We'll take the house in 2010, that'll do.
yeah, but that would have happened anyway given history.
silly...
typical wingnut thought process.. cause you know what, you could have had harry reid's seat. and the senate seat in delaware...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We'll take the house in 2010, that'll do.
I respectfully disagree. Republicans win when they run and act like FISCAL CONSERVATIVES. We already have a party for tax and spend, big gov't, nanny state liberals, and bed wetters...it starts with a D.
I'd rather lose in Delaware and send the message that needs to be sent to the RNC "no more RINO'S!!!!!"
NO MORE RINO'S
NO MORE RINO'S
NO MORE RINO'S
NO MORE RINO'S
Get it????
BRAVO
But they'll never get it.
what? that braindead wingnuts don't care if they lose to make a point?
yeah, we get it.
let me know how that works our for y'all.
Looks like incumbents or at least past office holders are getting in trouble. That was definitely one thing I wanted to see. I don't think too many Republicans are going to jump ship over a Tea Party Republican candidate at this point.
you do if you want a republican majority
they don't get it. they're idealogues. they think republicans are supposed to be rightwingnut extremists. and they think republicans in massachusetts are supposed to be as rightwingnuttilicious as republicans in utah.
i think they are going to find in a lot of races, they are going to grab defeat from the jaws of victory. like they did in NY-23.
they sure showed us.
so the best way to do that is to nominate unelectable fuckwits like o'donnell?
good luck widdat
I remember when John Kerry (did you know he served in Vietnam?) was "electable" and the junior Senator from Illinois running against the "Smartest Woman on the Planet" was "unelectable."
Seems times change.
hey, whatever floats your boat. castle would have won; o'donnell has no chance.
Looks like incumbents or at least past office holders are getting in trouble. That was definitely one thing I wanted to see. I don't think too many Republicans are going to jump ship over a Tea Party Republican candidate at this point.
Conventional wisdom is soooo worthless.doesn't matter if they do or not. independents are the key, and i don't see too many of them lining up to vote for this o'donnell nutbar.
sure i get it; you're a wingnut.
detached from reality.
a whackaloon.
good luck with it.
personally, i'd rather have a non-wingnut candidate that could actually, y'know, win the fucking election than some fuckwit like o'donnell who even the idiots at rnc realize can't win.
but then, i'm rational
Rational? Have you learned nothing about the policy and politics of the Republican Party over the past 16 years? What is the purpose of winning back control of both houses of congress if it will lead to the same results as last time? In other words, we will have a slim majority that is held hostage by RINO Senators, in which we will receive the blame for wrongheaded policies that result from initiatives that are anything but Republican! Then we will get crushed in the next election and keep repeating the vicious cycle that was 1995-2006. We need to run and govern as conservatives or not run at all. NO MORE RINO'S!!!!!!!
first of all, it's RINOs not RINO's.
hey, if you're willing to let the dems have the senate because the socalled RINO doesn't pass some mysterious litmus test to prove to YOUR satisfaction that he/she is republican enough for you, you'll get what you deserve and it won't be pretty.
Except when you don't win those RINO seats in swing districts and states, you don't get the party into the majority and that makes a BIG difference.
While true, that didn't exactly work out too well with the last group of RINOS in charge. Sure it ushered in you folks, who have fucked it up even more.
Time to move past this being a game and actually get some real "change" in Washington. That won't happen with the liberals on both sides of the aisle.
Your side will find out soon enough.
That's a crock of crap. We aren't going to vote for just anyone with an R behind their names anymore. And or because they have the B.S. support from the rooted good ol' boy network coming out of the RNC.
Castle a Republican rino voted FOR cap and tax--and this traitor deserved to lose his job.
We don't need traitors in the Republican party--and if that means losing this election to a democrat who we know is going to vote for Cap and Tax--it's better for us--because we are not blind-sided by it.
Even a LOSS here--will send a very loud message as it has done tonight--to the RNC in this country. WE'RE MAD AS HELL AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY LONGER. Now the RNC can move to a more conservative side in this country--or they can lose elections. It's up to them.
But isn't is at least marginally amusing to listen to people who wouldn't vote for an opposing party if their life depended upon it, tell them how to win elections?
BRAVO
But they'll never get it.
what? that braindead wingnuts don't care if they lose to make a point?
yeah, we get it.
let me know how that works our for y'all.
Why would Tea Party members care if they vote for a Republican that then goes to Washington D.C. and then votes like a DEMOCRAT? What's the difference?--That is exactly what Castle the Rino Republican represented to his constituents--who was also fully supported and defended by the RNC. And if the RNC continues to put up with these Rino Republicans who vote very liberal and against the wishes of their constiuency--HEY--then they too deserve to lose elections.
Looks like incumbents or at least past office holders are getting in trouble. That was definitely one thing I wanted to see. I don't think too many Republicans are going to jump ship over a Tea Party Republican candidate at this point.
Trickled-on economics is Keynesian economics, for republicans.Bush wasn't a 'keynsisan.' he followed EXACTLY the rightwing trickle down economics that the rightwingnuts have pushed since reagan.
i love how now you want to dissociate yourselves from him because he blowed it all up real good. lol..
WILMINGTON, Del. — Christine O'Donnell's former campaign manager has recorded an Election Day robocall for the Delaware Republican Party meant to shred the tea-party-backed candidate's conservative credentials as voters head to the polls.
The last-minute move appears to be the grand finale of what's been a fusillade of orchestrated attacks on O'Donnell originating from GOP headquarters on behalf of her primary opponent, nine-term moderate Rep. Mike Castle.
The call features the voice of Kristin Murray, who ran O'Donnell's 2008 Senate campaign against then-Sen. Joe Biden, and who charges that her old boss "is no conservative."
"I got into politics because I believe in conservative values and wanted to make a difference. But I was shocked to learn that O’Donnell is no conservative," says Murray, according to a script obtained by POLITICO.
"This is her third Senate race in five years. As O’Donnell’s manager, I found out she was living on campaign donations — using them for rent and personal expenses, while leaving her workers unpaid and piling up thousands in debt," she says.
Perhaps the most biting line in the call delivered by Murray: "She wasn't concerned about conservative causes. O’Donnell just wanted to make a buck."
We'll take the house in 2010, that'll do.
yeah, but that would have happened anyway given history.
silly...
typical wingnut thought process.. cause you know what, you could have had harry reid's seat. and the senate seat in delaware...
The person the rightwingnuts think was the appropriate person to represent them in delaware
WILMINGTON, Del. Christine O'Donnell's former campaign manager has recorded an Election Day robocall for the Delaware Republican Party meant to shred the tea-party-backed candidate's conservative credentials as voters head to the polls.
The last-minute move appears to be the grand finale of what's been a fusillade of orchestrated attacks on O'Donnell originating from GOP headquarters on behalf of her primary opponent, nine-term moderate Rep. Mike Castle.
The call features the voice of Kristin Murray, who ran O'Donnell's 2008 Senate campaign against then-Sen. Joe Biden, and who charges that her old boss "is no conservative."
"I got into politics because I believe in conservative values and wanted to make a difference. But I was shocked to learn that ODonnell is no conservative," says Murray, according to a script obtained by POLITICO.
"This is her third Senate race in five years. As ODonnells manager, I found out she was living on campaign donations using them for rent and personal expenses, while leaving her workers unpaid and piling up thousands in debt," she says.
Perhaps the most biting line in the call delivered by Murray: "She wasn't concerned about conservative causes. ODonnell just wanted to make a buck."
Read more: Ex-aide: Christine O'Donnell a 'complete fraud' - David Catanese - POLITICO.com
what? that braindead wingnuts don't care if they lose to make a point?
yeah, we get it.
let me know how that works our for y'all.
Why would Tea Party members care if they vote for a Republican that then goes to Washington D.C. and then votes like a DEMOCRAT? What's the difference?--That is exactly what Castle the Rino Republican represented to his constituents--who was also fully supported and defended by the RNC. And if the RNC continues to put up with these Rino Republicans who vote very liberal and against the wishes of their constiuency--HEY--then they too deserve to lose elections.
But isn't is at least marginally amusing to listen to people who wouldn't vote for an opposing party if their life depended upon it, tell them how to win elections?