The Impeachment Report Does Not Cite One Law Violated

[LoneLaugher]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

Whoever told you that impeachment requires a criminal indictment lied to you.

The fucker obstructed justice and abused his power. Among other impeachable offenses.

Get his fat ass under oath and he'll commit perjury as well.

He's going to be impeached. Rightly so.

Obstruction of justice is a violation of the law, Dufus. And no where in the report is that cited. So stop watching CNN and grow a brain.

You may want to wait until the articles of impeachment are drawn up, dummy.

 

[Weatherman2020]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

Whoever told you that impeachment requires a criminal indictment lied to you.

The fucker obstructed justice and abused his power. Among other impeachable offenses.

Get his fat ass under oath and he'll commit perjury as well.

He's going to be impeached. Rightly so.

Obstruction of justice is a violation of the law, Dufus. And no where in the report is that cited. So stop watching CNN and grow a brain.

You may want to wait until the articles of impeachment are drawn up, dummy.

Based on what? If the 300 page report doesn’t say squat, what’s the fabrication going to be?

 

[SAYIT]

The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.

You're full of shit, of course.

Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.

How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.

What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

Only if you accept the idea that congress doesn't need a legit excuse to do so but convicting a POTUS in a Senate trial is virtually impossible without proving high crimes and misdemeanors and no matter how badly you want to believe it, "Trump is a poopy-head" is not a high crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4b3f80-442d-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html
"...impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

Face it, Pelosi - like every Democrat - is a liar and a traitor to this country. Dividing this country is what they are all about.

Impeachment is divisive yet there is only one more thing more divisive and that is committing an impeachable offense...

And there is the rub. What you and/or our Hysterical House Dems consider to be - after a one-sided inquisition - an impeachable offense will have to stand up to the scrutiny of a Senate TRIAL where their hyper-partisan process will suddenly be subject to actual rules of American jurisprudence, not the Schiffty/Nadler ones. It is said a "glass of water" can be indicted - or according to Pelosi, elected - but proving guilt is a whole 'nother matter.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Their main argument will be Obstruction...

The question for the House is will they convict Trump on this and my answer is no...

Trump opponents - myself included - will be content with (a) Impeachment and (b) forcing Republicans to go on-record to defend your POS.

You know it is hard not to melt on this site with nonsense like this because I did not vote for Trump, I believe he obstructed and I believe the Senate will not Convict...

So what is so fucking hard for individuals like you to understand this?

Also Republicans are on record and their voting base do not give a damn what you think...

What you need to worry more about is how the swing and independent voter will react and will they care in November of 2020 that Trump obstructed the House Impeachment Inquiry or will they be more focused on matters like trade deals, so economy and stuff like infrastructure?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Obstruction of justice is a violation of the law, Dufus. And no where in the report is that cited.

^^

While this utter moron clearly did not read the report and is desperately begging for attention by making up stupid shit, you can ignore every word he says.

In what the rest of us call "reality", obstruction is a central theme of the report and is mentioned repeatedly.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I’ve read it.

You clearly have not. Your desperate, attention seeking behavior and lies are very childlike.

 

[Crepitus]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

Sure it does, extortion, obstruction of Justice, all kinda stuff.

 

[bluzman61]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

Of COURSE it doesn't, because there WERE no laws that were violated.

 

[Weatherman2020]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

Sure it does, extortion, obstruction of Justice, all kinda stuff.

Is that why in 300 pages it cites no such violations?

 

[Weatherman2020]

I’ve read it.

You clearly have not. Your desperate, attention seeking behavior and lies are very childlike.

Says Dufus desperately spinning for another epic failure.

 

[HappyJoy]

Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.

How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.

What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

Only if you accept the idea that congress doesn't need a legit excuse to do so but convicting a POTUS in a Senate trial is virtually impossible without proving high crimes and misdemeanors and no matter how badly you want to believe it, "Trump is a poopy-head" is not a high crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4b3f80-442d-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html
"...impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

Face it, Pelosi - like every Democrat - is a liar and a traitor to this country. Dividing this country is what they are all about.

Impeachment is divisive yet there is only one more thing more divisive and that is committing an impeachable offense...

And there is the rub. What you and/or our Hysterical House Dems consider to be - after a one-sided inquisition - an impeachable offense will have to stand up to the scrutiny of a Senate TRIAL where their hyper-partisan process will suddenly be subject to actual rules of American jurisprudence, not the Schiffty/Nadler ones. It is said a "glass of water" can be indicted - or according to Pelosi, elected - but proving guilt is a whole 'nother matter.

One sided? Shit, the White house didn't even live up to it's end of the bargain. Who were the Republicans going to call? Pompeo and Mulvaney? Bad enough all they could muster as a defense was some bullshit conspiracy about Ukraine. Then come to find out the fucking ranking member was once again finding a way to get himself involved directly with Giulani and others.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

Only if you accept the idea that congress doesn't need a legit excuse to do so but convicting a POTUS in a Senate trial is virtually impossible without proving high crimes and misdemeanors and no matter how badly you want to believe it, "Trump is a poopy-head" is not a high crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4b3f80-442d-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html
"...impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

Face it, Pelosi - like every Democrat - is a liar and a traitor to this country. Dividing this country is what they are all about.

Impeachment is divisive yet there is only one more thing more divisive and that is committing an impeachable offense...

And there is the rub. What you and/or our Hysterical House Dems consider to be - after a one-sided inquisition - an impeachable offense will have to stand up to the scrutiny of a Senate TRIAL where their hyper-partisan process will suddenly be subject to actual rules of American jurisprudence, not the Schiffty/Nadler ones. It is said a "glass of water" can be indicted - or according to Pelosi, elected - but proving guilt is a whole 'nother matter.

One sided? Shit, the White house didn't even live up to it's end of the bargain. Who were the Republicans going to call? Pompeo and Mulvaney? Bad enough all they could muster as a defense was some bullshit conspiracy about Ukraine. Then come to find out the fucking ranking member was once again finding a way to get himself involved directly with Giulani and others.

What’s after this witch trial? Trump cut the tag off a mattress?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Says Dufus desperately spinning for another epic failure.

Thats about the depth of insight we can expect from a right wing blog-educated dumbass.

 

[Care4all]

"All that is required for evil men to prevail is for the vast majority of men who call themselves 'Good Men', to do nothing"

AND THAT is precisely WHY they are going forward with impeachment...

even though it hurts them, they can not stay silent and let evil, prevail.

 

[Care4all]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation. 300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

they are accusing him of breaking his oath of office, the Constitution, the public trust.... not criminal statutes.... and since they are NOT law enforcement or the FBI working with special prosecutors like a Ken Starr, they CAN NOT use statutes of crimes committed... since there is no special prosecutor in this impeachment, that is up to future prosecutors, after he leaves office, if criminal statutes were broken.... to bring charges...

This is not a criminal proceeding that needs any criminal statutes...

It's a review on whether he has honored his oath of office and not abused his power... and whether he should or should not be fired for breaking his oath, under God, that he took.

Wait ... not collusion or extortion or QPQ or bribery or extortion? Now it's "we hate Trump?" Yeah ... that outta fly in a Senate trial.

There is no point having goalposts if you have 'em on wheels.

How do you know that? The 300 page report cites nothing of the sort.

Anyone named Trump is guilty by supposition, assumption, interpretation, association or speculation. It's in our constitution.

so what is YOUR VERSION of what happened?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Says Dufus desperately spinning for another epic failure.

Thats about the depth of insight we can expect from a right wing blog-educated dumbass.

I drink your tears of anguish like a fine wine.

 

[SAYIT]

What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

Only if you accept the idea that congress doesn't need a legit excuse to do so but convicting a POTUS in a Senate trial is virtually impossible without proving high crimes and misdemeanors and no matter how badly you want to believe it, "Trump is a poopy-head" is not a high crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4b3f80-442d-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html
"...impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

Face it, Pelosi - like every Democrat - is a liar and a traitor to this country. Dividing this country is what they are all about.

Impeachment is divisive yet there is only one more thing more divisive and that is committing an impeachable offense...

And there is the rub. What you and/or our Hysterical House Dems consider to be - after a one-sided inquisition - an impeachable offense will have to stand up to the scrutiny of a Senate TRIAL where their hyper-partisan process will suddenly be subject to actual rules of American jurisprudence, not the Schiffty/Nadler ones. It is said a "glass of water" can be indicted - or according to Pelosi, elected - but proving guilt is a whole 'nother matter.

One sided? Shit, the White house didn't even live up to it's end of the bargain. Who were the Republicans going to call? Pompeo and Mulvaney? Bad enough all they could muster as a defense was some bullshit conspiracy about Ukraine. Then come to find out the fucking ranking member was once again finding a way to get himself involved directly with Giulani and others.

What end was that? Trump was not in any way compelled to honor the House Dem charade.They had the power to request the courts to enforce any subpoenas they chose to issue. Instead they chose to parade a bunch of hand-picked witnesses - none of whom had a lick of evidence of any crimes - and 4 leftist legal scholars who also had none. Even you must know that their hearsay and opinions won't even be admissible should the Dems send their silliness on to the Senate for a real American-style trial.

 

[HappyJoy]

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

Only if you accept the idea that congress doesn't need a legit excuse to do so but convicting a POTUS in a Senate trial is virtually impossible without proving high crimes and misdemeanors and no matter how badly you want to believe it, "Trump is a poopy-head" is not a high crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4b3f80-442d-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html
"...impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

Face it, Pelosi - like every Democrat - is a liar and a traitor to this country. Dividing this country is what they are all about.

Impeachment is divisive yet there is only one more thing more divisive and that is committing an impeachable offense...

And there is the rub. What you and/or our Hysterical House Dems consider to be - after a one-sided inquisition - an impeachable offense will have to stand up to the scrutiny of a Senate TRIAL where their hyper-partisan process will suddenly be subject to actual rules of American jurisprudence, not the Schiffty/Nadler ones. It is said a "glass of water" can be indicted - or according to Pelosi, elected - but proving guilt is a whole 'nother matter.

One sided? Shit, the White house didn't even live up to it's end of the bargain. Who were the Republicans going to call? Pompeo and Mulvaney? Bad enough all they could muster as a defense was some bullshit conspiracy about Ukraine. Then come to find out the fucking ranking member was once again finding a way to get himself involved directly with Giulani and others.

What’s after this witch trial? Trump cut the tag off a mattress?

I agree, he is a witch.

 

[SAYIT]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation. 300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

they are accusing him of breaking his oath of office, the Constitution, the public trust.... not criminal statutes.... and since they are NOT law enforcement or the FBI working with special prosecutors like a Ken Starr, they CAN NOT use statutes of crimes committed... since there is no special prosecutor in this impeachment, that is up to future prosecutors, after he leaves office, if criminal statutes were broken.... to bring charges...

This is not a criminal proceeding that needs any criminal statutes...

It's a review on whether he has honored his oath of office and not abused his power... and whether he should or should not be fired for breaking his oath, under God, that he took.

Wait ... not collusion or extortion or QPQ or bribery or extortion? Now it's "we hate Trump?" Yeah ... that outta fly in a Senate trial.

There is no point having goalposts if you have 'em on wheels.

How do you know that? The 300 page report cites nothing of the sort.

Anyone named Trump is guilty by supposition, assumption, interpretation, association or speculation. It's in our constitution.

so what is YOUR VERSION of what happened?

It so obvious only a brain-dead moron would fail to see it. Trump was conducting the business of America, requiring the recipient of hard-working Americans' tax dollars to turn over any and all evidence they have - including obstruction of Ukrainian justice or corruption by a US official - before releasing the foreign aid. That's not just his job, it's a duty of his office.

 

[Care4all]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

Whoever told you that impeachment requires a criminal indictment lied to you.

The fucker obstructed justice and abused his power. Among other impeachable offenses.

Get his fat ass under oath and he'll commit perjury as well.

He's going to be impeached. Rightly so.

Obstruction of justice is a violation of the law, Dufus. And no where in the report is that cited. So stop watching CNN and grow a brain.

it's not a criminal trial, no one goes to jail, even if found guilty.... do you not understand that...?