GoogleDoodle: Silent March of 1917, This Day in Civil Rights

Pogo

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2012
123,708
22,746
2,190
Fennario
nintchdbpict000342046673.jpg


Yesterday's edition of the occasional "Google Doodle" feature on the home search page​


It marked exactly 100 years since this day in 1917 when thousands (estimated 8000-10,000) Black Americans, men, women and children, marched in the "Silent Parade" in New York City to protest, and bring attention to, the then-recent East St. Louis riots that had turned violence on the black community there, resulting in the worst labor-related violence in US history. (background of the riots in this thread)

nintchdbpict000342046573-e1501239205660.jpg


>> The only sounds were those of muffled drums, the shuffling of feet and the gentle sobs of some of the estimated 20,000 onlookers. The women and children wore all white. The men dressed in black.

On the afternoon of Saturday, July 28, 1917, nearly 10,000 African-Americans marched down Fifth Avenue, in silence, to protest racial violence and white supremacy in the United States.

New York City, and the nation, had never before witnessed such a remarkable scene.

The “Silent Protest Parade,” as it came to be known, was the first mass African-American demonstration of its kind and marked a watershed moment in the history of the civil rights movement.

The city’s surviving 6,000 black residents became refugees.

East St. Louis was an American pogrom. The fearless African-American anti-lynching activist Ida B. Wells traveled to the still smoldering city on July 4 and collected firsthand accounts of the aftermath. She described the incident as an “awful orgy of human butchery.”

The devastation of East St. Louis was compounded by the fact that America was at war. On April 2, President Woodrow Wilson had thrown the United States into the maelstrom of World War I. He did so by asserting America’s singularly unique place on the global stage and his goal to make the world “safe for democracy.” In the eyes of black people, East St. Louis exposed the hypocrisy of Wilson’s vision and America itself. << --- A silent protest parade in 1917 set the stage for civil rights marches


It took a palpable degree of courage for black people to engage in such a public spectacle in 1917, a period of the nadir of racism and bigotry. Black people were being randomly murdered in lynchings throughout the country on the basis of unfounded rumors or a simple inkling of temerity. The even larger Tulsa Race Riots lay two years in the future, and the Ku Klux Klan was reorganized two years in the past. Calling attention to the elephant in the room in silent dignity reminded the culture of the realities in the American experience and exactly how they were falling short of the American ideal.

These were the pioneers in an attempted resetting of social equilibrium that went on for decades and continues today. They made their statement on a Saturday one hundred years ago.
 
So wait a minute. Google commemorated an event where a bunch of black people burned down their own houses?

WTF??
 
So wait a minute. Google commemorated an event where a bunch of black people burned down their own houses?

WTF??

Literacy --- a lost art.

"What a waste it is to lose one's mind, or not to have a mind as being very wasteful. How true that is."
 
nintchdbpict000342046673.jpg


Yesterday's edition of the occasional "Google Doodle" feature on the home search page​


It marked exactly 100 years since this day in 1917 when thousands (estimated 8000-10,000) Black Americans, men, women and children, marched in the "Silent Parade" in New York City to protest, and bring attention to, the then-recent East St. Louis riots that had turned violence on the black community there, resulting in the worst labor-related violence in US history. (background of the riots in this thread)

nintchdbpict000342046573-e1501239205660.jpg


>> The only sounds were those of muffled drums, the shuffling of feet and the gentle sobs of some of the estimated 20,000 onlookers. The women and children wore all white. The men dressed in black.

On the afternoon of Saturday, July 28, 1917, nearly 10,000 African-Americans marched down Fifth Avenue, in silence, to protest racial violence and white supremacy in the United States.

New York City, and the nation, had never before witnessed such a remarkable scene.

The “Silent Protest Parade,” as it came to be known, was the first mass African-American demonstration of its kind and marked a watershed moment in the history of the civil rights movement.

The city’s surviving 6,000 black residents became refugees.

East St. Louis was an American pogrom. The fearless African-American anti-lynching activist Ida B. Wells traveled to the still smoldering city on July 4 and collected firsthand accounts of the aftermath. She described the incident as an “awful orgy of human butchery.”

The devastation of East St. Louis was compounded by the fact that America was at war. On April 2, President Woodrow Wilson had thrown the United States into the maelstrom of World War I. He did so by asserting America’s singularly unique place on the global stage and his goal to make the world “safe for democracy.” In the eyes of black people, East St. Louis exposed the hypocrisy of Wilson’s vision and America itself. << --- A silent protest parade in 1917 set the stage for civil rights marches


It took a palpable degree of courage for black people to engage in such a public spectacle in 1917, a period of the nadir of racism and bigotry. Black people were being randomly murdered in lynchings throughout the country on the basis of unfounded rumors or a simple inkling of temerity. The even larger Tulsa Race Riots lay two years in the future, and the Ku Klux Klan was reorganized two years in the past. Calling attention to the elephant in the room in silent dignity reminded the culture of the realities in the American experience and exactly how they were falling short of the American ideal.

These were the pioneers in an attempted resetting of social equilibrium that went on for decades and continues today. They made their statement on a Saturday one hundred years ago.

Part of the reason I used the Google Doodle in the OP was to edumacate the incessant whiners on this site who wet their pants every time the Google Doodle doesn't splash Memorial Day or some other well-known and obvious occasion that requires no such splash.

OMFG, they doodle things that create the ever-dangerous situation where somebody might actually learn about something they didn't know before. What a frickin' nightmare. :eek:

Much like the pants-wetting in this thread. Same thing. To paraphrase an old wisdom, "if you go on splashing that which needs no splash, you'll continue to get the results you always had".
 
Apparently the march ended peacefully. Contrast it to the WW1 Veterans "Bonus March" of 1932. The Veterans were attacked by a military battalion led by Douglas MacArthur and dispersed by swords and gunfire and bayonets.. It ain't always about race.
 
A march to commemorate violence caused by companies shipping in a bunch of scabs. Whoopity do.
 
Here is a more accurate story about black politicians and black politics of the era; almost all corrupt and dishonest con artists and swindlers, just as they are to this day.

Marcus Garvey - Wikipedia

The next year in May 1917, Garvey and thirteen others formed the first UNIA division outside Jamaica. They began advancing ideas to promote social, political, and economic freedom for black people. On 2 July, the East St. Louis riots broke out. On 8 July, Garvey delivered an address, entitled "The Conspiracy of the East St. Louis Riots", at Lafayette Hall in Harlem. During the speech, he declared the riot was "one of the bloodiest outrages against mankind", condemning America's claims to represent democracy when black people were victimized "for no other reason than they are black people seeking an industrial chance in a country that they have laboured for three hundred years to make great". It is "a time to lift one's voice against the savagery of a people who claim to be the dispensers of democracy".[15] By October, rancor within the UNIA had begun to set in. A split occurred in the Harlem division, with Garvey enlisted to become its leader; although he technically held the same position in Jamaica.[citation needed]

Garvey worked to develop a program to improve the conditions of ethnic Africans "at home and abroad" under UNIA auspices. On 17 August 1918, he began publishing the Negro World newspaper in New York, which was widely distributed. Garvey worked as an editor without pay until November 1920. He used Negro World as a platform for his views to encourage growth of the UNIA.[16] By June 1919, the membership of the organization had grown to over two million, according to its records.

On 27 June 1919, the UNIA set up its first business, incorporating the Black Star Line of Delaware, with Garvey as President. By September, it acquired its first ship. Much fanfare surrounded the inspection of the S.S. Yarmouth and its rechristening as the S.S. Frederick Douglass on 14 September 1919. Such a rapid accomplishment garnered attention from many.[16] The Black Star Line also formed a fine winery, using grapes harvested only in Ethiopia. During the first year, the Black Star Line's stock sales brought in $600,000. They had numerous problems during the next two years: mechanical breakdowns on their ships, what was said to be a result of incompetent workers, and poor record keeping. The officers were eventually accused of mail fraud.[16]

Edwin P. Kilroe, Assistant District Attorney in the District Attorney's office of the County of New York, began an investigation into the activities of the UNIA. He never filed charges against Garvey or other officers. After being called to Kilroe's office numerous times for questioning, Garvey wrote an editorial on the assistant DA's activities for the Negro World. Kilroe had Garvey arrested and indicted for criminal libel but dismissed the charges after Garvey published a retraction.[citation needed]

On 14 October 1919, Garvey received a visit in his Harlem office from George Tyler, who claimed Kilroe "had sent him" to get the leader.[17] Tyler pulled a .38-caliber revolver and fired four shots, wounding Garvey in the right leg and scalp. Garvey's secretary Amy quickly arranged to get Garvey taken to the hospital for treatment, and Tyler was arrested. The next day, Tyler committed suicide by leaping from the third tier of the Harlem jail as he was being taken to his arraignment.[citation needed]

By August 1920, the UNIA claimed four million members. The number has been questioned because of the organization's poor record keeping.[16] That month, the International Convention of the UNIA was held. With delegates from all over the world attending, 25,000 people filled Madison Square Garden on 1 August 1920 to hear Garvey speak.[18] Over the next couple of years, Garvey's movement was able to attract an enormous number of followers. Reasons for this included the cultural revolution of the Harlem Renaissance, the large number of West Indians who immigrated to New York, and the appeal of the slogan "One God, One Aim, One Destiny," to black veterans of the first World War.[19]

Garvey was just a black version of a Klan leader, and his appeal depended on racism. If anyone thinks this is just an aberration, they would be wrong.

“ Fun Reconstruction Facts”

Another weak seam in the Republican fabric joined predominately mulatto antebellum free Negroes and the largely black ex-slaves.

In Louisiana and N. Carolina, the early monopolization of black leadership by the mulatto class aroused the color and class tensions never far from the surface in the black community.

A mulatto candidate for the 1868 constitutional convention in South Carolina said: “ If ever there is a ****** government – an unmixed ****** government – established in South Carolina, I shall move.”

On the other side, a black leader said of the mulattoes: “To what race do they belong? … I know that my ancestors trod the burning sands of Africa, but why should men in whose veins run a great preponderance of white blood seek to specially ally themselves with the black man, prate of 'our race', when they are simply mongrels.”

p.560, Ordeal By Fire – The Civil War and Reconstruction - James McPherson, Knopf, 1982.

The truth is black people are their own worst enemies, incapable of genuine political organizing and supporting anything like moral honest leadership, and of course just as racist and bigoted as any Klan member; being a minority doesn't automatically make one noble and blameless, never has and never will. Few left for Africa, and it's dead certain they couldn't go to Canada; they tried that after the American Revolution, and over a thousand of those few had to leave almost immediately and go to Sierra Leone.
 
Last edited:
A march to commemorate violence caused by companies shipping in a bunch of scabs. Whoopity do.

Apparently the distinction between "commemorate" and "protest" sails blithely over some butthurt heads.
What a surprise.
 
I like how well dressed everyone is.

We were harder on each other, but damn we looked good.

They had to be hot though. Middle of a big city in July ----

And nothing says "Slavish Mentality" like "everybody has to wear a hat. Because they just do". That's what always strikes me about pre-1960s pictures.
 
The good old days when the Black community knew with certainty that the Democratic party did not have their best interests at heart.
 
I like how well dressed everyone is.

We were harder on each other, but damn we looked good.

They had to be hot though. Middle of a big city in July ----

And nothing says "Slavish Mentality" like "everybody has to wear a hat. Because they just do". That's what always strikes me about pre-1960s pictures.
People had manners back then.

and yes, if you had to suck it up to show good manners, you did.
 
I like how well dressed everyone is.

We were harder on each other, but damn we looked good.

They had to be hot though. Middle of a big city in July ----

And nothing says "Slavish Mentality" like "everybody has to wear a hat. Because they just do". That's what always strikes me about pre-1960s pictures.
People had manners back then.

and yes, if you had to suck it up to show good manners, you did.

Lockstep conformity should not be confused with "manners". It should however be comingled with lack of imagination.
 

Forum List

Back
Top