Supremes Rule In Favor Of Baker

[Silhouette]

We were discussing the USSC decision and how people can and should be opposed to a culture that embraces lewd sex acts on parade "in pride" every year across the US since the 1960s where they invite kids to watch.

That refusal to play along with or promote that lifestyle isn't just a choice. It's a legal mandate from child-protective laws in all 50 states. So the USSC could have just cited child-protection laws to get the baker off the hook. But they decided to take the LONNNNNNG way around the block. Saves them from calling out the naked Emperor that all seem to be in denial about.

But like I said, try any of those "pride" acts in front of a schoolyard at recess the next day and set your stopwatch on how fast the cops will have you in jail.

 

[Grumblenuts]

We were discussing the USSC decision and how people can and should be opposed to a culture

"We" being you. yourself, and ye, of course. You've heard there's some scary "culture" out there you want no part of? Simples. Don't join! Don't go to their parades! Don't take kids to see them! Don't be such a dunce!

That refusal to play along with or promote that lifestyle isn't just a choice. It's a legal mandate from child-protective laws in all 50 states. So the USSC could have just cited child-protection laws to get the baker off the hook. But they decided to take the LONNNNNNG way around the block. Saves them from calling out the naked Emperor that all seem to be in denial about.

Yeah, I got this YUGE, BEAUTY of a bridge! Been holding on to it. Waiting for just the right sort of shameless, lying, bastard. You'll do, but I can only let it go this DIRT CHEAP for a limited time so best grab the poker while the iron's hot!

set your stopwatch on how fast the cops

That is one helluva dumb expression. Did you make that up too? Wouldn't surprise me.

 

[Silhouette]

"We" being you. yourself, and ye, of course. You've heard there's some scary "culture" out there you want no part of? Simples. Don't join! Don't go to their parades! Don't take kids to see them! Don't be such a dunce!

So pride parades will now uninvite kids or post warnings to keep children away? Does this mean they're going to nix the children marching in the parades too? Like the boy scouts? The NAMBLA branch of LGBTQ will go into seizures if kiddies won't be watching or nearby.

And of course this would be a BRAND NEW policy embraced by LGBT pride. First time since the 1960s. Do you think it's that easy to erase the obvious in the LGBT culture? No, it isn't. That's right. And it's why people not only can object to promoting that culture in any way shape or form, they are required by law to do so. The phrase "it's a little too little, a little too late" comes to mind here.

 

[Grumblenuts]

"We" being you. yourself, and ye, of course. You've heard there's some scary "culture" out there you want no part of? Simples. Don't join! Don't go to their parades! Don't take kids to see them! Don't be such a dunce!

So pride parades will now uninvite kids or post warnings to keep children away? Does this mean they're going to nix the children marching in the parades too? Like the boy scouts? The NAMBLA branch of LGBTQ will go into seizures if kiddies won't be watching or nearby.

And of course this would be a BRAND NEW policy embraced by LGBT pride. First time since the 1960s. Do you think it's that easy to erase the obvious in the LGBT culture? No, it isn't. That's right. And it's why people not only can object to promoting that culture in any way shape or form, they are required by law to do so. The phrase "it's a little too little, a little too late" comes to mind here.

The phrase making it up as you go along continues coming to mind here. Your vocabulary word for the day:

cer·ti·fi·a·ble
ˈsərdəˌfīəb(ə)l/
adjective

1. able or needing to be certified.
   "encephalitis was a certifiable condition"
2. officially recognized as needing treatment for a mental disorder.

Note definition 2. in particular.

 

[Silhouette]

Well the USSC decision certainly opened up the door for anyone who isn't into promoting this type of deviant sex culture to kids. Even you have to admit that the words they used "neutral" and "respectful" will be troublesome for LGBTs asking regular law-abiding people to play along.

 

[Grumblenuts]

"neutral" and "respectful"

anyone who isn't into promoting this type of deviant sex culture to kids

LGBTs asking regular law-abiding people

USSC, KENNEDY, J., majority opinion:

While it is unexceptional that Colorado law can protect gay persons in acquiring products and services on the same terms and conditions as are offered to other members of the public, the law must be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion.
{snip}
Phillips too was entitled to a neutral and respectful consideration of his claims in all the circumstances of the case.

Translation for the certifiable: "While it is unexceptional that Colorado law can protect gay persons"", the law must be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion" which it obviously was despite the intent of this word salad here being to cast doubt or suggest something happened to the contrary. Clearly, the gay couple "too" were "entitled to a neutral and respectful consideration of" their "claims in all the circumstances of the case" but we in the majority remain determined to give them short shrift and spank the State of Colorado because we're generally more powerful so simply feel we must now and then. Put them in their place, that is. Can't have these States gettin' uppity now, can we!
Notes:
While"deviant sex culture" can be a religious view, expressing such a view is clearly neither "neutral" nor "respectful".
LGBTs are simply "other members of the public" = "regular law-abiding people" Duh!

 

[danielpalos]

We were discussing the USSC decision and how people can and should be opposed to a culture that embraces lewd sex acts on parade "in pride" every year across the US since the 1960s where they invite kids to watch.

That refusal to play along with or promote that lifestyle isn't just a choice. It's a legal mandate from child-protective laws in all 50 states. So the USSC could have just cited child-protection laws to get the baker off the hook. But they decided to take the LONNNNNNG way around the block. Saves them from calling out the naked Emperor that all seem to be in denial about.

But like I said, try any of those "pride" acts in front of a schoolyard at recess the next day and set your stopwatch on how fast the cops will have you in jail.

the right wing can't even, faithfully execute their Republican Doctrine. Why should anyone take the Right Wing, seriously about Morals?

 

[Flopper]

Well the USSC decision certainly opened up the door for anyone who isn't into promoting this type of deviant sex culture to kids. Even you have to admit that the words they used "neutral" and "respectful" will be troublesome for LGBTs asking regular law-abiding people to play along.

Exactly what decision are addressing.

 

[Silhouette]

Strange as it may seem, it's the decision that this thread is about.

 

[danielpalos]

Why take Laity Bakers seriously regarding morals.

 

[danielpalos]

Everybody knows, Only Religious Bakers are sacredly serious about Morals.

 

[Silhouette]

Well the USSC decision certainly opened up the door for anyone who isn't into promoting this type of deviant sex culture to kids. Even you have to admit that the words they used "neutral" and "respectful" will be troublesome for LGBTs asking regular law-abiding people to play along.

Exactly what decision are addressing.

The decision in this thread's OP.

 

[bodecea]

Everybody knows, Only Religious Bakers are sacredly serious about Morals.

And restaurant owners. Funny how the trumpanzees had a fit when The Red Hen owner exercised her religious/moral rights to refuse service based on the content of the customer's character.

 

[danielpalos]

Everybody knows, Only Religious Bakers are sacredly serious about Morals.

And restaurant owners. Funny how the trumpanzees had a fit when The Red Hen owner exercised her religious/moral rights to refuse service based on the content of the customer's character.

I thought the Red Hen was simply the owner refusing service to anyone for any reason?

The Laity Bakers are alleging, Religious morals.

 

[Silhouette]

Everybody knows, Only Religious Bakers are sacredly serious about Morals.

And restaurant owners. Funny how the trumpanzees had a fit when The Red Hen owner exercised her religious/moral rights to refuse service based on the content of the customer's character.

I think the The Red Hen can turn away anyone because of their character. But it must be proven. Gays have proven they unanimously line up behind deviant sex parades where they invite kids to watch and have since the 1960s. So rejecting that behavior has a basis in uber-documented fact.

 

[Flopper]

Everybody knows, Only Religious Bakers are sacredly serious about Morals.

And restaurant owners. Funny how the trumpanzees had a fit when The Red Hen owner exercised her religious/moral rights to refuse service based on the content of the customer's character.

I think the The Red Hen can turn away anyone because of their character. But it must be proven. Gays have proven they unanimously line up behind deviant sex parades where they invite kids to watch and have since the 1960s. So rejecting that behavior has a basis in uber-documented fact.

From a legal standpoint an owner can not deny service because of membership in a protected class such as, race, national origin, religion, etc.. depending on state laws. I don't think working for an asshole qualifies.

 

[Grumblenuts]

culture that embraces lewd sex acts

'Deviant' Sex Acts That Science Says Are Good For You

 

[Slyhunter]

Everybody knows, Only Religious Bakers are sacredly serious about Morals.

And restaurant owners. Funny how the trumpanzees had a fit when The Red Hen owner exercised her religious/moral rights to refuse service based on the content of the customer's character.

I think the The Red Hen can turn away anyone because of their character. But it must be proven. Gays have proven they unanimously line up behind deviant sex parades where they invite kids to watch and have since the 1960s. So rejecting that behavior has a basis in uber-documented fact.

From a legal standpoint an owner can not deny service because of membership in a protected class such as, race, national origin, religion, etc.. depending on state laws. I don't think working for an asshole qualifies.

No law shall be established or created that infringes on the freedom of Religion.
The 14th amendment violates this.

 

[Silhouette]

Everybody knows, Only Religious Bakers are sacredly serious about Morals.

And restaurant owners. Funny how the trumpanzees had a fit when The Red Hen owner exercised her religious/moral rights to refuse service based on the content of the customer's character.

I think the The Red Hen can turn away anyone because of their character. But it must be proven. Gays have proven they unanimously line up behind deviant sex parades where they invite kids to watch and have since the 1960s. So rejecting that behavior has a basis in uber-documented fact.

From a legal standpoint an owner can not deny service because of membership in a protected class such as, race, national origin, religion, etc.. depending on state laws. I don't think working for an asshole qualifies.

How about bending over and showing kids watching as another guy mock-rams your asshole while you're on a float in a "pride" parade? Do people who promote and embrace that identity and concept in pride qualify as a protected class?

 

[Grumblenuts]

How about bending over and showing kids watching as another guy mock-rams your asshole while you're on a float in a "pride" parade? Do people who promote and embrace that identity and concept in pride qualify as a protected class?

If, in their Bible, Jesus tells them that's how they must sometimes fight back against their oppressors, then it seems they're just exercising their 1st Amendment rights. On the other hand, all Bibles are fairy tales, filled with stupid rules and self-contradictions, so why get your panties all bunched over any of it?