The Danger of Democrats....

[Camp]

Of course socialism has a positive impact.

If you have the brain of a rabbit you'd think so. Every sane adult who ever lived under it knows it doesn't.

So, you hate Social Security?

 

[Rustic]

Of course socialism has a positive impact.

If you have the brain of a rabbit you'd think so. Every sane adult who ever lived under it knows it doesn't.

So, you hate Social Security?

Just like Every other socialist entitlement program it is destroying this country… Fucked

 

[PoliticalChic]

Of course socialism has a positive impact.

If you have the brain of a rabbit you'd think so. Every sane adult who ever lived under it knows it doesn't.

So, you hate Social Security?

Why do you hate the United States Constitution?

Article 1, section 8, enumerates the authority of the federal government.

Did you find 'insurance' and /or welfare therein?


So......you're a Socialist, huh?


Isn't that what I posited in the OP?

I'm never wrong.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Of course socialism has a positive impact.

If you have the brain of a rabbit you'd think so. Every sane adult who ever lived under it knows it doesn't.

So, you hate Social Security?

Just like Every other socialist entitlement program it is destroying this country… Fucked

Socialists have trouble thinking things through....e.g., Social Security

"The question here is not whether or not the intention of the SSA is beneficent, but whether or not its inception was properly vetted. The concept of a marketplace of ideas is based on the assumption that information is not buried or distorted, and all aspects of same are given access prior to acceptance of the plan."
Beck and Balfe, “Broke.”


No one considered that life expectancy would increase?

No one considered that the balance of workers and retirees might change?

No one calculated the long-term costs?


a. Like this:
Ida May Fuller, the first person to begin receiving benefits, in January, 1940, when she was 65- she lived to be 100. “…worked for three years under the Social Security program. The accumulated taxes on her salary during those three years was a total of $24.75. Her initial monthly check was $22.54. During her lifetime she collected a total of $22,888.92 in Social Security benefits.” Social Security History

 

[rhodescholar]

So, you hate Social Security?

It is a failed program as it depends upon permanent increases in population, with a 5-1 worker to retiree ratio. The country, economy and planet cannot sustain that, so by definition, it cannot work long-term.

A temporary welfare program, perhaps for the truly down-and-out, yes. A retirement program for those who did not save during their working years, no.

But then I would have mass deported all of the illegals long ago, which would have massively raised salaries in the US so workers would have been able to save more of their income.

There was a time when the liberals actually cared about the working and middle classes of this country, now they are so overwhelmed with leftist/democraptic propaganda to support the illegal class that any rational thoughts towards how destructive the illegals are is ignored/drowned out with noise. But the real people who are fucked over are the working classes who the liberals/left, including the unions - once championed. If there are groups of liberals I would hang, it would be the "immigration advocates/activists", the national democraptic party leadership, the NYT editorial board, and then the major union heads for knuckling under to the national democraptic party leadership and selling out their members by embracing the illegal hordes. That was an unforgiveable crime.

 

[Camp]

Of course socialism has a positive impact.

If you have the brain of a rabbit you'd think so. Every sane adult who ever lived under it knows it doesn't.

So, you hate Social Security?

Why do you hate the United States Constitution?

Article 1, section 8, enumerates the authority of the federal government.

Did you find 'insurance' and /or welfare therein?


So......you're a Socialist, huh?


Isn't that what I posited in the OP?

Stop asking me questions. I would be glad to answer any you ask, but first, you have to answer the ones I asked you. As usual, you will spend the entire day and post numerous posts in you weasel-like way of evading the answering of questions whose answer knock your thesis into the dirt where they belong.

The questions for the OP.

Do you think Social Security is an example of socialism at work in America?

Does Social Security have a negative impact on America?

Was the FDR idea for an Interstate Highway System program that was implemented by the great General and President Eisenhower a socialist program and did it have a negative impact on America?

 

[Dot Com]

North Koreans are the nastiest Marxist..

South Koreans and Koreans that emmigrated to the U.S. arent much better

 

[Moonglow]

North Koreans are the nastiest Marxist..

South Koreans and Koreans that emmigrated to the U.S. arent much better

I knew a few that could suck the chrome off a bumper..Whether they were Marxist was of no concern to me..

 

[Dot Com]

Well.....they haven't mandated toilet size....



Oh.....wait.....

"The Federal Regulations on Toilet Gallons"
The Federal Regulations on Toilet Gallons

Are you arguing that evidence of socialism in America is the people who haul the poop in your toilet away are limiting the amount of water you can use to flush the poop into the pipes that take it to the treatment plant?

The particular topic you have chosen to feature in this post is one about which, I am sure, you have a far more personal association, with than I.

I'll leave this....'interest'.....to you.

I do know more about it than you. About 40 years ago, as a heavy equipment operator, I was involved with installing new pipelines and overflow reservoirs at water treatment plants.
I was not the one who put the topic in your thread. You did.

That was probably me. Off topic but I always wanted to be a heavy equipment operator and run one of those big excavators or dozers. I make too much money at what I do to switch but that would be a cool job.

Stop making life all about the dollar and enjoy yourself..

she's AZN sooooo.....

 

[Camp]

So, you hate Social Security?

It is a failed program as it depends upon permanent increases in population, with a 5-1 worker to retiree ratio. The country, economy and planet cannot sustain that, so by definition, it cannot work long-term.

.

Your first sentence begins your post with a spin, misinformation, and partisan talking points. "It is a failed program..." is how you start. It has supported millions upon millions of senior American citizens for 77 years. It has done exactly what it was supposed to do when it was first instigated.
Without making predictions and speculations for the future, explain how Social Security has "failed" and as an add-on, explain what would have happened to those millions and millions of Americans who relied on Social Security for survival and dignity for the last 77 years.

 

[Dot Com]

How you been cut 'n paste grl?

 

[Dot Com]

AZNs a relative "johnny-come-lately." to MURICA. Name one famous AZN besides Sulu or the judge in the OJ trial?

 

[Camp]

a. Like this:
Ida May Fuller, the first person to begin receiving benefits, in January, 1940, when she was 65- she lived to be 100. “…worked for three years under the Social Security program. The accumulated taxes on her salary during those three years was a total of $24.75. Her initial monthly check was $22.54. During her lifetime she collected a total of $22,888.92 in Social Security benefits.” Social Security History

This is the kind of crap PoliticalChic loves to use. She will no doubt claim it is a true fact and can not be disputed. The point she counts on for people perhaps not to notice is the distortion. Of course, the first person into the program has a distinct advantage and that is magnified by the old age of the person, in this case, Ida May Fuller. Who could predict Ida May Fuller would live to be 100 years old. What is not pointed out are all the folks who pay into Social Security and pass away before they collect a return or the folks who retire on Social Security and pass away shortly later long before they collect what they put into the program.
PC is pissed off that Ida lived to be100.

 

[BluesLegend]

Well.....they haven't mandated toilet size....



Oh.....wait.....

"The Federal Regulations on Toilet Gallons"
The Federal Regulations on Toilet Gallons

Are you arguing that evidence of socialism in America is the people who haul the poop in your toilet away are limiting the amount of water you can use to flush the poop into the pipes that take it to the treatment plant?

The particular topic you have chosen to feature in this post is one about which, I am sure, you have a far more personal association, with than I.

I'll leave this....'interest'.....to you.

I do know more about it than you. About 40 years ago, as a heavy equipment operator, I was involved with installing new pipelines and overflow reservoirs at water treatment plants.
I was not the one who put the topic in your thread. You did.

That was probably me. Off topic but I always wanted to be a heavy equipment operator and run one of those big excavators or dozers. I make too much money at what I do to switch but that would be a cool job.

Ya, you're like the most envied guy on the site. Like a grown-up kid playing with huge tractors, bulldozers, front end loaders and such. I had one job that lasted about two years cutting irrigation trenches, really little river beds, through farmland and forest. The great outdoors, middle of nowhere. In hunting season we got licenses and hunted the property with permission from the landowner. We had the labor crews cut the downed trees into firewood size and hauled to where the landowner wanted. All prime hardwood. I had to buy a huge chest freezer for all the duck, goose, and deer meat.

That's so cool. Trust me on this high paying corporate jobs...your job and life sounds like way more fun.

 

[BluesLegend]

Well.....they haven't mandated toilet size....



Oh.....wait.....

"The Federal Regulations on Toilet Gallons"
The Federal Regulations on Toilet Gallons

Are you arguing that evidence of socialism in America is the people who haul the poop in your toilet away are limiting the amount of water you can use to flush the poop into the pipes that take it to the treatment plant?

You libs are a joke. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of RAW sewage into public waterways, sewage so toxic that you have to close public beaches. Why? Because liberals spend their money on stupid shit like Europe wanna be light rail systems instead of fixing their 100 year old sewer systems. You busy yourselves trying to control me flushing 1 extra gallon of water down my toilet while you foul entire rivers and bays with your nasty mess.

Almost all of those systems come under state control. The majority of the systems you are talking about are operated by Republican legislatures and Governors.
Nobody is controlling how much water you use to flush your toilet. The flush lever on your toilet is not regulated. If you want to flush twice, you have the freedom to do it.

Senator Rand Paul upon first winning his Senate seat was in a committee meeting and demanded to know which government idiot came up with the government low flow toilet.

It was probably one of the idiots that knew the cost of water treatment and the misuse of wasted clean water for flushing toilets.
BTW, Rand Paul is an idiot himself.

An educated doctor is an idiot...interesting theory.

 

[Camp]

Are you arguing that evidence of socialism in America is the people who haul the poop in your toilet away are limiting the amount of water you can use to flush the poop into the pipes that take it to the treatment plant?

You libs are a joke. You spill hundreds of millions of gallons of RAW sewage into public waterways, sewage so toxic that you have to close public beaches. Why? Because liberals spend their money on stupid shit like Europe wanna be light rail systems instead of fixing their 100 year old sewer systems. You busy yourselves trying to control me flushing 1 extra gallon of water down my toilet while you foul entire rivers and bays with your nasty mess.

Almost all of those systems come under state control. The majority of the systems you are talking about are operated by Republican legislatures and Governors.
Nobody is controlling how much water you use to flush your toilet. The flush lever on your toilet is not regulated. If you want to flush twice, you have the freedom to do it.

Senator Rand Paul upon first winning his Senate seat was in a committee meeting and demanded to know which government idiot came up with the government low flow toilet.

It was probably one of the idiots that knew the cost of water treatment and the misuse of wasted clean water for flushing toilets.
BTW, Rand Paul is an idiot himself.

An educated doctor is an idiot...interesting theory.

We can all be idiots when we step outside of our zone. Like Clint says, " a man has to know his limitations", or something like that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Of course socialism has a positive impact.

If you have the brain of a rabbit you'd think so. Every sane adult who ever lived under it knows it doesn't.

So, you hate Social Security?

Why do you hate the United States Constitution?

Article 1, section 8, enumerates the authority of the federal government.

Did you find 'insurance' and /or welfare therein?


So......you're a Socialist, huh?


Isn't that what I posited in the OP?

Stop asking me questions. I would be glad to answer any you ask, but first, you have to answer the ones I asked you. As usual, you will spend the entire day and post numerous posts in you weasel-like way of evading the answering of questions whose answer knock your thesis into the dirt where they belong.

The questions for the OP.

Do you think Social Security is an example of socialism at work in America?

Does Social Security have a negative impact on America?

Was the FDR idea for an Interstate Highway System program that was implemented by the great General and President Eisenhower a socialist program and did it have a negative impact on America?

There was no question, you dunce....it was rhetoric.


As a Roosevelt-groupie, you must feel about the Constitution the way FDR did....he hated it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

a. Like this:
Ida May Fuller, the first person to begin receiving benefits, in January, 1940, when she was 65- she lived to be 100. “…worked for three years under the Social Security program. The accumulated taxes on her salary during those three years was a total of $24.75. Her initial monthly check was $22.54. During her lifetime she collected a total of $22,888.92 in Social Security benefits.” Social Security History

This is the kind of crap PoliticalChic loves to use. She will no doubt claim it is a true fact and can not be disputed. The point she counts on for people perhaps not to notice is the distortion. Of course, the first person into the program has a distinct advantage and that is magnified by the old age of the person, in this case, Ida May Fuller. Who could predict Ida May Fuller would live to be 100 years old. What is not pointed out are all the folks who pay into Social Security and pass away before they collect a return or the folks who retire on Social Security and pass away shortly later long before they collect what they put into the program.
PC is pissed off that Ida lived to be100.

"This is the kind of crap PoliticalChic loves to use. She will no doubt claim it is a true fact and can not be disputed."

It's a fact and cannot be disputed,you fool.

Ida May Fuller, the first person to begin receiving benefits, in January, 1940, when she was 65- she lived to be 100. “…worked for three years under the Social Security program. The accumulated taxes on her salary during those three years was a total of $24.75. Her initial monthly check was $22.54. During her lifetime she collected a total of $22,888.92 in Social Security benefits.” Social Security History


I'm never wrong.....
Social Security History

 

[Camp]

Of course socialism has a positive impact.

If you have the brain of a rabbit you'd think so. Every sane adult who ever lived under it knows it doesn't.

So, you hate Social Security?

Why do you hate the United States Constitution?

Article 1, section 8, enumerates the authority of the federal government.

Did you find 'insurance' and /or welfare therein?


So......you're a Socialist, huh?


Isn't that what I posited in the OP?

Stop asking me questions. I would be glad to answer any you ask, but first, you have to answer the ones I asked you. As usual, you will spend the entire day and post numerous posts in you weasel-like way of evading the answering of questions whose answer knock your thesis into the dirt where they belong.

The questions for the OP.

Do you think Social Security is an example of socialism at work in America?

Does Social Security have a negative impact on America?

Was the FDR idea for an Interstate Highway System program that was implemented by the great General and President Eisenhower a socialist program and did it have a negative impact on America?

There was no question, you dunce....it was rhetoric.


As a Roosevelt-groupie, you must feel about the Constitution the way FDR did....he hated it.

Now you have degenerated into outright lying. You have posted a thread about socialism and America but refuse to answer whether Social Security is socialism or with the lie that it is rhetoric. It is a yes or no answer. You refuse to answer plain yes or no questions by falsely claiming they are rhetoric.
Go back to your flushing poop down the toilet topic, it suits you better.

 

[Dot Com]

That's easy to fix, just put in a larger reservoir tank..

^ that