There is Life on Europa!

[Procrustes Stretched]

Do you read the links you post?

Yep. And unlike you, my reading and comprehension skills are intact.

You're setting up strawmen again, Frankie.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yep. And unlike you, my reading and comprehension skills are intact.

You're setting up strawmen again, Frankie.

Unfair!

Only leftists are allowed to set up strawmen.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Unfair!

Only leftists are allowed to set up strawmen.

ty Troll

 

[ding]

Little Frankie Doo Doo

Carbon Dioxide Concentration | NASA Global Climate Change

Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Current news and data streams about global warming and climate change from NASA.

climate.nasa.gov

Oh wait!

Science.

Doesn't carbon dioxide in the atmosphere come from natural sources?​

Doesn't carbon dioxide in the atmosphere come from natural sources?

Yes, there are, but the only new process on Earth that has been identified that can account for the significant tipping of Earth's carbon balance is human activity, including deforestation, biomass burning, cement production, and—especially—fossil-fuel emissions.

www.climate.gov

How do you know they haven't mistaken a natural climate fluctuation - which the geologic record is littered with - for AGW?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Borrowing a page from Arthur C Clarke, "There is Life on Europa!"

The JWST just discovered that some advanced alien civilization has been making internal combustion engines and pumping planet killing CO2 into the atmosphere of Jupiter's Moon Europa!

Nothing else fits the facts! As we learned on our home planet, no natural process can produce CO2.

Europa is experiencing Climate Change

Scientists found CO2 on Europa. Here’s why it’s important

"In the last few weeks of September 2023, two teams of scientists using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) discovered the presence of carbon dioxide (CO2) on the surface of Jupiter’s icy moon Europa. This discovery could have implications for the search for life elsewhere in the universe."

The Deniers will, of course, try to chalk this up to some inexplicable "natural process" But we KNOW what causes CO2 don't we?

"‘… relay this information to Earth. Tsien destroyed three hours ago. I’m only survivor. Using my suit radio - no idea if it has enough range, but it’s the only chance. Please listen carefully. THERE IS LIFE ON EUROPA. I repeat: THERE IS LIFE ON EUROPA." --Arthur C Clarke, 2010: Odyssey Two

To all:

There are more fun ways to kill brain cells than reading the above post.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How do you know they haven't mistaken a natural climate fluctuation - which the geologic record is littered with - for AGW?

Sorry, you seem confused. Your question is for a climate scientist.

Would you like me to provide the email addresses of some climate scientists, so that you can pursue your in-no-way-total-bullshit curiosity?

 

[ding]

Sorry, you see confused. Your question is for a climate scientist.

Would you like me to provide the email addresses of some climate scientists, so that you can pursue your in-no-way-total-bullshit curiosity?

Actually anyone can understand the oxygen isotope curve which is the temperature record of the planet.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

How do you know they haven't mistaken a natural climate fluctuation - which the geologic record is littered with - for AGW?

I'm not a science denier.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Actually anyone can understand the oxygen isotope curve which is the temperature record of the planet.

. If you understood it, i think you would be able to make a point, instead of interrogating nonscientist strangers on a message board. Have at it.

 

[ding]

I'm not a science denier.

Sure you are. You deny that the geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends that were not caused by CO2 or orbital forcing. You deny that the planet cooled for millions of years with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm. You deny that the previous interglacial period was 2C warmer with 26 ft higher seas and 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today.

All of which are empirical climate evidence that was determined through scientific principles.

And this only scratches the surface of your science denial.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You deny that the geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends that were not caused by CO2 or orbital forcing.

No he isn't.

This is a lie.

You are a very dishonest poster, ding.

 

[ding]

. If you understood it, i think you would be able to make a point, instead of interrogating nonscientist strangers on a message board. Have at it.

I do understand it. Don't you? It's not that complicated... temperature versus time.

 

[ding]

No he isn't.

This is a lie.

You are a very dishonest poster, ding.

You deny it too. Prove me wrong. Tell me that everything I just wrote is what the science tells us about the past temperatures of the planet and that you accept them. I don't believe you can.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I do understand it. Don't you? It's not that complicated... temperature versus time.

It sure doesn't seem like you do. Probably because you haven't managed to make a single relevant point about it.

Guess who definitely does understand it...

The people who discovered that data and who taught and who teach us everything we will ever know about it.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Sure you are. You deny that the geologic record is...

I do not deny science. You do.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You deny it too.

Lie.

You're a very dishonest poster.

 

[ding]

It sure doesn't seem like you do. Probably because you haven't managed to make a single relevant point about it.

Guess who definitely des understand it...

The people who discovered that data and taught and teach us everything we will ever know about it.

Of course I have made relevant points about each and every single one of those pieces of empirical climate evidence.

I'd be happy to discuss what each one means in the Bull Ring with you.

 

[ding]

I do not deny science. You do.

So you agree that the planet cooled for millions of years with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of course I have made relevant points about each and every single one of those pieces of empirical climate evidence.

I'd be happy to discuss what each one means in the Bull Ring with you.

Why would I discuss a complicated scientific topic with an uneducated slob? I will just defer to the scientific community. Thanks, though.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you agree that the planet cooled for millions of years with atmospheric CO2 greater than 600 ppm?

Don't feed the sealion trolls.

If you have a relevant point to make, make it all by your big boy self.