recent" is the facts"?That's your excuse, is it?
Nah....just the facts....maam
