So now NO Democrat can define the word “woman?”

Seymour Flops

Diamond Member
Nov 25, 2021
13,977
11,204
2,138
Texas
When Judge Jackson refused to provide that simple definition, the libs on here defended her by saying that she is a USSC nominee, so the question was in a legal context and the court has not specifically defined that word (nor millions of others in the English language and billions in other languages), so it would be wrong for her to do so in a Senate hearing.

Fine.

But now, all Democrat-run federal agencies, even the ones specifically purporting to protect the safety, rights and interests of women are suddenly unable to define that mysterious word also.

Here’s the liberal definition: A woman is a person who identifies as a woman. Why are the Dems ashamed to just say that, when it is so obviously true for them?
 
But now, all Democrat-run federal agencies, even the ones specifically purporting to protect the safety, rights and interests of women are suddenly unable to define that mysterious word also.

Link please. They are sort of required in this part of the forum.
 
When Judge Jackson refused to provide that simple definition, the libs on here defended her by saying that she is a USSC nominee, so the question was in a legal context and the court has not specifically defined that word (nor millions of others in the English language and billions in other languages), so it would be wrong for her to do so in a Senate hearing.

Fine.

But now, all Democrat-run federal agencies, even the ones specifically purporting to protect the safety, rights and interests of women are suddenly unable to define that mysterious word also.

Here’s the liberal definition: A woman is a person who identifies as a woman. Why are the Dems ashamed to just say that, when it is so obviously true for them?
Why don't YOU give us your definition of woman, cheeseball.
 
When Judge Jackson refused to provide that simple definition, the libs on here defended her by saying that she is a USSC nominee, so the question was in a legal context and the court has not specifically defined that word (nor millions of others in the English language and billions in other languages), so it would be wrong for her to do so in a Senate hearing.

Fine.

But now, all Democrat-run federal agencies, even the ones specifically purporting to protect the safety, rights and interests of women are suddenly unable to define that mysterious word also.

Here’s the liberal definition: A woman is a person who identifies as a woman. Why are the Dems ashamed to just say that, when it is so obviously true for them?
"A woman is a person who identifies as a woman", you are correct.
 
Biologically…..It is easy to define man and woman…..just check between their legs

What is more complex to define is a persons sexuality which could make them sexually attracted to the same sex, be bisexual, identify as the opposite gender

Conservatives are outraged with anyone who doesn’t conform with their predefined sex.
 
Biologically…..It is easy to define man and woman…..just check between their legs

What is more complex to define is a persons sexuality which could make them sexually attracted to the same sex, be bisexual, identify as the opposite gender

Conservatives are outraged with anyone who doesn’t conform with their predefined sex.

Pedophiles are sexually-attracted to children. Does that make pedophiles children?

Weirdos who practice bestiality have sex with animals? Does that make them animals?

Necrophiliacs want to have sex with dead people. Does that make them a dead person?
 
Gender is not a societal construct. A man cannot become a woman by imagining that he's a woman.

Just as I can't go to a hair salon, have them make my hair kinky and black, and call myself a "Negro."

Da fuq is wrong with you people, anyway?
My 9th grade Biology teacher would have a stroke if he knew what nonsense this has become
 
Pedophiles are sexually-attracted to children. Does that make pedophiles children?

Weirdos who practice bestiality have sex with animals? Does that make them animals?

Necrophiliacs want to have sex with dead people. Does that make them a dead person?
Highlights how hateful Conservatives are towards anyone who is different.

They can’t discus homosexuals or transsexuals without connecting them to pedophilia or bestiality
 
Highlights how hateful Conservatives are towards anyone who is different.

They can’t discus homosexuals or transsexuals without connecting them to pedophilia or bestiality

At least we can define what homosexuality, transgenderism, pedophilia, and bestiality are. You Democrats seem to think they're all normal human behavior.

We also know how to define what a man or a woman is.
 

Forum List

Back
Top