The DNA Protection Act of 2013

Discussion in 'Politics' started by DNAprotection, Jan 18, 2013.

?

How would you vote on this proposal?

  1. no

    1 vote(s)
    9.1%
  2. yes

    9 vote(s)
    81.8%
  3. undecided

    1 vote(s)
    9.1%
  1. DNAprotection
    Offline

    DNAprotection Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    245
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    cali
    Ratings:
    +17
    The natural genetics or DNA of the natural world or the commons is under attack.
    Corporate interests are working 24 hours a day 7 days a weeks to re-design and or re-sequence the genetic material or DNA of the natural world in effort to patent and own such modified genetic designs or 'blueprints'.
    The DNA Protection Act of 2013 will protect the naturally intended genetic designs of the living natural world and or the commons within the state of California from the immanent threat of broken DNA caused by genetic engineering and or genetic modification technologies.
    We need your help to make The DNA Protection Act of 2013 into a law by way of getting it on the ballot and then getting it passed into law by a majority vote of the people.
    This is exclusively a non-partisan and non-affiliated grass roots effort on behalf of all life and all the generations of life to come.

    "THE DNA PROTECTION ACT OF 2013"

    This act shall be known as, and may be cited as THE DNA PROTECTION ACT OF 2013, and is hereby incorporated to amend and or be added to the California Health and Safety Code as;
    DIVISION 123.THE DNA PROTECTION ACT OF 2013... 151004,
    and is as set forth herein as follows;

    section 1. FINDINGS,
    The people of the State of California hereby find and declare that the purposes of THE DNA PROTECTION ACT OF 2013 are as follows:

    1.(a) whereas the people of the state of California recognize the many different religions and cultures and individuals, including "secular", that all together define and or represent and or make up what is commonly known as "THE PEOPLE" of the state of California, and as such, have different names for that which is ultimately responsible for the creation and or existence of the people and all that exists, as exampled by the following sample:
    GOD, CREATOR, NATURE etc...et al,
    and,
    1.(b) whereas the people of the state of California recognize that GOD, CREATOR, NATURE etc...et al, has endowed unto the people to equally share in dependency on, and responsibility to, what is commonly known as "the commons",
    and,
    1.(c) whereas the people of the state of California recognize that private and public entities are involved in what is commonly known as "genetic engineering" and or "gene splicing" and or "genetically modifying" all forms of life in effort to redesign the natural creation and or natural world and are applying such technology to 'food crops' and 'farm animals' that then end up in the human food chain,
    and,
    1.(d) whereas the people of the state of California recognize that said practices and or technologies have unknown side effects and or consequences to the natural world, and or "the commons" in general, and to humans specifically, and that said practices irreparably damage the original and or naturally intended design of life itself, and or specifically that of the commons, and thereby denying the people and the future generations of people of the commons in their naturally intended form and or naturally occurring DNA sequences that were and are naturally designed by and bestowed upon them by GOD, CREATOR, NATURE etc...et al, and to which the people have relied upon since the dawn of human kind and are inseparably dependent upon in the common struggle to live,
    and,
    1.(e) whereas said genetic engineering practices result in private and or public corporations and or private individuals owning patents on the genetic design of life forms,
    and,
    1.(f) whereas the naturally occurring forms of life that inhabit the commons currently have no statutory protections against the inevitable and eminent danger of 'genetic pollution' that results and or can result from genetic engineering,
    1.(g) we the people of California therefor find that genetic engineering poses an eminent threat of danger to all the naturally sequenced DNA in the natural world, and by the act of direct or indirect manipulation of naturally sequenced DNA does in itself create the irreparable permanent damage to the original genetic designs of life, and so we do hereby create the urgently necessary DNA protections contained herein as described in section 3 of this ACT.

    section 2. DEFINITIONS:

    2.(a) For the purposes of this ACT, the term "DNA", (deoxyribonucleic acid), shall mean the complex substance that is the main carrier of genetic information for all organisms and a major component of chromosomes and can be analogized to mean the 'blueprints' that determine what form(s) life takes and is central to the natural function(s) of all life in the common struggle to live.

    2.(b) For the purposes of this ACT, the term "the commons" shall mean the natural biological world and all life and ecosystems naturally existing in the natural world in its natural state of genetic design or DNA sequencing, and specifically, but not limited to, naturally occurring varieties of plants (including the seeds and pollen thereof), animals (including the offspring thereof) and insects (including the offspring thereof).

    2.(c) For the purposes of this ACT, the terms "genetically engineered" and "genetically modified" shall mean the scientific alteration of the structure of genetic material in a living organism, and or the technology of preparing recombinant DNA in vitro by cutting up DNA molecules and splicing together fragments from more than one organism.

    section 3. PROVISIONS, PROTECTIONS AND EXEMPTIONS:

    3.(a) This ACT does hereby prohibit live genetically engineered and or genetically modified plants (including the seeds and pollen thereof), animals (including the offspring thereof), insects (including the offspring thereof), and or any such organisms from existing within the boarders of the state of California, and that all living genetically engineered plants (including the seeds and pollen thereof), animals (including the offspring thereof), insects (including the offspring thereof), and or any such genetically engineered genetically modified organisms have six months from the date of the adoption of this ACT into law to be removed from the state by those individuals or corporate or government entities that brought and or posses such within the state of California, and which shall be done in a manner that does not further the threat of genetic pollution and or genetically engineered DNA contamination exposure to the commons and or natural world.

    3.(b) Failure to satisfy the requirements of this ACT, and or anyone who possesses and or sponsors in any way the possession of living genetically engineered organisms within the state of California after the initial six month clearing out period shall be subject to the punishments of fines no less than one million dollars per day for corporations and one hundred dollars per day for private individuals and or shall also be punishable by no less than six months in jail for private individuals and no less than ten years in prison for individuals working for or on behalf of corporate entities, and said penalties are to be paid to, and or, served in the county where said violation(s) has occurred. The penalties imposed by this ACT are to be adjudicated and assessed in the Superior Court jurisdiction of the county where the violation(s) have occurred and are to be determined exponentially based on estimates of damage and or potential damage to the collective DNA of the commons and or the natural world and to which consideration of possible impact of said damage is not limited to the county where the violation has occurred, and further, nothing in this ACT shall in any way be construed to mean limiting, preventing or precluding a California court of proper jurisdiction from increasing any of the stated penalties of this ACT at the courts discretion, and that such increases are to be determined based on estimates of damage(s) and or potential damage(s) to a specific and or the collective DNA of the commons and or the natural world and to, whether directly or indirectly, human beings and their naturally designed genetic inheritance of the commons and their collective dependence on, and responsibility to such.

    3.(c) This ACT is not intended to preclude or limit or interfere in any way with medical personnel from applying medical technologies or medical procedures that employ genetic modification technologies in their application(s) and or the research in effort to develop such, and so does hereby exempt such conduct from the requirements of this ACT, but said medical technologies or medical procedures and or research must ensure that they are to be applied in a way that isolates the intended or unintended effects of such to the specific patient(s) and is in no way a broader genetic contamination threat and or in no way can be a possible contaminant to the naturally sequenced DNA of any other living organisms of the commons and or the natural world, further, this ACT is not intended to "exempt" any living plant (including the seeds and pollen thereof), animals (including the offspring thereof), insects (including the offspring thereof), and or any such living genetically engineered and or genetically modified organisms intended for human consumption as "medicine" and or "nutritional medicine" that would be self applied at 'home' by ingestion or topically or any other method and is allowed only in a controlled hospital setting and is to be applied directly by or with the assistance of qualified medical personal.

    3.(d) If any provision of this measure or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the measure that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this measure are severable.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Intense
    Offline

    Intense Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    44,909
    Thanks Received:
    5,849
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +5,863
    Linked
     
  3. OODA_Loop
    Offline

    OODA_Loop Account Terminated

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,953
    Thanks Received:
    468
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +523
    You can have my DNA when you pry it off my cold boxers.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. Pogo
    Offline

    Pogo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2012
    Messages:
    64,016
    Thanks Received:
    10,713
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Location:
    Carolinia Agresticia; the Forest Primeval
    Ratings:
    +28,354
    Not only do I support this, I want one for my state, and then all of the remaining 55.

    Death to Monsanto.
     
  5. nitroz
    Offline

    nitroz INDEPENDENTly ruthless

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,421
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Merritt Island, FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    Summary of the bill?

    What are the consequences of me supporting it/not supporting it?
     
  6. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,940
    Thanks Received:
    5,212
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,684
    Some one else (Monsanto, AMGEN) can PATENT your DNA and make you pay exorbitant prices for Gene Therapy or whatever else later on.

    Oh you don't think your DNA can be Patented? "Google" it, I dare ya'!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. DNAprotection
    Offline

    DNAprotection Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    245
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    cali
    Ratings:
    +17
    Yes and here's more info on that:

    " Published on Mar 7, 2012

    Expanding the rights of individuals, communities, and nature as a key strategy for sustainability. The rights over a person's genes, tissues, and environmental health is near to non-existent. Over 20% of human genome is patoned by corporations and universities. Toxic trespass is a condition where human tissues contain unwanted toxins via unregulated food supply, water supply, air conditions and environmental factors. Lead in blood, mercury in hair, and contamination in mother's milk are examples of toxic trespass. As of now we do not have the right to a healthy environmental living condition. The current activism is not working to stop environmental problems. Although environmental law firms have judicial victories, most permits that were fought against end up being reestablished. Many established environmental issues should be seen as human rights issues."

    Google "Katherine Davies and Thomas Linzey" to see the youtube vid on this its worth it.

    As far as what the proposal would do, it simply would prohibit living GE/GM organisms from within the state of California, with the exemption allowed for in sec 3(c) for strictly controlled medical use or research etc.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. DNAprotection
    Offline

    DNAprotection Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    245
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    cali
    Ratings:
    +17
    Exactly what needs to happen in as many states possible, it reframes the debate over GMO's in such a way as to make it more conclusive in its foundation.
    I have found that to wield the all powerful Rumsfeld quote of destiny proves the undeniable point much like a simple decapitation or like game over in the video game debate version...once wielded not even the top Monsanto et al scientists can argue against the simple fatal truth of it and even Einstein would in all likelihood argue in defense of its simple equation logic with respect to not having all the numbers to the equations of life itself let alone its symbiotic nature and the possibly devastating chain reactive effects this technology could unleash as we allow the corps/gov to General Custer us all forward redesigning and privatizing the gene pool (we all swim in and come from) for profit...the quote of destiny is awesome and should only be used if ready to behead your opponent. Sometimes its useful to draw your opponent out far enough so as to be naked for their beheading...sorry, ima soldier...
    "There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know."
    Donald Rumsfeld
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. DNAprotection
    Offline

    DNAprotection Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    245
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    cali
    Ratings:
    +17
    I tried pm'n ya back Intense, but won't let me yet.
    All apologies to the folks here as I may have violated the rules with my original post of the proposal etc...as I did paste it up. To be clear to all though I did also write it.
    That may account for its 'tortured' language in some parts and whatever other shortcomings.
    The thing is though that there is nothing else out there like it and something needs to be so here ya go...if you like it then run with it...if you like it but want to change it then please do that.
    The issue is critical at this point in time and an all hands on deck effort is called for in my opinion.
    Thanks again to all for allowing the post<3
     
  10. DNAprotection
    Offline

    DNAprotection Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    245
    Thanks Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    cali
    Ratings:
    +17
    Hi again folks, just hoping to get a better sampling on the vote count.
    So far the response posts have been great but only 1 vote in the poll.
    I totally get the resistance to voting as it is usually a bait and switch game, but this effort is not such and truly needs your votes and opinions on this topic.
    I would post links to info that could help show more about the subject generally, but I think I need to make more posts here before I am allowed to do so and I don't have the time today to elaborate further in my own words about this subject and the urgent attention it deserves.
    'I'll be back' in attempt to further discuss terminator technology and all the rest that can and should be considered about this topic.
    Thanks again, please vote early and often...and remember, every time someone votes, a pig gets their wings and escapes from a Monsanto lab<3
     

Share This Page