Syriana - Twisted Liberal Propaganda

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by Adam's Apple, Mar 6, 2006.

  1. Adam's Apple
    Offline

    Adam's Apple Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,092
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +447
    This is from a paid subscription site, so I've printed it in its entirety. Perhaps Kathianne can provide a link.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/02/AR2006030201209.html

    ;)

    Oscars for Osama
    By Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post
    March 3, 2006

    Nothing tells you more about Hollywood than what it chooses to honor. But until you see "Syriana," nominated for best screenplay (and George Clooney, for best supporting actor) you have no idea how self-flagellation and self-loathing pass for complexity and moral seriousness in Hollywood.

    The "Syriana" script has, of course, the classic liberal tropes such as this stage direction: "The Deputy National Security Advisor, MARILYN RICHARDS, 40's, sculpted hair, with the soul of a seventy year-old white, Republican male, is in charge" (Page 21). Or this piece of over-the-top, Gordon Gekko Republican-speak, placed in the mouth of a Texas oilman: "Corruption is our protection. Corruption is what keeps us safe and warm. . . . Corruption . . . is how we win" (Page 93).

    But that's run-of-the-mill Hollywood. The true distinction of "Syriana's" script is the near-incomprehensible plot--a muddled mix of story lines about a corrupt Kazakh oil deal, a succession struggle in an oil-rich Arab kingdom, and a giant Texas oil company that pulls the strings at the CIA and, naturally, everywhere else--amid which, only two things are absolutely clear and coherent: the movie's one political hero and one pure soul.

    The political hero is the Arab prince who wants to end corruption, inequality and oppression in his country. As he tells his tribal elders, he intends to modernize his country by bringing the rule of law, market efficiency, women's rights and democracy.

    What do you think happens to him? He, his beautiful wife and beautiful children are murdered, incinerated, by a remote-controlled missile, fired from CIA headquarters in Langley, no less--at the very moment that (this passes for subtle cross-cutting film editing) his evil younger brother, the corrupt rival to the throne and puppet of the oil company, is being hailed at a suitably garish "oilman of the year" celebration populated by fat and ugly Americans.

    What is grotesque about this moment of plot clarity is that the overwhelmingly obvious critique of actual U.S. policy in the real Middle East today concerns America's excess of Wilsonian idealism in trying to find and promote--against a tide of tyranny, intolerance and fanaticism--local leaders like the Good Prince. Who in the greater Middle East is closest to the modernizing, democratizing paragon of "Syriana"? Without a doubt, President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, a man of exemplary--and quite nonfictional--personal integrity, physical courage and democratic temperament. Hundreds of brave American (and allied NATO) soldiers have died protecting him and the democratic system they established to allow him to govern. On the very night the Oscars will be honoring "Syriana," American soldiers will be fighting, some perhaps dying, in defense of precisely the kind of tolerant, modernizing Muslim leader that "Syriana" shows America slaughtering.

    It gets worse. The most pernicious element in the movie is the character at the moral heart of the film: the beautiful, modest, caring, generous Pakistani who becomes a beautiful, modest, caring, generous . . . suicide bomber. In his final act, the Pure One, dressed in the purest white robes, takes his explosives-laden little motorboat headfirst into his target. It is a replay of the real-life boat that plunged into the USS Cole in 2000, killing 17 American sailors, except that in the "Syriana" version, the target is another symbol of American imperialism in the Persian Gulf: a newly opened liquefied natural gas terminal.

    The explosion, which would have the force of a nuclear bomb, constitutes the moral high point of the movie, the moment of climactic cleansing, as the Pure One clad in white merges with the great white mass of the huge terminal wall, at which point the screen goes pure white. And reverently silent.

    In my naivete, I used to think that Hollywood had achieved its nadir with Oliver Stone's "JFK," a film that taught a generation of Americans that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by the CIA and the FBI in collaboration with Lyndon Johnson. But at least it was for domestic consumption, an internal affair of only marginal interest to other countries. "Syriana," however, is meant for export, carrying the most vicious and pernicious mendacities about America to a receptive world.

    Most liberalism is angst- and guilt-ridden, seeing moral equivalence everywhere. "Syriana" is of a different species entirely -- a pathological variety that burns with the certainty of its malign anti-Americanism. Osama bin Laden could not have scripted this film with more conviction.
     
  2. robertron
    Offline

    robertron Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    Robert Baer is a CIA asset. He's being presented by the mainstream media as a CIA insider who has turned plain folks liberal family man. He's just a CIA/corporate shill. The "oil shortage" is a prime example of how artificial scarcity is promoted by the media. The corporations who control the oil have every reason for us believe that there is a shortage. Promoting the idea of artificial scarcity is the same strategy that diamond producers use to keep diamond prices high. This is same reason that the vast oil fields in the United States remain untapped. It's a common misconception promoted by the corporate-owned mainstream media that environmentalists are preventing the oil drilling in places like Alaska.
    Don't think for one second that this is a free market vs. socialist issue. The government has a long history of working side by side with a few select corporate cartels to eliminate their competition. It's a technocratic corporatocracy like the one supported by the Nazi party of the 1940s. Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies. This is the basic structure of our current government. The people no longer have the control that we are supposed to under the Constitution.
     
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2011

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

syriana liberal propaganda

,

syriana movie propeganda

,

syriana propaganda