Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm reporting the color of their skin. I judge them on their character.racists is judging people by the color of their skin,,
and youve made it clear youre a racist,,
LIAR!!!I'm reporting the color of their skin. I judge them on their character.
And from what I can see in congress, republicans don't think blacks or Jews have the character to represent them in congress.
That's what's racist
Only you were talking about it racist terms. No merit at all.dems are the only ones that consider color of skin like youre doing,, and we all know thats racist,,
You are the one who judges on color not character.LIAR!!!
youre judging based on skin color,, because youre a racist,,
And this is exactly what it is in ALL these cases.
Hell, the DoJ admitted a day or so ago that they had NO proof that Trump's co-defendants in the Florida case had moved any boxes with classified documents, but claimed(!) that didn't matter. Can you wrap your head around that?
Back in the good old days when the Brits ruled the roost in the American colonies, the sneaky Brits used a system of their own to lord it over those who looked like them, spoke like them, and worshipped the same God as them, but called themselves American rather than British. It was very simple, really. The bad old Brits recalled an old British law passed by those whose knowledge of democracy was equal to mine of homosexuality, called the Bills of Attainder. If someone had displeased you, and if you belonged to the right party, he or she would be attainted, and they’d never bother you for the duration. Bills of Attainder did wonders for those who were on the side of the state, such as landowners, the rich, members of parliament, aristocrats, females with connections to the landowning aristocracy, and prostitutes whose clients belonged to the Church of England, parliament, and the landowning aristocracy.This kangaroo court system has now been revived right here in the good old US of A, and my good friend and editor of The New Criterion, Roger Kimball, was the first to write about it. As Roger pointed out, the Founders of this country, having managed to kick out the Brits, made sure Bills of Attainder became a no-no in the Land of the Free. Along with the hated “bills” came the ex post facto law, which was pretty much the same thing. The Founders said no bills, no post facto, and added a statute of limitations to ensure that if you stole an apple when young, you would not be prosecuted after you were a success fifty years later. (I am simplifying all this for any of you who only read from your telephones.)Needless to say, all the above are back with a vengeance, and the target is The Donald—who else?—with a ludicrous statute of limitations trampled by a woman who claims she was raped by The Donald at Bergdorf’s, an impossibility to those of us who know the dressing rooms, unless the rapist and the victim are tiny midgets no circus would employ because they’re simply too small.Let’s face it: Trump might not be a gentleman of the old school, but that he’s a victim of the establishment and target of the judiciary under orders from the top is as true as the fact he dyes his hair. Just reading the headlines reminds me of the ones that appeared back in the ’30s in Moscow. That’s when Uncle Joe Stalin purged his rivals by having them admit under torture that they had plotted against the state and had them shot. This the Democrats have not done, and they don’t need to because they’ve got the useful idiots, the media, on their side....Basically, the state of New York has issued a Bill of Attainder on The Donald, and the governor has admitted as much. When other investors threatened to stop doing business in the state because of the extraordinary fine imposed on Trump, she admitted it was a one-off; in other words, we’re only after Trump, not you, so back to business as usual.So, in summing up: The Biden regime is hell-bent on indicting, arresting, bankrupting, and imprisoning Trump. It is a strange universe for American politics. Not exactly Eisenhower versus Stevenson, or Kennedy versus Nixon. A debarred lawyer and a former porn star as star witnesses against the 45th president, the legal system misused as never before in America, grotesque judgments issued by judges like Engoron that would lead to suicide by Oliver Wendell Holmes, and bloated penalties imposed that would make a South American banana republic judge blush in shame. Biden himself is no innocent bystander. He made it clear he wanted Trump prosecuted, and Attorney General Merrick Garland shamefully obeyed. When Trump first won in 2016, the powers that be were unprepared. They soon after invented the Russian connection that took three years to prove totally false. This time they’re not taking any chances.
Targeting Trump
www.takimag.com
Not the same thing.Why do the Libs care, oh thats right, they got their buddy Biden free of the moving boxes charges but Trump faces the same thing. The difference? Biden is not fit to be President and not fit to be tried for his boxes.
Eternal Truths.And this is exactly what it is in ALL these cases.
Hell, the DoJ admitted a day or so ago that they had NO proof that Trump's co-defendants in the Florida case had moved any boxes with classified documents, but claimed(!) that didn't matter. Can you wrap your head around that?
Back in the good old days when the Brits ruled the roost in the American colonies, the sneaky Brits used a system of their own to lord it over those who looked like them, spoke like them, and worshipped the same God as them, but called themselves American rather than British. It was very simple, really. The bad old Brits recalled an old British law passed by those whose knowledge of democracy was equal to mine of homosexuality, called the Bills of Attainder. If someone had displeased you, and if you belonged to the right party, he or she would be attainted, and they’d never bother you for the duration. Bills of Attainder did wonders for those who were on the side of the state, such as landowners, the rich, members of parliament, aristocrats, females with connections to the landowning aristocracy, and prostitutes whose clients belonged to the Church of England, parliament, and the landowning aristocracy.This kangaroo court system has now been revived right here in the good old US of A, and my good friend and editor of The New Criterion, Roger Kimball, was the first to write about it. As Roger pointed out, the Founders of this country, having managed to kick out the Brits, made sure Bills of Attainder became a no-no in the Land of the Free. Along with the hated “bills” came the ex post facto law, which was pretty much the same thing. The Founders said no bills, no post facto, and added a statute of limitations to ensure that if you stole an apple when young, you would not be prosecuted after you were a success fifty years later. (I am simplifying all this for any of you who only read from your telephones.)Needless to say, all the above are back with a vengeance, and the target is The Donald—who else?—with a ludicrous statute of limitations trampled by a woman who claims she was raped by The Donald at Bergdorf’s, an impossibility to those of us who know the dressing rooms, unless the rapist and the victim are tiny midgets no circus would employ because they’re simply too small.Let’s face it: Trump might not be a gentleman of the old school, but that he’s a victim of the establishment and target of the judiciary under orders from the top is as true as the fact he dyes his hair. Just reading the headlines reminds me of the ones that appeared back in the ’30s in Moscow. That’s when Uncle Joe Stalin purged his rivals by having them admit under torture that they had plotted against the state and had them shot. This the Democrats have not done, and they don’t need to because they’ve got the useful idiots, the media, on their side....Basically, the state of New York has issued a Bill of Attainder on The Donald, and the governor has admitted as much. When other investors threatened to stop doing business in the state because of the extraordinary fine imposed on Trump, she admitted it was a one-off; in other words, we’re only after Trump, not you, so back to business as usual.So, in summing up: The Biden regime is hell-bent on indicting, arresting, bankrupting, and imprisoning Trump. It is a strange universe for American politics. Not exactly Eisenhower versus Stevenson, or Kennedy versus Nixon. A debarred lawyer and a former porn star as star witnesses against the 45th president, the legal system misused as never before in America, grotesque judgments issued by judges like Engoron that would lead to suicide by Oliver Wendell Holmes, and bloated penalties imposed that would make a South American banana republic judge blush in shame. Biden himself is no innocent bystander. He made it clear he wanted Trump prosecuted, and Attorney General Merrick Garland shamefully obeyed. When Trump first won in 2016, the powers that be were unprepared. They soon after invented the Russian connection that took three years to prove totally false. This time they’re not taking any chances.
Targeting Trump
Interesting twist. In order to fight racism, you have to be a racist, since you have to make race a factor, when ending racism.dems are the only ones that consider color of skin like youre doing,, and we all know thats racist,,
thats illogical,,Interesting twist. In order to fight racism, you have to be a racist, since you have to make race a factor, when ending racism.
You don't do that.thats illogical,,
just leave race out of it,,
thats how you end racism,,
That's how they enacted Jim Crow. That after the civil war, your father or grandfather had to have voted, for you to be allowed to vote, independent of skin color.thats illogical,,
just leave race out of it,,
thats how you end racism,,
Southern democrats were a much larger obstacle, there were very few southern republicans at all.CRA and VA were passed with Dem leadership votes despite the southern GOP representatives and senators voting against them.
I dont understand the question,,That's how they enacted Jim Crow. That after the civil war, your father or grandfather had to have voted, for you to be allowed to vote, independent of skin color.
So they weren't beiing racist. Right?
Racism can be perpetrated in the name of being race neutral, because it allows previous race bias to continue.I dont understand the question,,
since we are playing make believe,,If a company (such as the Trump Organization) only hires whites as personnel managers, Jews as finance managers, and blacks as waste managers.
It would be RACIST to look at their hiring practices.
I have never been racist to have a previous bias,,Racism can be perpetrated in the name of being race neutral, because it allows previous race bias to continue.
Except we have Trump on the record using race and religion in his hiring practices.since we are playing make believe,,
only whites applied to management positions,,
only jews applied to financing,,
only blacks applied for trash duty,,
so youre only against racist acts when they dont line up with your racist acts,,,Except we have Trump on the record using race and religion in his hiring practices.
Trump employees have secretly marked the applications of
minorities with codes, such as `No. 9' and `C' for colored. .
Trump saying of his accountants:
I've got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza.
Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of
people I want counting my money are short guys that wear
yarmulkes every day.
