Slut Or Not??

[daveman]

An interesting hypothesis. I propose a way to test it: pay for her birth control pills yourself.

If that shuts her up, then it was all about her. If not, then maybe there's actually a principle or two involved here.

One of the left's default "solutions":

Make someone else pay for it.

Typical.

LOL you're not that familiar with scientific method, are you?

The idea is only to conduct an experiment. After getting the answer, you can stop paying. Come on, isn't it worth fifty bucks or so to find out whether you're right that she has no principles and is just in it to get something free for yourself? Or do you even care whether you're right or not?

Leftists are utterly fascinated with other people's money.

You want to conduct your stupid experiment, YOU bankroll it. Or do you even care whether I'm right or not?

 

[Dragon]

You want to conduct your stupid experiment, YOU bankroll it. Or do you even care whether I'm right or not?

Not particularly, or rather, I'm convinced already that your whole idea is terminally stupid. It's got so little chance of being right IMO that it would be money wasted on a foregone conclusion.

No need for you to, either, of course, as the point that you were making a preposterous claim that liberal activists are all in it for their own selfish gain has already been made. You might want to do it, though, if you want to give your nonsense even a chance at credibility. Up to you, of course.

 

[daveman]

You want to conduct your stupid experiment, YOU bankroll it. Or do you even care whether I'm right or not?

Not particularly, or rather, I'm convinced already that your whole idea is terminally stupid. It's got so little chance of being right IMO that it would be money wasted on a foregone conclusion.

No need for you to, either, of course, as the point that you were making a preposterous claim that liberal activists are all in it for their own selfish gain has already been made. You might want to do it, though, if you want to give your nonsense even a chance at credibility. Up to you, of course.

Typical. You insist other people do what you refuse to do yourself.

You're a leftist, all right.

 

[Dragon]

You want to conduct your stupid experiment, YOU bankroll it. Or do you even care whether I'm right or not?

Not particularly, or rather, I'm convinced already that your whole idea is terminally stupid. It's got so little chance of being right IMO that it would be money wasted on a foregone conclusion.

No need for you to, either, of course, as the point that you were making a preposterous claim that liberal activists are all in it for their own selfish gain has already been made. You might want to do it, though, if you want to give your nonsense even a chance at credibility. Up to you, of course.

Typical. You insist other people do what you refuse to do yourself.

You're a leftist, all right.

Typical. Confronted with an unanswerable argument, and revelation of just what a putz you're being, you change the subject.

You're Daveman, all right.

 

[daveman]

Not particularly, or rather, I'm convinced already that your whole idea is terminally stupid. It's got so little chance of being right IMO that it would be money wasted on a foregone conclusion.

No need for you to, either, of course, as the point that you were making a preposterous claim that liberal activists are all in it for their own selfish gain has already been made. You might want to do it, though, if you want to give your nonsense even a chance at credibility. Up to you, of course.

Typical. You insist other people do what you refuse to do yourself.

You're a leftist, all right.

Typical. Confronted with an unanswerable argument, and revelation of just what a putz you're being, you change the subject.

You're Daveman, all right.

And you're incapable of originality, too.

Leftists are singularly unimaginative.

 

[Dragon]

Typical. You insist other people do what you refuse to do yourself.

You're a leftist, all right.

Typical. Confronted with an unanswerable argument, and revelation of just what a putz you're being, you change the subject.

You're Daveman, all right.

And you're incapable of originality, too.

Leftists are singularly unimaginative.

Well, YOU seem terminally unable to think of people as individuals instead of categories, hence your constant refrain of leftists this and leftists that.

You notice that I did not make any accusations against "conservatives" on the basis of your stupidity. Only against you, personally. There's personal responsibility, if you like.

 

[Two Thumbs]

1. “Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments” "He [Obama] encouraged me and supported me and thanked me for speaking out about the concerns of American women," Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments

2. “Fluke, who had been turned away from the official, men-only hearing on the issue of female contraception earlier in the month, spoke mostly about the high cost of contraceptives and their importance to women's health. Limbaugh understood her remarks to mean that not only did she think she could have as much sex as she wanted, with whomever she wanted, without compromising her health or producing a baby, but that she expected honest-to-goodness, God-fearing Americans like him to pick up the tab for it.” Rush Limbaugh's Sandra Fluke slander | Sadhbh Walshe | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk


3. slut (sl t). n. 1. a. A person, especially a woman, considered sexually promiscuoushttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/slut


4. The title of the OP is, by definition, proven. But the question is, why is this front page news”?

a. The Obama administration will do anything to get his string of failures out of the news. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/u...ded-on-birth-control-coverage-poll-finds.html

b. The hallmark of liberalism is the need to erase any criticism of personal behavior.

5. This is a grave error for society. Silence falls under the view of “TACIT APPROVAL AND LATENT COMPLICITY.”
If one is silent about bad behavior, one is agreeing to same.


6. In his new book, “Coming Apart,” Charles Murray decries the change in societal attitude that he calles “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental! As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, yet these individuals will not criticize the behaviors which are destroying the lower cultural class.

a. Ms. Fluke’s championing of the need for promiscuity is a case in point. The dogs of war have been released...attack the critic of poor behavior!

b. It is hardly shocking to see another Democrat-liberal President champion this decline in values.

c. The cultural upper-class looks at this situation, and, for the most part, simply shakes its head. Silently. Murray writes “The elites must preach what they practice.” The time is long past when the adults should consider if this Fluke-Obama agenda is the right one for America.
d. …..and make it’s opinion known:


Preach what they practice.
The water-cooler is the venue for this battle in the culture war!

She's not a slut.

sluts fuck for free or for a few drinks.

she wants income in the form of 3000 dollars so she can fuck.

THATS a whore.

 

[Katzndogz]

1. “Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments” "He [Obama] encouraged me and supported me and thanked me for speaking out about the concerns of American women," Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments

2. “Fluke, who had been turned away from the official, men-only hearing on the issue of female contraception earlier in the month, spoke mostly about the high cost of contraceptives and their importance to women's health. Limbaugh understood her remarks to mean that not only did she think she could have as much sex as she wanted, with whomever she wanted, without compromising her health or producing a baby, but that she expected honest-to-goodness, God-fearing Americans like him to pick up the tab for it.” Rush Limbaugh's Sandra Fluke slander | Sadhbh Walshe | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk


3. slut (sl t). n. 1. a. A person, especially a woman, considered sexually promiscuoushttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/slut


4. The title of the OP is, by definition, proven. But the question is, why is this front page news”?

a. The Obama administration will do anything to get his string of failures out of the news. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/u...ded-on-birth-control-coverage-poll-finds.html

b. The hallmark of liberalism is the need to erase any criticism of personal behavior.

5. This is a grave error for society. Silence falls under the view of “TACIT APPROVAL AND LATENT COMPLICITY.”
If one is silent about bad behavior, one is agreeing to same.


6. In his new book, “Coming Apart,” Charles Murray decries the change in societal attitude that he calles “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental! As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, yet these individuals will not criticize the behaviors which are destroying the lower cultural class.

a. Ms. Fluke’s championing of the need for promiscuity is a case in point. The dogs of war have been released...attack the critic of poor behavior!

b. It is hardly shocking to see another Democrat-liberal President champion this decline in values.

c. The cultural upper-class looks at this situation, and, for the most part, simply shakes its head. Silently. Murray writes “The elites must preach what they practice.” The time is long past when the adults should consider if this Fluke-Obama agenda is the right one for America.
d. …..and make it’s opinion known:


Preach what they practice.
The water-cooler is the venue for this battle in the culture war!

She's not a slut.

sluts fuck for free or for a few drinks.

she wants income in the form of 3000 dollars so she can fuck.

THATS a whore.

I have to admit, you have a good point. I suppose I have a need to deny her the integrity of a whore that at least charges their customers.

It seems that the government paying women to fuck is at least discrimatory. We don't pay men to fuck. At the very least, shouldn't money spent in pursuit of fucking be tax deductible?

 

[daveman]

Typical. Confronted with an unanswerable argument, and revelation of just what a putz you're being, you change the subject.

You're Daveman, all right.

And you're incapable of originality, too.

Leftists are singularly unimaginative.

Well, YOU seem terminally unable to think of people as individuals instead of categories, hence your constant refrain of leftists this and leftists that.

You notice that I did not make any accusations against "conservatives" on the basis of your stupidity. Only against you, personally. There's personal responsibility, if you like.

I'm sure you feel that's right.

 

[Two Thumbs]

1. “Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments” "He [Obama] encouraged me and supported me and thanked me for speaking out about the concerns of American women," Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments

2. “Fluke, who had been turned away from the official, men-only hearing on the issue of female contraception earlier in the month, spoke mostly about the high cost of contraceptives and their importance to women's health. Limbaugh understood her remarks to mean that not only did she think she could have as much sex as she wanted, with whomever she wanted, without compromising her health or producing a baby, but that she expected honest-to-goodness, God-fearing Americans like him to pick up the tab for it.” Rush Limbaugh's Sandra Fluke slander | Sadhbh Walshe | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk


3. slut (sl t). n. 1. a. A person, especially a woman, considered sexually promiscuoushttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/slut


4. The title of the OP is, by definition, proven. But the question is, why is this front page news”?

a. The Obama administration will do anything to get his string of failures out of the news. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/u...ded-on-birth-control-coverage-poll-finds.html

b. The hallmark of liberalism is the need to erase any criticism of personal behavior.

5. This is a grave error for society. Silence falls under the view of “TACIT APPROVAL AND LATENT COMPLICITY.”
If one is silent about bad behavior, one is agreeing to same.


6. In his new book, “Coming Apart,” Charles Murray decries the change in societal attitude that he calles “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental! As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, yet these individuals will not criticize the behaviors which are destroying the lower cultural class.

a. Ms. Fluke’s championing of the need for promiscuity is a case in point. The dogs of war have been released...attack the critic of poor behavior!

b. It is hardly shocking to see another Democrat-liberal President champion this decline in values.

c. The cultural upper-class looks at this situation, and, for the most part, simply shakes its head. Silently. Murray writes “The elites must preach what they practice.” The time is long past when the adults should consider if this Fluke-Obama agenda is the right one for America.
d. …..and make it’s opinion known:


Preach what they practice.
The water-cooler is the venue for this battle in the culture war!

She's not a slut.

sluts fuck for free or for a few drinks.

she wants income in the form of 3000 dollars so she can fuck.

THATS a whore.

I have to admit, you have a good point. I suppose I have a need to deny her the integrity of a whore that at least charges their customers.

It seems that the government paying women to fuck is at least discrimatory. We don't pay men to fuck. At the very least, shouldn't money spent in pursuit of fucking be tax deductible?

Actually, we do pay men to fuck.

Viagra is available through medicare and medicaid


as far as fucking for the tax deduction; you get more back with more kids. you can count up to 4. they are worth over a grand each.

 

[earlycuyler]

She's not a slut.

sluts fuck for free or for a few drinks.

she wants income in the form of 3000 dollars so she can fuck.

THATS a whore.

I have to admit, you have a good point. I suppose I have a need to deny her the integrity of a whore that at least charges their customers.

It seems that the government paying women to fuck is at least discrimatory. We don't pay men to fuck. At the very least, shouldn't money spent in pursuit of fucking be tax deductible?

Actually, we do pay men to fuck.

Viagra is available through medicare and medicaid


as far as fucking for the tax deduction; you get more back with more kids. you can count up to 4. they are worth over a grand each.

WHAAAA ??!! I got 4 kids. I can get money for that ? A thousand bucks each ?

 

[theliq]

One of the left's default "solutions":

Make someone else pay for it.

Typical.

LOL you're not that familiar with scientific method, are you?

The idea is only to conduct an experiment. After getting the answer, you can stop paying. Come on, isn't it worth fifty bucks or so to find out whether you're right that she has no principles and is just in it to get something free for yourself? Or do you even care whether you're right or not?

Leftists are utterly fascinated with other people's money.

You want to conduct your stupid experiment, YOU bankroll it. Or do you even care whether I'm right or not?

Hi Dave,well this is a strange request from the Dragon,which I really don't understand but I would add,I think everyone is inquisitive about other peoples money because they like to know how the made it.
As for a SCIENTIFIC METHOD.......well unless you win the lottery !!!!!!!!!! or inherite, It normally requires a lot of hard work......a lot of frigging hard work.just saying steve.

Trust you and the family are well.

 

[theliq]

1. “Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments” "He [Obama] encouraged me and supported me and thanked me for speaking out about the concerns of American women," Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments

2. “Fluke, who had been turned away from the official, men-only hearing on the issue of female contraception earlier in the month, spoke mostly about the high cost of contraceptives and their importance to women's health. Limbaugh understood her remarks to mean that not only did she think she could have as much sex as she wanted, with whomever she wanted, without compromising her health or producing a baby, but that she expected honest-to-goodness, God-fearing Americans like him to pick up the tab for it.” Rush Limbaugh's Sandra Fluke slander | Sadhbh Walshe | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk


3. slut (sl t). n. 1. a. A person, especially a woman, considered sexually promiscuoushttp://www.thefreedictionary.com/slut


4. The title of the OP is, by definition, proven. But the question is, why is this front page news”?

a. The Obama administration will do anything to get his string of failures out of the news. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/u...ded-on-birth-control-coverage-poll-finds.html

b. The hallmark of liberalism is the need to erase any criticism of personal behavior.

5. This is a grave error for society. Silence falls under the view of “TACIT APPROVAL AND LATENT COMPLICITY.”
If one is silent about bad behavior, one is agreeing to same.


6. In his new book, “Coming Apart,” Charles Murray decries the change in societal attitude that he calles “ecumenical niceness”…don’t fight, share toys, take turns….and never, ever be judgmental! As a result, the upper cultural class, which has stabilized by returning to more traditional ways, survives, yet these individuals will not criticize the behaviors which are destroying the lower cultural class.

a. Ms. Fluke’s championing of the need for promiscuity is a case in point. The dogs of war have been released...attack the critic of poor behavior!

b. It is hardly shocking to see another Democrat-liberal President champion this decline in values.

c. The cultural upper-class looks at this situation, and, for the most part, simply shakes its head. Silently. Murray writes “The elites must preach what they practice.” The time is long past when the adults should consider if this Fluke-Obama agenda is the right one for America.
d. …..and make it’s opinion known:


Preach what they practice.
The water-cooler is the venue for this battle in the culture war!

She's not a slut.

sluts fuck for free or for a few drinks.

she wants income in the form of 3000 dollars so she can fuck.

THATS a whore.

I have to admit, you have a good point. I suppose I have a need to deny her the integrity of a whore that at least charges their customers.

It seems that the government paying women to fuck is at least discrimatory. We don't pay men to fuck. At the very least, shouldn't money spent in pursuit of fucking be tax deductible?

Fuck Me more male discrimination from the Kat ...

 

[theliq]

As usual, you will completely ignore the mountain of facts that directly contradict your ignorant and hypocritical declarations.

Legal Prostitution in Australia a "Failure" | Change.org News

Human trafficking: Australia's sinister practice | Liberty Victoria

"In the Netherlands, Germany, and Australia, legalization has failed to protect the women in prostitution, control the enormous expansion of the sex industry, decrease child prostitution and trafficking from other countries, and prevent HIV/AIDS -- all arguments used for legalization. And it has transformed these countries into brothels."


HumanTrafficking.org | News & Updates: Debating Legalized Prostitution


Prostitution Research & Education Website


Sisyphe.org - The legalization of prostitution and its impact on trafficking in women and children

Well ya dickhead I was referring and only mentioned Western Australia other cities are different.

You never met a point you couldn't miss, did you?

THAT Unkoie IS BLOODY FUNNY..........and SMART. Unkoie 1v0 theliq

 

[theliq]

SLUTTY>>>>>>SLUTISH>>>>>>>>TALK ON THIS POST>>>>>>>HANDS UP>>>>>>>ARE YOU A SLUT OR A WHORE ??????????tl

 

[Two Thumbs]

I have to admit, you have a good point. I suppose I have a need to deny her the integrity of a whore that at least charges their customers.

It seems that the government paying women to fuck is at least discrimatory. We don't pay men to fuck. At the very least, shouldn't money spent in pursuit of fucking be tax deductible?

Actually, we do pay men to fuck.

Viagra is available through medicare and medicaid


as far as fucking for the tax deduction; you get more back with more kids. you can count up to 4. they are worth over a grand each.

WHAAAA ??!! I got 4 kids. I can get money for that ? A thousand bucks each ?

each ones a tax deduction until they are 18 or out of college [I think]

 

[Sky Dancer]

Typical. You insist other people do what you refuse to do yourself.

You're a leftist, all right.

Typical. Confronted with an unanswerable argument, and revelation of just what a putz you're being, you change the subject.

You're Daveman, all right.

And you're incapable of originality, too.

Leftists are singularly unimaginative.

I've never seen you treat posters as individual people. Only labels.

 

[theHawk]

Who determines when promicsuity has been reached?

Common sense?

 

[daveman]

Typical. Confronted with an unanswerable argument, and revelation of just what a putz you're being, you change the subject.

You're Daveman, all right.

And you're incapable of originality, too.

Leftists are singularly unimaginative.

I've never seen you treat posters as individual people. Only labels.

You see what you want to see.

There. I just spoke to you as a person. I've done so many times, both to you and to many others.

 

[Dragon]

Here's more on the meaning of "slut" as it impacts the conservative mind:

  The Santorum Strategy        : Information Clearing House

This is anything but an irrational position for radically conservative Republicans. Quite the contrary. It fits conservative moral logic -- the logic used by conservative populists, male for sure and for many women as well. In some respects it embodies the most powerful aspects of conservative moral logic, strengthening conservative moral logic in the minds not only of conservatives, but also of independents who have both conservative and progressive world views and swing between them.

Here's how that logic goes.

The strict father determines what happens in the family, including reproduction. Thus reproduction is the province of male authority.


The strict father does not condone moral weakness and self-indulgence without moral consequences. Sex without reproductive consequences is thus seen as immoral.


If the nation supports birth control for unmarried women, then the nation supports immoral behavior.


The conservative stress on individual responsibility means that you and no one else should have to pay for your birth control -- not your employer, your HMO, or the taxpayers.


Having to pay for your birth control also has a metaphorical religious value -- paying for your sins.


This is a classical slippery slope narrative. If no one else should have to pay for your birth control, the next step is that no one else should have to pay for any of your health care.


And the step after that is that no one else should be forced to pay for anyone else. This is, everything should be privatized -- no public education, safety nets, parks, or any public institutions or services.


That is what makes conservative moral logic into such a powerful instrument. And conservative and independent women can be pragmatic about the birth control details, while accepting the moral logic as a whole.

Incidentally, Rush Limbaugh's "slut" and "prostitute" remarks, while even more extreme than Santorum, make sense to conservatives in terms of the same conservative moral logic. Limbaugh apologized for those two words, but not for the logic behind them. Even after the apology for the two words, the logic lingers.