south carolina is a joke.

That's not how the process works.

I Dr. Paul gathers enough delegates, he will have a lot of bargaining power over the platform committee and with the potential nominee who wants those delegates.

This hasn't been about winning the nomination from day one.


I will say this and go away...

If Ron Paul gets the knod from the voters to run against Obama.... by some miracle.
He will have my vote with no questions asked.

Promise
He's not going to win the nomination...This a certainty as, even though he's the #1 choice of 15%-25% of the primary voters, he's #2 on almost nobody's list.

His candidacy is all about moving the party and quite probably laying the groundwork for Rand.

That we can agree on. It's why I said weeks ago that he won't run 3rd party. He doesn't want to burn bridges for his boy.
 
Of course its been about the great delusion of winning. It's only changing now because his ultimate loss is becoming obvious. Once the convention is over whatever influence Paul had will most likely be a distant memory. His legacy may live on in congress but his power will end as abruptly as it began.
The only one deluded is you...Dr. Paul never had a prayer of winning the nomination.

But his vote totals have nearly doubled from the '08 effort...Little wonder the establishment elites and their lemming supporters are getting twitchy.

I'm not the one you need to convince. Focus on the lemings. Start with paulitician. Lol
 
Of course its been about the great delusion of winning. It's only changing now because his ultimate loss is becoming obvious. Once the convention is over whatever influence Paul had will most likely be a distant memory. His legacy may live on in congress but his power will end as abruptly as it began.
The only one deluded is you...Dr. Paul never had a prayer of winning the nomination.

But his vote totals have nearly doubled from the '08 effort...Little wonder the establishment elites and their lemming supporters are getting twitchy.

Ron Paul winning, would get me to vote GOP for the first time in 12 years. Is he the most likeable person on the ticket? No. He doesn't have a lot of charisma. But I find his ideas very interesting.

If he were to somehow implement even two of his ideas while in office, I think it would be an interesting presidency. He would be a breath of fresh air. Providing that he isn't simply saying what he thinks that people want to hear, and then he'll just go business as usual once in office.
 
I'm not worried like convincing lemmings like yourself.....You're too set and obstinate to accept the fact that people are sick and tired of republicans who campaign like libertarians, then govern like progressive socialists.....You are obviously still good with that.


Old dog, new tricks, and all that.
 
I'm not worried like convincing lemmings like yourself.....You're too set and obstinate to accept the fact that people are sick and tired of republicans who campaign like libertarians, then govern like progressive socialists.....You are obviously still good with that.


Old dog, new tricks, and all that.

Yada, yada, yada.....

Same tripe different bot
 
Far as I can tell there really are three branches of modern Republicanism.

There's the Libertarian branch represented by Ron Paul.

There's the Religious right branch represented by Perry and Mitt.

And there's the Statist Politics as Usual branch represented by the Newtster.

The primary thing unifying them is their mutual hatred for the Dems.

All three of these groups represent significant parts of the GOP.

But they definitely do have significant differences in their political and social philosophies.

In fact, if not for the DEMS, given that these various groups have idealogical hatred for one another at least as vicious as they have for liberalism, I doubt they'd be in the same party.
 
I'm not worried like convincing lemmings like yourself.....You're too set and obstinate to accept the fact that people are sick and tired of republicans who campaign like libertarians, then govern like progressive socialists.....You are obviously still good with that.


Old dog, new tricks, and all that.

Yada, yada, yada.....

Same tripe different bot

This is how you recognize a Paul-bot:
-Ron Paul is "Dr Paul"
-All GOP candidates are really just Obama in different clothes
-Paul is the only person on the planet who supports the Constitution.
-People who dont support Paul wholeheartedly are socialists and--gasp--neo-cons (and we know what that's code for)

Oh. And by their wookie suits.
2179173334_4b92881b97.jpg
 
Last edited:
South Carolina is one of the most beautiful states I have ever been blessed to enjoy. Now I've had my moments over mustard based and all y'all know what I am talking about, but truly it's an awesome state with awesome folk.

Why would you diss them this way just for politics? That's crazy.

For some people ideology and politics over-ride EVERY other consideration in life.
 
i have said from the beginning....the south will not vote for a mormon ...simple as that....

sc welcomed the repentant* sinner over the mormon......it will be that way all over the south...



*i dont believe a word the whore monger says......his 2nd and current wives are both whores who began affairs with a married man....fact.
 
SC is a joke. Also Newt has the highest percentages from married couples and the Religious. What that say about the morals and values of the folks in SC. Is it no wonder that a lot of people don't take religion seriously and more? Or at least those that claim to religious. Don't pick the most honorable Christian that's been married to the same woman for 55 years. Yea let's boo him for following the Golden Rule. Pathetic. The majority in this country are bat shit crazy. I need zombie repellant

You know what? I love Dr. Paul. I think for the most part he makes fabulous sense.
It's people like you who turn the rest of us off.

I'm still trying to determine if you are doing this on purpose to hurt him. I watched this bullshit before where so called Paulites hit every board and frankly you were an embarrasment to a very good man.

If you are doing it again you should be ashamed of yourselves. Truly.

Spot on.... I think he is genuine and a good man.

I cant stand the Paul-bots. Huge assholes!

Right on the money. While your observation is not true of the vast majority of Paul supporters in real life (like me) there are a great many who have gone into a personality cult mind state when it comes to Dr Paul. They shed all reason, courtesy, consideration and charity and go after anyone who gets in Pauls way like the mindless zealots they are. Unfortunately they infest the internet and give a horrible impression of normal Paul supporters.
 
i have said from the beginning....the south will not vote for a mormon ...simple as that....

sc welcomed the repentant* sinner over the mormon......it will be that way all over the south...



*i dont believe a word the whore monger says......his 2nd and current wives are both whores who began affairs with a married man....fact.

The anti-feminism of the Left rears its head.
 
i have said from the beginning....the south will not vote for a mormon ...simple as that....

sc welcomed the repentant* sinner over the mormon......it will be that way all over the south...



*i dont believe a word the whore monger says......his 2nd and current wives are both whores who began affairs with a married man....fact.

The anti-feminism of the Left rears its head.

anti feminism? o do explain how speaking the truth is anti feminism?
 
i have said from the beginning....the south will not vote for a mormon ...simple as that....

sc welcomed the repentant* sinner over the mormon......it will be that way all over the south...



*i dont believe a word the whore monger says......his 2nd and current wives are both whores who began affairs with a married man....fact.

The anti-feminism of the Left rears its head.

anti feminism? o do explain how speaking the truth is anti feminism?

You dont think characterizing a woman as a whore is anti-feminist?
 
i have said from the beginning....the south will not vote for a mormon ...simple as that....

sc welcomed the repentant* sinner over the mormon......it will be that way all over the south...

Mormons are theologically polytheistic, though most of their membership have no idea of this, and so evangelicals have a problem with them as politicians.


*i dont believe a word the whore monger says......his 2nd and current wives are both whores who began affairs with a married man....fact.

These women were perhaps sluts but not whores.

Politicians tend to use whores when it suits them and court sluts iif they are attractive enough.

The biggest whores in all that are the politicians themselves, typically.
 
anti feminism? o do explain how speaking the truth is anti feminism?

You dont think characterizing a woman as a whore is anti-feminist?

lets see i called him a whore monger which he is.....i called the women who had affairs with him...whores which they are.......i dont see that as anti feminist ....i see it as speaking the truth.....

I suspect feminists would have a problem with htis. Except of course if we were talking about a Republican. Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy can rape women and still have support from the feminist leaders. They are the biggest fucking hypocrites on the planet.
 
You dont think characterizing a woman as a whore is anti-feminist?

Rabbi, you seem to be a very intelligent and reasonable person, so would you explain this to me?

How does refering to a woman as a prostitute or call girl show more respect for women than calling them whores or harlots?

It is the activity they engage in that turns whatever word used to denote them into a harsh perjorative expression. It wont be long until people think of 'call girl' and prostitute to be pejoratives on equal terms with whore and harlot.

How is it anit-feminist to use prostitute instead of whore? They both mean the woman is foolishly short selling herself.
 
You dont think characterizing a woman as a whore is anti-feminist?

Rabbi, you seem to be a very intelligent and reasonable person, so would you explain this to me?

How does refering to a woman as a prostitute or call girl show more respect for women than calling them whores or harlots?

It is the activity they engage in that turns whatever word used to denote them into a harsh perjorative expression. It wont be long until people think of 'call girl' and prostitute to be pejoratives on equal terms with whore and harlot.

How is it anit-feminist to use prostitute instead of whore? They both mean the woman is foolishly short selling herself.

You dont think referring to the wife of a candidate as a whore is anti-feminist? Never mind that it is irrelevant what the wife's views and actions are.
Would you mind if I referred to your wife as a whore?
 

Forum List

Back
Top