So, is the left denouncing Obama's "unlawful" war in Libya?

[Robert]

Or did he bomb something because of it? I sort of doubt the cigar did it for him

This is kind of sad. At least Clinton got a blow job for bombing something.

 

[sinister59]

the day Obama puts troops on the ground I'll agree

No you won't.

The day Obama puts troops on the ground, you'll fall to your knees and worship him - as you do everyday.

and your point ?

 

[Robert]

the day Obama puts troops on the ground I'll agree

No you won't.

The day Obama puts troops on the ground, you'll fall to your knees and worship him - as you do everyday.

and your point ?

Got knee pads?

 

[sinister59]

No you won't.

The day Obama puts troops on the ground, you'll fall to your knees and worship him - as you do everyday.

and your point ?

Got knee pads?

sad little pervert aren't you

 

[Annie]

Under Obama, it's "humanitarian" and if Bush were president still, it would be about oil and liberals would be screaming that "Bush is a War Monger".

You have a short memory. With Bush, his "rationale" for war were Saddam's WMDs (alleged WMDs) and his WMD programs. Remember? Rumsfeld knew where they were. Are they still looking for those WMDs, or did they find them?

the day Obama puts troops on the ground I'll agree , but till then you neo-cons sound like spoiled children

But no problem with CIA on ground? http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html

Lest we forget:

The CIA's Vietnam Histories

 

[sinister59]

You have a short memory. With Bush, his "rationale" for war were Saddam's WMDs (alleged WMDs) and his WMD programs. Remember? Rumsfeld knew where they were. Are they still looking for those WMDs, or did they find them?

the day Obama puts troops on the ground I'll agree , but till then you neo-cons sound like spoiled children

But no problem with CIA on ground? http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html

Lest we forget:

The CIA's Vietnam Histories

if you only knew what your talking about

 

[Annie]

the day Obama puts troops on the ground I'll agree , but till then you neo-cons sound like spoiled children

But no problem with CIA on ground? http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html

Lest we forget:

The CIA's Vietnam Histories

if you only knew what your talking about

Well there's a response. Of no use, but a response.

 

[Uncensored2008]

and your point ?

That you're a mindless sycophant.

 

[sinister59]

and your point ?

That you're a mindless sycophant.

who are you calling a teabagger?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Code Pink is denouncing Obama in the worst way...

...saying he's no different than Bush.

So all you hypocrite chasing hypocrites can go back to bed now.

 

[KissMy]

Dummycrats could not comprehend what Bill Clinton was telling them. Obama Called on Anti War BS on Campaign Trail.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLDx4NZr2u4"]Obama Called on Anti War BS on Campaign Trail[/ame]

 

[georgephillip]

Some historical perspective on Libya:

"The leaders of 14 capitalist powers in Europe plus the United States met for a conference in Berlin 126 years ago to decide how all of Africa’s land and vast resources would be divided as colonies and zones of control among themselves.

"No Africans were invited to the conference.

"The 1884 Conference of Berlin, more than any other single event, became emblematic of the dynamic transformation of capitalism into a system of global imperialism.

"By 1902, 90 percent of Africa’s territory was under European control. African self-governance was wiped off the map in most of the continent. Only Ethiopia remained an independent state. Liberia was technically independent too, but it was in fact under the control of the United States.

"The so-called 'Scramble for Africa' by Britain, France, Belgium, Italy, Germany, the United States and the other capitalist powers was essential for the growth and enrichment of the modern-day capitalist class, which included the owners of the biggest banks, syndicates and monopolies.

"Africa was plundered and looted and, as a result, the western capitalists entered the 20th century with the largest fortunes in the history of the human race."

When the London Conference on Libya took place on March 29, 2011 it was convened by the same imperial powers that took part in Berlin in 1884.

In 2011 Africans were invited to attend, but only Tunisia and Morocco sent representatives.

Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan and Carter serve the same corporate masters.

War and Oil.

Nothing of substance changes by "choosing" between Republican OR Democrat at the polls.

Everything changes if hundreds of Republicans AND Democrats are FLUSHED from DC in November 2012.

The war against Libya in historical perspective

 

[Zona]

No? Well then what is the problem with Iraq again? (Not that I am defending Iraq, I thought it was dumb, I think military action in Libya is dumb too). So...where are the left's cries for peace like in 2003?

I know right...he freaking sent 10,000 troops to Storm that place just like in Iraq. He is a war monger.

 

[Zona]

'Operation Odyssey Dawn'

^Own it Liberals...

You Voted for it.



peace...

No? Well then what is the problem with Iraq again? (Not that I am defending Iraq, I thought it was dumb, I think military action in Libya is dumb too). So...where are the left's cries for peace like in 2003?

Apparently, you failed to note the announcement by the Arab League and the vote in the UN to authorize a no fly zone and the necessary use of force to implement it. Did Bush have either of those kinds of international authorizations prior to invading Iraq?

Nailed it.

 

[Avatar4321]

'Operation Odyssey Dawn'

^Own it Liberals...

You Voted for it.



peace...

No? Well then what is the problem with Iraq again? (Not that I am defending Iraq, I thought it was dumb, I think military action in Libya is dumb too). So...where are the left's cries for peace like in 2003?

Apparently, you failed to note the announcement by the Arab League and the vote in the UN to authorize a no fly zone and the necessary use of force to implement it. Did Bush have either of those kinds of international authorizations prior to invading Iraq?

Nailed it.

Since when do we need international authorization to declare war? The Constitution says approval from Congress.

We have that in the Iraq war. We don't here, yet.

 

[KissMy]

Apparently, you failed to note the announcement by the Arab League and the vote in the UN to authorize a no fly zone and the necessary use of force to implement it. Did Bush have either of those kinds of international authorizations prior to invading Iraq?

Saudi king urged U.S. to attack Iran Should we do that to???

Iraqi government officials see Saudi Arabia, not Iran, as the biggest threat to the integrity and cohesion of their fledgling democratic state. Should we attack Saudi Arabia???

Should we fight the wars between the Mid-East countries for them just because they want us to???

 

[bripat9643]

Quite well, thank you.

Hey man, why didn't you tell me you were over here? I've had my fill of XXXXX forum. There's nothing but morons inhabiting that place.
We Don't discuss other Forums here on the Open Boards, use PM Format.

 

[bripat9643]

Apparently, you failed to note the announcement by the Arab League and the vote in the UN to authorize a no fly zone and the necessary use of force to implement it. Did Bush have either of those kinds of international authorizations prior to invading Iraq?

We didn't fail to notice. We just failed to give a damn. Obama said that only an imminent threat to the United States justified the use of military force.

He's a liar, and you defend him.

 

[bripat9643]

How, exactly is the U.N. action unlawful?

Who gives a damn whether it's "lawful" according to some arbitrary leftwing definition of the term? It's stupid for us and hypocritical of libs regardless of the so-called "legality."

 

[percysunshine]

Quite well, thank you.

Hey man, why didn't you tell me you were over here? I've had my fill of Hoffa's forum. There's nothing but morons inhabiting that place.

Morons are where you find them....