The LIARS Keep on LYING - Kudlow Exposes Trump for the LIAR He Is

Because you didn't read the link, dope.

"Jim Hackett, Ford’s CEO, is working to engineer a $25.5 billion restructuring of the automaker, hoping to cut costs and remain competitive, the Wall Street Journalreports. But auto sales are down, and one reason is the trade tariffs that Trump has imposed on metals and other goods. According to Bloomberg, Hackett has said they have already cost the company $1 billion in profit and could do “more damage” if the disputes aren’t resolved quickly."
DOPE, that's nothing but one guy (with highly vested interests) talking, and giving no explanation for his "conclusion" - and you suck it right up.
LOL...
He's just the CEO of Ford Motor Company.
What does he know? Meh...:dunno:


Dope.
 
Right just like how the same economist predicted a can of soup was going to cost $5 during the trade war with Mexico and Canada...
Right just like how the same economist predicted a can of soup was going to cost $5 during the trade war with Mexico and Canada...

Ford Prepares for Mass Layoffs After Losing $1 Billion to Trump's Trade Tariffs, Report Says


How exactly did TRUMP's tariffs cause Ford to lose $1 Billion? The article doesn't say.

Umm....what are cars made from?

Steel and aluminum tarriffs.

The steel tariff was only for steel coming from China, Canada and Mexico were ripping us off by going around NAFTA, which is why TRUMP renegotiated.
Hello Dumbass.

You know what a certificate of origin is? A mill cert?

Yes, and Canada and Mexico were using ways to get around NAFTA rules, or paying a low fine. Basically they were getting parts from China and assembling them so they could slap on a made in Canada/Mexico label.
 
I think "we the people" should be allowed to buy what the hell ever we want without the government trying to influence us by the use of taxes, which is what a tariff is.
You think WRONG. The tariffs PROTECT us from foreign economic war being waged against us. (as has been for the past 30 years)

Yep, freedom is a terrible thing, which is why you fight against ti every day. :290968001256257790-final:
 
"failing economy"
1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif
1348488761322-smiley_rofl.gif
Obama's "failing economy" GDPs went from 2.3 down to 1.8 in 2016.

Note the direction of the bars > DOWN
th


united-states-gdp-growth.png
 
Last edited:
Yep, freedom is a terrible thing, which is why you fight against ti every day. :290968001256257790-final:
Yes, I fight against the freedom of foreign countries to commit remittance imperialism on us, by exporting unskilled people across out borders, and the freedom of those people to disrespect & break our immigration laws.

I fight against the freedom of people to kill millions of people, by needless abortions.

I fight against the freedom of Muslim jihadists to Islamize our society, and convert it into an Islamic state.

I fight against the freedom of liberals to violate our civil rights laws, by racially discriminating in Affirmative Action programs.

I fight against those who would deprive AMERICANS of their 2nd Amendment rights, and would deprive people of their right to live, by endorsing gun-free zones.

I fight against the freedom of rapists, murderers, robbers, etc to go around committing their crimes.

And you ?
 
In 1999 Clinton raided 400 companies we knew were hiring illegals. In 2003 bush raided 3. You play this Democrats are to blame shit and you can’t understand republicans and the corporate lobbyists don’t mind illegals. If republicans wanted to raise wages they’d raid these companies and pu5 the owners on notice. We all know illegal employers vote republican.

Don’t forget the gop is split on illegals. John McCain said they were just here doing jobs Americans won’t do.
And your numbers are from …………………..?????? looks like we don't know, because you didn't say. In any case, we all know it the Democrats who have supported illegal immigration in every manifestation of it (sanctuary cities, birthright citizenship, wall opposition, Amnesty proposals, etc, and Republicans who have opposed these things.

Anything attempted to the contrary is a laughingstock.

As for John McCain, he was never a Republican. Just like Jeff Flake, Susan Collins, Bob Orker, et al he was a RINO, all the way.

And let's not forge Other Planet Janet Napalitano bussing thousands of "raidied" illegal aliens over to CIS, so they could immediately be given green cards.
 
Hey, economics "teacher." You do know that the economy is more than cars, right?

Of course you don't!
I know your 4% number, unaccompanied by any source, is a joke, economics student, and if you're trying to tell us that China has not had unrestricted access to our MARKET, with low tariffs (if any), while they were hitting our exporters with high tariffs, then you're either a liar, or an ignorant fool.

EARTH TO TORO: EVERYBODY (even the most leftist liberals) concede that China has been filling up our stores with Chinese made products, because of lower or no tariffs against them. If you're going to try to counter Trump's tariff policies, at least have a grain of credibility with it, and present the at least the appearance of knowledge. :rolleyes:
 
The Obama HATERS will NEVER admit that Obama presided over a complete reversal of a DEAD ECONOMY, the worst since the Great Depression..

That's OK because we know these assholes are nothing more than dishonest, racist, assholes.

During Obama's tenure the market experienced a 148% positive direction, a feat unheard of since Clinton, plus 229%, and these same lying assholes hate him too.

These lying, racist, assholes are just jealous they cannot get a Republican POTUS to come close to the economic performance of TWO presidents they all HATE WITH A PASSION, like Satan hates.
FALSE! The words "presided over" are intending to deceive us into thinking that Obama should get CREDIT for the upward movement of the economy in the 2008-2015 recovery years.

Actually, it is normal for major recessions to experience upward mobility for a number of years afterward, and for this ordinary recoil effect, 2008-2015 is no exception. It is BS for Obama lovers to try to give him credit. When the recoil effect had finally lost its spring, and Obama was on his own to "preside over" the economy (in 2016), he was a complete FLUNK, showing his true economic FAILURE colors with GDP growth sinking from 2.3% down to a dismal 1.8%, in the community activist's final year.

Shows what happens when you put a "community activist"in the White House, instead of a successful businessman
 
Here's a graph for you that explains it.

View attachment 261220

Like I said, you don't understand simple supply and demand dynamics.
HA HA. Thought you could get away with just throwing a graph in here, and then pretending that it somehow shows how tariffs "make things more expensive"

This is too funny. OK student. Now let's see you try to explain your own graph, and how it relates to tariffs to make things more expensive. Go ahead. Thought you hit a home run ? You haven't even swung the bat yet.
 
Dumbfuck, that's not the definition of a failing economy. :eusa_doh:
Uh oh. it's LIBERAL DEFINITION TIME. HA HA HA. Hey, didn't you all know that liberal loonies get immersed in liberal universities, listen to liberal loonie "professors", watch liberal loonie TV (CNN, MSNBC, PBS), and then go around telling us what definitions of things are all based on the liberal loonieness they've been immersed in.

EARTH TO FAUN: A full year of a SINKING GDP growth % is an economy that WAS failing > before Trump rescued it. You're welcome. :rolleyes:

And watch your language, boy. Your mommy may soon come after you with the mop handle. :laugh:
 
Dumbfuck, that's not the definition of a failing economy. :eusa_doh:
Uh oh. it's LIBERAL DEFINITION TIME. HA HA HA. Hey, didn't you all know that liberal loonies get immersed in liberal universities, listen to liberal loonie "professors", watch liberal loonie TV (CNN, MSNBC, PBS), and then go around telling us what definitions of things are all based on the liberal loonieness they've been immersed in.

EARTH TO FAUN: A full year of a SINKING GDP growth % is an economy that WAS failing > before Trump rescued it. You're welcome. :rolleyes:

And watch your language, boy. Your mommy may soon come after you with the mop handle. :laugh:
dumbfuck, a failing economy is defined by the NBER, which requires negative growth. :eusa_doh:

Conservatives are such dumb fucking imbeciles.
 
dumbfuck, a failing economy is defined by the NBER, which requires negative growth. :eusa_doh:

Conservatives are such dumb fucking imbeciles.
Didn't I just say how imbecile liberals think they can grab some definition from some liberal professor, in some liberal-slanted university, and then actually expect us to adopt it ? Well, here's a perfect example. Look at the liberal fool throwing his definition at us, that he sucked up from some liberal something or other, and expecting us to follow it.

Hey moron. We don't swallow your half-ass indoctrinations. Only YOU think your universities and their liberal propaganda has a shred of validity. That your con job world, not ours.

A failing economy is one that has a SINKING GDP growth % for 4 quarters (example > Obama's putrid legacy > his last year in office) :biggrin:

Liberals are idiots, who can't think outside the box of their own indoctrination. SAD.

Uh oh. Here comes your mommy. She's got the mop. :eek-52:
 
dumbfuck, a failing economy is defined by the NBER, which requires negative growth. :eusa_doh:

Conservatives are such dumb fucking imbeciles.
Didn't I just say how imbecile liberals think they can grab some definition from some liberal professor, in some liberal-slanted university, and then actually expect us to adopt it ? Well, here's a perfect example. Look at the liberal fool throwing his definition at us, that he sucked up from some liberal something or other, and expecting us to follow it.

Hey moron. We don't swallow your half-ass indoctrinations. Only YOU think your universities and their liberal propaganda has a shred of validity. That your con job world, not ours.

A failing economy is one that has a SINKING GDP growth % for 4 quarters (example > Obama's putrid legacy > his last year in office) :biggrin:

Liberals are idiots, who can't think outside the box of their own indoctrination. SAD.

Uh oh. Here comes your mommy. She's got the mop. :eek-52:
LOL

Look at the forum curmudgeon making up his own definitions about 4 quarters of sinking GDP growth. :lmao:

Dumbass, you mean like the 4 quarters which included Q2-2016? The quarter which grew at 2.3% -- which is equal to, or higher than, 1/3 of all of trump's quarters.
 
Look at the forum curmudgeon making up his own definitions about 4 quarters of sinking GDP growth. :lmao:

Dumbass, you mean like the 4 quarters which included Q2-2016? The quarter which grew at 2.3% -- which is equal to, or higher than, 1/3 of all of trump's quarters.
You don't get it, The definitions YOU are using, every day, are MADE UP by the people you got them from (often slanted liberal universities), and then you expect everyone to accept them). You don't realize what a laughingstock you are)

Just look are what you are denying > that a REDUCTION OF DGP growth is a failing economy. Of course that's what it is. And oh, you want look a little further at Obama's numbers ? OK. I'll play that game with you. Here's his last 6 quarters. An average GDP of 1.4%

united-states-gdp-growth.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top