Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
When Judge Jackson refused to provide that simple definition, the libs on here defended her by saying that she is a USSC nominee, so the question was in a legal context and the court has not specifically defined that word (nor millions of others in the English language and billions in other languages), so it would be wrong for her to do so in a Senate hearing.
Fine.
But now, all Democrat-run federal agencies, even the ones specifically purporting to protect the safety, rights and interests of women are suddenly unable to define that mysterious word also.
Here’s the liberal definition: A woman is a person who identifies as a woman. Why are the Dems ashamed to just say that, when it is so obviously true for them?
Fine.
But now, all Democrat-run federal agencies, even the ones specifically purporting to protect the safety, rights and interests of women are suddenly unable to define that mysterious word also.
Here’s the liberal definition: A woman is a person who identifies as a woman. Why are the Dems ashamed to just say that, when it is so obviously true for them?