NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
NASCAR has now come out against the Indiana law...
...blame that on liberals, lol.
...blame that on liberals, lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, this one. The one you posted is an opinion commentary.what Article in Forbes this one?here is a great one about restaurants closing in Seattle due to the mandatory minimum wage increase and it is a current topic and thread. Such a big lie and fake story that the pro business conservative publication FORBES produced an article about it calling it the "Anatomy of a Lie".The right contrives lies and straw man fallacies to advance their agenda, this thread being one of many examples
Proof Perfect That The Minimum Wage Costs Jobs - Forbes
Btw I have had a Subscription to forbes since the 80s
forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2015/03/22/minimum-wage-increase-killing-seattle-restaurants-anatomy-of-a-lie-from-inside-the-bubble/
NASCAR has now come out against the Indiana law...
...blame that on liberals, lol.
And the right continues to take the bait, hook, line and sinker, to the gut, fatally.Everyone is familiar with "Hands Up, Don't Shoot". We found out the whole thing was made up by lying journalists, perpetrated by a tax-cheat, Al Sharpton, and encouraged and prodded along by a dishonest president.
The left and Democrats don't need real events anymore. They can just make em up when needed. There are enough people out there that have bought into their alternate universe..... and so every new lie becomes just a reaffirmation of what they all believe is going on......regardless of the fact it was all made up in the first place.
Why the Rolling Stone gang-rape story will never be labeled a hoax WashingtonExaminer.com
By now it's clear that the brutal gang rape reported last November in Rolling Stone did not occur. I write that, knowing full well the backlash I could receive from not adding the caveat that something could still have happened to Jackie, the accuser in the story.
Activists have clung to the idea that something probably did happen to make a young woman tell a tale of a brutal gang rape and become a campus activist to keep the hoax claims isolated to a small subset. These same activists bent over backwards following the Charlottesville Police press conference last week to claim that Jackie probably wasn't lying, because such a false accusation "flies in the face of statistics," as one CNN panelist said. Of course, the statistic that only 2 percent of reported rapes are false – doubtful anyway – only applies to rapes actually reported to police, which this one was not.
But in any event, the faint possibility that Jackie may have suffered some other horrific event is not the reason this story will not be labeled a hoax by activists or most in the mainstream media.
No, the reason it will not be labeled a hoax comes from an anonymous McGill University student, using the pseudonym Aurora Dagny, who wrote last year that dogmatism is in part to blame for activists' refusal to accept evidence contrary to their worldview.
"One way to define the difference between a regular belief and a sacred belief is that people who hold sacred beliefs think it is morally wrong for anyone to question those beliefs," Dagny wrote. "If someone does question those beliefs, they're not just being stupid or even depraved, they're actively doing violence. They might as well be kicking a puppy. When people hold sacred beliefs, there is no disagreement without animosity."
Because the activists behind the Rolling Stone story hold a "sacred belief" that thousands, perhaps even millions, of college students are sexually assaulted each year, any evidence to the contrary is seen as detrimental to the cause.
It's why Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., was able to continue calling Jackie a "victim" of a crime for which there is no proof. It's why the University of Virginia's president, Teresa Sullivan, and those responsible for vandalizing the fraternity named in the Rolling Stone article have not had to apologize for their rush to judgment.
Here's the fake story from Rolling Stone - A Rape on Campus A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA Rolling Stone
Apparently they are not listening to requests for a major thread merge.Hands up MODS ...
do your job and merge all these threads that are robbing the board ... multiple threads/same topic are no-no's
Death-threats and lawsuits tend to get your attention....And the right continues to take the bait, hook, line and sinker, to the gut, fatally.Everyone is familiar with "Hands Up, Don't Shoot". We found out the whole thing was made up by lying journalists, perpetrated by a tax-cheat, Al Sharpton, and encouraged and prodded along by a dishonest president.
The left and Democrats don't need real events anymore. They can just make em up when needed. There are enough people out there that have bought into their alternate universe..... and so every new lie becomes just a reaffirmation of what they all believe is going on......regardless of the fact it was all made up in the first place.
Why the Rolling Stone gang-rape story will never be labeled a hoax WashingtonExaminer.com
By now it's clear that the brutal gang rape reported last November in Rolling Stone did not occur. I write that, knowing full well the backlash I could receive from not adding the caveat that something could still have happened to Jackie, the accuser in the story.
Activists have clung to the idea that something probably did happen to make a young woman tell a tale of a brutal gang rape and become a campus activist to keep the hoax claims isolated to a small subset. These same activists bent over backwards following the Charlottesville Police press conference last week to claim that Jackie probably wasn't lying, because such a false accusation "flies in the face of statistics," as one CNN panelist said. Of course, the statistic that only 2 percent of reported rapes are false – doubtful anyway – only applies to rapes actually reported to police, which this one was not.
But in any event, the faint possibility that Jackie may have suffered some other horrific event is not the reason this story will not be labeled a hoax by activists or most in the mainstream media.
No, the reason it will not be labeled a hoax comes from an anonymous McGill University student, using the pseudonym Aurora Dagny, who wrote last year that dogmatism is in part to blame for activists' refusal to accept evidence contrary to their worldview.
"One way to define the difference between a regular belief and a sacred belief is that people who hold sacred beliefs think it is morally wrong for anyone to question those beliefs," Dagny wrote. "If someone does question those beliefs, they're not just being stupid or even depraved, they're actively doing violence. They might as well be kicking a puppy. When people hold sacred beliefs, there is no disagreement without animosity."
Because the activists behind the Rolling Stone story hold a "sacred belief" that thousands, perhaps even millions, of college students are sexually assaulted each year, any evidence to the contrary is seen as detrimental to the cause.
It's why Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., was able to continue calling Jackie a "victim" of a crime for which there is no proof. It's why the University of Virginia's president, Teresa Sullivan, and those responsible for vandalizing the fraternity named in the Rolling Stone article have not had to apologize for their rush to judgment.
Here's the fake story from Rolling Stone - A Rape on Campus A Brutal Assault and Struggle for Justice at UVA Rolling Stone
No, this one. The one you posted is an opinion commentary.what Article in Forbes this one?here is a great one about restaurants closing in Seattle due to the mandatory minimum wage increase and it is a current topic and thread. Such a big lie and fake story that the pro business conservative publication FORBES produced an article about it calling it the "Anatomy of a Lie".The right contrives lies and straw man fallacies to advance their agenda, this thread being one of many examples
Proof Perfect That The Minimum Wage Costs Jobs - Forbes
Btw I have had a Subscription to forbes since the 80s
forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2015/03/22/minimum-wage-increase-killing-seattle-restaurants-anatomy-of-a-lie-from-inside-the-bubble/
A very real problem we see here every day is the inability of RWs to tell the difference between an op/ed and a factual article.
That's why they believe every lie they get from Fox -- even though they KNOW they are being lied to.
To sum it all up; Liberals and progressives will only believe what fits inside their ideological beliefs. Anything that doesn't fit isn't believable to them. It's like the simple fact that most blacks feel that white cops are suspicious of them (for good reason) and why gays feel that straight folks, and particularly Christians, think they are perverts. This is what Democrats are trying to take advantage of. Their innate prejudices and bigotry of specific groups. These folks are much more easily misled that others.
Making it up to drive an agenda you say? Like Jeremiah Wright, ACORN, the "Knockout Game", Henry Louis Gates, Shirley Sherrod, Van Jones and "Hip Hop Barbecues"?
Oh wait, that's Fox Noise...
So who contrived what,hands up don't shoot,was false,the gang rape was also.The right contrives lies and straw man fallacies to advance their agenda, this thread being one of many examples
Keeping in form,you attack the messenger,but reject the truth,thanks for reinforcing the OP,good job.
That's also a opinion piece, because we will never know till 2018? Until the full law comes into effect, but common sense and looking at history of places like Detroit says my link is correctNo, this one. The one you posted is an opinion commentary.what Article in Forbes this one?here is a great one about restaurants closing in Seattle due to the mandatory minimum wage increase and it is a current topic and thread. Such a big lie and fake story that the pro business conservative publication FORBES produced an article about it calling it the "Anatomy of a Lie".The right contrives lies and straw man fallacies to advance their agenda, this thread being one of many examples
Proof Perfect That The Minimum Wage Costs Jobs - Forbes
Btw I have had a Subscription to forbes since the 80s
forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2015/03/22/minimum-wage-increase-killing-seattle-restaurants-anatomy-of-a-lie-from-inside-the-bubble/
Then quit whining and contribute or get lost.Why don't you report it?Hands up MODS ...
do your job and merge all these threads that are robbing the board ... multiple threads/same topic are no-no's
and be a chickenshit like you ?
naaaaaah, I'll pass.
You understand that's not an article, right?No, this one. The one you posted is an opinion commentary.what Article in Forbes this one?here is a great one about restaurants closing in Seattle due to the mandatory minimum wage increase and it is a current topic and thread. Such a big lie and fake story that the pro business conservative publication FORBES produced an article about it calling it the "Anatomy of a Lie".The right contrives lies and straw man fallacies to advance their agenda, this thread being one of many examples
Proof Perfect That The Minimum Wage Costs Jobs - Forbes
Btw I have had a Subscription to forbes since the 80s
forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2015/03/22/minimum-wage-increase-killing-seattle-restaurants-anatomy-of-a-lie-from-inside-the-bubble/
regardless of the fact it was all made up in the first place.
Liberals and progressives will only believe what fits inside their ideological beliefs.
So who contrived what,hands up don't shoot,was false,the gang rape was also.The right contrives lies and straw man fallacies to advance their agenda, this thread being one of many examples
Keeping in form,you attack the messenger,but reject the truth,thanks for reinforcing the OP,good job.
This is what you get for getting your news from Fox.
Here are the facts of "hands up don't shoot" and (Republican generated) Benghazi but I'll bet RWs will refuse to watch it because they prefer their lies to the truth.
Jon Stewart calls out Fox News for a double standard in covering Ferguson and Benghazi - The Washington Post
The article gives a detailed line of events that led a fraudulent blogg piece of total lies through the process of becoming a mainstream lie. It showed how a totally false story could end being broadcast of the Rush show to a national audience and even portrayed as credible on FOX News after it had been exposed as a total farce. The story claimed restaurants in Seattle were closing do to the raise of minimum wage to 15.00 per hour. Not a single restaurant was closed and the minimum wage is Seattle was only being raised from 9.47, the state minimum, to 9.50, the new city minimum. Your excuse response is to claim that the fraudulent piece is irrelevant because it reinforces your opinion on the topic. Hey, look at Detroit, that is proof the idea behind the lies are right and therefore justified.That's also a opinion piece, because we will never know till 2018? Until the full law comes into effect, but common sense and looking at history of places like Detroit says my link is correctNo, this one. The one you posted is an opinion commentary.what Article in Forbes this one?here is a great one about restaurants closing in Seattle due to the mandatory minimum wage increase and it is a current topic and thread. Such a big lie and fake story that the pro business conservative publication FORBES produced an article about it calling it the "Anatomy of a Lie".The right contrives lies and straw man fallacies to advance their agenda, this thread being one of many examples
Proof Perfect That The Minimum Wage Costs Jobs - Forbes
Btw I have had a Subscription to forbes since the 80s
forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2015/03/22/minimum-wage-increase-killing-seattle-restaurants-anatomy-of-a-lie-from-inside-the-bubble/
Jon Stewart, huh..? Now that's a reliable source. He has an army of investigative reporters employed by his news network. Oh.. wait a minute, he doesn't have a news network, he gets his news from MSNBC. Oh well, it doesn't matter when you are a leftist.Here are the facts of "hands up don't shoot" and (Republican generated) Benghazi but I'll bet RWs will refuse to watch it because they prefer their lies to the truth.
So who contrived what,hands up don't shoot,was false,the gang rape was also.The right contrives lies and straw man fallacies to advance their agenda, this thread being one of many examples
Keeping in form,you attack the messenger,but reject the truth,thanks for reinforcing the OP,good job.
This is what you get for getting your news from Fox.
Here are the facts of "hands up don't shoot" and (Republican generated) Benghazi but I'll bet RWs will refuse to watch it because they prefer their lies to the truth.
Jon Stewart calls out Fox News for a double standard in covering Ferguson and Benghazi - The Washington Post