The Impeachment Report Does Not Cite One Law Violated

[SAYIT]

Wait ... not collusion or extortion or QPQ or bribery or extortion? Now it's "we hate Trump?" Yeah ... that outta fly in a Senate trial.

There is no point having goalposts if you have 'em on wheels.Anyone named Trump is guilty by supposition, assumption, interpretation, association or speculation. It's in our constitution.

so what is YOUR VERSION of what happened?

It so obvious only a brain-dead moron would fail to see it. Trump was conducting the business of America, requiring the recipient of hard-working Americans' tax dollars to turn over any and all evidence they have - including obstruction of Ukrainian justice or corruption by a US official - before releasing the foreign aid. That's not just his job, it's a duty of his office.

Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?

So you say you drank too much of the bright blue Kool-aid again? Have you ever heard of the presumption of innocence? Dems will have to prove in a Senate trail that which you believe to be the truth - emphasis on prove - and they couldn't even do that during their one-sided, KGB-style inquisition.

I guess I've got my answer. You're a moron who believes that Trump was ever concerned with corruption in Ukraine.

Ignorance is bliss. So why are you so upset?

No, he was also concerned that US aid to Ukraine had been used by a former VPOTUS - whose name shall remain secret - to fill the pockets of his son.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It so obvious only a brain-dead moron would fail to see it. Trump was conducting the business of America, requiring the recipient of hard-working Americans' tax dollars to turn over any and all evidence they have - including obstruction of Ukrainian justice or corruption by a US official - before releasing the foreign aid. That's not just his job, it's a duty of his office.

Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?

Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?

Ironic.

No. Sorry. You'll Nit be able to cite an instance where I pushed a line of bull like that. I'm batting .999 and my single misstep was a long time ago. I know before I post. Period.

You are sorry. And you’re batting .000

Did you say something tubby?

LMAO. Using my insults against me? You don’t even have originality. Stupid fat Leftist.

 

[Lesh]

Criminal acts are not required for Impeachment

Keep up

Dems can impeach or elect "a glass of water" (Pelosi) but high crimes and misdemeanors are required for conviction in a Senate trial. After yesterday's Dem FUBAR I have no illusion that any bitter leftard can keep up. What we learned (again) is that not only our Hysterical House Dems are unhinged but that 3 of 4 of the left's most learned legal scholars are bat-shit crazy. The one who had the audacity to think, act, and speak reasonably, rationally, and thoughtfully quickly became the target of the seething hatred of his comrades. Hate is the glue that binds our leftards:

Impeachment Witness Turley Claims Home, Professorship Threatened during Testimony

Abuse of Power..Bribery..are Impeachable Acts

 

[SAYIT]

Criminal acts are not required for Impeachment

Keep up

Dems can impeach or elect "a glass of water" (Pelosi) but high crimes and misdemeanors are required for conviction in a Senate trial. After yesterday's Dem FUBAR I have no illusion that any bitter leftard can keep up. What we learned (again) is that not only our Hysterical House Dems are unhinged but that 3 of 4 of the left's most learned legal scholars are bat-shit crazy. The one who had the audacity to think, act, and speak reasonably, rationally, and thoughtfully quickly became the target of the seething hatred of his comrades. Hate is the glue that binds our leftards:

Impeachment Witness Turley Claims Home, Professorship Threatened during Testimony

Abuse of Power..Bribery..are Impeachable Acts

Once more for the Brain-dead: claiming Trump guilty doesn't make him so. The Dems will have to make a real case in the Senate and hearsay, speculation, innuendo, presumptions, and opinions of unhinged leftards will not be admissible. The one-sided, KGB inquisition conducted by Hysterical House Dems will be exposed for the fraud all rational Americans know it has been.

 

[regent]

It seems as if the bulk of Republicans have not read, nor know, much about the impeachment process.
Impeachment is a political process not a legal process. It is not a courtroom procedure and of course there are rules but the House charges and the Senate votes on the charges.
One of the Republican House charges was thatdr Johnson had attempted to portray Congress as disgraceful, ridicule and contempt.

 

[WEATHER53]

Mostly an opinion based lecture.

 

[bripat9643]

The Starr report listed actual crimes, and the impeachment referal listed actual crimes.

You're full of shit, of course.

Neat. Let me know when Starr is a member of Congress.

How'd that work out anyway? I mean other than making Clinton more popular.

What part of "the impeachment referral listed actual crimes" didn't you understand, dumbass?

That a crime doesn't actually have to be committed in order to be impeached, weasel dick.

Only if you accept the idea that congress doesn't need a legit excuse to do so but convicting a POTUS in a Senate trial is virtually impossible without proving high crimes and misdemeanors and no matter how badly you want to believe it, "Trump is a poopy-head" is not a high crime.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...4b3f80-442d-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html
"...impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”

Face it, Pelosi - like every Democrat - is a liar and a traitor to this country. Dividing this country is what they are all about.

Impeachment is divisive yet there is only one more thing more divisive and that is committing an impeachable offense. Trump held up financial aid and dangled a white house visit in order to get the president of Ukraine to publicly state they were opening investigations into Biden and his kid.

Sure, the senate won't convict, after all we haven't reached the all mighty threshold of shooting someone on 5th Ave.

Trump didn't commit anything impeachable, moron. However, Dims believe being president while Republican is impeachable.

 

[LoneLaugher]

so what is YOUR VERSION of what happened?

It so obvious only a brain-dead moron would fail to see it. Trump was conducting the business of America, requiring the recipient of hard-working Americans' tax dollars to turn over any and all evidence they have - including obstruction of Ukrainian justice or corruption by a US official - before releasing the foreign aid. That's not just his job, it's a duty of his office.

Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?

So you say you drank too much of the bright blue Kool-aid again? Have you ever heard of the presumption of innocence? Dems will have to prove in a Senate trail that which you believe to be the truth - emphasis on prove - and they couldn't even do that during their one-sided, KGB-style inquisition.

I guess I've got my answer. You're a moron who believes that Trump was ever concerned with corruption in Ukraine.

Ignorance is bliss. So why are you so upset?

No, he was also concerned that US aid to Ukraine had been used by a former VPOTUS - whose name shall remain secret - to fill the pockets of his son.

Nope. He was concerned that said former VP would beat his fat, dumb ass in 2020 and he wanted to have an announcement of investigations. Period.

Moron.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?

Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?

Ironic.

No. Sorry. You'll Nit be able to cite an instance where I pushed a line of bull like that. I'm batting .999 and my single misstep was a long time ago. I know before I post. Period.

You are sorry. And you’re batting .000

Did you say something tubby?

LMAO. Using my insults against me? You don’t even have originality. Stupid fat Leftist.

I knew it. Thanks for the confirmation.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Their main argument will be Obstruction...

The question for the House is will they convict Trump on this and my answer is no...

Trump opponents - myself included - will be content with (a) Impeachment and (b) forcing Republicans to go on-record to defend your POS.

You know it is hard not to melt on this site with nonsense like this because I did not vote for Trump, I believe he obstructed and I believe the Senate will not Convict...

So what is so fucking hard for individuals like you to understand this?

Also Republicans are on record and their voting base do not give a damn what you think...

What you need to worry more about is how the swing and independent voter will react and will they care in November of 2020 that Trump obstructed the House Impeachment Inquiry or will they be more focused on matters like trade deals, so economy and stuff like infrastructure?

If they are, they'd never vote for Trump. He's made no trade deals and he's done nothing on infrastructure. Case closed.

Well you just lied because he is waiting for Pelosi to pass the Canada, Mexico and U.S. trade agreement...

So your Propaganda news source must be leaving that out...

Also he has suggested infrastructure and both sides seem to be slow on it...

 

[bripat9643]

It so obvious only a brain-dead moron would fail to see it. Trump was conducting the business of America, requiring the recipient of hard-working Americans' tax dollars to turn over any and all evidence they have - including obstruction of Ukrainian justice or corruption by a US official - before releasing the foreign aid. That's not just his job, it's a duty of his office.

Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?

So you say you drank too much of the bright blue Kool-aid again? Have you ever heard of the presumption of innocence? Dems will have to prove in a Senate trail that which you believe to be the truth - emphasis on prove - and they couldn't even do that during their one-sided, KGB-style inquisition.

I guess I've got my answer. You're a moron who believes that Trump was ever concerned with corruption in Ukraine.

Ignorance is bliss. So why are you so upset?

No, he was also concerned that US aid to Ukraine had been used by a former VPOTUS - whose name shall remain secret - to fill the pockets of his son.

Nope. He was concerned that said former VP would beat his fat, dumb ass in 2020 and he wanted to have an announcement of investigations. Period.

Moron.

Mind reading isn't admissible in court, dumbass.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Their main argument will be Obstruction...

The question for the House is will they convict Trump on this and my answer is no...

Trump opponents - myself included - will be content with (a) Impeachment and (b) forcing Republicans to go on-record to defend your POS.

You know it is hard not to melt on this site with nonsense like this because I did not vote for Trump, I believe he obstructed and I believe the Senate will not Convict...

So what is so fucking hard for individuals like you to understand this?

Also Republicans are on record and their voting base do not give a damn what you think...

What you need to worry more about is how the swing and independent voter will react and will they care in November of 2020 that Trump obstructed the House Impeachment Inquiry or will they be more focused on matters like trade deals, so economy and stuff like infrastructure?

If they are, they'd never vote for Trump. He's made no trade deals and he's done nothing on infrastructure. Case closed.

Well you just lied because he is waiting for Pelosi to pass the Canada, Mexico and U.S. trade agreement...

So your Propaganda news source must be leaving that out...

Also he has suggested infrastructure and both sides seem to be slow on it...

Sorry. He’s made no deals happen. And he’s gotten no infrastructure done. Total failure.

 

[Kondor3]

Their main argument will be Obstruction...

The question for the House is will they convict Trump on this and my answer is no...

Trump opponents - myself included - will be content with (a) Impeachment and (b) forcing Republicans to go on-record to defend your POS.

...Also Republicans are on record and their voting base do not give a damn what you think...

Quite true. They will, indeed, be "on-record" as voting to defend The Creature, and America at-large will not think kindly of them for that.

...What you need to worry more about is how the swing and independent voter will react and will they care in November of 2020 that Trump obstructed the House Impeachment Inquiry or will they be more focused on matters like trade deals, so economy and stuff like infrastructure?

Those voters who cannot see beyond the end of their noses will focus on short-term, short-lived economic conditions.

Those voters who care about the long-term health of our constitutional system of representative democracy will focus elsewhere.

The right-wing dictators of Europe of the early 20th made the trains run on-time and provided remarkable growth-economies, too.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Their main argument will be Obstruction...

The question for the House is will they convict Trump on this and my answer is no...

Trump opponents - myself included - will be content with (a) Impeachment and (b) forcing Republicans to go on-record to defend your POS.

...Also Republicans are on record and their voting base do not give a damn what you think...

Quite true. They will, indeed, be "on-record" as voting to defend The Creature, and America at-large will not think kindly of them for that.

...What you need to worry more about is how the swing and independent voter will react and will they care in November of 2020 that Trump obstructed the House Impeachment Inquiry or will they be more focused on matters like trade deals, so economy and stuff like infrastructure?

Those voters who cannot see beyond the end of their noses will focus on short-term, short-lived economic conditions.

Those voters who care about the long-term health of our constitutional system of representative democracy will focus elsewhere.

So then most of America outside California and New York and the city of Chicago will vote for Trump?

Yes, I am saying most of America is short sighted and just care about their pocketbooks and 401k...

If Trump win in 2020 just remember you were delusional to think Americans are not short sighted...

 

[Kondor3]

Are you one of the people who actually believes that horse shit or are you one of the people who just says it because you hope it fools enough morons?

So you say you drank too much of the bright blue Kool-aid again? Have you ever heard of the presumption of innocence? Dems will have to prove in a Senate trail that which you believe to be the truth - emphasis on prove - and they couldn't even do that during their one-sided, KGB-style inquisition.

I guess I've got my answer. You're a moron who believes that Trump was ever concerned with corruption in Ukraine.

Ignorance is bliss. So why are you so upset?

No, he was also concerned that US aid to Ukraine had been used by a former VPOTUS - whose name shall remain secret - to fill the pockets of his son.

Nope. He was concerned that said former VP would beat his fat, dumb ass in 2020 and he wanted to have an announcement of investigations. Period.

Moron.

Mind reading isn't admissible in court, dumbass.

No mind-reading necessary, my little Orange Minion... it's all out-in-the-open and in the public domain, now.

Your demigod POS is now going to be held to account for his despicable un-American oath-breaking behaviors.

 

[Kondor3]

Their main argument will be Obstruction...

The question for the House is will they convict Trump on this and my answer is no...

Trump opponents - myself included - will be content with (a) Impeachment and (b) forcing Republicans to go on-record to defend your POS.

...Also Republicans are on record and their voting base do not give a damn what you think...

Quite true. They will, indeed, be "on-record" as voting to defend The Creature, and America at-large will not think kindly of them for that.

...What you need to worry more about is how the swing and independent voter will react and will they care in November of 2020 that Trump obstructed the House Impeachment Inquiry or will they be more focused on matters like trade deals, so economy and stuff like infrastructure?

Those voters who cannot see beyond the end of their noses will focus on short-term, short-lived economic conditions.

Those voters who care about the long-term health of our constitutional system of representative democracy will focus elsewhere.

So then most of America outside California and New York and the city of Chicago will vote for Trump?

Yes, I am saying most of America is short sighted and just care about their pocketbooks and 401k...

If Trump win in 2020 just remember you were delusional to think Americans are not short sighted...

I have more faith in the American People than you do, apparently, and, for that, I am content.

 

[easyt65]

so? talk is cheap ask Trump.

Why talk to the President, the man whose actions have resulted n the strongest economy in decades, the lowest unemployment in decades, the lowest minority unemployment in history, and on and on and on....despite the non-stop 100% commitment by House Democrats to do nothing but undo the 2016 election for the last 4 years?!

The Democrats continue to prove all they CAN do is TALK and FAIL to deliver.

thats pretty close to dumber ^^^^^^^^^^^^

point deductions for whining voice.

Sorry I had to spank your ass in front of your snowflake pals. The fact is that while Democrats have invested 4 years f their lives and dragged the nation along behind them on their crusade to undo the 2016 election President Trump has accomplished successes not seen for DECADES in less that 4 years, that not even your /messiah' Barry could do in 8 years.

tough staying on topic after I handed you your ass aint it?

you are DISMISSED.

'Handed me my ass'? Dear, Siete, you exposed to everyone how completely ignorant you are of the successes this President has racked up while the Democrats have engaged in Sedition, attempted to undermine the President of the United States, and have engaged in a 4-year failed attempt to affect a political coup Barak Obama started.

The fact is this President accomplished in less than 4 years more that any other President in several DECADES than Barry was able to accomplish in 8 years.

Showing your ignorance and being corrected with facts in front of everyone is NOT 'handing ANYONE their ass'. It's being 'schooled'.

Bwuhahahahahaha....

 

[DBA]

When you’re accusing someone of violating the law, you cite the law (Section blah blah of Code blah blah) and then detail the evidence of such violation.

300+ page report can’t even state one law. It’s just a bunch of innuendos and lists actions that are not against the law.

Democrats moving forward with this sham have destroyed their own party.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uplo...rt___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

The corruption rampant throughout the ameican economic/political/"legal" system is intuitively obvious to even the most casual of observers and the so called president is a laughing stock on the world stage.

Yeah, they are all laughing while our economy runs laps around them. Socialists aren't very smart, but we all knew that.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Their main argument will be Obstruction...

The question for the House is will they convict Trump on this and my answer is no...

Trump opponents - myself included - will be content with (a) Impeachment and (b) forcing Republicans to go on-record to defend your POS.

...Also Republicans are on record and their voting base do not give a damn what you think...

Quite true. They will, indeed, be "on-record" as voting to defend The Creature, and America at-large will not think kindly of them for that.

...What you need to worry more about is how the swing and independent voter will react and will they care in November of 2020 that Trump obstructed the House Impeachment Inquiry or will they be more focused on matters like trade deals, so economy and stuff like infrastructure?

Those voters who cannot see beyond the end of their noses will focus on short-term, short-lived economic conditions.

Those voters who care about the long-term health of our constitutional system of representative democracy will focus elsewhere.

So then most of America outside California and New York and the city of Chicago will vote for Trump?

Yes, I am saying most of America is short sighted and just care about their pocketbooks and 401k...

If Trump win in 2020 just remember you were delusional to think Americans are not short sighted...

I have more faith in the American People than you do, apparently, and, for that, I am content.

You can have all the faith you want and yet you will ne wrong if the markets are strong, 401k is strong and no major wars or attack happens.

Swing voters really do not care about the Ukraine nonsense and Pelosi used that to bait Trump into Obstruction, so enjoy because this will all come out and by November if the economy is strong and nothing major like a war or attack Trump win again...

You fools thought you would beat Reagan in 1984 with Walter Mondale and Joe Biden will be your new Walter Mondale...

 

[Kondor3]

...You can have all the faith you want and yet you will ne wrong if the markets are strong, 401k is strong and no major wars or attack happens...

Yes, I can, and I do.

...Swing voters really do not care about the Ukraine nonsense and Pelosi used that to bait Trump into Obstruction, so enjoy because this will all come out and by November if the economy is strong and nothing major like a war or attack Trump win again...

We will know the answer to that question on the morning of November 4, 2020.

...You fools thought you would beat Reagan in 1984 with Walter Mondale...

Don't lump me in with hard-line Democrats; I voted for Nixon in 72, Reagan in 84, GHWB in 88 and GWB in 2000 and 2004.

I voted for HRC in 2016 and held my nose while doing it.

I am in-favor of much of what Trump sold you folks on, in 2016; it's just that I considered him far too high a price to get what I wanted.

...and Joe Biden will be your new Walter Mondale...

We will know the answer to that question on the morning of November 4, 2020.

Until then, I - and much of America by now - would rather vote-in a fence post than your amoral arrogant incompetent POS.