The Word "Critical" as Used in Critical Race Theory - Does It Mean Critical As In Serious or As Being Critical/Judgmental of Race Theory?

What does the word "Critical" in "Critcal Race Theory" mean to you?


  • Total voters
    3
If your going to teach CRT then it should begin at the beginning.
Which was much farther back in history than the origen of the United States.
Or maybe we could start more modern like say: Margaret Sanger.
She was a progressive that thought weeding out the lower classes through abortion was a good idea.
Who needs to enslave them when we can just never have them be born in the first place.

Is Margaret Sanger taught in CRT?

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.


Surveying the "successes" of tax-subsidized birth control programs, Guttmacher noted in 1970 that "[Birth control services are proliferating in areas adjacent to concentrations of black population." (In the 1980's, targeting the inner-city black communities for school based sex clinics became more sensitive than expected.)

Guttmacher thought that as long as the birth rate continued to fall or remained at a low level, Planned Parenthood should certainly be introduced before family size by coercion is attempted."

Reaching this goal, he thought, would best be accomplished by having groups other than the PPFA preach the doctrine of a normative 2.1-child family, as doing this would offend Planned Parenthood's minority clients. He suggested that family size would decrease if abortion were liberalized nationwide and received government support. In this prediction he was right on target.

But Guttmacher did not completely reject forced population control: Predicting 20 critical years ahead in the struggle to control the population explosion, Dr. Alan Guttmacher, president of Planned parenthoodÑWorld Population, continues to urge the use of all voluntary means to hold down on the world birthrate. But he foresees the possibility that eventual coercion may become necessary, particularly in areas where the pressure is greatest, possibly India and China. "Each country," he says, "will have to decide its own form of coercion, and determine when and how it should be employed. At Present, the means are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion. Perhaps some day a way of enforcing compulsory birth control will be feasible.

Coerced abortion is already practiced in China, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation's approval.

So what is our government proposing to do now?
Have tax payers fund abortions right?
Not Republicans mind you. Republicans are for life, not genocide.
Choose you this day who you will stand with.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock...

I should point out that this thread is about CRT.

You have managed to go from CRT to Planned Parenthood.

That's how completely insane your thinking is. You can't even keep track of the initial point as you go ranting off into fantasies about genocide and abortion rights.
 
You don't believe in Jewish Space Lasers, do you?
They are called Direct Energy Weapons aka: DEW

You missed the point about Sanger.
The same people that backed her genocidal eugenics policies are the same people pushing this CRT.
It's really in your own best interest to try and start a civil war with a population that outnumbers your own.. right?

I got another one for you...
This vaccine for C19... who is it being pushed on the most?
What are the long term effects?
Who is pushing it?

People of Color... you all need to WAKE UP and recognize who your true enemy is.
Hint: It's not Republicans

We are against abortion (genocide/eugenics)
Most of us are against the "Jab" (genocide/eugenics)
We voted for the abolishment of slavery, civil rights, and non-discrimination laws.

You watch how Sanger worked. She used Blacks (Pastors, Nurses, Teachers, Community organizers) to push her agenda.
Who is coming to your door to push the Jab on you?


WAKEY WAKEY


I need go no further than this;

"The same people that backed her genocidal eugenics policies are the same people pushing this CRT."

Really? The same people? Do you know what "the same" means? "The same" means identical. So, you are sawing that the people who worked with her in 1921 are still alive today and working for Planned Parenthood?

Geez, I want in on that fountain of youth.

You miss the point of reality.

The same party... does that make you feeeeeeeeeeeeeel better?
You don't even know what reality is.



"Same" party? Didn't we just go over the definition of "same"?

Did you flush your intelligence down the toiletbowl?
 
If your going to teach CRT then it should begin at the beginning.
Which was much farther back in history than the origen of the United States.
Or maybe we could start more modern like say: Margaret Sanger.
She was a progressive that thought weeding out the lower classes through abortion was a good idea.
Who needs to enslave them when we can just never have them be born in the first place.

Is Margaret Sanger taught in CRT?

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.


Surveying the "successes" of tax-subsidized birth control programs, Guttmacher noted in 1970 that "[Birth control services are proliferating in areas adjacent to concentrations of black population." (In the 1980's, targeting the inner-city black communities for school based sex clinics became more sensitive than expected.)

Guttmacher thought that as long as the birth rate continued to fall or remained at a low level, Planned Parenthood should certainly be introduced before family size by coercion is attempted."

Reaching this goal, he thought, would best be accomplished by having groups other than the PPFA preach the doctrine of a normative 2.1-child family, as doing this would offend Planned Parenthood's minority clients. He suggested that family size would decrease if abortion were liberalized nationwide and received government support. In this prediction he was right on target.

But Guttmacher did not completely reject forced population control: Predicting 20 critical years ahead in the struggle to control the population explosion, Dr. Alan Guttmacher, president of Planned parenthoodÑWorld Population, continues to urge the use of all voluntary means to hold down on the world birthrate. But he foresees the possibility that eventual coercion may become necessary, particularly in areas where the pressure is greatest, possibly India and China. "Each country," he says, "will have to decide its own form of coercion, and determine when and how it should be employed. At Present, the means are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion. Perhaps some day a way of enforcing compulsory birth control will be feasible.

Coerced abortion is already practiced in China, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation's approval.

So what is our government proposing to do now?
Have tax payers fund abortions right?
Not Republicans mind you. Republicans are for life, not genocide.
Choose you this day who you will stand with.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock...

I should point out that this thread is about CRT.

You have managed to go from CRT to Planned Parenthood.

That's how completely insane your thinking is. You can't even keep track of the initial point as you go ranting off into fantasies about genocide and abortion rights.
Critical Race Theory has to do with RACE. Planned Parenthood was created to eliminate people of RACE.
Do you even have a clue how to connect dots???
 
If your going to teach CRT then it should begin at the beginning.
Which was much farther back in history than the origen of the United States.
Or maybe we could start more modern like say: Margaret Sanger.
She was a progressive that thought weeding out the lower classes through abortion was a good idea.
Who needs to enslave them when we can just never have them be born in the first place.

Is Margaret Sanger taught in CRT?

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.


Surveying the "successes" of tax-subsidized birth control programs, Guttmacher noted in 1970 that "[Birth control services are proliferating in areas adjacent to concentrations of black population." (In the 1980's, targeting the inner-city black communities for school based sex clinics became more sensitive than expected.)

Guttmacher thought that as long as the birth rate continued to fall or remained at a low level, Planned Parenthood should certainly be introduced before family size by coercion is attempted."

Reaching this goal, he thought, would best be accomplished by having groups other than the PPFA preach the doctrine of a normative 2.1-child family, as doing this would offend Planned Parenthood's minority clients. He suggested that family size would decrease if abortion were liberalized nationwide and received government support. In this prediction he was right on target.

But Guttmacher did not completely reject forced population control: Predicting 20 critical years ahead in the struggle to control the population explosion, Dr. Alan Guttmacher, president of Planned parenthoodÑWorld Population, continues to urge the use of all voluntary means to hold down on the world birthrate. But he foresees the possibility that eventual coercion may become necessary, particularly in areas where the pressure is greatest, possibly India and China. "Each country," he says, "will have to decide its own form of coercion, and determine when and how it should be employed. At Present, the means are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion. Perhaps some day a way of enforcing compulsory birth control will be feasible.

Coerced abortion is already practiced in China, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation's approval.

So what is our government proposing to do now?
Have tax payers fund abortions right?
Not Republicans mind you. Republicans are for life, not genocide.
Choose you this day who you will stand with.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock...

You are confusing individuals with groups of individuals.

As Planned Parenthood explains,


"Sanger went on to travel the country to share her vision — a vision that had deeply harmful blind spots."
"Sanger believed in eugenics — an inherently racist and ableist ideology that labeled certain people unfit to have children. "

See, this is where you go wrong in your thinking. First off, Planned Parenthood has no problem with recognizing the first proponent of birth control was inherently flawed in her thinking.

Your premise is that because Sanger what the first recognized champion of birth control, then ALL proponents of birth control, including Planned Parenthood, believe what she did.

That's like saying that because Germany was once controlled by Nazi's, then all Germans believe in killing all Jewish people.

It's like saying that because Lincoln was a member of the Republican Party, that no Republicans are prejudice.

Or that because Marjorie Taylor Green believes that Jewish Space Lasers cause California fires, then ALL republicans believe it.

You don't believe in Jewish Space Lasers, do you?
Apparently you don't know much about planned parenthood.
You need to do more research.

In a recent preliminary hearing in the court case against the Center for Medical Progress, a Planned Parenthood official admitted to harvesting aborted fetal parts for the purpose of selling them to human tissue procurement companies.

Sandra Merritt and David Daleiden are currently defending themselves against 15 felony charges after their series of undercover videos exposed the abortion provider’s unethical trade in baby body parts. As Liberty Counsel has pointed out, Merritt and Daleiden are the first undercover journalists to be criminally prosecuted in California history, indicating that the charges may have been politically motivated.

The felony charges against the Center for Medical Progress have been pursued by pro-choice politicians, such as former California Attorney General Kamala Harris and current state Attorney General Xavier Becerra. Harris has received huge campaign donations from the abortion industry in the past, including more than $81,000 from Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocacy groups. As California’s attorney general, Harris chose not to investigate the illegal activities of Planned Parenthood. Instead, she had her office search Daleiden’s home to seize his laptop and the hard drives that contained video footage of his investigation.

Daleiden’s representation, the Thomas More Society, filed a motion to void the warrant that led to the search and seizure of Daleiden’s property. The motion discloses evidence of Harris' efforts to protect Planned Parenthood:


The whole program is flawed from inception to current.
It's a money making, money laundering scheme with genocidal side effects.
It gets MUCH worse but I won't put it here..
Do your own research.


Yeah I can see you do research. And make the most absurd connections. Do you have a pin-up board where you connect newspaper clippings with lengths of yarn? Or rather organize them into folders on your computer named, "Genocide".

Hitler = Nazi = Genocide = Sanger = American Birth Control League = Planned Parenthood.

Oh, boy.
Apparently you can't read either.
Go back and read the Sanger article.
It's ALL connected.
And no I don't have a pin up board. It's called a brain and I know how to use mine.

"IT'S ALL CONNECTED".

Oh, wait, I remember that movie. "Conspiracy Theory". Mel Gibson and Julia Roberts.

Yeah, you sure know how to use your "brain".......

Oh boy......
 
If your going to teach CRT then it should begin at the beginning.
Which was much farther back in history than the origen of the United States.
Or maybe we could start more modern like say: Margaret Sanger.
She was a progressive that thought weeding out the lower classes through abortion was a good idea.
Who needs to enslave them when we can just never have them be born in the first place.

Is Margaret Sanger taught in CRT?

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.


Surveying the "successes" of tax-subsidized birth control programs, Guttmacher noted in 1970 that "[Birth control services are proliferating in areas adjacent to concentrations of black population." (In the 1980's, targeting the inner-city black communities for school based sex clinics became more sensitive than expected.)

Guttmacher thought that as long as the birth rate continued to fall or remained at a low level, Planned Parenthood should certainly be introduced before family size by coercion is attempted."

Reaching this goal, he thought, would best be accomplished by having groups other than the PPFA preach the doctrine of a normative 2.1-child family, as doing this would offend Planned Parenthood's minority clients. He suggested that family size would decrease if abortion were liberalized nationwide and received government support. In this prediction he was right on target.

But Guttmacher did not completely reject forced population control: Predicting 20 critical years ahead in the struggle to control the population explosion, Dr. Alan Guttmacher, president of Planned parenthoodÑWorld Population, continues to urge the use of all voluntary means to hold down on the world birthrate. But he foresees the possibility that eventual coercion may become necessary, particularly in areas where the pressure is greatest, possibly India and China. "Each country," he says, "will have to decide its own form of coercion, and determine when and how it should be employed. At Present, the means are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion. Perhaps some day a way of enforcing compulsory birth control will be feasible.

Coerced abortion is already practiced in China, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation's approval.

So what is our government proposing to do now?
Have tax payers fund abortions right?
Not Republicans mind you. Republicans are for life, not genocide.
Choose you this day who you will stand with.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock...

I should point out that this thread is about CRT.

You have managed to go from CRT to Planned Parenthood.

That's how completely insane your thinking is. You can't even keep track of the initial point as you go ranting off into fantasies about genocide and abortion rights.
Critical Race Theory has to do with RACE. Planned Parenthood was created to eliminate people of RACE.
Do you even have a clue how to connect dots???

Not the way you do. Bears have four legs and dogs have four legs. Yogi Bear was stole pic-a-nic baskets from Mr. Ranger. So, your dog is a pic-a-nic basket stealer because your dog is the same as a bear.

Great dot connecting.
 
If your going to teach CRT then it should begin at the beginning.
Which was much farther back in history than the origen of the United States.
Or maybe we could start more modern like say: Margaret Sanger.
She was a progressive that thought weeding out the lower classes through abortion was a good idea.
Who needs to enslave them when we can just never have them be born in the first place.

Is Margaret Sanger taught in CRT?

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.


Surveying the "successes" of tax-subsidized birth control programs, Guttmacher noted in 1970 that "[Birth control services are proliferating in areas adjacent to concentrations of black population." (In the 1980's, targeting the inner-city black communities for school based sex clinics became more sensitive than expected.)

Guttmacher thought that as long as the birth rate continued to fall or remained at a low level, Planned Parenthood should certainly be introduced before family size by coercion is attempted."

Reaching this goal, he thought, would best be accomplished by having groups other than the PPFA preach the doctrine of a normative 2.1-child family, as doing this would offend Planned Parenthood's minority clients. He suggested that family size would decrease if abortion were liberalized nationwide and received government support. In this prediction he was right on target.

But Guttmacher did not completely reject forced population control: Predicting 20 critical years ahead in the struggle to control the population explosion, Dr. Alan Guttmacher, president of Planned parenthoodÑWorld Population, continues to urge the use of all voluntary means to hold down on the world birthrate. But he foresees the possibility that eventual coercion may become necessary, particularly in areas where the pressure is greatest, possibly India and China. "Each country," he says, "will have to decide its own form of coercion, and determine when and how it should be employed. At Present, the means are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion. Perhaps some day a way of enforcing compulsory birth control will be feasible.

Coerced abortion is already practiced in China, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation's approval.

So what is our government proposing to do now?
Have tax payers fund abortions right?
Not Republicans mind you. Republicans are for life, not genocide.
Choose you this day who you will stand with.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock...

You are confusing individuals with groups of individuals.

As Planned Parenthood explains,


"Sanger went on to travel the country to share her vision — a vision that had deeply harmful blind spots."
"Sanger believed in eugenics — an inherently racist and ableist ideology that labeled certain people unfit to have children. "

See, this is where you go wrong in your thinking. First off, Planned Parenthood has no problem with recognizing the first proponent of birth control was inherently flawed in her thinking.

Your premise is that because Sanger what the first recognized champion of birth control, then ALL proponents of birth control, including Planned Parenthood, believe what she did.

That's like saying that because Germany was once controlled by Nazi's, then all Germans believe in killing all Jewish people.

It's like saying that because Lincoln was a member of the Republican Party, that no Republicans are prejudice.

Or that because Marjorie Taylor Green believes that Jewish Space Lasers cause California fires, then ALL republicans believe it.

You don't believe in Jewish Space Lasers, do you?
Apparently you don't know much about planned parenthood.
You need to do more research.

In a recent preliminary hearing in the court case against the Center for Medical Progress, a Planned Parenthood official admitted to harvesting aborted fetal parts for the purpose of selling them to human tissue procurement companies.

Sandra Merritt and David Daleiden are currently defending themselves against 15 felony charges after their series of undercover videos exposed the abortion provider’s unethical trade in baby body parts. As Liberty Counsel has pointed out, Merritt and Daleiden are the first undercover journalists to be criminally prosecuted in California history, indicating that the charges may have been politically motivated.

The felony charges against the Center for Medical Progress have been pursued by pro-choice politicians, such as former California Attorney General Kamala Harris and current state Attorney General Xavier Becerra. Harris has received huge campaign donations from the abortion industry in the past, including more than $81,000 from Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocacy groups. As California’s attorney general, Harris chose not to investigate the illegal activities of Planned Parenthood. Instead, she had her office search Daleiden’s home to seize his laptop and the hard drives that contained video footage of his investigation.

Daleiden’s representation, the Thomas More Society, filed a motion to void the warrant that led to the search and seizure of Daleiden’s property. The motion discloses evidence of Harris' efforts to protect Planned Parenthood:


The whole program is flawed from inception to current.
It's a money making, money laundering scheme with genocidal side effects.
It gets MUCH worse but I won't put it here..
Do your own research.


Yeah I can see you do research. And make the most absurd connections. Do you have a pin-up board where you connect newspaper clippings with lengths of yarn? Or rather organize them into folders on your computer named, "Genocide".

Hitler = Nazi = Genocide = Sanger = American Birth Control League = Planned Parenthood.

Oh, boy.
Apparently you can't read either.
Go back and read the Sanger article.
It's ALL connected.
And no I don't have a pin up board. It's called a brain and I know how to use mine.

"IT'S ALL CONNECTED".

Oh, wait, I remember that movie. "Conspiracy Theory". Mel Gibson and Julia Roberts.

Yeah, you sure know how to use your "brain".......

Oh boy......
Even though your lacking in crucial brain cells,
I still defend your right to live.
Have a good day
 
I know we think a lot alike.
So I'll ask you this...
What do you suppose the end game is for CRT?
They teaching kids how to hate each other because of the color of their skin.
How far into the future do you see this progressing into any kind of positive result?
And for who?
Hugs

Must be for the purpose of world domination.

They also put an addictive substance in Colonel Sanders chicken that makes you crave it fortnightly.

Stuart Mackenzie had it all figured out. It's "The Queen, the Vatican, the Gettys, the Rothschilds, and Colonel Sanders before he went tets-up. Oh, I hated the Colonel with is wee beady eyes! And that smug look on his face, "Oh, you're gonna buy my chicken! Ohhhhh!"" - Stuart Mackenzie
 
If your going to teach CRT then it should begin at the beginning.
Which was much farther back in history than the origen of the United States.
Or maybe we could start more modern like say: Margaret Sanger.
She was a progressive that thought weeding out the lower classes through abortion was a good idea.
Who needs to enslave them when we can just never have them be born in the first place.

Is Margaret Sanger taught in CRT?

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.


Surveying the "successes" of tax-subsidized birth control programs, Guttmacher noted in 1970 that "[Birth control services are proliferating in areas adjacent to concentrations of black population." (In the 1980's, targeting the inner-city black communities for school based sex clinics became more sensitive than expected.)

Guttmacher thought that as long as the birth rate continued to fall or remained at a low level, Planned Parenthood should certainly be introduced before family size by coercion is attempted."

Reaching this goal, he thought, would best be accomplished by having groups other than the PPFA preach the doctrine of a normative 2.1-child family, as doing this would offend Planned Parenthood's minority clients. He suggested that family size would decrease if abortion were liberalized nationwide and received government support. In this prediction he was right on target.

But Guttmacher did not completely reject forced population control: Predicting 20 critical years ahead in the struggle to control the population explosion, Dr. Alan Guttmacher, president of Planned parenthoodÑWorld Population, continues to urge the use of all voluntary means to hold down on the world birthrate. But he foresees the possibility that eventual coercion may become necessary, particularly in areas where the pressure is greatest, possibly India and China. "Each country," he says, "will have to decide its own form of coercion, and determine when and how it should be employed. At Present, the means are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion. Perhaps some day a way of enforcing compulsory birth control will be feasible.

Coerced abortion is already practiced in China, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation's approval.

So what is our government proposing to do now?
Have tax payers fund abortions right?
Not Republicans mind you. Republicans are for life, not genocide.
Choose you this day who you will stand with.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock...

You are confusing individuals with groups of individuals.

As Planned Parenthood explains,


"Sanger went on to travel the country to share her vision — a vision that had deeply harmful blind spots."
"Sanger believed in eugenics — an inherently racist and ableist ideology that labeled certain people unfit to have children. "

See, this is where you go wrong in your thinking. First off, Planned Parenthood has no problem with recognizing the first proponent of birth control was inherently flawed in her thinking.

Your premise is that because Sanger what the first recognized champion of birth control, then ALL proponents of birth control, including Planned Parenthood, believe what she did.

That's like saying that because Germany was once controlled by Nazi's, then all Germans believe in killing all Jewish people.

It's like saying that because Lincoln was a member of the Republican Party, that no Republicans are prejudice.

Or that because Marjorie Taylor Green believes that Jewish Space Lasers cause California fires, then ALL republicans believe it.

You don't believe in Jewish Space Lasers, do you?
Apparently you don't know much about planned parenthood.
You need to do more research.

In a recent preliminary hearing in the court case against the Center for Medical Progress, a Planned Parenthood official admitted to harvesting aborted fetal parts for the purpose of selling them to human tissue procurement companies.

Sandra Merritt and David Daleiden are currently defending themselves against 15 felony charges after their series of undercover videos exposed the abortion provider’s unethical trade in baby body parts. As Liberty Counsel has pointed out, Merritt and Daleiden are the first undercover journalists to be criminally prosecuted in California history, indicating that the charges may have been politically motivated.

The felony charges against the Center for Medical Progress have been pursued by pro-choice politicians, such as former California Attorney General Kamala Harris and current state Attorney General Xavier Becerra. Harris has received huge campaign donations from the abortion industry in the past, including more than $81,000 from Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocacy groups. As California’s attorney general, Harris chose not to investigate the illegal activities of Planned Parenthood. Instead, she had her office search Daleiden’s home to seize his laptop and the hard drives that contained video footage of his investigation.

Daleiden’s representation, the Thomas More Society, filed a motion to void the warrant that led to the search and seizure of Daleiden’s property. The motion discloses evidence of Harris' efforts to protect Planned Parenthood:


The whole program is flawed from inception to current.
It's a money making, money laundering scheme with genocidal side effects.
It gets MUCH worse but I won't put it here..
Do your own research.


Yeah I can see you do research. And make the most absurd connections. Do you have a pin-up board where you connect newspaper clippings with lengths of yarn? Or rather organize them into folders on your computer named, "Genocide".

Hitler = Nazi = Genocide = Sanger = American Birth Control League = Planned Parenthood.

Oh, boy.
Apparently you can't read either.
Go back and read the Sanger article.
It's ALL connected.
And no I don't have a pin up board. It's called a brain and I know how to use mine.

"IT'S ALL CONNECTED".

Oh, wait, I remember that movie. "Conspiracy Theory". Mel Gibson and Julia Roberts.

Yeah, you sure know how to use your "brain".......

Oh boy......
Even though your lacking in crucial brain cells,
I still defend your right to live.
Have a good day

Excellent example of how emotional thinking works. Thank you.

You should see a therapist about that mood swinging problem.
 

That is exactly the opposite of what CRT is.

"the basic tenets of CRT include that racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics rather than explicit and intentional prejudices on the part of individuals."

I know those are a lot of big words so I will paraphrase.

It says that the legal codification of racism IS the problem.
 
If your going to teach CRT then it should begin at the beginning.
Which was much farther back in history than the origen of the United States.
Or maybe we could start more modern like say: Margaret Sanger.
She was a progressive that thought weeding out the lower classes through abortion was a good idea.
Who needs to enslave them when we can just never have them be born in the first place.

Is Margaret Sanger taught in CRT?

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.


Surveying the "successes" of tax-subsidized birth control programs, Guttmacher noted in 1970 that "[Birth control services are proliferating in areas adjacent to concentrations of black population." (In the 1980's, targeting the inner-city black communities for school based sex clinics became more sensitive than expected.)

Guttmacher thought that as long as the birth rate continued to fall or remained at a low level, Planned Parenthood should certainly be introduced before family size by coercion is attempted."

Reaching this goal, he thought, would best be accomplished by having groups other than the PPFA preach the doctrine of a normative 2.1-child family, as doing this would offend Planned Parenthood's minority clients. He suggested that family size would decrease if abortion were liberalized nationwide and received government support. In this prediction he was right on target.

But Guttmacher did not completely reject forced population control: Predicting 20 critical years ahead in the struggle to control the population explosion, Dr. Alan Guttmacher, president of Planned parenthoodÑWorld Population, continues to urge the use of all voluntary means to hold down on the world birthrate. But he foresees the possibility that eventual coercion may become necessary, particularly in areas where the pressure is greatest, possibly India and China. "Each country," he says, "will have to decide its own form of coercion, and determine when and how it should be employed. At Present, the means are compulsory sterilization and compulsory abortion. Perhaps some day a way of enforcing compulsory birth control will be feasible.

Coerced abortion is already practiced in China, with the International Planned Parenthood Federation's approval.

So what is our government proposing to do now?
Have tax payers fund abortions right?
Not Republicans mind you. Republicans are for life, not genocide.
Choose you this day who you will stand with.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock...

You are confusing individuals with groups of individuals.

As Planned Parenthood explains,


"Sanger went on to travel the country to share her vision — a vision that had deeply harmful blind spots."
"Sanger believed in eugenics — an inherently racist and ableist ideology that labeled certain people unfit to have children. "

See, this is where you go wrong in your thinking. First off, Planned Parenthood has no problem with recognizing the first proponent of birth control was inherently flawed in her thinking.

Your premise is that because Sanger what the first recognized champion of birth control, then ALL proponents of birth control, including Planned Parenthood, believe what she did.

That's like saying that because Germany was once controlled by Nazi's, then all Germans believe in killing all Jewish people.

It's like saying that because Lincoln was a member of the Republican Party, that no Republicans are prejudice.

Or that because Marjorie Taylor Green believes that Jewish Space Lasers cause California fires, then ALL republicans believe it.

You don't believe in Jewish Space Lasers, do you?
Apparently you don't know much about planned parenthood.
You need to do more research.

In a recent preliminary hearing in the court case against the Center for Medical Progress, a Planned Parenthood official admitted to harvesting aborted fetal parts for the purpose of selling them to human tissue procurement companies.

Sandra Merritt and David Daleiden are currently defending themselves against 15 felony charges after their series of undercover videos exposed the abortion provider’s unethical trade in baby body parts. As Liberty Counsel has pointed out, Merritt and Daleiden are the first undercover journalists to be criminally prosecuted in California history, indicating that the charges may have been politically motivated.

The felony charges against the Center for Medical Progress have been pursued by pro-choice politicians, such as former California Attorney General Kamala Harris and current state Attorney General Xavier Becerra. Harris has received huge campaign donations from the abortion industry in the past, including more than $81,000 from Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocacy groups. As California’s attorney general, Harris chose not to investigate the illegal activities of Planned Parenthood. Instead, she had her office search Daleiden’s home to seize his laptop and the hard drives that contained video footage of his investigation.

Daleiden’s representation, the Thomas More Society, filed a motion to void the warrant that led to the search and seizure of Daleiden’s property. The motion discloses evidence of Harris' efforts to protect Planned Parenthood:


The whole program is flawed from inception to current.
It's a money making, money laundering scheme with genocidal side effects.
It gets MUCH worse but I won't put it here..
Do your own research.


Yeah I can see you do research. And make the most absurd connections. Do you have a pin-up board where you connect newspaper clippings with lengths of yarn? Or rather organize them into folders on your computer named, "Genocide".

Hitler = Nazi = Genocide = Sanger = American Birth Control League = Planned Parenthood.

Oh, boy.
Apparently you can't read either.
Go back and read the Sanger article.
It's ALL connected.
And no I don't have a pin up board. It's called a brain and I know how to use mine.

"IT'S ALL CONNECTED".

Oh, wait, I remember that movie. "Conspiracy Theory". Mel Gibson and Julia Roberts.

Yeah, you sure know how to use your "brain".......

Oh boy......
Even though your lacking in crucial brain cells,
I still defend your right to live.
Have a good day

Oh, and I am sorry you feel stupid. You aren't stupid. Wrong, yes. Stupid, no.
 
You don't believe in Jewish Space Lasers, do you?
They are called Direct Energy Weapons aka: DEW

You missed the point about Sanger.
The same people that backed her genocidal eugenics policies are the same people pushing this CRT.
It's really in your own best interest to try and start a civil war with a population that outnumbers your own.. right?

I got another one for you...
This vaccine for C19... who is it being pushed on the most?
What are the long term effects?
Who is pushing it?

People of Color... you all need to WAKE UP and recognize who your true enemy is.
Hint: It's not Republicans

We are against abortion (genocide/eugenics)
Most of us are against the "Jab" (genocide/eugenics)
We voted for the abolishment of slavery, civil rights, and non-discrimination laws.

You watch how Sanger worked. She used Blacks (Pastors, Nurses, Teachers, Community organizers) to push her agenda.
Who is coming to your door to push the Jab on you?


WAKEY WAKEY

"They are called Direct Energy Weapons aka: DEW"

Doesn't matter if you call them Jewish Space Lasers or Direct Energy Weapons. They didn't cause forest fires in California.

See how you can't seem to follow the point but get distracted by some completely unrelated point because it triggers some emotion?
 
Just what is critical race theory anyway?

Better yet, let’s establish what it’s not:

It’s not about claiming all whites are ‘racist.’

It’s not about dividing the American people along racial lines.

It is neither ‘anti-American’ nor ‘anti-white propaganda.’

It does not teach whites to be ashamed of their history or who they are.

It does not promote ‘political correctness,’ ‘social justice,’ or ‘cancel culture.’

It would be quite the opposite.

"the basic tenets of CRT include that racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics rather than explicit and intentional prejudices on the part of individuals."

It is saying that racial outcomes ARE NOT due to individual prejudices that are explicit and intentional.

So, opponents what? Believe the opposite is true, that racism is caused by their intentional and explicit prejudices?

Just so I am clear about this.....

So, Senator Ted Cruz and House Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene believe that racism is the result of them being explicit and intentionally prejudice? Or is it their constituents that they believe are intentionally and explicitly racist?
I don't understand why it has to be one or the other when in reality it's both - explicit and intentional race based prejudices on the part of individuals, as well as baked in white supremacist perspectives which in spite of specific actions no longer being legal, the attitudes often remain.
 

Forum List

Back
Top