He's full of shit, from what I read of his article.I find it hard to believe you have never heard of him. If true, you need to read him extensively. He is one of the greatest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He's full of shit, from what I read of his article.I find it hard to believe you have never heard of him. If true, you need to read him extensively. He is one of the greatest.
Which shows they were not slaves. The slavery contract is a bill of sale.In Maine, the indentured servants wrote in their contracts that they could NOT be served Lobster more than 3 times a week
Yeah. They weren't property.it didn't exist as a 'legal entity'?
The local constabulary had no clue people owned slaves?
/----/ Wisdom of the MonthNever heard of the man. I assumed you are the cracker.Yeah... Walter Williams is a cracker. LMFAO!!!
He's full of shit, from what I read of his article.I find it hard to believe you have never heard of him. If true, you need to read him extensively. He is one of the greatest.
/----/ Please post one example of his article that you think is BS --- if it's not too inconvenient.He's full of shit, from what I read of his article.I find it hard to believe you have never heard of him. If true, you need to read him extensively. He is one of the greatest.
Your post may indicate that you may be terribly ignorant.He's full of shit, from what I read of his article.I find it hard to believe you have never heard of him. If true, you need to read him extensively. He is one of the greatest.
Indentured servants aren't slaves. That's just a myth perpetrated by some people who want to make themselves feel better. If one feels bad when taught history, is it history's fault or do you need to look inside your own psyche to find the cause?
Indentured "slavery" had no ideological basis. It was an answer to the British establishments fear of the mob. That was a very real factor in those days.
The answer was to ship white trash a long way away from civilisation. Out of sight , out of mind.
It wasnt a pleasant experience but neither was life in London if you were poor.
The pay off is that they were able to improve their lot after serving.
I dont think that it can be compared to black slavery. These people werent picked up by gangs. They were sent there because they had done something, however trivial it might seem to us. And they had a light at the end of the tunnel in a country that had many similarities to the one they had left. Religion,language and so on.
And they didnt have to suffer centuries of racist oppression on account of their skin colour.
If you want to learn about slavery then you need to read The Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas. However it is dry stuff.
Indentured "slavery" had no ideological basis. It was an answer to the British establishments fear of the mob. That was a very real factor in those days.
The answer was to ship white trash a long way away from civilisation. Out of sight , out of mind.
It wasnt a pleasant experience but neither was life in London if you were poor.
The pay off is that they were able to improve their lot after serving.
I dont think that it can be compared to black slavery. These people werent picked up by gangs. They were sent there because they had done something, however trivial it might seem to us. And they had a light at the end of the tunnel in a country that had many similarities to the one they had left. Religion,language and so on.
And they didnt have to suffer centuries of racist oppression on account of their skin colour.
If you want to learn about slavery then you need to read The Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas. However it is dry stuff.
The confederacy only lasted 4 years because decent Americans smashed it.The Confederacy only lasted for about four years. The flag that flew from the stern of slave ships for 200 years was the Union Jack and later the Stars and Stripes.
You either deliberately misunderstand me or there is some comprehension issue.Indentured "slavery" had no ideological basis. It was an answer to the British establishments fear of the mob. That was a very real factor in those days.
The answer was to ship white trash a long way away from civilisation. Out of sight , out of mind.
It wasnt a pleasant experience but neither was life in London if you were poor.
The pay off is that they were able to improve their lot after serving.
I dont think that it can be compared to black slavery. These people werent picked up by gangs. They were sent there because they had done something, however trivial it might seem to us. And they had a light at the end of the tunnel in a country that had many similarities to the one they had left. Religion,language and so on.
And they didnt have to suffer centuries of racist oppression on account of their skin colour.
If you want to learn about slavery then you need to read The Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas. However it is dry stuff.
The statement "Indentured slavery has no ideological basis" is the idiot statement of the
twenty first century. Slavery has existed for thousands of years------over the entire planet---
in many different forms. Indentured servitude is one form------England did not invent it
You either deliberately misunderstand me or there is some comprehension issue.Indentured "slavery" had no ideological basis. It was an answer to the British establishments fear of the mob. That was a very real factor in those days.
The answer was to ship white trash a long way away from civilisation. Out of sight , out of mind.
It wasnt a pleasant experience but neither was life in London if you were poor.
The pay off is that they were able to improve their lot after serving.
I dont think that it can be compared to black slavery. These people werent picked up by gangs. They were sent there because they had done something, however trivial it might seem to us. And they had a light at the end of the tunnel in a country that had many similarities to the one they had left. Religion,language and so on.
And they didnt have to suffer centuries of racist oppression on account of their skin colour.
If you want to learn about slavery then you need to read The Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas. However it is dry stuff.
The statement "Indentured slavery has no ideological basis" is the idiot statement of the
twenty first century. Slavery has existed for thousands of years------over the entire planet---
in many different forms. Indentured servitude is one form------England did not invent it
Indentured servants aren't slaves. That's just a myth perpetrated by some people who want to make themselves feel better. If one feels bad when taught history, is it history's fault or do you need to look inside your own psyche to find the cause?
Were you born stupid or did you grow into it
Indentured servants aren't slaves. That's just a myth perpetrated by some people who want to make themselves feel better. If one feels bad when taught history, is it history's fault or do you need to look inside your own psyche to find the cause?
Were you born stupid or did you grow into it
Indentured servants voluntarily signed a contract to work for somebody for a certain number of years. A slave is a sold piece of property that had no say at all in the process until he/she dies. To say they are the same thing is nonsense.
The confederacy only lasted 4 years because decent Americans smashed it.The Confederacy only lasted for about four years. The flag that flew from the stern of slave ships for 200 years was the Union Jack and later the Stars and Stripes.
Actually decent Americans eventually smashed the criminal enterprise known as the British monarchy and turned it into an inbred bit of ceremonial fluff. Later on the Colonies saved the country formerly known as England from speaking German.The confederacy only lasted 4 years because decent Americans smashed it.The Confederacy only lasted for about four years. The flag that flew from the stern of slave ships for 200 years was the Union Jack and later the Stars and Stripes.
Indentured "slavery" had no ideological basis. It was an answer to the British establishments fear of the mob. That was a very real factor in those days.
The answer was to ship white trash a long way away from civilisation. Out of sight , out of mind.
It wasnt a pleasant experience but neither was life in London if you were poor.
The pay off is that they were able to improve their lot after serving.
I dont think that it can be compared to black slavery. These people werent picked up by gangs. They were sent there because they had done something, however trivial it might seem to us. And they had a light at the end of the tunnel in a country that had many similarities to the one they had left. Religion,language and so on.
And they didnt have to suffer centuries of racist oppression on account of their skin colour.
If you want to learn about slavery then you need to read The Slave Trade by Hugh Thomas. However it is dry stuff.
The statement "Indentured slavery has no ideological basis" is the idiot statement of the
twenty first century. Slavery has existed for thousands of years------over the entire planet---
in many different forms. Indentured servitude is one form------England did not invent it
Indentured servants aren't slaves. That's just a myth perpetrated by some people who want to make themselves feel better. If one feels bad when taught history, is it history's fault or do you need to look inside your own psyche to find the cause?
Were you born stupid or did you grow into it
Indentured servants voluntarily signed a contract to work for somebody for a certain number of years. A slave is a sold piece of property that had no say at all in the process until he/she dies. To say they are the same thing is nonsense.