Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Joe Biden, a member of The Executive Branch during The Obama Administration did have The Constitutional Power to Threaten to With Hold Foreign Aid.Crap on a crutch, this thing again?What Biden did threatening to with hold aid from Ukraine unless they fired the attorney investigating Biden's son, apparently was completely legal. There was an actual Quid Pro Quo. Biden threatened and extorted Ukraine, and Ukraine got Hunter Biden off the hook.It's utter bullshit. His loyal oompah loompahs will buy it, but nobody else.I've heard several Trump supporters say that even if everything Trump has been accused of is true - it's not impeachable. Is that a reasonable defense? What do you think?
It has long been obvious that Republicans would ultimately converge on this final defense of President Trump: Even if he did everything he has been accused of doing, and perhaps a lot more that we don’t know about, it’s absolutely fine!
We now have a particularly ugly preview of what this defense may look like, as Trump’s Senate trial gets underway. On Sean Hannity’s Thursday night show, former Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus said:
Sometimes the best defense is the ‘so what’ defense. If everything the Democrats said is true, it’s still not impeachable. If everything Lev Parnas said is true, it’s still not impeachable. That’s what this is about.
What’s truly perverse here is that if Trump did nothing wrong, then no one could speak to that more forcefully than the witnesses Democrats want to hear from, and who Trump and McConnell desperately do not. If withholding the aid was correct on the merits, why not hear from those directly involved in that decision?
The answer is that Trump and McConnell know Trump did engage in profoundly corrupt, impeachable conduct. Trump used the power of his office — and the conditioning of official acts, including withholding hundreds of millions in appropriated military aid from a vulnerable ally — to strong-arm that ally into manufacturing disinformation to corrupt the 2020 election on his behalf.
More: Hannity previews Trump’s final defense: So what if he’s guilty?
It wasn't Biden, son. It was the whole Western world. And it wasn't for Biden's benefit.
How many times do you morons need to be told the same damn thing?
You're repeating bullshit talking points, not reality.Joe Biden, a member of The Executive Branch during The Obama Administration did have The Constitutional Power to Threaten to With Hold Foreign Aid.Crap on a crutch, this thing again?What Biden did threatening to with hold aid from Ukraine unless they fired the attorney investigating Biden's son, apparently was completely legal. There was an actual Quid Pro Quo. Biden threatened and extorted Ukraine, and Ukraine got Hunter Biden off the hook.It's utter bullshit. His loyal oompah loompahs will buy it, but nobody else.I've heard several Trump supporters say that even if everything Trump has been accused of is true - it's not impeachable. Is that a reasonable defense? What do you think?
It has long been obvious that Republicans would ultimately converge on this final defense of President Trump: Even if he did everything he has been accused of doing, and perhaps a lot more that we don’t know about, it’s absolutely fine!
We now have a particularly ugly preview of what this defense may look like, as Trump’s Senate trial gets underway. On Sean Hannity’s Thursday night show, former Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus said:
Sometimes the best defense is the ‘so what’ defense. If everything the Democrats said is true, it’s still not impeachable. If everything Lev Parnas said is true, it’s still not impeachable. That’s what this is about.
What’s truly perverse here is that if Trump did nothing wrong, then no one could speak to that more forcefully than the witnesses Democrats want to hear from, and who Trump and McConnell desperately do not. If withholding the aid was correct on the merits, why not hear from those directly involved in that decision?
The answer is that Trump and McConnell know Trump did engage in profoundly corrupt, impeachable conduct. Trump used the power of his office — and the conditioning of official acts, including withholding hundreds of millions in appropriated military aid from a vulnerable ally — to strong-arm that ally into manufacturing disinformation to corrupt the 2020 election on his behalf.
More: Hannity previews Trump’s final defense: So what if he’s guilty?
It wasn't Biden, son. It was the whole Western world. And it wasn't for Biden's benefit.
How many times do you morons need to be told the same damn thing?
Trump also threatened to with hold Foreign Aid from El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatamala, and in Fact DID SO.
Where are charges that The President abused his power with respect to El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala and Mexico?
The House impeachment was perfectIf the Clinton Impeachment rules for the Senate were considered a Kangaroo Court....yes.Will Senate proceedings be a kangaroo court?RW is use to kangaroo courts, he feels uncomfortable with an honest court.It is the truth as many Republicans admit to not even reading the chargesBullshit rhetoric like this becomes what dims then refer to as facts. And think they can get away with it. Good luck with whatever geriatric they put up against him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I watched everything. It’s bullshit and you know it. I really hope that shitt, polosi, schrumer, nads, and some other idiots get subpoenaed to testify. It would be interesting to see them destroyed, and fall flat on their incompetent lying faces. It time to put up or STFU! But you pussies won’t be satisfied, just the same as hiltard losing the election. Manufactured facts are not facts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
McConnell has repeatedly indicated they will be
But, the Schiff House rules were definitely considered a Kargaroo court.
Trump was invited to participateWhere have you been? The House proceedings did not give Due Process....as the rules according to Schiff.I'm not going there and say so what if Trump's guilty. The Articles are total partisan bullshit. So why even give Nancy a talking point?
Article-2 is dead, the USSC killed it. Trump does have the right of due process, and that is NOT "Obstruction of the House"
Article-1 is dead, hearsay evidence is NOT allowed in the senate.
What part of Due Process was denied?
The minority did not have their day like the Nixon impeachment proceedings and the Clinton impeachment proceedings.
I know liberals do not like to hear itSorry but you are mistaken as usualNor does it have to be for us to know whats motivating youYou answer with further incompetence.
That reason is not listed anywhere in articles of impeachment.
Again your incompetence fails you.
Not at all.
Your dopey generalization as to what is motivating the impeachment is indicative of a mind that is unable to grasp and understand the series of events that has led us to where we are. So, instead of outing yourself as dumb as shit by saying you don't understand, you, not unlike your retarded bretheren, opt instead to hide behind the relative safety of a handful of dopey narratives.
IOW, failure by incompetence.
the truth makes you look petty and vindictive
but you are motivated and driven by lies about trump
The House impeachment was perfectIf the Clinton Impeachment rules for the Senate were considered a Kangaroo Court....yes.Will Senate proceedings be a kangaroo court?RW is use to kangaroo courts, he feels uncomfortable with an honest court.It is the truth as many Republicans admit to not even reading the charges
I watched everything. It’s bullshit and you know it. I really hope that shitt, polosi, schrumer, nads, and some other idiots get subpoenaed to testify. It would be interesting to see them destroyed, and fall flat on their incompetent lying faces. It time to put up or STFU! But you pussies won’t be satisfied, just the same as hiltard losing the election. Manufactured facts are not facts.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
McConnell has repeatedly indicated they will be
But, the Schiff House rules were definitely considered a Kargaroo court.
I disagreeI know liberals do not like to hear itSorry but you are mistaken as usualNor does it have to be for us to know whats motivating you
Again your incompetence fails you.
Not at all.
Your dopey generalization as to what is motivating the impeachment is indicative of a mind that is unable to grasp and understand the series of events that has led us to where we are. So, instead of outing yourself as dumb as shit by saying you don't understand, you, not unlike your retarded bretheren, opt instead to hide behind the relative safety of a handful of dopey narratives.
IOW, failure by incompetence.
the truth makes you look petty and vindictive
but you are motivated and driven by lies about trump
Continued incompetence.
The proceedings were a sham when Schiff made up the impeachments rules.Trump was invited to participateWhere have you been? The House proceedings did not give Due Process....as the rules according to Schiff.I'm not going there and say so what if Trump's guilty. The Articles are total partisan bullshit. So why even give Nancy a talking point?
Article-2 is dead, the USSC killed it. Trump does have the right of due process, and that is NOT "Obstruction of the House"
Article-1 is dead, hearsay evidence is NOT allowed in the senate.
What part of Due Process was denied?
The minority did not have their day like the Nixon impeachment proceedings and the Clinton impeachment proceedings.
He declined
Then declared the proceedings to be a sham
I disagreeI know liberals do not like to hear itSorry but you are mistaken as usualAgain your incompetence fails you.
Not at all.
Your dopey generalization as to what is motivating the impeachment is indicative of a mind that is unable to grasp and understand the series of events that has led us to where we are. So, instead of outing yourself as dumb as shit by saying you don't understand, you, not unlike your retarded bretheren, opt instead to hide behind the relative safety of a handful of dopey narratives.
IOW, failure by incompetence.
the truth makes you look petty and vindictive
but you are motivated and driven by lies about trump
Continued incompetence.
You make Putin Smile.Trumpdrones are too stupid to fathom language used by the framers of the constitution leaving them too stupid to understand an impeachment proceeding -
ergo;
"who cares" leads their defense.
Yea, its as if who cares about the constitution.Trumpdrones are too stupid to fathom language used by the framers of the constitution leaving them too stupid to understand an impeachment proceeding -
ergo;
"who cares" leads their defense.
Trump rages about impeachment on Twitter, but he has Republicans to blame for the rulesThe proceedings were a sham when Schiff made up the impeachments rules.Trump was invited to participateWhere have you been? The House proceedings did not give Due Process....as the rules according to Schiff.I'm not going there and say so what if Trump's guilty. The Articles are total partisan bullshit. So why even give Nancy a talking point?
Article-2 is dead, the USSC killed it. Trump does have the right of due process, and that is NOT "Obstruction of the House"
Article-1 is dead, hearsay evidence is NOT allowed in the senate.
What part of Due Process was denied?
The minority did not have their day like the Nixon impeachment proceedings and the Clinton impeachment proceedings.
He declined
Then declared the proceedings to be a sham
Trump was invited to participateWhere have you been? The House proceedings did not give Due Process....as the rules according to Schiff.I'm not going there and say so what if Trump's guilty. The Articles are total partisan bullshit. So why even give Nancy a talking point?
Article-2 is dead, the USSC killed it. Trump does have the right of due process, and that is NOT "Obstruction of the House"
Article-1 is dead, hearsay evidence is NOT allowed in the senate.
What part of Due Process was denied?
The minority did not have their day like the Nixon impeachment proceedings and the Clinton impeachment proceedings.
He declined
Then declared the proceedings to be a sham
Trumpdrones are too stupid to fathom language used by the framers of the constitution leaving them too stupid to understand an impeachment proceeding -
ergo;
"who cares" leads their defense.
Who cares about where you want to place blame. The rules were a sham and stacked against the president....PERIOD!Trump rages about impeachment on Twitter, but he has Republicans to blame for the rulesThe proceedings were a sham when Schiff made up the impeachments rules.Trump was invited to participateWhere have you been? The House proceedings did not give Due Process....as the rules according to Schiff.I'm not going there and say so what if Trump's guilty. The Articles are total partisan bullshit. So why even give Nancy a talking point?
Article-2 is dead, the USSC killed it. Trump does have the right of due process, and that is NOT "Obstruction of the House"
Article-1 is dead, hearsay evidence is NOT allowed in the senate.
What part of Due Process was denied?
The minority did not have their day like the Nixon impeachment proceedings and the Clinton impeachment proceedings.
He declined
Then declared the proceedings to be a sham
Opinion | Trump has the GOP to blame for the impeachment rules he hates so much
Who cares about where you want to place blame. The rules were a sham and stacked against the president....PERIOD!Trump rages about impeachment on Twitter, but he has Republicans to blame for the rulesThe proceedings were a sham when Schiff made up the impeachments rules.Trump was invited to participateWhere have you been? The House proceedings did not give Due Process....as the rules according to Schiff.What part of Due Process was denied?
The minority did not have their day like the Nixon impeachment proceedings and the Clinton impeachment proceedings.
He declined
Then declared the proceedings to be a sham
Opinion | Trump has the GOP to blame for the impeachment rules he hates so much
There was no Due Process, not a day or an hour for the minority. Kangaroo Court
First impeachment proceedings that didn't let the minority have their due process. What was Schiff trying to cover up? The truth?Who cares about where you want to place blame. The rules were a sham and stacked against the president....PERIOD!Trump rages about impeachment on Twitter, but he has Republicans to blame for the rulesThe proceedings were a sham when Schiff made up the impeachments rules.Trump was invited to participateWhere have you been? The House proceedings did not give Due Process....as the rules according to Schiff.
The minority did not have their day like the Nixon impeachment proceedings and the Clinton impeachment proceedings.
He declined
Then declared the proceedings to be a sham
Opinion | Trump has the GOP to blame for the impeachment rules he hates so much
There was no Due Process, not a day or an hour for the minority. Kangaroo Court
guess why there was no due process -
it wasnt a criminal trial ........... DDDDDUUUUUHHHHH
NO INDICTMENT
NO JUDGE
NO JURY
AN IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING .
