Fani Willis and Wade referred to Georgia State Bar for Misconduct

We are not interested in your "reading between the lines". She did not make the statements you are claiming. She didn't say "she often did" this or that with her transactions, or kept a lot or a little, she did not speak about "the bulk" of anything.
She said something to that effect. She said she'd keep cash from her transactions like whenever she went to Publix.
She dissembled, rambled, was evasive and combative, and unresponsive to the questions, and it was not lost on the judge.
I'm happy you think so. We can see how good your assessment is when the ruling comes in.
The statements I quoted are her words, and they conflict. You can lose all of the money or you can keep some of the money, but you can't do both. She said several times that she lost all the money from her campaign.
All the money she put into the campaign she lost because she lost the campaign. This isn't that hard guy.
You are trying to twist that into her losing the campaign, which is just not what the line of questioning was about.
The line of questioning was about a part in a book that she gave quotes for that suggested she was broke. She mentioned losing the $50,000 for her campaign as the context for that and saying she felt like she just gave $50,000 away after she lost.
 
She said something to that effect. She said she'd keep cash from her transactions like whenever she went to Publix.

I'm happy you think so. We can see how good your assessment is when the ruling comes in.

All the money she put into the campaign she lost because she lost the campaign. This isn't that hard guy.

The line of questioning was about a part in a book that she gave quotes for that suggested she was broke. She mentioned losing the $50,000 for her campaign as the context for that and saying she felt like she just gave $50,000 away after she lost.
Well you are slowly getting it. She either lost all of the $50K, which means she couldn't have kept part of it- or she did keep part of it, which means she didn't lose all of it.

This sort of contradiction is common when someone is not being truthful, because you have to compound your first lie with another, and another, and it just snowballs.

Before you know it, you are saying "it depends on what your definition of "is" is".
 
Well you are slowly getting it. She either lost all of the $50K, which means she couldn't have kept part of it- or she did keep part of it, which means she didn't lose all of it.
Sorry being pedantic isn't a real legal argument.
This sort of contradiction is common when someone is not being truthful, because you have to compound your first lie with another, and another, and it just snowballs.
What do you imagine she's lying about?
Before you know it, you are saying "it depends on what your definition of "is" is".
No, this all relies on you being stupid.
 
It was clear to me. The only people it wasn’t clear to are the ones who want to believe she’s corrupt.

Where would Trump’s lawyers come up with a scenario where a civil servant takes vacations in order to bilk the taxpayers?


Trump always accuses others of the things he’s doing because he thinks everyone is as dishonest and corrupt as he is.
This is about Big Fani’s corruption…And you aren’t the arbiter of what is clear or not, considering your propensity to make things up that weren’t said. Besides, you have no dog in the fight, other than your hatred.
 
I cannot believe this was entered into evidence in this matter. There is no point to this other than to humiliate and embarrass these lawyers.

God forbid that Trump and his criminal associate should simply try the case on the evidence, and not try to humiliate and smear their betters
Good one, soon to be EX-lawyers. Now tell us you believe in truth and justice.
 
I cannot believe this was entered into evidence in this matter. There is no point to this other than to humiliate and embarrass these lawyers.

God forbid that Trump and his criminal associate should simply try the case on the evidence, and not try to humiliate and smear their betters
Christ, can you be any more triggered and gullible?
Lighten up, Karen, it's a parody from a hit song.
 
GHoQj67XkAA34_g.jpg
 
What conflicting statements? She took out $50,000 for her own campaign, kept a little of that money as cash as she testified she often did with her transactions, and then lost the bulk of it when she lost her campaign. How are you still confused you Bingo?
Show us where she said she lost “the bulk of it”.

Watch the troll squirm.
 
Fani Willis and Nathan Wade referred to the Georgia State Bar for Misconduct.

- Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis and her former lover Nathan Wade are facing two ethics complaints from a conservative government watchdog group based on their court testimony on allegations they had an 'improper' affair.

The American Accountability Foundation (AAF) is requesting that the Georgia state bar open disciplinary proceedings against the Fulton County DA and Wade for violations of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct.


Mod Edited, Deleting advertising link on the board. White 6






AAF is alleging Wade lied under oath about his relationship with Willis, and alleging that Willis admitted to keeping campaign money for personal use on the witness stand.





"To ensure that the citizens of Fulton County and the State of Georgia understand that the Bar will not countenance any violation of its ethics by those charged with upholding it, we urge you to revoke Ms. Willis’ license to practice law and permanently bar her from practicing law," adding the same request in a separate complaint against Wade.

This, is beautiful.
 

Forum List

Back
Top