Thanks to guns, these women were not victims

[Esmeralda]

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

M You're fooling no one. Your side once all the campgrounds band

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

The truth is you're side and some companies like United airlines, MetLife wants all Guns banned.

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

Lies. They want gun registration and bans, just like the Nazis.

You're afraid they are going to ban all the guns when they just want to ban the military style weapons that are used in mass shootings. It's a childish stance for the pro-gun people. You're like little kids screaming 'don't take away my toys!'

You're like little kids saying "Gimme your toys", "You can't have that".

 

[Godboy]

Mom-daughter duo shoot would-be robber in their liquor store

That is one tough dude though, that woman shot that guy point blank in the back and he kept fighting at least for a bit.

Good for them. Too bad way more women were murdered by guns though. Very sad.

Where did you get that dumbass idea? For every woman murdered by a gun, at least 100-200 are saved by a gun, probably a lot more.

Do Guns Save Lives?

 

[Skull Pilot]

It has been my experience that women shoot better than most men.

Not talking professional shooters here but just off the street.

My male friends who don't shoot much don't shoot as well as women with the same amount of range time.

Just my observations.

I will say my wife as a dead shot at 20 yards with her .380

 

[Coyote]

What a dirty filthy ass animal. Lucky those two decent white women had a gun, right? RIGHT!?!?!?

There is the animal. All of the typical features. Wise nose, big thick ass lips. Oh, and of course a criminal. I mean of course.

United Airlines, Delta , hertz, enterprise to name a few companies involved with banning guns would rather those two women were not able to defend their store and lives.

No they wouldn’t you guys keep resurrecting the same old straw man.

Yep. Your side puts out lies, we are telling practically the truth to counteract.

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

Oh, is this where you pretend that you left wing hypocrites pretend that you don't want ALL guns banned.

I guess it is. Typical.

I am not pretending anything. I dont want all guns banned. That is the problem with you guys.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Yep. Your side puts out lies, we are telling practically the truth to counteract.

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

M You're fooling no one. Your side once all the campgrounds band

Yep. Your side puts out lies, we are telling practically the truth to counteract.

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

The truth is you're side and some companies like United airlines, MetLife wants all Guns banned.

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

my rights has nothing to do with murderous people

making such an accusation makes YOU the despicable person ya fucking low life

 

[jon_berzerk]

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

M You're fooling no one. Your side once all the campgrounds band

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

The truth is you're side and some companies like United airlines, MetLife wants all Guns banned.

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

So you want to give up your right to an abortion then?

Talk about innocents being killed....

we have tried it their way with the AWB which was a total failure

we have been seeing their way with gun free zones and people across the country getting mowed down in them

to continue with their useless and dangerous ways would be despicable

 

[Esmeralda]

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

M You're fooling no one. Your side once all the campgrounds band

Did those women have an AK or AR?

Why no....therein lies your straw man.

The truth is you're side and some companies like United airlines, MetLife wants all Guns banned.

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

my rights has nothing to do with murderous people

making such an accusation makes YOU the despicable person ya fucking low life

The attitude of the pro-gun people that everyone is being punished for something only bad people do is a ludicrous argument. Every law and every rule in the world is based on people who do the wrong thing. All of us pay the price for what others do when we obey laws. There are many, many laws related to driving and motor vehicles because of the people who do the wrong thing, like driving too fast or carelessly or drunkenly. Laws that require all kinds of paperwork related to owning a car, insurance, passing a test to drive, being of a certain age to drive, etc. To whine that you are being punished for what bad people do by having to obey laws is just plain childish and ridiculous.


People who drive cars don't have the right to use their cars to murder people and people who own guns don't have the right to use them to murder people, that is why there are strict laws regarding owning and using a car and why there need to be strict laws regarding owning and using a gun.


And yes, you are despicable if you think it is okay to consider hundreds of innocent people as just collateral for your right to own dangerous weapons with no strict controls on that ownership. Absolutely despicable. I don't know how you people can sleep at night, and if there is a hell, that’s where you are headed.

 

[Aba Incieni]

M You're fooling no one. Your side once all the campgrounds band
The truth is you're side and some companies like United airlines, MetLife wants all Guns banned.

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

my rights has nothing to do with murderous people

making such an accusation makes YOU the despicable person ya fucking low life

The attitude of the pro-gun people that everyone is being punished for something only bad people do is a ludicrous argument. Every law and every rule in the world is based on people who do the wrong thing. All of us pay the price for what others do when we obey laws. There are many, many laws related to driving and motor vehicles because of the people who do the wrong thing, like driving too fast or carelessly or drunkenly. Laws that require all kinds of paperwork related to owning a car, insurance, passing a test to drive, being of a certain age to drive, etc. To whine that you are being punished for what bad people do by having to obey laws is just plain childish and ridiculous.


People who drive cars don't have the right to use their cars to murder people and people who own guns don't have the right to use them to murder people, that is why there are strict laws regarding owning and using a car and why there need to be strict laws regarding owning and using a gun.


And yes, you are despicable if you think it is okay to consider hundreds of innocent people as just collateral for you right to own dangerous weapons with no strict controls on that ownership. Absolutely despicable. I don't know how you people can sleep at night, and if there is a hell, that’s where you are headed.

Gun ownership is a right.

Driving is a privilege.

 

[Esmeralda]

M You're fooling no one. Your side once all the campgrounds band
The truth is you're side and some companies like United airlines, MetLife wants all Guns banned.

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

So you want to give up your right to an abortion then?

Talk about innocents being killed....

we have tried it their way with the AWB which was a total failure

we have been seeing their way with gun free zones and people across the country getting mowed down in them

to continue with their useless and dangerous ways would be despicable

To continue allowing private citizens to own military style weapons is foolish, ludicrous, and in the case of those who insist on the right to own them, both despicable and monstrous.

 

[Coyote]

M You're fooling no one. Your side once all the campgrounds band
The truth is you're side and some companies like United airlines, MetLife wants all Guns banned.

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

So you want to give up your right to an abortion then?

Talk about innocents being killed....

we have tried it their way with the AWB which was a total failure

we have been seeing their way with gun free zones and people across the country getting mowed down in them

to continue with their useless and dangerous ways would be despicable

We have been doing it your way for the past decade - mor guns less restriction. Mass shootings have gone up.

 

[jon_berzerk]

M You're fooling no one. Your side once all the campgrounds band
The truth is you're side and some companies like United airlines, MetLife wants all Guns banned.

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

my rights has nothing to do with murderous people

making such an accusation makes YOU the despicable person ya fucking low life

The attitude of the pro-gun people that everyone is being punished for something only bad people do is a ludicrous argument. Every law and every rule in the world is based on people who do the wrong thing. All of us pay the price for what others do when we obey laws. There are many, many laws related to driving and motor vehicles because of the people who do the wrong thing, like driving too fast or carelessly or drunkenly. Laws that require all kinds of paperwork related to owning a car, insurance, passing a test to drive, being of a certain age to drive, etc. To whine that you are being punished for what bad people do by having to obey laws is just plain childish and ridiculous.


People who drive cars don't have the right to use their cars to murder people and people who own guns don't have the right to use them to murder people, that is why there are strict laws regarding owning and using a car and why there need to be strict laws regarding owning and using a gun.


And yes, you are despicable if you think it is okay to consider hundreds of innocent people as just collateral for your right to own dangerous weapons with no strict controls on that ownership. Absolutely despicable. I don't know how you people can sleep at night, and if there is a hell, that’s where you are headed.

let see one of your sane gun control proposals

and we will see just how sane it is

 

[jon_berzerk]

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

So you want to give up your right to an abortion then?

Talk about innocents being killed....

we have tried it their way with the AWB which was a total failure

we have been seeing their way with gun free zones and people across the country getting mowed down in them

to continue with their useless and dangerous ways would be despicable

We have been doing it your way for the past decade - mor guns less restriction. Mass shootings have gone up.

bullshit

leaving kids defenseless in a school setting is your way retard not mine

we have tried an AWB which failed miserable which once again is your way not mine

get back to me when you tell the truth for once ya liar

 

[mudwhistle]

What a dirty filthy ass animal. Lucky those two decent white women had a gun, right? RIGHT!?!?!?

There is the animal. All of the typical features. Wise nose, big thick ass lips. Oh, and of course a criminal. I mean of course.

*racist*

 

[martybegan]

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

So you want to give up your right to an abortion then?

Talk about innocents being killed....

we have tried it their way with the AWB which was a total failure

we have been seeing their way with gun free zones and people across the country getting mowed down in them

to continue with their useless and dangerous ways would be despicable

We have been doing it your way for the past decade - mor guns less restriction. Mass shootings have gone up.

Got the data to support that?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

What a dirty filthy ass animal. Lucky those two decent white women had a gun, right? RIGHT!?!?!?

There is the animal. All of the typical features. Wise nose, big thick ass lips. Oh, and of course a criminal. I mean of course.

United Airlines, Delta , hertz, enterprise to name a few companies involved with banning guns would rather those two women were not able to defend their store and lives.

Of course not. These two white women are obviously racists. The appropriate response to being robbed by a black man is to rip off her clothes and lay down with legs spread.
No mother should ever have to fear for her son's life when he robs someone.

 

[Esmeralda]

This is why gunnuts cannot, refuse, to be reasonable and accept sane gun laws, because they are afraid all their toys will be taken away. No one wants to take away all your toys, AG, just those what are most deadly and are completely unnecessary for private citizens to own. And don't say if they are banned, only criminals will have them--that is not borne out by the facts. When strict gun laws are applied, crime goes down or stays the same, and murder goes way down.

we are not going to accept gun laws that are useless or restrict the rights of the law abiding

suggesting otherwise is not "sane" gun laws

it is about as insane as suggesting the kids are safe in gun free zones

You put your rights above the lives of innocent people, including the most innocent: children. That makes you despicable.

my rights has nothing to do with murderous people

making such an accusation makes YOU the despicable person ya fucking low life

The attitude of the pro-gun people that everyone is being punished for something only bad people do is a ludicrous argument. Every law and every rule in the world is based on people who do the wrong thing. All of us pay the price for what others do when we obey laws. There are many, many laws related to driving and motor vehicles because of the people who do the wrong thing, like driving too fast or carelessly or drunkenly. Laws that require all kinds of paperwork related to owning a car, insurance, passing a test to drive, being of a certain age to drive, etc. To whine that you are being punished for what bad people do by having to obey laws is just plain childish and ridiculous.


People who drive cars don't have the right to use their cars to murder people and people who own guns don't have the right to use them to murder people, that is why there are strict laws regarding owning and using a car and why there need to be strict laws regarding owning and using a gun.


And yes, you are despicable if you think it is okay to consider hundreds of innocent people as just collateral for your right to own dangerous weapons with no strict controls on that ownership. Absolutely despicable. I don't know how you people can sleep at night, and if there is a hell, that’s where you are headed.

let see one of your sane gun control proposals

and we will see just how sane it is

I have already discussed them ad infinitum. I'm not going to go through it all again just to entertain you.

 

[Esmeralda]

 

[WEATHER53]

This young man looks like he had so much potential

What a waste

-Geaux

He was on his way to graduate studies and only wanted a pack of gum and a soda

 

[martybegan]

We removed that part of the constitution via amendment(s),

If you want to eliminate private gun ownership then get to work on repealing the 2nd.

 

[jillian]

Mom-daughter duo shoot would-be robber in their liquor store

That is one tough dude though, that woman shot that guy point blank in the back and he kept fighting at least for a bit.

• According to the Centers for Disease Control, there were 130,557 deaths in 2013 from unintentional injuries, the 4th ranking cause of death in 2013 overall. From 2005-2010, almost 3,800 people in the U.S. died from unintentional shootings.
  

• Accidental gun deaths occur mainly in those under 25 years old. Over 1,300 victims of unintentional shootings for the period 2005–2010 were under 25 years of age. Adolescents are particularly susceptible to accidental shootings due to specific behavioral characteristics associated with adolescence, such as impulsivity, feelings of invincibility, and curiosity about firearms.
  

• Miller, Azrael, and Hemenway reported in a 2001 study that regardless of age, people are significantly more likely to die from unintentional firearm injuries when they live in states with more guns, relative to states with fewer guns. On average, states with the highest gun levels had nine times the rate of unintentional firearms deaths compared to states with the lowest gun levels

Examining Accidental Shooting Death Statistics