The Herman Cain Conspiracy

Bass v 2.0

Biblical Warrior For God.
Jun 16, 2008
11,405
1,458
98
Pennsylvania
mark block americans for prosperity perry The Herman Cain Conspiracy | News One


The question is why? The answer is simple. The Republican Party never wanted a Black man to lead, but they wanted to look like they did. After the RNC Chariman Michael Steele (a right wing token if we ever saw one) was bullied by Rush Limbaugh and cast aside like a rusty spittoon, there was no Black Republican leader to represent the right. Most of the candidates Black America knew from the right were either seen as Toms (like Steele) or just had no juice on the block. They needed a new guy. A charismatic guy. A Black guy who looked like he could win, but couldn’t. Herman Cain was that Black guy.

Ultimately, Herman Cain assassinated himself. Shot himself in the heart and took his wife with him. His infidelity is his to own and his to work out between his God and wife. He knew what was in his past. Only his ego, or the false support of those in on the hit, would make him believe he could get past the vetting of so many in such crucial times.
As of now, there is no fingerprints, no weapon, no get away vehicle. Suspects? There are many. We have Mark Block, the Koch Brothers to Perry, Anderson, its a long list.

The one thing nobody argue though, is that it was a clean hit, and Cain’s run is done.


The interesting thing is that those idiots on the right who complain about a possible "liberal" conspiracy against Cain and or liberals cheering about Cain stepping down is that they are not attacking their fellow rightwingers for abandoning Cain for Gingrich. if they were really behind Cain and really behind a black Republican winning they would have stuck with him regardless, it shows just how serious they were about really supporting a Black Republican candidate. They withdraw their support from one cheater only to throw it behind another cheater, very smart, :rolleyes: . Say what you want about Cain but he was very loyal to a party that showed him token loyalty.
 
et tu Bass, et tu

So your shitting on the Reps b/c they didn't keep backing Cain after it turns out he likes to sexually harass employees and other women under his control?

pathetic

so are you happy Cains out?
 
Very, very, very weak attempt, troll.

Shut up retard, the dorks in your party pretended to like Cain, just as they do with every token black Republican but leave them high and dry when the going gets tough. That's why i switched my party affiliation from Republican to Independent, they use blacks only for the good of the party to make the party look good, not because they are genuinely for black people. Cain isn't a dummy, he knew this and or should have known, he willfully went on with it now the price paid isn't a failed campaign, but his marriage.
 
et tu Bass, et tu

So your shitting on the Reps b/c they didn't keep backing Cain after it turns out he likes to sexually harass employees and other women under his control?

pathetic

so are you happy Cains out?

The irony you dummy is that the Repubitards are throwing their support behind another cheater, Gingrich. If cheating is cheating and wrong and wrong why throw support behind another cheater? Are you insinuating that Gingrich is somehow morally superior to Cain? is you party insinuating that a white cheater is better than a black cheater? I don't care either way, your party, your candidates.
 
I'm happy this perve is out of the race! Yesterday was a good day!!! YAY!

I wanted him out, but not for the reasons why he's getting out, whatever morally failings he had, Cain was not politically able and qualified to lead this country, not when he's putting Muslims, calling blacks brainwashed and reveling in being a tool for the Koch Brothers.
 
I will say I'm angry with the republican party as 95 percent of it sure as hell isn't like me. Most republicans have attacked me just as hard as the leftist and they supported Cain. Cain was the one that fucked up and what fucked him was the charges of Sexual harassment. In the future we will likely lower our standards and that will start the slow decline into the crapper.
 
Last edited:
et tu Bass, et tu

So your shitting on the Reps b/c they didn't keep backing Cain after it turns out he likes to sexually harass employees and other women under his control?

pathetic

so are you happy Cains out?

The irony you dummy is that the Repubitards are throwing their support behind another cheater, Gingrich. If cheating is cheating and wrong and wrong why throw support behind another cheater? Are you insinuating that Gingrich is somehow morally superior to Cain? is you party insinuating that a white cheater is better than a black cheater? I don't care either way, your party, your candidates.

I haven't spoken jive in a long time, so please try to use proper English from now on.
Thanks.

I'm not a rep, just to be clear.

I liked Cain and he had my support along with Paul. but he turned out to be a criminal.

There's the rub. Cains acts were criminal [sexual harassment]. Newts acts were not criminal, just cruel and tasteless.

And please keep in mind, a man cheating on his wife is OK with the left. so please don't go looking for the moral high ground, b/c you don't have any.
 
I will say I'm angery with the republican party as 95 percent of it sure as hell isn't like me. Cain was the one that fucked up and what fucked him was the charges of Sexual harrassment. In the future we will likely lower our standards and that will start the low decline into the crapper.

If i were a black Republican I would leave the party ASAP, but knowing how dumb they are the NBRA, Project 21 and other Black Republicans are not standing up for Cain. Yes, his cheating was wrong, his sexual harassment of women were wrong, but it makes no sense for the party to throw their support behind another who's as equally and or even more of a cheater than Cain.
 
If Cain had an affair or was involved in sexual harrassment, he should have known that these allegations would eventually surface during the rigors of a presidential campaign.

The Democrats had no reason to "conspire" against a GOP candidate like Cain, given that the November polls show that Obama would defeat him in a general election by an average of 10.2%.

The only ones who benefit from Cain being forced to withdraw at this stage of the presidential campaign are some of the other Republican candidates. It was Cain's Campaign, afterall, that accused the Perry Campaign of leaking the story about the sexual harrassment settlements.

It is also no secret that the Republican "establishment" have been watching the polls and have come to the conclusion that Romney is the only one of the GOP candidates that would have any chance of defeating Obama in a general election.

GOP "insiders" were less than pleased when Cain, a candidate they perceive as unelectable, took a temporary lead in the polls so close to the primaries, and they certainly don't want to see Gingrich to take his place. If Gingrich continues to surge ahead, I suspect that there will be more leaks coming from anonymous sources - either a GOP candidate or the Republican "establishment."
 
Last edited:
et tu Bass, et tu

So your shitting on the Reps b/c they didn't keep backing Cain after it turns out he likes to sexually harass employees and other women under his control?

pathetic

so are you happy Cains out?

The irony you dummy is that the Repubitards are throwing their support behind another cheater, Gingrich. If cheating is cheating and wrong and wrong why throw support behind another cheater? Are you insinuating that Gingrich is somehow morally superior to Cain? is you party insinuating that a white cheater is better than a black cheater? I don't care either way, your party, your candidates.

I haven't spoken jive in a long time, so please try to use proper English from now on.
Thanks.

I'm not a rep, just to be clear.

I liked Cain and he had my support along with Paul. but he turned out to be a criminal.

There's the rub. Cains acts were criminal [sexual harassment]. Newts acts were not criminal, just cruel and tasteless.

And please keep in mind, a man cheating on his wife is OK with the left. so please don't go looking for the moral high ground, b/c you don't have any.

Cain's acts were criminal? Prove it, unless he raped or sexually assaulted a woman and it was proven in a court of law he did nothing criminal, nice way to try to cover the hypocrisy and latent racism of your own party that really offered token support to a black candidate.

As far as cheating and the left, well, your party supporting Gingrich leaves you no room to criticize another party supporting cheaters.
 
The irony you dummy is that the Repubitards are throwing their support behind another cheater, Gingrich. If cheating is cheating and wrong and wrong why throw support behind another cheater? Are you insinuating that Gingrich is somehow morally superior to Cain? is you party insinuating that a white cheater is better than a black cheater? I don't care either way, your party, your candidates.

I haven't spoken jive in a long time, so please try to use proper English from now on.
Thanks.

I'm not a rep, just to be clear.

I liked Cain and he had my support along with Paul. but he turned out to be a criminal.

There's the rub. Cains acts were criminal [sexual harassment]. Newts acts were not criminal, just cruel and tasteless.

And please keep in mind, a man cheating on his wife is OK with the left. so please don't go looking for the moral high ground, b/c you don't have any.

Cain's acts were criminal? Prove it, unless he raped or sexually assaulted a woman and it was proven in a court of law he did nothing criminal, nice way to try to cover the hypocrisy and latent racism of your own party that really offered token support to a black candidate.

As far as cheating and the left, well, your party supporting Gingrich leaves you no room to criticize another party supporting cheaters.

Racism?

What a fuckhole you are. You got nothing and had to play that so early that you showed yourself to be incapable of adult conversation.

If you make sexual advances on a person that works under you, that's sexual harassment or if you accept the advances of a person working under you.

Damn, I didn't know you were to incompetent.

I'll leave you to your uncle tom hate mongering. Oh, Condi Rice has a new book out, I'm sure you don't know that, since she's an Aunt Tomalina. But make sure to spew your hate for her next time you get a chance.
 
I haven't spoken jive in a long time, so please try to use proper English from now on.
Thanks.

I'm not a rep, just to be clear.

I liked Cain and he had my support along with Paul. but he turned out to be a criminal.

There's the rub. Cains acts were criminal [sexual harassment]. Newts acts were not criminal, just cruel and tasteless.

And please keep in mind, a man cheating on his wife is OK with the left. so please don't go looking for the moral high ground, b/c you don't have any.

Cain's acts were criminal? Prove it, unless he raped or sexually assaulted a woman and it was proven in a court of law he did nothing criminal, nice way to try to cover the hypocrisy and latent racism of your own party that really offered token support to a black candidate.

As far as cheating and the left, well, your party supporting Gingrich leaves you no room to criticize another party supporting cheaters.

Racism?

What a fuckhole you are. You got nothing and had to play that so early that you showed yourself to be incapable of adult conversation.

If you make sexual advances on a person that works under you, that's sexual harassment or if you accept the advances of a person working under you.

Damn, I didn't know you were to incompetent.

I'll leave you to your uncle tom hate mongering. Oh, Condi Rice has a new book out, I'm sure you don't know that, since she's an Aunt Tomalina. But make sure to spew your hate for her next time you get a chance.

If cheating is cheating and its wrong why throw support behind Gingrich? Why not throw him equally under the bus like Cain?

Condi Rice is from down south just like I am and comes from a similar area. I don't agree with a lot of what she has done but I have never called her the female equivalent of an Uncle Tom, she has never said the things that whites want to hear nor have she pandered to whites and unlike Cain, she admits racism is still a problem in this country, she's much more realistic.
 
Shut up retard, the dorks in your party pretended to like Cain, just as they do with every token black Republican but leave them high and dry when the going gets tough. That's why i switched my party affiliation from Republican to Independent, they use blacks only for the good of the party to make the party look good, not because they are genuinely for black people. Cain isn't a dummy, he knew this and or should have known, he willfully went on with it now the price paid isn't a failed campaign, but his marriage.

Bass, we may have our differences, but I have no reason to lie to you... Mr. Cain was no token black man to me. I truly believe he is a good man and would have made a good POTUS.
His race made no difference to me.... I swear.
There are alot of us out here too... race truly is not a factor with me.

I dont want to argue the issue. Just wanted to be civilized about it and tell you that you wrong about a big number of us. BTW, I am not a repoblican. I am a conservative first and foremost.

Thats all... just had to say my piece.
 
Shut up retard, the dorks in your party pretended to like Cain, just as they do with every token black Republican but leave them high and dry when the going gets tough. That's why i switched my party affiliation from Republican to Independent, they use blacks only for the good of the party to make the party look good, not because they are genuinely for black people. Cain isn't a dummy, he knew this and or should have known, he willfully went on with it now the price paid isn't a failed campaign, but his marriage.

Bass, we may have our differences, but I have no reason to lie to you... Mr. Cain was no token black man to me. I truly believe he is a good man and would have made a good POTUS.
His race made no difference to me.... I swear.
There are alot of us out here too... race truly is not a factor with me.

I dont want to argue the issue. Just wanted to be civilized about it and tell you that you wrong about a big number of us. BTW, I am not a repoblican. I am a conservative first and foremost.

Thats all... just had to say my piece.

I'm not saying all Republicans are like that but those who abandoned Cain for Gingrich, they're the ones who need to check themselves.
 
If cheating is cheating and its wrong why throw support behind Gingrich? Why not throw him equally under the bus like Cain?

Condi Rice is from down south just like I am and comes from a similar area. I don't agree with a lot of what she has done but I have never called her the female equivalent of an Uncle Tom, she has never said the things that whites want to hear nor have she pandered to whites and unlike Cain, she admits racism is still a problem in this country, she's much more realistic.


I am a big Condi fan... I was impressed with her interview with Hannity the other night.
He kept trying to talk race and she kept deflecting it away... she didnt want to make it the topic of discussion.
He was being a typical RW hack that night... not a big fan of his at all.

She could do a good job as POTUS in my book :eusa_whistle:
 

Forum List

Back
Top