Time For The Tea Party To Replace The Republican party ?

[Katzndogz]

It's time for the tea party to give up compromise and negotiation and go for subversion.

 

[NoVote]

The concept behind what is called the Tea Party needs to worm it's way into the democrap party. Everything they touch is ruined eventually. Cities, counties, states, even the nation goes downhill when they get into power. Socialism just won't work here.

 

[Votto]

Since the dawn of civilization those who are progressive in nature have always won out. The Republican Party of 1840-1970 is not the Republican party of today, in fact it was virtually the opposite. The Whigs success was due to the fact that slavery was going to end eventually. I believe we were the second to last western nation to ban slavery, only to Brazil in 1888 (I think). The Tea Party is on the wrong side of history. In order to save the Party, we have to adapt to non crazy ideas. We maintain or fiscal stances because they are a neccessity, but lets drop these crazy social thoughts because they are the reasons we lose so many youth votes. Trust me I know, I am in college and every person I speak to who says, I like the Repubs. ideas on the economy but I cant morally vote for someone who wants to ban gay marraige or any other host of out dated social ideals. If we want a conservative revival we need to stop putting people in congress from Kansas 3rd district or wherever who placee social issues over our impending fiscal doom. just my opinion though

The gay marriage issue is easy to remedy. Just take the position that government has absolutely no business in marriage by smiling on only certian sexual activity but not others.

As for abortion, it is the abortionists who are on the wrong side of history. Like slavery, people smile and say it's OK but still think it is still suboptimal on some level. They just put up with it due to financial reasons.

As for fiscal sanity, no one in the GOP seems to be offering anything substanitive to reduce the deficit or has in the past.

In the end, the GOP is a house divided on social issues and bankrupt in regards to fiscal issues. They are an absolute disgrace.

 

[Votto]

The concept behind what is called the Tea Party needs to worm it's way into the democrap party. Everything they touch is ruined eventually. Cities, counties, states, even the nation goes downhill when they get into power. Socialism just won't work here.

When did the Tea Party get into power and ruin everything? If memory serves, the GOP caves into the democrat mantra every fregg'in time.

 

[NoVote]

Read it again. I did not say the Tea Party is in power, in fact, I said earlier, I hope they never get in power, it will ruin them.

It's the democraps who ruin everything they touch. And now that you mention it, it's the repugs who let them get away with it.

 

[PredFan]

Time For The Tea Party To Replace The Republican party ?

Background:
The religious revival, that swept the northern United States from 1840 to 1855 (See: "The burnt-over district, Wickopedia) made it imposable for the members of America's politically conservative party (Called the Whig Party) to tolerate the expansion/ and or acceptance of slavery. (Whig members included: Abraham Lincoln, Danial Webster, Henry Clay, Zachary Taylor etc) But the leadership of the Whig party refused to advance the anti-slavery agenda of the vast majority of it's members. The party's leadership preferred to compromise with the Democrats party's pro-slavery stance.

Consequently a group of former Whigs, who believed in a literal interpretation of the American Constitution (that "All Men" really are created equal) formed a new party called The Republican Party, in Ripon, Wisconsin on June 6th 1854. Their ranks soon swelled with former Republicans, and Democrats of conscience. And within six years "the rest" became history.

What concerns conservatives today is the encrochmont of economic slavery. (The emancipation of Russia's original economic slaves occured in 1861 (See: Emancipation reform 1861, Wickopedia) And of Russia's "modern economic slaves" in 1991.

Do you think that it is time for "The Tea Party" (or a party of a different name, representing conservative Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians) to replace the Republican party ?

Nowadays, the Tea Party IS the Republican Party. Initially, the Tea Party was formed in opposotion to runaway government spending (first under Bush). The when hussein was elected, the GOP took it over and now there isn't any real difference.

 

[NoVote]

The GOP only "thinks" they have taken it over. When it comes voting time, if a repug has been remiss, they will eat him for lunch. And not for the first time. The Tea Party, if anything, resemble the independents. They are independent.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Time For The Tea Party To Replace The Republican party ?

but, everything that's wrong with the GObP/pubs is personified by the teepotters.

Its the potters that need to go. And, asap.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The GOP only "thinks" they have taken it over. When it comes voting time, if a repug has been remiss, they will eat him for lunch. And not for the first time. The Tea Party, if anything, resemble the independents. They are independent.

They MIGHT have started out that way but they're owned and controlled by the kochs now.

If we could get money out of the political "system", it would mean the end to the crazy potters.

Doesn't matter though. According to a poll I read today or yesterday, only 8% of the population are friendly to the whole screwed up idea of the Tea Party and even fewer to the reality that is the teaparty.

 

[NoVote]

They MIGHT have started out that way but they're owned and controlled by the kochs now.

I know it's a difficult concept to understand, but the Kochs' only think they control them. They have stolen the name, they think they have stolen the people behind the name, and there is the lie. The real force behind the people that vote the Tea Party concept do not need leaders, speech makers, lies or brass bands. They just quietly go about the business of voting for who they think is honest. Try to think of them as 'thinkers' instead of your usual brain dead party hack.

Anyone can claim to be anything they want, but when the curtain close on the booth, they can vote for anyone they want with no one being the wiser. Powerful stuff, there.

 

[UseCaution]

Time For The Tea Party To Replace The Republican party ?

Background:
The religious revival, that swept the northern United States from 1840 to 1855 (See: "The burnt-over district, Wickopedia) made it imposable for the members of America's politically conservative party (Called the Whig Party) to tolerate the expansion/ and or acceptance of slavery. (Whig members included: Abraham Lincoln, Danial Webster, Henry Clay, Zachary Taylor etc) But the leadership of the Whig party refused to advance the anti-slavery agenda of the vast majority of it's members. The party's leadership preferred to compromise with the Democrats party's pro-slavery stance.

Consequently a group of former Whigs, who believed in a literal interpretation of the American Constitution (that "All Men" really are created equal) formed a new party called The Republican Party, in Ripon, Wisconsin on June 6th 1854. Their ranks soon swelled with former Republicans, and Democrats of conscience. And within six years "the rest" became history.

What concerns conservatives today is the encrochmont of economic slavery. (The emancipation of Russia's original economic slaves occured in 1861 (See: Emancipation reform 1861, Wickopedia) And of Russia's "modern economic slaves" in 1991.

Do you think that it is time for "The Tea Party" (or a party of a different name, representing conservative Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians) to replace the Republican party ?

Please Proceed as,
" The Tea Party"

Or my favorite.​

"The Torn Scrotum Party"​

As for the mix of Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians.
"The Adult Party"​

 

[Friends]

I would welcome the creation of the Tea Party as a third party because it would split the right wing vote, and benefit the Democrats.

 

[zonly1]

Time For The Tea Party To Replace The Republican party ?

Background:
The religious revival, that swept the northern United States from 1840 to 1855 (See: "The burnt-over district, Wickopedia) made it imposable for the members of America's politically conservative party (Called the Whig Party) to tolerate the expansion/ and or acceptance of slavery. (Whig members included: Abraham Lincoln, Danial Webster, Henry Clay, Zachary Taylor etc) But the leadership of the Whig party refused to advance the anti-slavery agenda of the vast majority of it's members. The party's leadership preferred to compromise with the Democrats party's pro-slavery stance.

Consequently a group of former Whigs, who believed in a literal interpretation of the American Constitution (that "All Men" really are created equal) formed a new party called The Republican Party, in Ripon, Wisconsin on June 6th 1854. Their ranks soon swelled with former Republicans, and Democrats of conscience. And within six years "the rest" became history.

What concerns conservatives today is the encrochmont of economic slavery. (The emancipation of Russia's original economic slaves occured in 1861 (See: Emancipation reform 1861, Wickopedia) And of Russia's "modern economic slaves" in 1991.

Do you think that it is time for "The Tea Party" (or a party of a different name, representing conservative Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians) to replace the Republican party ?

conservatives are economic power slaves or cause slavery? really douche bag?
show empirical data, otherwise shut the hell up.

 

[Politico]

How could they? They don't even have a single person in office with a T next to their name.

 

[Morganist]

It is more like the original Republican party.

 

[RightNorLeft]

How could they? They don't even have a single person in office with a T next to their name.

Theres no one with an L next to their name for Liberal either if you want to put it in those terms.
The teaparty is a synonym for the far right.

 

[Friends]

The Republican Party is in a comparable situation to where the Democrats were during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Dissatisfied radicals dreamed of a third party on the left. They overestimated the appeal of their opinions. The presidential election of 1972 brought them back to reality. Although liberals moved to the left because of the War in Vietnam the black ghetto riots that happened from 1964 to 1968 moved most white blue collar workers to the right. These white blue collar workers noticed when the black ghetto riots ended abruptly with the election of Richard Nixon.

Currently the standard of living for most Americans is declining, while the rich are getting richer. This is a Democratic issue if the Democrats can learn how to exploit it.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Time For The Tea Party To Replace The Republican party ?

Ya' really think anyone would notice?​

April 24, 2013

A Gathering Of Lemmings!​

"To say we haven’t been real active is an understatement. We haven’t done anything,” Texas Republican Rep. Joe L. Barton, a member of the group, recently told CQ Roll Call."

DUH!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

Since the dawn of civilization those who are progressive in nature have always won out. The Republican Party of 1840-1970 is not the Republican party of today, in fact it was virtually the opposite. The Whigs success was due to the fact that slavery was going to end eventually. I believe we were the second to last western nation to ban slavery, only to Brazil in 1888 (I think). The Tea Party is on the wrong side of history. In order to save the Party, we have to adapt to non crazy ideas. We maintain our fiscal stances because they are a neccessity, but lets drop these crazy social thoughts because they are the reasons we lose so many youth votes. Trust me I know, I am in college and every person I speak to who says, I like the Repubs. ideas on the economy but I cant morally vote for someone who wants to ban gay marraige or any other host of out dated social ideals. If we want a conservative revival we need to stop putting people in congress from Kansas 3rd district or wherever who placee social issues over our impending fiscal doom. just my opinion though

IKE wouldn't recognize the halfwit neocon white trash that destroyed the Republican Party. Die-hards in both parties make me wonder if some form of that movie "invasion of the body snatchers" hasn't come to pass.

Some years ago Clintonistas defended the man who signed NAFTA, gave Blackwater its first no-bid contract and in the course of a perjury scandal came to support repeal of Glass Steagall and rescinding good-sense regulations on commodities speculation.

In these forums today is a thread claiming Bush wasn't the worst president in history, and there are people lost enough to support that without ever asking to see or posting charted comparisons with former presidents. Instead, like monkeys in a zoo they throw shit on the new guy, Obama - who, if my memory serves me well, has three years or so to go.

One hopes real fiscal conservative and liberal young people come to understand it'd be better to die in the streets than continue to give ground to corporate rule and either takes back the parties postmodern partisans degraded or come together in a new party devoid of social bogusness and focused on good jobs, tight budgets, and long prison sentences for white collar crime.

The group that gets there first is going to rule for a long time because the rest will take care of itself.

Good luck.

 

[Politico]

When the Tea party is an actual party ask again.