- Thread starter
- #21
i simply see this as a contract dispute. the unions have a contract in place with the state. the state no longer likes that contract, so they need to negotiate a new one. instead walker simply wants to take away their ability to negotiate for the whole, and that is wrong.
Did Obama's federal pay freeze lead you to make polls too?
a pay freeze, is different. if those employees were part of a union and their contract gave him the ability to do so, he was well within his rights. if their contract did not, then they would have a right to protest a breach of contract.