Picked up an R 700 yesterday, .308
Very nice!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Picked up an R 700 yesterday, .308
So basically you are trying to ban them over time.
A manufacture ban is a ban, no matter how you try to spin it.
Of course they will still be manufactured for the agents of the state, so what it really is is a sales ban.
How can gun rights people trust gun control people when you have to lie every time you make a statement?
A manufacture ban is a manufacture ban. That's not "spin" that's literally what it is.
Wasn't Ronnie Raygun President when they stopped making new, fully auto machine guns for the general public? Ronnie Raaygun, Gun Taker Awayer.
The assault weapons ban is on the manufacture of assault weapons for civilian use. If you already have one, you're allowed to keep it. If you don't have one and want one, you'll be allowed to buy one on the market provided it was legal when manufactured (during a period with no ban and otherwise legal). The ban is only on the manufacture.
At least, that is the ban that expired in 2004.
I'm pretty sure Congress has the authority to regulate commerce.
i didn't realize we replaced the stars and stripes with a hammer and sickle
I didn't realize they let the mentally challenged 5 year children of hookers post on here.
Continuing on with my previous thought because I have nothing better to do...
If I tell you a story about a dog that attacked and chewed a toddler to death in a public park, this would obviously horrify you.
And despite the fact I have NOT told you what kind of dog it was, you have an image of a very specific type of dog in your mind. A Rottweiler or a pit bull or some other large breed made infamous by Hollywood and the media.
But this story about the kid killed by a vicious dog has gripped the national psyche and a great hue and cry has gone up to ban "attack dogs".
Why "attack dogs" and not dogs in general? Because dog haters know that support for a ban on all dogs would die an instant death. So a tactic of incrementalism must be taken.
Heretofore, the definition of "attack dog" did not specify a breed. It specified the behavior of an attack dog.
But now the legal community includes breeds of dogs in a legal definition of "attack dog", and this is when the law becomes entirely capricious.
Just so with "assault rifle". I say "assault rifle" and you have an image in your mind based on what has been made infamous by Hollywood and the media. And now a great hue and cry has gone up to ban "assault rifles".
Why not guns in general? Because gun haters know that support for a total gun ban would die an instant death. So the incrementalist tactic is deployed.
But we know the ultimate goal is a ban on all guns. We know this because of the underlying conversation about guns being only for state militias, laying the foundation for a much larger and wider scope of future bans after the next tragedy.
'
So while they ar not going to take the guns you already have, they are going to make it harder and harder for future generations to acquire them.
You're a retard.
No jackass, you're a retard. Tell me, what is an "assault" rifle, eh? You don't know. You haven't even the first clue. So let me tell you....An "assault" rifle is a rifle that is capable of automatic fire. So please tell me....give me one example of an automatic rifle that can be readily found in the hands of US civilians, either legally or illegally. You can't. Because they aren't out there. A semiautomatic rifle is NOT an assault rifle. Now shut up, you uninformed idiot.
"Assault rifle" is a legal term. So an "assault rifle" is whatever the law says it is.
If our politicians decide a stripped down semi-automatic AR-15 is not an assault rifle, and an AR-15 with a flash suppressor is an assault rifle, then that is just the way it is.
It's an invention of the law. Like someone being killed "execution-style" is an invention of the media. It is whatever they decide it is.
Because of this ridiculous legal ambiguity, the words "assault rifle" conjure up different images in the minds of the perceivers, much the way the word "dog" does.
Picked up an R 700 yesterday, .308
congrats.. I hope it jams and explodes.
So basically you are trying to ban them over time.
A manufacture ban is a ban, no matter how you try to spin it.
Of course they will still be manufactured for the agents of the state, so what it really is is a sales ban.
How can gun rights people trust gun control people when you have to lie every time you make a statement?
A manufacture ban is a manufacture ban. That's not "spin" that's literally what it is.
Wasn't Ronnie Raygun President when they stopped making new, fully auto machine guns for the general public? Ronnie Raaygun, Gun Taker Awayer.
The assault weapons ban is on the manufacture of assault weapons for civilian use. If you already have one, you're allowed to keep it. If you don't have one and want one, you'll be allowed to buy one on the market provided it was legal when manufactured (during a period with no ban and otherwise legal). The ban is only on the manufacture.
At least, that is the ban that expired in 2004.
I'm pretty sure Congress has the authority to regulate commerce.
Steve Quayle, creator of SteveQuayle.com, says "the red list is on!" This refers to the so-called "red list" -- a secret kill list of Americans authorized by Obama and designed to be invoked immediately before an attempted radical leftist takeover of the nation. In support of this theory, Obama himself actually signed into law the NDAA which authorizes secret assassinations of U.S. citizens on U.S. soil.
They aren't gonna take your guns
The assault weapons ban is on the manufacture of assault weapons for civilian use. If you already have one, you're allowed to keep it. If you don't have one and want one, you'll be allowed to buy one on the market provided it was legal when manufactured (during a period with no ban and otherwise legal). The ban is only on the manufacture.
At least, that is the ban that expired in 2004.
I'm pretty sure Congress has the authority to regulate commerce.
The assault weapons ban is on the manufacture of assault weapons for civilian use. If you already have one, you're allowed to keep it. If you don't have one and want one, you'll be allowed to buy one on the market provided it was legal when manufactured (during a period with no ban and otherwise legal). The ban is only on the manufacture.
At least, that is the ban that expired in 2004.
I'm pretty sure Congress has the authority to regulate commerce.
I'm pretty sure they don't have the authority to violate the Second Amendment.
and the common use test in Heller vs DC
Picked up an R 700 yesterday, .308
congrats.. I hope it jams and explodes.
damn this thing is accurate. I am very pleasedPicked up an R 700 yesterday, .308
Very nice!!